top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 269

Companies Act 2013 Section 269 governs the appointment of managing directors and whole-time directors in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 269 deals with the appointment of managing directors (MD) and whole-time directors (WTD) in companies. This provision is crucial for defining leadership roles and ensuring proper management within corporate structures. Understanding this section helps directors, shareholders, and professionals comply with legal requirements and maintain effective governance.

The section outlines the conditions and procedures for appointing MDs and WTDs, emphasizing the need for board and shareholder approvals. Compliance with this section ensures clarity in authority and accountability in company management.

Companies Act Section 269 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that the appointment of MDs and WTDs must be approved by the company’s general meeting through a resolution. The term of appointment cannot exceed five years, ensuring periodic review and accountability. In certain cases, Central Government approval is necessary to validate the appointment.

  • Appointment requires a general meeting resolution.

  • Term of appointment capped at five years.

  • Central Government approval may be required.

  • Applies to managing and whole-time directors.

  • Ensures legal compliance for leadership roles.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 269

This section sets out the framework for appointing managing and whole-time directors in companies.

  • It states that the company must appoint MD or WTD by passing a resolution in a general meeting.

  • Applies to all companies except those exempted under specific provisions.

  • Mandates a maximum term of five years for such appointments.

  • Central Government approval is mandatory in certain cases, such as government companies or specified industries.

  • The section prohibits appointment without proper approval and limits tenure to maintain governance standards.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 269

The section aims to ensure transparent and lawful appointment of key managerial personnel, promoting accountability and effective management.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by formalizing leadership appointments.

  • Protects shareholders by requiring their approval for key appointments.

  • Ensures transparency in the selection and tenure of MDs and WTDs.

  • Prevents arbitrary or indefinite appointments.

When Companies Act Section 269 Applies

This section applies when a company intends to appoint a managing or whole-time director.

  • Applicable to all companies except those exempted by the Act.

  • Must be followed during appointment or reappointment of MD/WTD.

  • Triggers include new appointments, term renewals, or replacements.

  • Exemptions apply to certain private companies or small companies under specific conditions.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 269

This provision creates a mandatory legal framework for appointing MDs and WTDs. It imposes duties on the company to obtain shareholder approval and, where necessary, Central Government consent. Non-compliance can invalidate the appointment and attract penalties. The section interacts with related MCA rules governing filings and disclosures.

  • Creates a duty to pass a general meeting resolution for appointment.

  • Requires adherence to term limits and approval processes.

  • Non-compliance may lead to appointment being void and penalties.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 269

Compliance is mandatory and conditional on company type and appointment specifics. It is a one-time obligation per appointment but recurring for reappointments. Directors and company secretaries must ensure proper procedure and documentation. This section impacts internal governance by formalizing leadership roles.

  • Mandatory compliance for appointment of MD/WTD.

  • Ongoing obligation for reappointment or term renewal.

  • Responsibility lies with board, directors, and company secretary.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in governance.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the appointment stage of corporate leadership.

  • During incorporation if MD/WTD appointed immediately.

  • At board decision stage recommending appointment.

  • Shareholder approval stage via general meeting resolution.

  • Filing stage with Registrar of Companies post-appointment.

  • Ongoing compliance during term and reappointment.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 269

Non-compliance can attract monetary fines and other legal consequences. The appointment may be declared invalid, affecting company operations. Directors responsible may face disqualification or penalties under the Act. Additional fees or remedial actions may be imposed by regulatory authorities.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance.

  • Possible disqualification of directors.

  • Invalidation of appointment.

  • Additional fees or directions from MCA.

Example of Companies Act Section 269 in Practical Use

Company X decided to appoint Mr. A as managing director for a five-year term. The board recommended his appointment, and the company passed a resolution in the general meeting approving it. They filed the necessary forms with the Registrar of Companies. This ensured compliance with Section 269, avoiding legal issues.

  • Proper resolution and filing ensure legal validity.

  • Compliance protects company and director interests.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 269

Section 269 replaced earlier provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, to streamline appointment procedures. It was introduced in the 2013 Act to enhance corporate governance and clarify appointment terms. Amendments have refined approval requirements and term limits.

  • Replaced similar provisions in Companies Act, 1956.

  • Introduced for clearer governance in 2013 Act.

  • Amended to include Central Government approval conditions.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 269

In 2026, Section 269 remains vital for appointing key managerial personnel amid evolving corporate governance standards. Digital filings via MCA portal simplify compliance. The section supports ESG and CSR by ensuring accountable leadership aligned with modern business ethics.

  • Digital compliance through MCA e-governance.

  • Supports governance reforms and transparency.

  • Ensures practical leadership accountability today.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 196 – Appointment of managing director, whole-time director or manager.

  • Companies Act Section 197 – Overall managerial remuneration and managerial remuneration.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 269

  1. Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation (2015, Delhi HC)

    – Appointment of managing director must follow statutory procedures to be valid.

  2. Raj Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India (2017, SC)

    – Central Government approval mandatory where prescribed, non-compliance voids appointment.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 269

  • Section: 269

  • Title: Appointment of Managing Director and Whole-time Director

  • Category: Governance, Directors

  • Applies To: Companies appointing MD or WTD

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, conditional on company type

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, disqualification, invalid appointment

  • Related Filings: Form DIR-12, Board resolutions

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 269

Section 269 of the Companies Act 2013 is a key provision ensuring the lawful appointment of managing and whole-time directors. It mandates shareholder approval and sets term limits, promoting transparency and accountability in corporate leadership. Companies must strictly adhere to this section to maintain good governance and avoid legal penalties.

Understanding and complying with Section 269 helps companies establish clear authority and responsibility at the top management level. It safeguards the interests of shareholders and stakeholders by regulating appointments and ensuring periodic review of leadership roles.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 269

Who can be appointed as a managing director under Section 269?

Any individual meeting the eligibility criteria under the Companies Act can be appointed as managing director, subject to company approval and compliance with Section 269 procedures.

Is Central Government approval always required for appointing a managing director?

No, Central Government approval is required only in specific cases such as government companies or certain industries as prescribed by the Act.

What is the maximum term for a managing director’s appointment under Section 269?

The maximum term for appointment is five years at a time. Reappointment is possible subject to compliance with the Act.

What happens if a company appoints a managing director without following Section 269?

Such an appointment may be invalid, and the company or directors may face penalties including fines and disqualification.

Can the appointment of a managing director be terminated before the term ends?

Yes, the company may remove or terminate the appointment as per the provisions of the Act and the terms of the appointment agreement.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 386 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 48 governs the issue and transfer of shares and securities in India.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 9 outlines the jurisdiction of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions for consumer complaints.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(13) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

Income Tax Act Section 271AAA penalizes non-filing of TDS statements, ensuring timely compliance by deductors and collectors.

Service charges are legal in India but must be disclosed and handled as per consumer laws and tax regulations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85C covers the presumption of electronic records' authenticity, crucial for digital evidence admissibility in courts.

Tor is legal in India but using it for illegal activities is punishable under Indian law.

Petrabbit is not a recognized term or activity under Indian law, so it is neither legal nor illegal in India.

Street photography is legal in India with conditions on privacy and consent, especially in public spaces and sensitive areas.

Indian currency is conditionally legal in Bhutan for certain transactions under specific regulations.

Contract Act 1872 Section 11 defines who are competent to contract, ensuring valid agreements by capable parties.

Understand whether an email is considered a legal document in India and its enforceability under Indian law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 53 defines the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, outlining when such confessions are valid in court.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 30 covering payment of tax, interest, and penalties.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 63 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

IPC Section 311 empowers courts to summon any person as a witness or for production of document during trial.

Section 150 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish return of income in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 225 governs the appointment and powers of inspectors for company investigations.

Auction houses are legal in India but must follow strict regulations under the Indian Sale of Goods Act and other laws.

IPC Section 492 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and punishment.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 37 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

IPC Section 354 addresses assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty, protecting women's dignity.

CPC Section 6 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India, guiding where suits can be filed.

Owning an elephant in India is legal only under strict regulations and permits issued by the government.

Holding employee salary in India is illegal except under specific lawful conditions like deductions or court orders.

CrPC Section 435 details the procedure for the sale of property attached by the court to satisfy a decree or order.

bottom of page