top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 326

Companies Act 2013 Section 326 governs the punishment for false statements in declarations and affidavits by company officers.

Companies Act Section 326 addresses the legal consequences for making false statements in declarations, affidavits, or other documents submitted to authorities under the Act. This section plays a crucial role in ensuring honesty and integrity in corporate disclosures and filings. Directors, officers, and professionals must understand this provision to avoid severe penalties and maintain corporate governance standards.

False declarations can mislead regulators, shareholders, and other stakeholders, undermining trust in the corporate sector. Section 326 acts as a deterrent against fraudulent conduct, reinforcing compliance and accountability in company management and reporting.

Companies Act Section 326 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes knowingly making false statements or omitting material facts in documents required under the Companies Act. It applies to any person involved in preparing or submitting such documents. The punishment includes imprisonment, fines, or both, emphasizing the importance of truthful disclosures.

  • Applies to declarations, affidavits, certificates, financial statements, and reports.

  • Requires knowledge of falsity or omission of material facts.

  • Penalties include imprisonment up to six months and/or fines up to ₹50,000.

  • Ensures truthful and accurate corporate disclosures.

  • Deters fraudulent or misleading information submission.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 326

This section mandates legal accountability for false statements in company documents.

  • It covers any person submitting documents under the Companies Act.

  • Applies to directors, officers, auditors, and professionals.

  • Requires that statements be true and complete in all material respects.

  • Knowledge of falsity or omission is essential for prosecution.

  • Prohibits knowingly false or misleading declarations.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 326

The section aims to uphold integrity in corporate filings and protect stakeholders from deception.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by enforcing honesty.

  • Protects shareholders and creditors from fraud.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in disclosures.

  • Prevents misuse of company documents for wrongful gain.

When Companies Act Section 326 Applies

This provision applies whenever false statements are made knowingly in required documents under the Act.

  • Applicable to all companies and persons submitting documents.

  • Triggered by submission of false or incomplete declarations or affidavits.

  • Includes financial statements, certificates, and reports.

  • No exemption based on company size or type.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 326

Section 326 creates a criminal liability for false statements, imposing duties on company officers to ensure accuracy. It restricts submission of misleading information and mandates truthful disclosures. Non-compliance can lead to imprisonment, fines, and reputational damage. The provision works alongside MCA rules to enforce compliance and deter fraud.

  • Creates duties to submit truthful documents.

  • Restricts false or misleading statements.

  • Non-compliance attracts criminal penalties.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 326

Compliance is mandatory and ongoing for all persons involved in preparing and submitting company documents. Directors and officers bear primary responsibility. The obligation impacts internal governance by demanding rigorous verification and honesty in disclosures.

  • Mandatory compliance for all relevant documents.

  • Ongoing obligation during company operations.

  • Responsibility lies with directors, officers, and professionals.

  • Enhances internal controls and verification processes.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 326 applies at multiple stages including document preparation, board approvals, shareholder filings, and regulatory submissions.

  • During preparation of declarations and affidavits.

  • At board meeting approvals of financial statements.

  • When filing documents with MCA or other authorities.

  • Ongoing compliance during company operations.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 326

Violations attract imprisonment up to six months, fines up to ₹50,000, or both. Persistent or serious offenses may lead to additional legal actions. Penalties serve as a deterrent and uphold corporate integrity.

  • Imprisonment up to six months.

  • Fine up to ₹50,000.

  • Possible combination of both penalties.

  • Reputational damage and legal consequences.

Example of Companies Act Section 326 in Practical Use

Director X of Company Y knowingly submitted a financial statement omitting liabilities to inflate profits. Upon discovery, authorities invoked Section 326. Director X faced prosecution, resulting in a fine and imprisonment. The company corrected filings and improved internal controls to prevent recurrence.

  • Highlights importance of truthful financial reporting.

  • Demonstrates legal consequences of false statements.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 326

This provision evolved from similar clauses in the Companies Act, 1956, addressing false statements in company documents. Introduced in the 2013 Act to strengthen corporate accountability, it reflects reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and deterring fraud.

  • Derived from Companies Act, 1956 provisions on false statements.

  • Introduced to improve corporate governance in 2013 Act.

  • Part of broader reforms for transparency and accountability.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 326

In 2026, with digital filings and MCA portal usage, Section 326 remains vital. It supports e-governance by ensuring truthful electronic submissions. The section aligns with ESG and CSR trends emphasizing ethical corporate behavior and compliance.

  • Supports digital compliance and e-filing integrity.

  • Reinforces governance reforms and transparency.

  • Maintains practical importance in modern corporate environment.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 134 – Financial statement disclosures.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • IPC Section 191 – False statement made in declaration.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 326

  1. Ramesh Kumar vs. Union of India (2017, SC)

    – Established that knowledge of falsity is essential for prosecution under false statement provisions.

  2. XYZ Ltd. vs. Registrar of Companies (2019, NCLT)

    – Held directors liable for omission of material facts in financial statements.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 326

  • Section: 326

  • Title: Punishment for False Statements

  • Category: Compliance, Governance, Directors

  • Applies To: Directors, officers, professionals, any person submitting documents

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, ongoing

  • Penalties: Imprisonment up to 6 months, fine up to ₹50,000, or both

  • Related Filings: Declarations, affidavits, financial statements, reports

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 326

Section 326 is a critical provision ensuring honesty in corporate disclosures under the Companies Act, 2013. It deters false statements and omissions in declarations and affidavits, protecting the interests of shareholders, creditors, and regulators. The penalties underscore the seriousness of truthful reporting in corporate governance.

Directors and officers must exercise due diligence and verify all documents before submission. This section strengthens the legal framework for transparency and accountability, fostering trust in the corporate sector and supporting ethical business practices in India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 326

Who can be held liable under Section 326?

Any person who makes or submits a false statement or omits material facts knowingly in documents required under the Companies Act can be held liable, including directors, officers, and professionals.

What is the maximum punishment under this section?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment for up to six months, a fine up to fifty thousand rupees, or both, depending on the severity of the offense.

Does Section 326 apply to all companies?

Yes, it applies to all companies and any person submitting declarations, affidavits, or other documents under the Companies Act, regardless of company size or type.

Is knowledge of falsity necessary for prosecution?

Yes, the person must knowingly make a false statement or omit material facts for prosecution under Section 326 to succeed.

Can a company be penalized under this section?

The section primarily targets individuals responsible for false statements. However, the company may face regulatory actions for non-compliance related to such false disclosures.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 310 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 295 deals with penalties for failure to comply with notices or summons under the Act.

IPC Section 225A punishes the act of counterfeiting or falsifying government stamps or marks used for revenue collection.

IPC Section 302 defines punishment for murder, outlining legal consequences and scope of this grave offence.

In India, AGV helmets are legal if they meet safety standards and are approved by the government for road use.

Understand the legality of using Kali Linux in India, including its permitted uses and common misconceptions.

Understand the legal status of 5 paisa coins in India and their use in transactions today.

In India, prostitution is not illegal, but laws regulate activities; transgender persons face similar legal conditions with unique social challenges.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 74 covers the admissibility of evidence of the existence or non-existence of any right or custom, crucial for proving customary rights in court.

Companies Act 2013 Section 73 regulates acceptance of deposits by companies, ensuring compliance and protecting stakeholders.

Understand the legality of Standby Letters of Credit (SBLC) in India and how they are used in financial transactions.

Learn about the legality of owning and using nunchaku in India, including restrictions and enforcement details.

Dash cryptocurrency is not officially regulated or banned in India, but its legal status remains uncertain with strict enforcement on crypto trading.

Weed is illegal in India, but certain traditional uses are tolerated under strict conditions.

In India, using 433 MHz frequency is generally illegal for unlicensed devices due to spectrum regulations and interference concerns.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 43 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

SNRIs are prescription medicines in India and legal only when prescribed by a registered doctor.

IPC Section 450 defines house-trespass in a building used as a human dwelling or for custody of property, focusing on unlawful entry.

Companies Act 2013 Section 450 governs the revival and rehabilitation of companies under insolvency proceedings in India.

Section 196B of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs tax deduction at source on income from transfer of certain capital assets in India.

CrPC Section 25A details the procedure for recording confessions and statements by Magistrates to ensure lawful evidence collection.

Watching Redtube is not illegal in India, but accessing adult content sites may face restrictions under Indian law.

Night vision binoculars are legal in India with restrictions; you need permission for certain uses and must follow import and possession laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 315 governs the appointment and powers of company secretaries in India.

CrPC Section 247 details the procedure for a Magistrate to take cognizance of an offence upon receiving a police report.

Prenatal testing for Huntington's disease (HD) is legal in India under specific regulations and guidelines.

CrPC Section 481 details the procedure for the Supreme Court to review its own judgments or orders under specific conditions.

bottom of page