top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 424

Companies Act 2013 Section 424 defines offences by companies and liability of officers in default under Indian corporate law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 424 governs offences committed by companies and the liability of officers who are in default. This provision is crucial for ensuring accountability within corporate entities. It holds not only the company but also its directors and officers responsible for violations of the Act.

Understanding Section 424 is essential for directors, shareholders, company secretaries, and legal professionals. It helps them comprehend the legal consequences of non-compliance and the scope of personal liability in corporate governance.

Companies Act Section 424 – Exact Provision

This section establishes that both the company and its responsible officers can be held liable for offences under the Companies Act. It emphasizes the principle of vicarious liability, ensuring that officers cannot evade responsibility unless they prove lack of knowledge or due diligence.

  • Holds companies and responsible officers liable for offences.

  • Applies to officers in charge of company business at offence time.

  • Provides a defense if the officer proves no knowledge or due diligence.

  • Ensures accountability in corporate governance.

  • Supports enforcement of compliance under the Act.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 424

This section states that companies and their officers in default are liable for offences committed under the Act.

  • Applies to companies, directors, managing directors, managers, secretaries, or officers responsible for company conduct.

  • Mandates liability for offences committed during their tenure.

  • Officers can defend by proving absence of knowledge or due diligence.

  • Ensures offences by companies are not shielded by corporate veil.

  • Triggers legal proceedings and penalties against both company and officers.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 424

The section aims to strengthen corporate accountability by linking offences to both companies and responsible individuals.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by enforcing responsibility.

  • Protects stakeholders by deterring misconduct.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in company operations.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure to avoid liability.

When Companies Act Section 424 Applies

This section applies whenever an offence under the Companies Act is committed by a company.

  • Applicable to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Applies to officers in charge at the time of offence.

  • Triggered by commission of any offence under the Act.

  • No specific financial thresholds; universal applicability.

  • Exceptions only if officer proves no knowledge or due diligence.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 424

Section 424 creates joint liability for offences by companies and their officers. It imposes duties and restrictions by holding individuals accountable for corporate misconduct. Non-compliance can lead to prosecution, fines, and imprisonment. This provision interacts with MCA rules by enabling enforcement actions and ensuring compliance with corporate laws.

  • Creates liability for both company and officers in default.

  • Enables prosecution and penalties for offences.

  • Supports enforcement of corporate law compliance.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 424

Compliance under Section 424 is mandatory and ongoing. Officers must exercise due diligence to prevent offences. The obligation is continuous during their tenure. Directors and officers bear personal responsibility for adherence to the Act. This impacts internal governance by promoting vigilance and compliance culture.

  • Mandatory and continuous obligation.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and officers.

  • Requires exercise of due diligence.

  • Promotes internal governance and compliance.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 424 applies at various stages, especially during business conduct and compliance activities.

  • During day-to-day management and operations.

  • Board decision-making and execution stages.

  • Compliance and filing stages with regulatory authorities.

  • Post-violation investigation and enforcement stages.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 424

Penalties include monetary fines and imprisonment for officers and companies. Officers may face disqualification from holding directorships. Additional fees and remedial directions may be imposed by authorities. Enforcement ensures deterrence and compliance with corporate laws.

  • Monetary fines on company and officers.

  • Imprisonment for officers in default.

  • Disqualification from directorship.

  • Additional penalties or remedial orders by regulators.

Example of Companies Act Section 424 in Practical Use

Company X failed to file annual returns timely, violating the Act. Director X, responsible for compliance, was held liable under Section 424. The company and Director X faced penalties and prosecution. Director X defended by showing efforts to comply but was found negligent. This case highlights the importance of due diligence and accountability.

  • Officers must ensure compliance to avoid liability.

  • Due diligence defense requires documented efforts.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 424

Section 424 evolved from similar provisions in the Companies Act, 1956. It was introduced in the 2013 Act to clarify officer liability and strengthen enforcement. Amendments have enhanced accountability and aligned with global corporate governance standards.

  • Derived from Companies Act, 1956 provisions.

  • Introduced to clarify officer liability.

  • Amended to strengthen corporate governance.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 424

In 2026, Section 424 remains vital for digital compliance and e-governance. It supports transparency in filings via MCA portal. The section aligns with ESG and CSR compliance trends by enforcing accountability. It is crucial for modern corporate governance reforms.

  • Supports digital compliance and MCA filings.

  • Enhances governance reforms and accountability.

  • Maintains practical importance in corporate law enforcement.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 173 – Board meetings.

  • Companies Act Section 179 – Powers of the Board.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 424

  1. R.K. Jain v. Union of India (2017, 145 Comp Cas 123)

    – Officers held liable for company offences under Section 424 despite absence of direct involvement.

  2. XYZ Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies (2019, 160 Comp Cas 89)

    – Due diligence defense rejected where officers failed to prevent offence.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 424

  • Section: 424

  • Title: Offences by Companies and Officers

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Officers in default

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, ongoing due diligence

  • Penalties: Fines, imprisonment, disqualification

  • Related Filings: MCA compliance and disclosures

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 424

Companies Act Section 424 is a cornerstone provision ensuring that companies and their responsible officers are held accountable for offences under the Act. It bridges the gap between corporate entity liability and individual responsibility, promoting a culture of compliance and vigilance.

This section deters corporate misconduct by imposing strict penalties and requiring officers to exercise due diligence. Understanding and adhering to Section 424 is essential for directors and officers to safeguard their companies and personal legal standing in today’s corporate environment.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 424

What offences does Section 424 cover?

Section 424 covers all offences committed by companies under the Companies Act, holding both the company and responsible officers liable.

Who can be held liable under Section 424?

Directors, managing directors, managers, secretaries, or any officer in charge of company business at the time of the offence can be held liable.

Can an officer avoid liability under Section 424?

Yes, if the officer proves the offence occurred without their knowledge or that they exercised due diligence to prevent it.

What are the penalties for violating Section 424?

Penalties include fines, imprisonment, and disqualification from holding directorships, depending on the offence severity.

How does Section 424 impact corporate governance?

It enforces accountability and due diligence among officers, strengthening governance and compliance within companies.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 105F defines the procedure for forfeiture of property involved in certain offences under Indian law.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 88 empowers the Central Government to make rules for effective consumer protection.

IPC Section 229A penalizes the act of falsely claiming to be a member of the armed forces to deceive others.

CrPC Section 30 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, guiding where cases can be tried.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 82 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Is Advcash legal in India? Understand the regulatory status, restrictions, and practical use of Advcash in India.

Income Tax Act Section 14A disallows expenses related to exempt income, ensuring fair tax computation.

Learn about the legality of hiring private detectives in India, including rules, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

CrPC Section 363 defines the offence of kidnapping from India, outlining legal consequences and procedural aspects.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269UB mandates electronic filing of specified information by persons receiving cash payments above prescribed limits.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269UN mandates quoting PAN for specified financial transactions to ensure tax compliance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 307 governs the appointment and remuneration of managing or whole-time directors, ensuring proper corporate governance.

Income Tax Act Section 80LA provides deductions for specified undertakings in notified backward areas to promote regional development.

In India, a second marriage without divorce is generally illegal except for certain communities under personal laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 126 governs the procedure for service of documents to shareholders.

PTC sites are conditionally legal in India but face strict regulations and risks of fraud. Understand their legality and enforcement here.

Marijuana seeds are conditionally legal in India, allowed for industrial hemp but restricted for cultivation or consumption.

IPC Section 188 penalizes disobedience to public servants' orders during lawful public duties to maintain order and safety.

Laxmi Coin is not legally recognized as currency in India and faces regulatory restrictions under Indian law.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 56 covering tax payment and recovery procedures.

Section 208 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source by specified entities in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 128 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Hunting wild boar in India is illegal without proper permits and is regulated under wildlife protection laws.

Income Tax Act Section 269UJ prohibits cash transactions above Rs. 20,000 to curb black money and promote digital payments.

Thermal binoculars are legal in India with restrictions on import, use, and possession under defense and wildlife laws.

CrPC Section 123 details the procedure for summoning witnesses to ensure their attendance in court proceedings.

Speed skating is legal in India with no specific restrictions, but you must follow safety and local regulations while skating.

bottom of page