top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 248

Companies Act 2013 Section 248 governs the power of the Registrar to remove the name of a company from the register of companies.

Companies Act Section 248 empowers the Registrar of Companies (ROC) to remove a company’s name from the register under specific conditions. This section plays a vital role in ensuring that the corporate register remains accurate and free from inactive or defunct companies.

Understanding Section 248 is crucial for directors, shareholders, and professionals involved in company management and compliance. It helps in managing dormant companies and streamlining corporate governance by legally dissolving companies that no longer operate.

Companies Act Section 248 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes the ROC to strike off companies that are inactive or have failed to start business within a stipulated time. It helps maintain the integrity of the corporate registry by removing companies that are no longer functional or have become dormant without formal status.

  • ROC can remove names of non-commencing companies after one year.

  • Companies inactive for two consecutive financial years are liable for removal.

  • Companies must apply for dormant status to avoid removal.

  • Ensures corporate register accuracy and reduces clutter.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 248

This section sets out conditions under which the ROC can remove a company's name from the register.

  • Applies to companies incorporated under the Act.

  • Targets companies not commencing business within one year.

  • Includes companies inactive for two consecutive financial years.

  • Companies can avoid removal by applying for dormant status under Section 455.

  • Removal is an administrative action by the ROC.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 248

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by removing inactive companies from the register, protecting stakeholders and ensuring transparency.

  • Maintains an updated and accurate corporate register.

  • Protects shareholders and creditors from dormant companies.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate identity.

  • Enhances transparency and accountability in company records.

When Companies Act Section 248 Applies

The section applies when companies fail to commence business or remain inactive for specified periods.

  • Companies not starting business within one year of incorporation.

  • Companies inactive for two consecutive financial years.

  • Companies that do not apply for dormant status under Section 455.

  • Applies to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Triggered by ROC’s administrative review or complaints.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 248

Section 248 creates a legal mechanism for the ROC to remove companies from the register, effectively dissolving them. This action restricts the company from operating or entering contracts post-removal. Non-compliance with filing or business commencement timelines triggers this provision. The ROC’s decision is subject to prescribed procedures and notices. It interacts with MCA rules regarding name removal and public notices.

  • Creates duty for companies to commence business timely.

  • ROC’s removal leads to company dissolution.

  • Non-compliance results in loss of corporate status.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 248

Compliance involves either commencing business within one year or applying for dormant status if inactive. It is a conditional, ongoing obligation to maintain company status. Directors and officers are responsible for timely compliance to avoid removal. Internal governance must monitor business activity and filings to prevent unintended dissolution.

  • Mandatory compliance to avoid name removal.

  • Ongoing monitoring of business activity required.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and company officers.

  • One-time application possible for dormant status.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily after incorporation and during the company’s operational phase when business activity is assessed.

  • Post-incorporation monitoring stage.

  • During annual filings and financial year closure.

  • Before company becomes dormant or inactive.

  • Prior to ROC initiating name removal proceedings.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 248

Removal of the company’s name results in legal dissolution. The company ceases to exist as a legal entity. Directors may face restrictions on future company management. Additional penalties may apply if non-compliance involves concealment or fraud. The company cannot carry on business or hold assets post-removal.

  • Company legally dissolved upon name removal.

  • Directors may face disqualification risks.

  • Possible monetary penalties for related violations.

  • Company loses all rights and liabilities.

Example of Companies Act Section 248 in Practical Use

Company X was incorporated but did not start any business within one year. The ROC issued a notice under Section 248 to remove its name. Company X failed to respond or apply for dormant status. Consequently, the ROC removed its name, dissolving Company X legally. This prevented misuse of the corporate identity and cleared the register.

  • Companies must respond promptly to ROC notices.

  • Applying for dormant status can prevent removal.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 248

Section 248 replaces provisions from the Companies Act, 1956 regarding removal of company names. It was introduced in the 2013 Act to streamline the process and incorporate modern compliance requirements. Amendments have enhanced procedural safeguards and clarity on dormant companies.

  • Replaces earlier provisions under Companies Act, 1956.

  • Introduced to improve corporate register accuracy.

  • Amended to include dormant company provisions.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 248

In 2026, Section 248 is crucial for digital compliance and maintaining clean corporate records. The MCA portal facilitates online notices and filings related to name removal. It supports governance reforms by ensuring only active companies remain registered. The provision aligns with ESG and CSR trends by promoting responsible corporate conduct.

  • Supports digital filings and MCA e-governance.

  • Enhances corporate governance and transparency.

  • Prevents misuse of inactive companies.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 455 – Dormant companies.

  • Companies Act Section 252 – Power of Registrar to restore name.

  • Companies Act Section 3 – Incorporation of company.

  • Companies Act Section 434 – Compounding of offences.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 248

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 248

  • Section: 248

  • Title: Power of Registrar to remove name of company from register

  • Category: Compliance, Corporate Governance

  • Applies To: All companies incorporated under the Act

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory business commencement or dormant status application

  • Penalties: Company dissolution, director disqualification risks

  • Related Filings: Application for dormant status, ROC notices

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 248

Section 248 is a vital provision ensuring that the register of companies remains accurate and free from inactive or non-operational entities. It empowers the Registrar to remove names of companies that fail to commence business or remain inactive, thereby protecting stakeholders and maintaining transparency.

Directors and company officers must understand their obligations under this section to avoid unintended dissolution. The provision supports good corporate governance and aligns with modern compliance practices, making it essential knowledge for all corporate professionals.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 248

What triggers the Registrar to remove a company's name under Section 248?

The Registrar can remove a company's name if it has not started business within one year of incorporation or has been inactive for two consecutive financial years without applying for dormant status.

Can a company avoid removal if it is inactive?

Yes, a company can apply for dormant status under Section 455 to avoid removal if it is not carrying on business but intends to remain registered.

What happens once a company's name is removed under Section 248?

The company is legally dissolved, ceases to exist, and cannot carry on business or hold assets. Directors may also face restrictions on managing companies.

Is the removal process under Section 248 automatic?

No, the Registrar must follow prescribed procedures including issuing notices and allowing the company to respond before removal.

Can a company restore its name after removal under Section 248?

Yes, the company or any interested party can apply for restoration of the name under Section 252 within a specified period following removal.

Related Sections

IPC Section 195A criminalizes giving false evidence to obstruct justice, ensuring integrity of judicial proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 419 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

CrPC Section 116 empowers a Magistrate to issue search warrants to find stolen or unlawfully possessed property.

Companies Act 2013 Section 294 governs the register of members and related disclosures for Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 86 governs the appointment and powers of managing directors and managers in Indian companies.

IPC Section 347 defines wrongful confinement, outlining unlawful restriction of a person's freedom of movement.

IT Act Section 69 empowers government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information for security and investigation purposes.

IPC Section 329 penalizes voluntarily causing hurt to extort property or valuable security, addressing coercion through violence.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 55A defines 'capital asset' for taxation under capital gains provisions.

CrPC Section 378 defines the offence of theft, detailing key elements and legal implications under Indian criminal law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 101 defines the burden of proof, specifying who must prove a fact in civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 232 covers the procedure for sentencing when a person is convicted of an offence, detailing how courts pronounce and record sentences.

IPC Section 449 defines criminal trespass by entering into or upon property with intent to commit an offence or intimidate.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 163 mandates that police officers must prepare a written report of all information received about a cognizable offence.

IPC Section 124A defines sedition, penalizing acts inciting hatred or contempt against the government.

Companies Act 2013 Section 27 governs the alteration of share capital, crucial for corporate capital management and shareholder rights.

Contract Act 1872 Section 74 explains compensation for breach of contract when no specific sum is agreed.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85B deals with presumption of electronic records' authenticity, crucial for digital evidence admissibility in courts.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 69 details the penalties for non-compliance with orders by Consumer Commissions, ensuring enforcement of consumer rights.

IT Act Section 39 mandates the appointment of adjudicating officers to resolve cyber contraventions under the IT Act, 2000.

CPC Section 34 covers the procedure for setting aside ex parte decrees in civil suits.

IPC Section 320 defines grievous hurt and lists specific injuries considered grievous under Indian law.

CrPC Section 64 explains the procedure for releasing a person on bond without sureties in certain cases.

IPC Section 284 penalizes negligent acts that may cause harm to public health by handling noxious substances.

CrPC Section 213 details the procedure for framing charges by the Magistrate after considering the police report and evidence.

CPC Section 135 empowers courts to order attachment of property to secure decree execution.

CrPC Section 218 empowers a Magistrate to order investigation into offences without a police report under certain conditions.

bottom of page