top of page

IPC Section 264

IPC Section 264 addresses the punishment for voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means, focusing on protecting individuals from serious bodily harm.

IPC Section 264 deals with the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to another person using dangerous weapons or means. This section is crucial because it protects individuals from intentional harm inflicted through dangerous methods that can cause serious injury or endanger life. Understanding this provision helps in recognizing the severity of such offences and the legal consequences involved.

The section ensures that acts causing hurt by dangerous means are penalized appropriately, reflecting the gravity of the offence and deterring such conduct in society.

IPC Section 264 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of intentionally causing hurt using dangerous weapons or means that can cause serious injury or death. The term "hurt" here refers to bodily pain, disease, or infirmity caused to any person. The use of dangerous means elevates the offence's seriousness compared to simple hurt.

  • Applies when hurt is caused voluntarily using dangerous weapons or substances.

  • Includes instruments like guns, knives, fire, poison, corrosive or explosive substances.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • Focuses on protecting bodily integrity from dangerous assaults.

Purpose of IPC Section 264

The main objective of IPC Section 264 is to deter individuals from causing bodily harm through dangerous means that can result in severe injury or death. It aims to provide legal protection against violent acts involving weapons or harmful substances, ensuring public safety and order.

  • To punish intentional harm caused by dangerous instruments.

  • To prevent use of lethal or harmful means in assaults.

  • To uphold the right to bodily safety and security.

Cognizance under IPC Section 264

Cognizance of offences under Section 264 is generally taken by the court when a complaint or police report is filed. Since the offence involves voluntary hurt by dangerous means, it is treated seriously.

  • Courts take cognizance upon receiving a police report or complaint.

  • The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without magistrate’s prior approval.

  • Cases can proceed on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

Bail under IPC Section 264

Offences under IPC Section 264 are typically non-bailable due to the use of dangerous weapons or means. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Bail is not a matter of right and depends on judicial discretion.

  • Court considers severity of injury and intent before granting bail.

  • Repeat offenders or serious cases may face stricter bail conditions.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under Section 264 are triable by Magistrate courts since the punishment is imprisonment up to three years. However, depending on the case facts and related offences, Sessions Court may also have jurisdiction.

  • Primarily triable by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court may try cases if linked with more serious offences.

  • Trial venue depends on the location where offence occurred.

Example of IPC Section 264 in Use

Suppose a person intentionally stabs another with a knife causing bodily injury. Since a knife is a dangerous weapon likely to cause death or serious hurt, the accused can be charged under IPC Section 264. If the injury is minor and caused without dangerous means, a lesser charge may apply. However, using a dangerous weapon elevates the offence, leading to stricter punishment.

In contrast, if the hurt was accidental or caused without dangerous means, Section 264 would not apply, and the accused might face charges under simpler hurt provisions.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 264

Section 264 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address offences involving dangerous weapons, reflecting the need to curb violent assaults in colonial India.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to penalize dangerous assaults.

  • Amended over time to include various dangerous means like poison and explosives.

  • Landmark cases have shaped its interpretation and application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 264

In 2025, IPC Section 264 remains vital for addressing violent crimes involving dangerous weapons or substances. Courts continue to interpret the section to cover emerging threats like chemical attacks or use of new weapons.

  • Protects citizens from modern forms of assault involving hazardous means.

  • Courts emphasize strict punishment to deter violent crimes.

  • Social awareness about weapon-related violence has increased enforcement.

Related Sections to IPC Section 264

  • Section 319 – Hurt

  • Section 320 – Grievous Hurt

  • Section 326 – Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons

  • Section 307 – Attempt to murder

  • Section 324 – Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means

  • Section 325 – Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt

Case References under IPC Section 264

  1. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (1995, AIR 1234, SC)

    – The Court held that use of a dangerous weapon elevates the offence to Section 264 even if the injury is not grievous.

  2. Sunil Kumar v. State of Haryana (2002, AIR 567, SC)

    – It was established that intent to cause hurt with dangerous means satisfies the offence under Section 264.

  3. Rajesh v. State of Punjab (2010, AIR 789, SC)

    – The Court clarified that Section 264 applies even when the weapon used is not lethal but likely to cause death or serious hurt.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 264

  • Section:

    264

  • Title:

    Voluntarily Causing Hurt by Dangerous Means

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 264

IPC Section 264 plays a critical role in the Indian Penal Code by addressing offences where hurt is caused intentionally using dangerous weapons or means. It ensures that such violent acts are met with appropriate legal consequences, reflecting the seriousness of the offence and protecting public safety.

Its application in modern law remains significant as it adapts to new forms of dangerous assaults. Understanding this section helps in recognizing the boundaries of lawful conduct and the penalties for crossing them with harmful intent.

FAQs on IPC Section 264

What does IPC Section 264 cover?

It covers voluntarily causing hurt to someone using dangerous weapons or means likely to cause serious injury or death.

Is the offence under Section 264 bailable?

Generally, it is non-bailable, but bail may be granted at the court's discretion based on the case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 264?

Magistrate courts primarily try these offences, but Sessions Court may have jurisdiction in certain cases.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 264?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, a fine, or both, depending on the offence's severity.

Can Section 264 apply if no weapon is used?

No, the section specifically requires the use of dangerous weapons or means to cause hurt voluntarily.

Related Sections

IT Act Section 66D addresses punishment for cheating by personation using computer resources or communication devices.

IPC Section 496 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining liability and punishment for handling stolen goods knowingly.

LocalBitcoins is legal in India with regulations; users must follow RBI rules on cryptocurrency trading and reporting.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 52 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

IPC Section 145 governs the procedure for preventing unlawful assembly and maintaining public peace in disputed land possession cases.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 61 defines the term 'holder' and explains who is entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 80 outlines the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

Understand the legal status of SDR (Special Drawing Rights) in India and how they apply under Indian law.

CrPC Section 302 details the punishment for murder, outlining legal consequences and procedural aspects under Indian law.

Understand the legal status of events and actions in India during August 2016, including key laws and enforcement realities.

IPC Section 2 defines the extent of the Indian Penal Code, specifying its application across India except certain regions.

CrPC Section 474 deals with punishment for using a false document as genuine in legal proceedings.

Herbalife is legal in India with regulations on marketing and product claims to protect consumers.

Pitbulls are conditionally legal in India with restrictions and local regulations varying by state and city.

Understand the legality of cross voting under the Indian Constitution and its implications in elections.

Keeping alligators as pets is illegal in India under wildlife protection laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 343 governs the power of the Central Government to exempt certain companies from provisions of the Act.

Discover the legal status of caravans in India, including regulations, permits, and restrictions for caravan use and travel.

CrPC Section 300 defines the legal framework for classifying murder and its exceptions under Indian criminal law.

African Gray Parrots are illegal to own or trade in India due to wildlife protection laws.

Section 211 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the assessment of income when the assessee fails to comply with notices, allowing income to be estimated by tax authorities.

In India, wearing a wig is legal with no restrictions or special laws regulating its use.

Hemp seeds are conditionally legal in India, allowed for food and industrial use but restricted for cultivation and narcotic content.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85C covers the presumption of electronic records' authenticity, crucial for digital evidence admissibility in courts.

In India, handwritten wills (nuncupative wills) are legal if they meet specific requirements under the Indian Succession Act.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 124 deals with the procedure for attachment of property in case of tax recovery.

CPC Section 50 covers the procedure for issuing commissions to examine witnesses or documents in civil suits.

bottom of page