top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 375

Companies Act 2013 Section 375 governs the winding up of companies by the Tribunal under insolvency proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 375 deals with the winding up of companies by the Tribunal, particularly under insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings. This section is crucial for managing the closure of companies that are unable to meet their financial obligations. It provides a legal framework for orderly winding up, protecting the interests of creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders.

Understanding Section 375 is essential for directors, shareholders, insolvency professionals, and companies to ensure compliance with legal procedures during winding up. It helps in safeguarding rights and minimizing disputes during the dissolution process.

Companies Act Section 375 – Exact Provision

This section clarifies that when the Tribunal orders winding up under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, the winding up provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 will apply in conjunction with the IBC. It ensures that the legal framework for winding up is consistent and integrated with insolvency laws.

  • Applies winding up provisions of Companies Act alongside IBC.

  • Ensures orderly dissolution of insolvent companies.

  • Protects interests of creditors and stakeholders.

  • Facilitates legal clarity during insolvency proceedings.

  • Supports Tribunal’s authority in winding up decisions.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 375

This section states that when a company is wound up by the Tribunal under the IBC, the winding up provisions of the Companies Act apply subject to the IBC’s provisions.

  • Applies to companies ordered to be wound up by the Tribunal.

  • Relevant to directors, creditors, insolvency professionals, and shareholders.

  • Mandates compliance with winding up rules under the Companies Act.

  • Triggered by Tribunal’s winding up order under IBC.

  • Permits integration of Companies Act and IBC procedures.

  • Restricts conflicting provisions by prioritizing IBC rules.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 375

The section aims to harmonize the winding up process under the Companies Act with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. This integration strengthens corporate insolvency resolution and liquidation frameworks.

  • Strengthens corporate governance during insolvency.

  • Protects rights of creditors and stakeholders.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in winding up.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure during insolvency.

When Companies Act Section 375 Applies

This section applies when the Tribunal orders winding up of a company under the IBC, ensuring that Companies Act provisions govern the process alongside the IBC.

  • Applicable to companies under Tribunal’s winding up order.

  • Relevant for insolvency and liquidation proceedings.

  • Triggered by insolvency resolution failure or liquidation order.

  • Excludes voluntary winding up not ordered by Tribunal.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 375

Section 375 creates a legal bridge between the Companies Act and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It imposes duties and procedural requirements on companies and insolvency professionals during winding up. Non-compliance may lead to penalties under both laws. It ensures that winding up under insolvency is conducted with statutory safeguards and approvals.

  • Creates combined compliance duties under Companies Act and IBC.

  • Impacts corporate actions during insolvency and liquidation.

  • Non-compliance can attract penalties and legal consequences.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 375

Compliance with Section 375 is mandatory when winding up is ordered by the Tribunal under the IBC. It is an ongoing obligation throughout the liquidation process. Directors and insolvency professionals must ensure adherence to procedural rules. Internal governance is affected as control shifts to the liquidator under legal supervision.

  • Mandatory compliance during Tribunal-ordered winding up.

  • Ongoing obligation until completion of liquidation.

  • Responsibility lies with liquidators and company officers.

  • Internal governance transitions to liquidator’s control.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the winding up stage initiated by the Tribunal under insolvency proceedings. It governs the liquidation and dissolution phases.

  • Triggered after Tribunal’s winding up order.

  • Applies during liquidation and asset distribution.

  • Relevant during creditor claims and settlements.

  • Ends with company dissolution and removal from register.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 375

Failure to comply with winding up provisions under this section can lead to penalties under the Companies Act and the IBC. These include monetary fines, possible imprisonment for fraudulent conduct, and disqualification of directors. Additional fees and remedial directions may be imposed by the Tribunal or regulatory authorities.

  • Monetary fines for procedural violations.

  • Imprisonment for fraud or misconduct.

  • Disqualification of directors and officers.

  • Additional fees and Tribunal directives.

Example of Companies Act Section 375 in Practical Use

Company X was declared insolvent and the Tribunal ordered its winding up under the IBC. The appointed liquidator followed the Companies Act winding up provisions alongside the IBC rules. Creditors were paid from asset sales, and the company was dissolved legally. This ensured an orderly closure protecting stakeholder interests.

  • Demonstrates integration of Companies Act and IBC in practice.

  • Highlights importance of legal compliance during winding up.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 375

Section 375 was introduced in the Companies Act, 2013 to align winding up procedures with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It replaced older provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, reflecting modern insolvency frameworks. Amendments have refined the interplay between corporate and insolvency laws.

  • Shifted from Companies Act, 1956 to 2013 Act framework.

  • Introduced to harmonize with IBC, 2016.

  • Major reforms to streamline insolvency and winding up.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 375

In 2026, Section 375 remains vital for managing corporate insolvency with digital filings and MCA portal integration. It supports e-governance and compliance trends, aligning with ESG and CSR considerations during winding up. The section ensures transparent and efficient liquidation processes.

  • Supports digital compliance via MCA portal.

  • Facilitates governance reforms in insolvency.

  • Maintains practical importance in corporate restructuring.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 7 – Incorporation of company.

  • Companies Act Section 248 – Power to remove name of company from register.

  • Companies Act Section 434 – Winding up by Tribunal.

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 33 – Liquidation process.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

Case References under Companies Act Section 375

  1. Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India (2019, SCC 130)

    – Affirmed the primacy of IBC over Companies Act in insolvency resolution and winding up.

  2. Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta (2019, SCC 408)

    – Clarified roles of Tribunal and insolvency professionals in winding up under IBC.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 375

  • Section: 375

  • Title: Winding Up by Tribunal under Insolvency Proceedings

  • Category: Insolvency, Corporate Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Insolvency Professionals, Creditors

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory during Tribunal-ordered winding up

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, imprisonment, disqualification

  • Related Filings: MCA portal filings, Tribunal applications

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 375

Companies Act Section 375 plays a critical role in integrating the winding up provisions of the Companies Act with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It ensures that companies undergoing insolvency are wound up in a legally compliant, transparent, and orderly manner. This protects the interests of creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders during a challenging corporate phase.

For directors, insolvency professionals, and companies, understanding Section 375 is essential to navigate the complexities of insolvency and liquidation. It provides clarity on procedural requirements and legal duties, supporting effective corporate governance and compliance in insolvency scenarios.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 375

What does Section 375 of the Companies Act 2013 cover?

Section 375 governs the winding up of companies by the Tribunal under insolvency proceedings, applying Companies Act provisions alongside the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Who must comply with Section 375?

Companies ordered to be wound up by the Tribunal, their directors, insolvency professionals, and creditors must comply with Section 375 during the winding up process.

When does Section 375 apply?

It applies when the Tribunal orders winding up of a company under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, ensuring coordinated legal procedures.

What are the penalties for non-compliance with Section 375?

Penalties include monetary fines, imprisonment for fraud, disqualification of directors, and other remedial actions under the Companies Act and IBC.

How does Section 375 relate to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code?

Section 375 integrates the winding up provisions of the Companies Act with the IBC, ensuring that insolvency proceedings follow a consistent legal framework.

Related Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 14 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

In India, sex chat on Instagram is subject to strict laws under IT and obscenity laws, making it largely illegal and punishable.

CBS Fantasy is not legally recognized in India due to strict laws on online fantasy gaming and betting.

CrPC Section 142 empowers a Magistrate to summon a person to show cause for disobedience of an order or summons.

CrPC Section 477 details procedures for trials when accused persons are not found, ensuring justice proceeds fairly even in their absence.

Understand the legality of criticizing the Quran in India, including free speech limits and related laws.

Currency exchange is legal in India under strict regulations by the RBI and FEMA rules.

Understand the legality of money transfer in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Unlocking phones is legal in India with certain conditions and restrictions under telecom regulations.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 78 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

IPC Section 136 mandates the attendance of witnesses in court to ensure justice through truthful testimony.

CrPC Section 32 details the admissibility of statements made by a person who is dead or cannot be found as evidence in court.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 75A defines the duties and liabilities of partners in firms regarding negotiable instruments.

CrPC Section 265G details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during investigation or trial.

IPC Section 144 empowers magistrates to issue orders in urgent cases to prevent danger or obstruction to public peace.

Anavar is a controlled substance in India and is illegal without prescription or license.

IPC Section 235 covers the procedure for framing charges in criminal trials, ensuring fair trial commencement.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 82 covering tax deduction at source rules and compliance.

CrPC Section 452 deals with the procedure for taking possession of property in cases of house-breaking or wrongful occupation.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 92 covering transfer pricing and valuation adjustments.

Companies Act 2013 Section 249 governs the right of shareholders to requisition a general meeting in Indian companies.

Income Tax Act Section 73A deals with carry forward and set off of losses in speculative business.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 75 deals with the presumption of ownership of documents, aiding proof of possession and control in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 60 defines oral evidence as statements made by witnesses verbally, crucial for proving facts in court.

CPC Section 126 defines the procedure for arresting a judgment-debtor to enforce a decree.

CrPC Section 339 details the procedure for a Magistrate to take cognizance of an offence upon police report or complaint.

In India, keeping colored birds as pets is legal with regulations protecting wildlife and prohibiting certain species.

bottom of page