top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269B

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269B prohibits cash repayments of loans above specified limits to curb black money.

Income Tax Act Section 269B deals with restrictions on repayment of loans or deposits in cash. It prohibits any person from repaying a loan or deposit of Rs. 20,000 or more in cash to prevent tax evasion and promote transparency.

This section is crucial for taxpayers, professionals, and businesses to understand as it enforces limits on cash transactions, ensuring compliance with tax laws and discouraging unaccounted money circulation.

Income Tax Act Section 269B – Exact Provision

This means that if you are repaying a loan or deposit amounting to Rs. 20,000 or more, you cannot do so in cash. The repayment must be made through banking channels like cheque, bank draft, or electronic transfer. This helps the government track financial transactions and prevent tax evasion.

  • Cash repayment of loans or deposits Rs. 20,000 or more is prohibited.

  • Repayment must be through cheque, bank draft, or electronic transfer.

  • Applies to all persons repaying loans or deposits.

  • Promotes transparency and discourages black money.

Explanation of Income Tax Act Section 269B

This section restricts cash repayments of loans or deposits to Rs. 20,000 or above, mandating banking channel payments.

  • Applies to all persons (individuals, firms, companies).

  • Threshold limit is Rs. 20,000 for cash repayments.

  • Trigger event: repayment of loan or deposit.

  • Allowed modes: account payee cheque, bank draft, electronic clearing system.

  • Cash repayments above limit are disallowed and penalized.

Purpose and Rationale of Income Tax Act Section 269B

The section aims to curb tax evasion by restricting large cash repayments, ensuring financial transparency and better tax compliance.

  • Ensures traceability of large financial transactions.

  • Prevents circulation of unaccounted cash.

  • Encourages use of formal banking channels.

  • Supports government revenue collection efforts.

When Income Tax Act Section 269B Applies

This section applies during repayment of loans or deposits of Rs. 20,000 or more in any financial year.

  • Relevant in the financial year when repayment occurs.

  • Applies irrespective of residential status.

  • No exceptions for type of loan or depositor.

  • Applicable to all persons making repayments.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under Income Tax Act Section 269B

Section 269B does not directly tax income but restricts cash repayments to ensure compliance. Non-adherence may lead to penalties affecting the taxpayer's financial position.

It interacts with provisions on penalties and cash transaction limits, reinforcing the use of banking channels for repayments.

  • Non-compliance leads to penalty under Section 271D.

  • Promotes transparent financial records.

  • Does not affect income computation directly.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under Income Tax Act Section 269B

This section imposes a compliance obligation to avoid cash repayments above Rs. 20,000. It benefits the government by reducing black money circulation and benefits taxpayers by promoting transparent transactions.

  • Creates mandatory compliance duty.

  • Applies to all persons repaying loans or deposits.

  • Non-compliance attracts penalties.

  • Encourages formal banking use.

Stage of Tax Process Where Section Applies

Section 269B applies at the repayment stage of loans or deposits, focusing on the mode of payment.

  • During repayment of loan or deposit.

  • Before return filing or assessment.

  • Non-compliance detected during assessment or audit.

  • Relevant for penalty proceedings.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under Income Tax Act Section 269B

Violation of Section 269B attracts penalty under Section 271D equal to the amount of cash repayment. No direct interest is charged under this section, but non-compliance can lead to scrutiny and prosecution.

  • Penalty equals amount of cash repayment (Section 271D).

  • Possible prosecution for willful violation.

  • Consequences include increased tax scrutiny.

  • Discourages cash transactions above limit.

Example of Income Tax Act Section 269B in Practical Use

Assessee X took a loan of Rs. 50,000 from Company Y. While repaying Rs. 25,000, Assessee X attempted to pay in cash. This violated Section 269B as repayment above Rs. 20,000 must be through banking channels. Company Y refused cash and insisted on cheque payment, ensuring compliance.

  • Cash repayment above Rs. 20,000 is disallowed.

  • Banking channel payments ensure transparency.

Historical Background of Income Tax Act Section 269B

Section 269B was introduced to curb black money by restricting large cash repayments. Over the years, amendments have aligned it with digital payment trends and increased thresholds for inflation.

  • Introduced to prevent tax evasion via cash repayments.

  • Threshold limits revised periodically.

  • Judicial interpretations emphasize strict compliance.

Modern Relevance of Income Tax Act Section 269B

In 2026, Section 269B remains vital due to increased digital transactions and government focus on transparency. It complements digital filings, TDS returns, and faceless assessments by ensuring traceable repayments.

  • Supports digital compliance and banking transparency.

  • Relevant for individuals and businesses alike.

  • Aligns with government’s anti-black money policies.

Related Sections

  • Income Tax Act Section 4 – Charging section.

  • Income Tax Act Section 269T – Restrictions on cash receipt of loans or deposits.

  • Income Tax Act Section 271D – Penalty for violation of Sections 269B and 269T.

  • Income Tax Act Section 139 – Filing of returns.

  • Income Tax Act Section 143 – Assessment.

  • Income Tax Act Section 234C – Interest for deferment of advance tax.

Case References under Income Tax Act Section 269B

  1. ITO v. M.C. Chockalingam (2002) 82 ITD 1 (Madras)

    – Cash repayment above limit disallowed; penalty upheld under Section 271D.

  2. DCIT v. M/s. S. R. Associates (2010) 132 TTJ 1 (Bang)

    – Strict application of Section 269B to prevent cash repayments.

Key Facts Summary for Income Tax Act Section 269B

  • Section: 269B

  • Title: Restrictions on Cash Repayment of Loans or Deposits

  • Category: Compliance, Penalty

  • Applies To: All persons repaying loans or deposits

  • Tax Impact: No direct tax, but penalty on cash repayments above Rs. 20,000

  • Compliance Requirement: Repayment through banking channels

  • Related Forms/Returns: Relevant for audit and assessment proceedings

Conclusion on Income Tax Act Section 269B

Section 269B is a key provision to prevent tax evasion by restricting cash repayments of loans or deposits above Rs. 20,000. It mandates the use of banking channels, promoting transparency and accountability in financial transactions.

Understanding and complying with this section helps taxpayers avoid penalties and supports the government’s efforts to curb black money. It remains highly relevant in the digital age, aligning with modern tax administration and compliance frameworks.

FAQs on Income Tax Act Section 269B

What is the cash repayment limit under Section 269B?

The limit is Rs. 20,000. Any repayment of loan or deposit equal to or above this amount must be made through cheque, bank draft, or electronic transfer, not in cash.

Who must comply with Section 269B?

All persons repaying loans or deposits, including individuals, firms, and companies, must comply with this section to avoid penalties for cash repayments above Rs. 20,000.

What happens if someone repays a loan in cash above Rs. 20,000?

They are liable to pay a penalty equal to the amount of cash repayment under Section 271D. The transaction is disallowed, and further scrutiny may follow.

Are there any exceptions to Section 269B?

No exceptions exist. All repayments of Rs. 20,000 or more must be made through banking channels to ensure transparency and compliance.

How does Section 269B support tax compliance?

By restricting large cash repayments, it promotes traceable transactions, reduces black money circulation, and helps the government track financial flows for accurate tax assessment.

Related Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 53 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Giving cash discounts in India is legal but must comply with GST rules and consumer protection laws.

Medical grade marijuana is illegal in India, with strict regulations under the Narcotic Drugs Act.

Income Tax Act Section 92B defines 'Associated Enterprise' for transfer pricing provisions under the Act.

In India, spa services with 'happy endings' are illegal and considered prostitution under the law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 65 governs the registration of charges created by companies on their assets.

Income Tax Act Section 67 addresses income from undisclosed sources and its taxation under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 191 governs the disclosure of interest by directors to ensure transparency in corporate governance.

Evidence Act Section 165 empowers courts to call for documents or objects relevant to a case, ensuring comprehensive evidence collection.

CrPC Section 37 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts to ensure proper trial location.

Buying swords in India is legal with restrictions under arms laws and local regulations.

CrPC Section 270 defines the offence of public nuisance and its legal consequences under Indian criminal law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 244 deals with refunds of excess tax paid by taxpayers.

Understand the legality of binary compensation plans in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Section 198 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the procedure for recovery of income tax from persons responsible for paying income.

CrPC Section 442 details the procedure for a person to surrender before a Magistrate and the Magistrate's power to grant bail or remand.

In India, SMS conversations can be legal evidence if properly authenticated and relevant to the case.

CrPC Section 288 defines the offence of public nuisance and its legal consequences under Indian law.

CrPC Section 426 covers procedures for the sale of property attached or seized during criminal proceedings.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 1 defines key terms and scope of the Act, essential for understanding negotiable instruments law.

Contract Act 1872 Section 8 defines the communication, acceptance, and revocation of proposals in contract formation.

CrPC Section 229 details the procedure for framing charges in warrant cases after the accused appears before the Magistrate.

Selling game hacks in India is illegal under IT laws and can lead to penalties and criminal charges.

Companies Act 2013 Section 390 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Alternative medicine is legal in India with regulated practice and government recognition under AYUSH.

IPC Section 443 defines criminal trespass, covering unlawful entry into property with intent to commit an offence or intimidate.

Understand the legality of opening an account with Cashaa in India and related regulations.

bottom of page