top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 375

Companies Act 2013 Section 375 governs the winding up of companies by the Tribunal under insolvency proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 375 deals with the winding up of companies by the Tribunal, particularly under insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings. This section is crucial for managing the closure of companies that are unable to meet their financial obligations. It provides a legal framework for orderly winding up, protecting the interests of creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders.

Understanding Section 375 is essential for directors, shareholders, insolvency professionals, and companies to ensure compliance with legal procedures during winding up. It helps in safeguarding rights and minimizing disputes during the dissolution process.

Companies Act Section 375 – Exact Provision

This section clarifies that when the Tribunal orders winding up under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, the winding up provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 will apply in conjunction with the IBC. It ensures that the legal framework for winding up is consistent and integrated with insolvency laws.

  • Applies winding up provisions of Companies Act alongside IBC.

  • Ensures orderly dissolution of insolvent companies.

  • Protects interests of creditors and stakeholders.

  • Facilitates legal clarity during insolvency proceedings.

  • Supports Tribunal’s authority in winding up decisions.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 375

This section states that when a company is wound up by the Tribunal under the IBC, the winding up provisions of the Companies Act apply subject to the IBC’s provisions.

  • Applies to companies ordered to be wound up by the Tribunal.

  • Relevant to directors, creditors, insolvency professionals, and shareholders.

  • Mandates compliance with winding up rules under the Companies Act.

  • Triggered by Tribunal’s winding up order under IBC.

  • Permits integration of Companies Act and IBC procedures.

  • Restricts conflicting provisions by prioritizing IBC rules.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 375

The section aims to harmonize the winding up process under the Companies Act with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. This integration strengthens corporate insolvency resolution and liquidation frameworks.

  • Strengthens corporate governance during insolvency.

  • Protects rights of creditors and stakeholders.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in winding up.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure during insolvency.

When Companies Act Section 375 Applies

This section applies when the Tribunal orders winding up of a company under the IBC, ensuring that Companies Act provisions govern the process alongside the IBC.

  • Applicable to companies under Tribunal’s winding up order.

  • Relevant for insolvency and liquidation proceedings.

  • Triggered by insolvency resolution failure or liquidation order.

  • Excludes voluntary winding up not ordered by Tribunal.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 375

Section 375 creates a legal bridge between the Companies Act and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It imposes duties and procedural requirements on companies and insolvency professionals during winding up. Non-compliance may lead to penalties under both laws. It ensures that winding up under insolvency is conducted with statutory safeguards and approvals.

  • Creates combined compliance duties under Companies Act and IBC.

  • Impacts corporate actions during insolvency and liquidation.

  • Non-compliance can attract penalties and legal consequences.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 375

Compliance with Section 375 is mandatory when winding up is ordered by the Tribunal under the IBC. It is an ongoing obligation throughout the liquidation process. Directors and insolvency professionals must ensure adherence to procedural rules. Internal governance is affected as control shifts to the liquidator under legal supervision.

  • Mandatory compliance during Tribunal-ordered winding up.

  • Ongoing obligation until completion of liquidation.

  • Responsibility lies with liquidators and company officers.

  • Internal governance transitions to liquidator’s control.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the winding up stage initiated by the Tribunal under insolvency proceedings. It governs the liquidation and dissolution phases.

  • Triggered after Tribunal’s winding up order.

  • Applies during liquidation and asset distribution.

  • Relevant during creditor claims and settlements.

  • Ends with company dissolution and removal from register.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 375

Failure to comply with winding up provisions under this section can lead to penalties under the Companies Act and the IBC. These include monetary fines, possible imprisonment for fraudulent conduct, and disqualification of directors. Additional fees and remedial directions may be imposed by the Tribunal or regulatory authorities.

  • Monetary fines for procedural violations.

  • Imprisonment for fraud or misconduct.

  • Disqualification of directors and officers.

  • Additional fees and Tribunal directives.

Example of Companies Act Section 375 in Practical Use

Company X was declared insolvent and the Tribunal ordered its winding up under the IBC. The appointed liquidator followed the Companies Act winding up provisions alongside the IBC rules. Creditors were paid from asset sales, and the company was dissolved legally. This ensured an orderly closure protecting stakeholder interests.

  • Demonstrates integration of Companies Act and IBC in practice.

  • Highlights importance of legal compliance during winding up.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 375

Section 375 was introduced in the Companies Act, 2013 to align winding up procedures with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It replaced older provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, reflecting modern insolvency frameworks. Amendments have refined the interplay between corporate and insolvency laws.

  • Shifted from Companies Act, 1956 to 2013 Act framework.

  • Introduced to harmonize with IBC, 2016.

  • Major reforms to streamline insolvency and winding up.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 375

In 2026, Section 375 remains vital for managing corporate insolvency with digital filings and MCA portal integration. It supports e-governance and compliance trends, aligning with ESG and CSR considerations during winding up. The section ensures transparent and efficient liquidation processes.

  • Supports digital compliance via MCA portal.

  • Facilitates governance reforms in insolvency.

  • Maintains practical importance in corporate restructuring.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 7 – Incorporation of company.

  • Companies Act Section 248 – Power to remove name of company from register.

  • Companies Act Section 434 – Winding up by Tribunal.

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 33 – Liquidation process.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

Case References under Companies Act Section 375

  1. Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India (2019, SCC 130)

    – Affirmed the primacy of IBC over Companies Act in insolvency resolution and winding up.

  2. Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta (2019, SCC 408)

    – Clarified roles of Tribunal and insolvency professionals in winding up under IBC.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 375

  • Section: 375

  • Title: Winding Up by Tribunal under Insolvency Proceedings

  • Category: Insolvency, Corporate Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Insolvency Professionals, Creditors

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory during Tribunal-ordered winding up

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, imprisonment, disqualification

  • Related Filings: MCA portal filings, Tribunal applications

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 375

Companies Act Section 375 plays a critical role in integrating the winding up provisions of the Companies Act with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It ensures that companies undergoing insolvency are wound up in a legally compliant, transparent, and orderly manner. This protects the interests of creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders during a challenging corporate phase.

For directors, insolvency professionals, and companies, understanding Section 375 is essential to navigate the complexities of insolvency and liquidation. It provides clarity on procedural requirements and legal duties, supporting effective corporate governance and compliance in insolvency scenarios.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 375

What does Section 375 of the Companies Act 2013 cover?

Section 375 governs the winding up of companies by the Tribunal under insolvency proceedings, applying Companies Act provisions alongside the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Who must comply with Section 375?

Companies ordered to be wound up by the Tribunal, their directors, insolvency professionals, and creditors must comply with Section 375 during the winding up process.

When does Section 375 apply?

It applies when the Tribunal orders winding up of a company under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, ensuring coordinated legal procedures.

What are the penalties for non-compliance with Section 375?

Penalties include monetary fines, imprisonment for fraud, disqualification of directors, and other remedial actions under the Companies Act and IBC.

How does Section 375 relate to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code?

Section 375 integrates the winding up provisions of the Companies Act with the IBC, ensuring that insolvency proceedings follow a consistent legal framework.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

IPC Section 2 defines the extent of the Indian Penal Code, specifying its application across India except certain regions.

CrPC Section 228 details the procedure for trial of offences committed by public servants in relation to their official duties.

CPC Section 94 details the right to appeal from original decrees and orders in civil suits.

Vidmate is illegal in India due to copyright violations and lack of official licensing for content streaming and downloads.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 54D provides capital gains exemption on compulsory acquisition of industrial land or building.

Online Matka is illegal in India as it is considered a form of gambling under Indian law with strict enforcement and penalties.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 248 defines 'assessee' and related terms for tax proceedings clarity.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 4 defines promissory notes and their essential features under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 231 governs the appointment of special auditors to ensure independent audit compliance.

CPC Section 18 defines the place of suing, specifying where a civil suit can be filed based on defendant's residence or property location.

Discover the legal status of CFDs in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices for trading Contracts for Difference.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 128 defines the proof required to establish a fact, crucial for determining admissibility and relevance in trials.

Knuckles are considered illegal weapons in India under the Arms Act with strict enforcement and penalties.

Yts.Pe is illegal in India as it facilitates piracy and copyright infringement, violating Indian copyright laws.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 19 outlines the procedure for filing complaints before Consumer Commissions to resolve consumer disputes effectively.

Rx drugs are legal in India but require a valid prescription from a licensed medical practitioner.

IPC Section 194 penalizes giving false evidence or fabricating false documents to mislead judicial proceedings.

CrPC Section 442 details the procedure for a person to surrender before a Magistrate and the Magistrate's power to grant bail or remand.

IPC Section 95 defines acts done by a person incapable of judgment as not offenses, protecting those lacking mental capacity.

Eating turtle is illegal in India due to wildlife protection laws that prohibit hunting and consumption of endangered species.

Companies Act 2013 Section 367 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

IPC Section 171A penalizes bribery of public servants to influence their official duties, ensuring integrity in public administration.

Crocin is legal in India as an over-the-counter pain reliever and fever reducer with regulated sale and usage.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 102 empowers income tax authorities to summon persons for inquiry or investigation.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 34 defines the liability of the maker of a promissory note or drawer of a bill of exchange.

Hookah is conditionally legal in India with restrictions on public use, age limits, and licensing under state laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 250 deals with appeals to the Commissioner (Appeals) against income tax orders.

bottom of page