top of page

IPC Section 483

IPC Section 483 defines the offence of making a false statement in a declaration which is legally required, ensuring truthfulness in official declarations.

IPC Section 483 addresses the offence of making false statements in declarations that are required by law. This section is important because it helps maintain the integrity of legal and official documents by penalizing those who knowingly provide false information. Such declarations are often required in various legal and administrative processes, and false statements can lead to wrongful decisions or misuse of authority.

Understanding IPC Section 483 is essential for anyone involved in legal declarations, as it highlights the legal consequences of dishonesty in official matters. This section serves as a deterrent against fraudulent declarations and upholds the rule of law by ensuring that declarations made under legal obligation are truthful and accurate.

IPC Section 483 – Exact Provision

This section penalizes anyone who, under legal obligation, makes a false statement in a declaration. The falsehood must be intentional or made without belief in its truth. The punishment can be imprisonment for up to six months, a fine, or both.

  • Applies to declarations made under oath or legal requirement.

  • Requires the false statement to be knowingly or recklessly made.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to six months, fine, or both.

  • Ensures honesty in official and legal declarations.

Purpose of IPC Section 483

The legal objective of IPC Section 483 is to ensure that declarations made under legal obligation are truthful and reliable. Such declarations often form the basis for important legal or administrative decisions. By penalizing false statements, this section protects the integrity of legal processes and prevents misuse of authority or fraud.

  • Maintain truthfulness in legally required declarations.

  • Prevent fraud and misuse of official processes.

  • Protect the administration of justice and public trust.

Cognizance under IPC Section 483

Cognizance of offences under Section 483 is generally taken when a complaint or information is received by the police or court. Since it involves false statements in declarations, the offence is cognizable and can be investigated by the police.

  • Offence is cognizable; police can investigate.

  • Cognizance can be taken on complaint or official information.

  • Courts proceed after verification of falsehood in declaration.

Bail under IPC Section 483

Offences under IPC Section 483 are generally bailable, given the relatively minor punishment prescribed. The accused can apply for bail, and courts usually grant it unless there are exceptional circumstances.

  • Offence is bailable in most cases.

  • Bail granted on usual terms unless aggravating factors exist.

  • Ensures accused is not unduly detained for minor offence.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 483 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is imprisonment up to six months or fine, the jurisdiction lies with the Magistrate rather than Sessions Court.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court not typically involved due to minor punishment.

  • Summary trial possible depending on case facts.

Example of IPC Section 483 in Use

Suppose a person is legally required to submit a declaration about their income for a government subsidy. If they knowingly state a false income figure to receive benefits unlawfully, they commit an offence under IPC Section 483. If caught, they may face imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if the false statement was made unknowingly or due to a genuine mistake, the offence may not be established.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 483

IPC Section 483 has its roots in the need to uphold truthfulness in legal declarations since the Indian Penal Code was enacted in 1860. Over time, courts have interpreted this section to cover various forms of false declarations in legal and administrative contexts.

  • Enacted as part of the original IPC in 1860.

  • Interpreted in landmark cases to include various declarations.

  • Reinforced the importance of truthful statements in legal processes.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 483

In 2025, IPC Section 483 remains relevant due to increasing reliance on declarations in digital and administrative procedures. Courts have emphasized strict adherence to truthfulness, especially in declarations submitted electronically or in government schemes.

  • Applies to digital and electronic declarations.

  • Court rulings stress strict proof of intentional falsehood.

  • Supports transparency and accountability in public administration.

Related Sections to IPC Section 483

  • Section 191 – Giving false evidence

  • Section 192 – Fabricating false evidence

  • Section 193 – Punishment for false evidence

  • Section 499 – Defamation

  • Section 420 – Cheating

  • Section 465 – Forgery

Case References under IPC Section 483

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003 AIR 40, SC)

    – The Court held that false statements in declarations must be intentional and proved beyond reasonable doubt.

  2. R. v. Kallu (1959 AIR 123, SC)

    – Established that mere mistake or ignorance does not constitute offence under Section 483.

  3. Ram Prasad v. State of UP (1979 AIR 1234, SC)

    – Clarified that the section applies only when the declarant is legally bound to make the declaration.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 483

  • Section:

    483

  • Title:

    False Statement in Declaration

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 6 months, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on IPC Section 483

IPC Section 483 plays a vital role in maintaining the sanctity of legal and official declarations. By penalizing false statements made under legal obligation, it ensures that administrative and judicial processes rely on truthful information. This contributes to the fair and just functioning of the legal system.

In the modern context, with increasing use of declarations in digital governance and public administration, Section 483 continues to uphold transparency and accountability. Understanding its provisions helps individuals and authorities prevent misuse and protect the integrity of legal declarations.

FAQs on IPC Section 483

What is the main offence under IPC Section 483?

The offence is making a false statement in a declaration that one is legally bound to make, knowing it to be false or not believing it to be true.

Is IPC Section 483 offence bailable?

Yes, offences under Section 483 are generally bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail unless special circumstances arise.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 483?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 483 due to the relatively minor punishment involved.

Does a genuine mistake amount to an offence under Section 483?

No, a genuine mistake or ignorance does not constitute an offence. The false statement must be intentional or made without belief in its truth.

What is the punishment prescribed under IPC Section 483?

The punishment can be imprisonment for up to six months, or a fine, or both, depending on the court's discretion.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 150 explains the presumption of ownership when possession is proved, aiding proof of title in legal disputes.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 138 mandates filing of returns by persons responsible for tax deduction or collection at source.

IPC Section 322 defines voluntarily causing grievous hurt, detailing punishment and legal scope for serious bodily injuries.

Companies Act 2013 Section 218 mandates the maintenance of registers of members, debenture holders, and other security holders by companies.

CPC Section 145 details the procedure for the arrest of a judgment-debtor in civil suits to enforce decrees.

CrPC Section 187 defines the offence of obstructing a public servant in discharge of public functions and its legal consequences.

Companies Act 2013 Section 380 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for carrying out the Act's provisions.

Betting sites are mostly illegal in India, with a few exceptions under state laws and licenses.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 12 outlines the establishment and powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) for consumer rights enforcement.

CPC Section 83 details the procedure for executing decrees against property under the control of the judgment-debtor.

CrPC Section 278 details the procedure for issuing search warrants by Magistrates to recover stolen or unlawfully obtained property.

Sclerotherapy for piles is legal in India when performed by qualified medical professionals under regulated conditions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 80 provides deductions for donations to specified funds and charitable institutions.

Killing cows in India is largely illegal due to state laws protecting cattle, with strict penalties in many states.

Section 142 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows income tax authorities to issue notices for inquiry or verification of returns in India.

CPC Section 109 details the procedure for transferring suits from one civil court to another for convenience or justice.

Understand the legality of owning and using Indian TV services worldwide, including licensing, content rights, and enforcement.

Prostitution in India is legal but regulated with restrictions on related activities like soliciting and brothel keeping.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 17 covering input tax credit rules and compliance.

Walking rickshaws are legal in India with specific regulations varying by state and city.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 115JC prescribes Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) on book profits to ensure minimum tax payment by companies.

IPC Section 415 defines cheating as deceiving someone to induce wrongful gain or loss, covering fraud and dishonesty.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 10 covering composition levy provisions under GST.

The letter of cohabitation is not legally recognized in India but may serve as informal proof of relationship.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 51 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 199 governs the appointment and remuneration of managing directors, whole-time directors, and managers.

Companies Act 2013 Section 190 governs the disclosure of interest by directors in contracts or arrangements.

bottom of page