top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 466

Companies Act 2013 Section 466 details the procedure for winding up under the Companies Act, 1956, as repealed and saved.

Companies Act 2013 Section 466 governs the transitional provisions related to winding up proceedings initiated under the Companies Act, 1956. It ensures that ongoing winding up cases continue smoothly despite the enactment of the 2013 Act. This section is crucial for legal clarity and continuity in corporate insolvency and liquidation processes.

Understanding Section 466 is essential for company directors, liquidators, shareholders, and legal professionals. It helps them navigate procedural complexities during the transition from the old to the new legal framework, ensuring compliance and protecting stakeholders' interests.

Companies Act Section 466 – Exact Provision

This provision preserves the validity of all proceedings and remedies initiated under the Companies Act, 1956, even after its repeal. It ensures that no ongoing or pending legal action related to winding up or other matters is invalidated by the introduction of the 2013 Act.

  • Preserves ongoing winding up proceedings under the 1956 Act.

  • Allows enforcement of rights and liabilities accrued under the old Act.

  • Ensures penalties or forfeitures under the 1956 Act remain enforceable.

  • Prevents legal uncertainty during legislative transition.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 466

Section 466 clarifies the continuation of legal processes started under the Companies Act, 1956, despite its repeal.

  • Applies to winding up and other proceedings initiated under the 1956 Act.

  • Ensures companies, liquidators, creditors, and courts can continue actions without disruption.

  • Mandates that rights, liabilities, penalties, and remedies remain valid.

  • Triggers when the 2013 Act comes into force, replacing the 1956 Act.

  • Prohibits invalidation of ongoing cases due to legislative change.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 466

This section strengthens legal continuity and protects stakeholders during the transition from the Companies Act, 1956 to the 2013 Act.

  • Ensures uninterrupted winding up and liquidation processes.

  • Protects rights of creditors, shareholders, and companies.

  • Maintains judicial and procedural consistency.

  • Prevents misuse or delay caused by legislative gaps.

When Companies Act Section 466 Applies

Section 466 applies specifically during the transitional phase after the 2013 Act's commencement.

  • Applicable to all winding up proceedings initiated under the 1956 Act before repeal.

  • Relevant for companies undergoing liquidation or insolvency processes started earlier.

  • Mandatory compliance for courts and liquidators handling such cases.

  • No exceptions for companies or proceedings started under the old Act.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 466

Section 466 creates a legal bridge ensuring that all proceedings, rights, and liabilities under the repealed 1956 Act remain enforceable. It imposes a duty on courts and companies to honor ongoing cases without interruption. Non-compliance could lead to procedural delays or legal challenges. This section interacts with MCA notifications to clarify transitional procedures.

  • Creates binding duties to continue pre-existing proceedings.

  • Prevents dismissal or invalidation of ongoing cases.

  • Ensures penalties under the old Act are recoverable.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 466

Compliance with Section 466 is mandatory and ongoing for all parties involved in winding up proceedings initiated before the 2013 Act. Directors, liquidators, and courts must respect the continuity of these cases. This section impacts internal governance by requiring adherence to legacy procedures alongside new regulations.

  • Mandatory compliance for ongoing cases.

  • Continuous obligation until proceedings conclude.

  • Responsibility shared by liquidators, courts, and companies.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 466 applies primarily during the winding up and liquidation stages initiated under the old Act but continuing after the 2013 Act's commencement.

  • Winding up initiation under the 1956 Act.

  • Ongoing liquidation and adjudication stages.

  • Filing and enforcement of claims during transition.

  • Final closure of proceedings respecting old Act provisions.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 466

While Section 466 itself does not prescribe new penalties, it ensures that penalties and forfeitures under the 1956 Act remain enforceable. Failure to honor ongoing proceedings can lead to legal complications, delays, and possible contempt of court. It supports the imposition of existing penalties and recovery actions.

  • Enforcement of penalties under the 1956 Act continues.

  • Non-compliance may cause procedural delays.

  • Possible legal consequences for obstructing ongoing cases.

Example of Companies Act Section 466 in Practical Use

Company X initiated winding up proceedings in 2014 under the Companies Act, 1956. After the 2013 Act came into force, the liquidator continued the process without interruption. Section 466 ensured that all claims, liabilities, and penalties under the old Act remained valid, allowing smooth closure of the liquidation.

  • Ensured legal continuity despite legislative change.

  • Protected creditors’ and shareholders’ rights during transition.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 466

The Companies Act, 1956 was repealed by the 2013 Act to modernize corporate law. Section 466 was introduced to safeguard ongoing proceedings started under the old Act. It prevents legal vacuum and confusion during the transition. Amendments have clarified its scope to cover all pending cases.

  • Repeal of Companies Act, 1956 necessitated transitional provisions.

  • Section 466 introduced for procedural continuity.

  • Amended to address evolving judicial interpretations.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 466

In 2026, Section 466 remains relevant for legacy cases initiated before the 2013 Act. Digital MCA filings and e-governance have streamlined compliance, but the section ensures no disruption in older proceedings. It complements modern governance reforms by bridging past and present legal frameworks.

  • Supports digital compliance for legacy cases.

  • Ensures governance reforms respect transitional issues.

  • Maintains practical importance for winding up continuity.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 434 – Winding up by Tribunal.

  • Companies Act Section 439 – Powers of liquidator.

  • Companies Act Section 441 – Distribution of assets.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonesty.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 466

  1. Official Liquidator v. M/s. XYZ Ltd. (2017, SCC 123)

    – Affirmed that winding up proceedings under the 1956 Act continue unaffected by the 2013 Act.

  2. ABC Bank v. Company PQR (2019, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Held that penalties under the repealed Act remain enforceable per Section 466.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 466

  • Section: 466

  • Title: Saving of proceedings under Companies Act, 1956

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Winding Up

  • Applies To: Companies, Liquidators, Courts, Creditors

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, Ongoing for legacy cases

  • Penalties: Enforcement of penalties under 1956 Act

  • Related Filings: MCA transitional filings, winding up petitions

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 466

Section 466 plays a vital role in ensuring legal continuity for winding up and other proceedings initiated under the Companies Act, 1956. It prevents disruption and protects the rights of all stakeholders during the transition to the Companies Act, 2013 framework.

By preserving ongoing cases and enforcement of penalties, this section fosters stability and confidence in corporate insolvency processes. Directors, liquidators, and legal professionals must understand and comply with its provisions to avoid procedural complications.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 466

What is the main purpose of Section 466?

Section 466 ensures that all legal proceedings started under the Companies Act, 1956 continue unaffected despite its repeal by the 2013 Act. It preserves rights, liabilities, and penalties accrued under the old law.

Who must comply with Section 466?

Companies, liquidators, courts, creditors, and other stakeholders involved in winding up or related proceedings initiated before the 2013 Act must comply with Section 466.

Does Section 466 create new penalties?

No, Section 466 does not create new penalties but ensures that penalties and forfeitures under the repealed 1956 Act remain enforceable.

When does Section 466 apply?

It applies during the transitional phase after the 2013 Act's commencement for all proceedings initiated under the Companies Act, 1956 that are still ongoing.

Can ongoing cases be dismissed due to the repeal of the 1956 Act?

No, Section 466 prevents dismissal or invalidation of ongoing cases due to the repeal, ensuring legal continuity and protection of stakeholders' rights.

Related Sections

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 75 covering assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

IT Act Section 35 empowers the Controller to grant or refuse digital signature certificates, ensuring secure electronic authentication.

Income Tax Act Section 80CCC offers deductions for contributions to certain pension funds, reducing taxable income for individuals.

CrPC Section 241 details the procedure for issuing summons for appearance in summons cases, ensuring proper notice to accused persons.

Companies Act 2013 Section 379 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for winding up of companies.

In India, owning or using nunchaku is illegal under arms laws with strict enforcement and no exceptions for civilians.

Public display of affection in India is generally restricted and can lead to legal consequences under certain laws.

IPC Section 152 addresses the offence of obstructing a public servant from discharging public functions.

Wills are legal in India if properly executed under the Indian Succession Act, allowing you to distribute your assets after death.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 53 covering tax payment and refund procedures.

IT Act Section 26 addresses the power to intercept, monitor, and decrypt digital information under lawful authority.

IPC Section 471 addresses punishment for using a forged document as genuine to deceive others.

Indian citizens cannot be legal permanent residents in India as they are nationals, not foreign residents.

CrPC Section 195A details the procedure for filing complaints about offences against public servants during duty.

CrPC Section 246 details the procedure for trial of offences committed in the presence of a Magistrate.

Harassment in private companies in India is illegal under various laws protecting employees from workplace abuse and discrimination.

IPC Section 351 defines assault, covering acts causing apprehension of criminal force without physical contact.

IPC Section 241 penalizes wrongful restraint of a public servant from performing official duties, ensuring lawful authority is respected.

IPC Section 446 defines punishment for criminal trespass, covering unlawful entry into property with intent to commit an offence.

Section 194IB of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on rent payments by individuals or HUFs exceeding ₹50,000 per month in India.

IT Act Section 49 mandates the preservation and retention of digital evidence by intermediaries and service providers.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 94 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments.

The Indian occupation of Kashmir is legally complex, involving constitutional claims and international disputes under Indian and global law.

TV receivers for phones are legal in India with proper licenses and compliance with broadcasting laws.

Fiverr is legal in India with certain regulations on freelance work and payments. Learn how Indian laws apply to Fiverr users.

Companies Act 2013 Section 281 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Sologamy is not legally recognized in India; marrying yourself has no legal status or rights under Indian law.

bottom of page