top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 391

Companies Act 2013 Section 391 governs compromise, arrangement, and reconstruction procedures for companies in India.

Companies Act Section 391 deals with the legal framework for compromise, arrangement, and reconstruction of companies. It provides a structured process for companies to reorganize their affairs, settle disputes, or restructure their capital and liabilities. This section is crucial for corporate governance as it ensures that such arrangements are conducted transparently and with the approval of shareholders and creditors.

Understanding Section 391 is essential for directors, shareholders, legal professionals, and companies to navigate mergers, demergers, and other corporate restructuring effectively. It safeguards the interests of all stakeholders and maintains corporate compliance during significant changes.

Companies Act Section 391 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to oversee and approve compromises or arrangements between companies and their stakeholders. It ensures that any such agreement is fair, approved by the majority, and legally binding. The process protects minority interests and maintains corporate stability during restructuring.

  • Applies to compromises or arrangements with creditors or members.

  • Requires Tribunal approval after majority consent.

  • Ensures binding effect on all stakeholders once sanctioned.

  • Facilitates corporate restructuring and dispute resolution.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 391

Section 391 outlines the procedure for companies to seek approval for compromises or arrangements with creditors or members through the Tribunal.

  • States that companies or stakeholders can apply to the Tribunal for meetings.

  • Applies to companies, creditors, and members involved in the arrangement.

  • Mandates calling of meetings to approve the proposed compromise or arrangement.

  • Requires approval by a majority in number and three-fourths in value.

  • Allows the Tribunal to sanction the arrangement, making it binding.

  • Prohibits arrangements without Tribunal approval.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 391

The section aims to provide a transparent and legally enforceable framework for corporate restructuring and dispute resolution.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by involving the Tribunal.

  • Protects shareholders and creditors during restructuring.

  • Ensures transparency and fairness in compromise or arrangement.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate restructuring processes.

When Companies Act Section 391 Applies

This section applies when a company proposes a compromise or arrangement with creditors or members requiring legal sanction.

  • Applicable to all companies seeking restructuring or compromise.

  • Must be triggered by a formal proposal from company or stakeholders.

  • Applies during mergers, demergers, or financial restructuring.

  • Exemptions are rare; Tribunal involvement is mandatory.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 391

Section 391 creates a legal duty to obtain Tribunal approval for compromises or arrangements. It restricts companies from implementing such agreements without sanction. Non-compliance can invalidate arrangements and invite legal challenges. The provision interacts with MCA rules governing filings and disclosures related to restructuring.

  • Creates binding effect of sanctioned arrangements on all stakeholders.

  • Requires disclosures and filings with the Tribunal and Registrar.

  • Non-compliance may lead to nullification of arrangements.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 391

Compliance with Section 391 is mandatory and involves a one-time process per arrangement. Directors and officers must ensure proper application to the Tribunal and conduct meetings as ordered. It impacts internal governance by requiring transparency and stakeholder approval.

  • Mandatory compliance for restructuring arrangements.

  • One-time obligation per compromise or arrangement.

  • Responsibility lies with company directors and officers.

  • Requires coordination with legal and financial advisors.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 391 applies primarily during the restructuring or compromise proposal stage and continues through approval and filing stages.

  • Triggered after board decision to propose arrangement.

  • Involves calling meetings of creditors or members.

  • Requires Tribunal hearing and sanction stage.

  • Continues with filing and disclosure post-sanction.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 391

Failure to comply with Section 391 can lead to invalidation of arrangements, penalties under the Act, and possible legal action. While imprisonment is uncommon, monetary fines and disqualification of officers may occur.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance.

  • Possible disqualification of directors.

  • Invalidation of unsanctioned arrangements.

  • Additional remedial directions by Tribunal.

Example of Companies Act Section 391 in Practical Use

Company X faced financial difficulties and proposed a compromise with creditors to restructure debt. The directors applied to the NCLT under Section 391 to call creditor meetings. After approval by the required majority and Tribunal sanction, the arrangement became binding. This allowed Company X to continue operations and avoid liquidation.

  • Demonstrates legal restructuring process.

  • Shows protection of creditor and company interests.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 391

Section 391 replaces provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, consolidating compromise and arrangement procedures. Introduced in the 2013 Act to streamline corporate restructuring and enhance Tribunal oversight, it reflects modern corporate governance needs.

  • Replaces earlier Companies Act, 1956 provisions.

  • Introduced to empower NCLT for efficient resolution.

  • Incorporates lessons from judicial precedents and reforms.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 391

In 2026, Section 391 remains vital for corporate restructuring amid evolving business challenges. Digital filings via MCA portal and e-governance facilitate compliance. The section aligns with ESG and CSR trends by ensuring responsible restructuring.

  • Supports digital compliance and filings.

  • Enhances governance reforms through Tribunal oversight.

  • Maintains practical importance in corporate restructuring.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 394 – Power of Tribunal to enforce compromise or arrangement.

  • Companies Act Section 395 – Power of Tribunal to enforce compromise or arrangement in case of amalgamation.

  • Companies Act Section 396 – Power of Tribunal to enforce compromise or arrangement in case of amalgamation.

  • Companies Act Section 100 – Meetings of creditors and members.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 391

  1. In Re: Hindustan Steel Ltd. (1979) 57 Comp Cas 538

    – Established principles on approval of compromise by creditors and Tribunal sanction.

  2. Re: Ashapura Minechem Ltd. (2010) 101 SCL 1 (Bom)

    – Clarified the scope of Tribunal powers under Section 391.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 391

  • Section: 391

  • Title: Power of Court to enforce compromise or arrangement

  • Category: Corporate restructuring, governance, compliance

  • Applies To: Companies, creditors, members, Tribunal

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, one-time per arrangement

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, invalidation, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Tribunal applications, meeting notices, sanction orders

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 391

Companies Act Section 391 is a cornerstone provision for corporate restructuring in India. It ensures that compromises and arrangements between companies and their stakeholders are conducted transparently and with legal oversight. The involvement of the Tribunal safeguards minority interests and maintains corporate stability during significant changes.

For directors, shareholders, and professionals, understanding and complying with Section 391 is essential to navigate mergers, demergers, and financial restructurings effectively. The section balances flexibility in corporate management with protection for all parties involved.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 391

What is the main purpose of Section 391?

Section 391 provides a legal framework for companies to seek approval for compromises or arrangements with creditors or members through the Tribunal, ensuring fairness and binding effect.

Who can apply to the Tribunal under Section 391?

The company itself or any creditor or member involved in the proposed compromise or arrangement can apply to the Tribunal to call meetings and seek approval.

Is Tribunal approval mandatory for compromises under Section 391?

Yes, any compromise or arrangement must be sanctioned by the Tribunal after approval by the required majority to be legally binding.

What happens if a company implements an arrangement without Tribunal sanction?

Such an arrangement may be declared invalid, and the company may face penalties or legal challenges for non-compliance with Section 391.

Does Section 391 apply to all companies?

Yes, it applies to all companies proposing compromises or arrangements with creditors or members that require legal sanction through the Tribunal.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Pitbulls are conditionally legal in India with restrictions and local regulations varying by state and city.

IT Act Section 25 addresses penalties for failure to protect sensitive personal data or information under the IT Act, 2000.

Contract Act 1872 Section 8 defines the communication, acceptance, and revocation of proposals in contract formation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 187 governs the inspection of registers and documents by members and others.

Contract Act 1872 Section 10 explains when an agreement becomes a legally valid and enforceable contract.

CrPC Section 446 details the procedure for the disposal of property forfeited to the government after conviction.

Online games earning money are conditionally legal in India with regulations on betting, skill, and prize distribution.

Rave parties in India face strict legal restrictions and are often considered illegal due to drug and noise laws.

Street performing is conditionally legal in India, subject to local permissions and regulations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 108 covers the burden of proof when a person is in possession of stolen property, presuming guilt unless explained.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 25 details the powers of the District Commission in consumer dispute resolution.

In India, a purchase order is a legally binding document once accepted by the seller.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 117 governs the procedure for filing revised income tax returns by taxpayers.

Microfinance is legal in India, regulated by RBI and other bodies with specific rules for lending and operations.

IPC Section 124 defines sedition, penalizing acts that incite hatred or contempt against the government.

Companies Act 2013 Section 323 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Weed was illegal in India before 1985 under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 291 prescribes penalties for failure to comply with TDS provisions and related defaults.

Skydiving is legal in India with strict regulations and licensed operators ensuring safety and compliance.

Liposuction is legal in India with regulations ensuring it is performed by qualified medical professionals in approved facilities.

CrPC Section 352 defines punishment for assault or use of criminal force without grave injury, detailing legal consequences.

IPC Section 485 addresses the offence of lurking house-trespass or house-breaking in the night, focusing on unlawful entry with intent.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 255 empowers the Commissioner (Appeals) to dismiss appeals under specified conditions.

IPC Section 66 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to extort property or valuable security.

IPC Section 305 addresses abetment of suicide by a child or insane person, outlining punishment and legal scope.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 37 details the powers of the Consumer Commission to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses and production of documents.

Companies Act 2013 Section 253 governs the power of the Central Government to remove names of companies from the register.

bottom of page