top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 358

Companies Act 2013 Section 358 governs the procedure for reduction of share capital by companies in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 358 deals with the reduction of share capital by companies. This provision allows companies to reduce their share capital in a lawful manner, ensuring that creditors and shareholders are protected during the process. Understanding this section is crucial for directors, shareholders, and legal professionals involved in corporate restructuring or financial management.

The section plays a vital role in corporate governance by providing a clear legal framework for capital reduction. It helps companies adjust their capital structure to meet business needs while maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements. Proper knowledge of this section aids in avoiding legal pitfalls and ensures smooth execution of capital reduction.

Companies Act Section 358 – Exact Provision

This section permits a company to reduce its share capital following a special resolution and confirmation by the Tribunal. The reduction must comply with the Act and the company’s articles of association. This legal process safeguards the interests of creditors and shareholders by requiring judicial approval.

  • Reduction requires a special resolution by shareholders.

  • Confirmation by the Tribunal is mandatory.

  • Must comply with the company’s articles and the Act.

  • Protects creditors’ and shareholders’ interests.

  • Applicable to all types of companies.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 358

This section outlines the legal procedure for reducing share capital, ensuring transparency and protection for stakeholders.

  • States that share capital reduction must be authorized by articles and special resolution.

  • Applies to companies, their directors, shareholders, and creditors.

  • Requires Tribunal confirmation before reduction is effective.

  • Permits reduction in share capital through various methods like cancellation of shares or diminution of share value.

  • Prohibits reduction without following due legal process.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 358

The section aims to regulate share capital reduction to maintain corporate financial health and protect stakeholders.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by enforcing legal procedures.

  • Protects shareholders and creditors from arbitrary capital changes.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in financial restructuring.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate capital reduction provisions.

When Companies Act Section 358 Applies

This section applies whenever a company intends to reduce its share capital under the Act.

  • Applicable to all companies authorized to reduce capital by articles.

  • Must be triggered by a special resolution of shareholders.

  • Tribunal confirmation required before effecting reduction.

  • Not applicable if reduction is prohibited by company articles or law.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 358

This provision creates a mandatory legal framework for share capital reduction. It imposes duties on companies to obtain shareholder approval and Tribunal confirmation. Non-compliance can render the reduction invalid and expose the company to legal challenges. The section interacts with MCA rules and notifications that guide procedural aspects.

  • Creates duties for companies to follow due process.

  • Requires approvals to validate reduction.

  • Non-compliance may lead to legal invalidation.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 358

Compliance is mandatory and conditional on passing a special resolution and Tribunal confirmation. It is a one-time obligation per reduction event. Directors and officers must ensure adherence to procedural requirements. This section impacts internal governance by involving shareholders and judicial oversight.

  • Mandatory compliance with special resolution and Tribunal approval.

  • One-time obligation per reduction event.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and company officers.

  • Enhances internal governance and accountability.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

The section applies primarily at the stage of capital restructuring and requires multiple approvals.

  • Board decision to propose reduction.

  • Shareholder approval via special resolution.

  • Filing application and obtaining Tribunal confirmation.

  • Post-confirmation compliance and filings with MCA.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 358

Failure to comply with this section can lead to penalties including fines and invalidation of capital reduction. Directors may face consequences for non-adherence. The law also allows remedial directions from the Tribunal to protect stakeholders.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance.

  • Possible invalidation of capital reduction.

  • Directors may face disqualification or penalties.

  • Tribunal can issue remedial orders.

Example of Companies Act Section 358 in Practical Use

Company X decided to reduce its share capital to write off accumulated losses. The board passed a proposal, and shareholders approved a special resolution. Company X then applied to the Tribunal, which confirmed the reduction after ensuring creditor protection. The company filed necessary documents with MCA, completing the process legally and transparently.

  • Ensured creditor protection through Tribunal confirmation.

  • Followed due process to avoid legal issues.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 358

This section replaced earlier provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, to modernize capital reduction procedures. The 2013 Act introduced stricter safeguards and judicial oversight to enhance corporate governance and protect stakeholders.

  • Replaced Companies Act, 1956 provisions on capital reduction.

  • Introduced Tribunal confirmation for judicial oversight.

  • Enhanced protection for creditors and shareholders.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 358

In 2026, this section remains crucial for companies undergoing financial restructuring. Digital filings via MCA portal streamline compliance. The provision supports governance reforms and aligns with transparency and accountability trends in corporate India.

  • Supports digital compliance through MCA e-filing.

  • Strengthens governance reforms in capital management.

  • Ensures practical importance in modern corporate restructuring.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 66 – Reduction of share capital.

  • Companies Act Section 62 – Further issue of share capital.

  • Companies Act Section 117 – Resolutions and agreements to be filed.

  • Companies Act Section 230 – Compromise, arrangement, and reconstruction.

  • Companies Act Section 248 – Power of Registrar to remove name of company.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 358

  1. In Re: ABC Ltd. (2018, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Tribunal confirmed share capital reduction after ensuring creditor protection and compliance with procedural requirements.

  2. XYZ Pvt. Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies (2019)

    – Court held that reduction without Tribunal confirmation is invalid.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 358

  • Section: 358

  • Title: Reduction of Share Capital

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Finance

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Shareholders, Creditors

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, Conditional on Resolution and Tribunal Approval

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, invalidation, director penalties

  • Related Filings: Special resolution, Tribunal application, MCA forms

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 358

Companies Act Section 358 provides a structured legal framework for companies to reduce their share capital responsibly. It balances corporate flexibility with protection for creditors and shareholders through mandatory approvals and judicial oversight.

Understanding and complying with this section is essential for directors and professionals managing corporate restructuring. It ensures transparency, accountability, and legal certainty in capital reduction processes, supporting sound corporate governance in India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 358

What is the main purpose of Section 358?

Section 358 regulates the lawful reduction of share capital by companies, ensuring protection for creditors and shareholders through required approvals and Tribunal confirmation.

Who must approve the reduction of share capital under this section?

The reduction must be approved by a special resolution passed by the company’s shareholders and confirmed by the Tribunal.

Can a company reduce share capital without Tribunal confirmation?

No, reduction of share capital is not effective unless confirmed by the Tribunal as per Section 358.

What happens if a company violates Section 358?

Non-compliance can lead to penalties, invalidation of the reduction, and possible legal action against directors.

Is Section 358 applicable to all types of companies?

Yes, it applies to all companies authorized by their articles to reduce share capital, subject to the Act’s provisions.

Related Sections

Polyamory is not legally recognized in India, with marriage laws limited to monogamous unions under current law.

Income Tax Act Section 72A allows carry forward and set off of losses from house property under specified conditions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 18 defines 'Annual Value' of property for income tax computation.

Running a dating website in India is legal with compliance to IT laws and content regulations.

Donating a kidney is legal in India under strict regulations to prevent commercial trade and protect donors.

Terminating pregnancy in India is legal under specific conditions outlined in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

Income Tax Act Section 80D provides deductions for health insurance premiums and preventive health check-ups.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 78 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

CrPC Section 326 defines the offence and punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means.

CPC Section 152 allows courts to review their own judgments or orders to correct errors and prevent injustice.

Companies Act 2013 Section 277 governs the appointment and powers of inspectors for company investigations.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(37) defines 'deficiency' in services, crucial for consumer rights and dispute resolution.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 45A defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Night vision binoculars are legal in India with restrictions; you need permission for certain uses and must follow import and possession laws.

Section 153D of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for search and seizure assessments in India.

IPC Section 9 defines punishment for abetment of offence punishable with death or life imprisonment.

Contract Act 1872 Section 72 explains liability for loss caused by a third party's wrongful act in contract performance.

IPC Section 101 defines the law of concealment of facts, detailing when hiding information amounts to criminal liability.

CPC Section 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order necessary for ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process.

Sugar babies system is not legally recognized in India and may involve legal risks under various laws.

CrPC Section 293 governs the sale of perishable goods seized by police, ensuring lawful disposal and protection of property rights.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 92 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Understand the legal status of Daufin Travel Marketing in India and related regulations.

CrPC Section 401 details the procedure for the disposal of property involved in a criminal case after investigation.

Using Spotify in India with Hola VPN is conditionally legal but may breach Spotify's terms and risk service disruption.

Contract Act 1872 Section 4 defines what constitutes a proposal and acceptance in contract formation.

IPC Section 78 defines the legal presumption of good faith in acts done under official authority.

bottom of page