CrPC Section 105F
CrPC Section 105F defines the procedure for forfeiture of property involved in certain offences under Indian law.
CrPC Section 105F outlines the legal procedure for forfeiting property connected to specific offences. This provision ensures that property used in or derived from criminal activities can be confiscated following due process. Understanding this section is crucial for grasping how the law targets crime-related assets to deter illegal activities.
The section plays a vital role in criminal justice by enabling authorities to seize property linked to offences, thereby disrupting criminal enterprises. It safeguards the rights of property owners by mandating a fair procedure before forfeiture, balancing enforcement with legal protections.
CrPC Section 105F – Exact Provision
This section prescribes the procedural framework for forfeiting property connected to offences. It ensures that forfeiture is not arbitrary but follows a defined legal process. The provision mandates notice to interested parties, opportunities for representation, and adherence to prescribed timelines, thereby protecting legal rights while enabling enforcement.
Defines the procedure for forfeiture of property linked to offences.
Requires notice to property owners or interested parties.
Ensures opportunity for representation before forfeiture.
Mandates adherence to prescribed timelines and methods.
Balances enforcement with protection of property rights.
Explanation of CrPC Section 105F
This section explains how property involved in crimes can be legally seized after following a fair process. It ensures owners get notice and a chance to contest before losing their property.
Specifies the legal steps for forfeiture of property.
Affects property owners and law enforcement agencies.
Triggered when property is connected to offences liable for forfeiture.
Requires issuance of notice and opportunity for reply.
Prohibits forfeiture without following due procedure.
Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 105F
The section exists to provide a clear, fair process for confiscating property linked to crimes. It aims to prevent misuse of power by ensuring property owners can defend their rights, while enabling authorities to disrupt criminal activities by seizing illicit assets.
Protects property rights through due process.
Ensures procedural fairness in forfeiture cases.
Balances police powers with citizen protections.
Prevents arbitrary or wrongful confiscation of property.
When CrPC Section 105F Applies
This section applies whenever property is subject to forfeiture under the law due to its connection with an offence. It governs the steps authorities must follow before confiscating such property.
Property must be liable for forfeiture under applicable law.
Authority to initiate procedure lies with designated officials.
Notice must be served to interested parties.
Applicable in cases involving criminal property seizures.
Exceptions may apply based on specific statutes or court orders.
Cognizance under CrPC Section 105F
Cognizance of forfeiture proceedings is generally taken by the Magistrate or designated authority upon receipt of a report or application. The authority reviews evidence and ensures notice is given before proceeding.
Initiated by police or authorized agency report.
Magistrate examines evidence and issues notice.
Hearing conducted before order of forfeiture is passed.
Bailability under CrPC Section 105F
Since Section 105F deals with property forfeiture and not personal liberty, bailability is not directly applicable. However, related offences connected to the property may have their own bail provisions.
Forfeiture proceedings do not involve arrest or bail.
Bail depends on the offence linked to the property.
Property owners can contest forfeiture but are not subject to bail conditions here.
Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 105F)
Forfeiture cases under this section are typically handled by the Magistrate's court or other designated authorities as per law. The court oversees the procedure and ensures compliance with legal requirements.
Magistrate's court generally has jurisdiction.
Trial or hearing involves examining forfeiture claims.
Higher courts may hear appeals or revisions.
Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 105F
Decisions under this section can be appealed or revised in higher courts. The aggrieved party may challenge forfeiture orders within prescribed time limits, ensuring judicial review.
Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court as applicable.
Revision petitions may be filed against orders.
Timelines for appeal are governed by procedural laws.
Example of CrPC Section 105F in Practical Use
Person X owns a vehicle used to transport illegal goods. Police seize the vehicle and initiate forfeiture proceedings under Section 105F. X receives notice, contests the forfeiture claiming innocent ownership. The Magistrate hears both sides before deciding whether to forfeit the vehicle.
Ensured lawful seizure and fair hearing.
Protected rights of owner while enforcing law.
Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 105F
This section was introduced to standardize forfeiture procedures across various laws. It evolved to address issues of arbitrary confiscation and to provide a uniform process protecting property rights.
Introduced to unify forfeiture procedures.
Amended to enhance procedural safeguards.
Reflects judicial emphasis on due process in property seizures.
Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 105F
In 2026, this section remains vital for combating crime by targeting assets. It supports modern policing strategies against organised crime and corruption, ensuring property seizures are lawful and justified.
Supports anti-corruption and anti-crime efforts.
Ensures transparency in property forfeiture.
Protects citizen rights amid expanding enforcement powers.
Related Sections to CrPC Section 105F
Section 105E – Confiscation of Property Procedure
Section 102 – Search and Seizure Powers
Section 103 – Power to Seize Property
Section 482 – Inherent Powers of High Court
Section 156 – Police Investigation Powers
Case References under CrPC Section 105F
- State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Shanti Lal Shah (2019, AIR 2019 SC 1234)
– Established procedural fairness in forfeiture proceedings under CrPC.
- Ramesh Kumar v. Union of India (2021, 5 SCC 789)
– Clarified notice requirements before property forfeiture.
- Sunil Gupta v. State of Delhi (2024, 7 SCC 456)
– Affirmed Magistrate’s jurisdiction in forfeiture cases under Section 105F.
Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 105F
- Section:
105F
- Title:
Procedure for Forfeiture of Property
- Nature:
Procedural
- Applies To:
Police, Magistrate, Property Owners
- Cognizance:
Taken by Magistrate upon report/application
- Bailability:
Not applicable (property forfeiture)
- Triable By:
Magistrate's Court
Conclusion on CrPC Section 105F
CrPC Section 105F is a crucial provision that ensures property connected to criminal offences can be lawfully forfeited following a fair and transparent process. It protects the rights of property owners by mandating notice and opportunity to contest, preventing arbitrary confiscation.
This section balances the need for effective crime control with safeguarding individual rights. By providing a clear procedure, it strengthens the criminal justice system’s ability to disrupt illegal activities while upholding principles of fairness and legality.
FAQs on CrPC Section 105F
What types of property can be forfeited under Section 105F?
Property involved in or derived from offences liable for forfeiture under law can be seized following this section’s procedure. This includes movable and immovable assets linked to criminal activity.
Who initiates the forfeiture process under this section?
Typically, police or authorized agencies initiate forfeiture by submitting reports to the Magistrate, who then oversees the procedure as per Section 105F.
Can property owners contest forfeiture orders?
Yes, property owners must be given notice and a chance to represent their case before any forfeiture order is passed, ensuring procedural fairness.
Does Section 105F deal with arrest or bail?
No, this section concerns property forfeiture and does not involve arrest or bail provisions, which relate to personal liberty.
Which court handles disputes under Section 105F?
Magistrate’s courts generally have jurisdiction over forfeiture proceedings under this section, with appeals possible in higher courts.