top of page

IPC Section 171G

IPC Section 171G penalizes the promotion or attempt to promote feelings of enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc.

IPC Section 171G addresses acts that promote feelings of enmity or hatred between different groups in India. These groups may be distinguished by religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, or other factors. The section aims to prevent actions that could disturb public harmony by inciting hostility or ill will among communities. Understanding this section is crucial in a diverse country like India, where maintaining peace among various social groups is essential for national unity.

This provision plays a significant role in curbing hate speech and preventing communal tensions. It helps law enforcement agencies and courts to take action against individuals or groups who deliberately spread animosity and disrupt social peace. IPC Section 171G thus acts as a legal safeguard to uphold harmony and protect the secular fabric of the nation.

IPC Section 171G – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section makes it a punishable offence to encourage hostility or hatred between different groups based on various social or cultural distinctions. The law covers both actual promotion and attempts to promote such feelings. The punishment can include imprisonment, a fine, or both, depending on the severity of the act.

  • Penalizes promoting enmity or hatred between groups.

  • Applies to religion, race, birthplace, language, caste, community, and more.

  • Includes attempts to promote such feelings.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

Purpose of IPC Section 171G

The primary objective of IPC Section 171G is to maintain public order and communal harmony in India. By criminalizing acts that incite hatred or enmity between different groups, the law seeks to prevent communal riots, violence, and social unrest. It promotes peaceful coexistence and safeguards the unity and integrity of the nation.

  • Prevent communal and social tensions.

  • Protect peace and public order.

  • Promote harmony among diverse groups.

Cognizance under IPC Section 171G

Cognizance of offences under Section 171G can be taken by courts upon receiving a complaint or police report. Since the offence relates to public order, it is generally cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate without magistrate's permission.

  • Court takes cognizance based on police report or complaint.

  • Cases may be initiated suo moto by authorities in some situations.

Bail under IPC Section 171G

Offences under IPC Section 171G are generally non-bailable due to their potential impact on public order. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Bail is not a matter of right; court’s discretion applies.

  • Severity of the act and public interest are considered.

  • Courts may impose conditions to prevent further promotion of enmity.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 171G are triable by Magistrate courts. Depending on the seriousness and connected offences, Sessions Courts may also have jurisdiction.

  • Magistrate courts handle most cases initially.

  • Sessions Court may try cases involving serious consequences.

  • Special courts may be involved if linked to other offences.

Example of IPC Section 171G in Use

Suppose a person delivers a public speech inciting hatred against a particular religious community, urging others to boycott them. This act promotes enmity between groups on religious grounds. If charged under Section 171G, the accused may face imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if the speech was merely a criticism without promoting hatred or enmity, the section would not apply, showing the importance of intent and effect.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 171G

Section 171G was introduced to address rising communal tensions during the colonial period and post-independence India. It evolved as part of the IPC amendments to strengthen laws against hate speech and maintain social order.

  • Introduced during IPC amendments in the mid-20th century.

  • Strengthened after communal riots in the 1960s and 1980s.

  • Key cases shaped interpretation of 'promotion' and 'attempts'.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 171G

In 2025, IPC Section 171G remains vital in curbing hate speech, especially with the rise of social media platforms. Courts have interpreted the section to include online acts promoting enmity. It supports efforts to maintain peace in a digitally connected society.

  • Applies to online and offline promotion of enmity.

  • Courts emphasize balance between free speech and public order.

  • Supports government initiatives against hate crimes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 171G

  • Section 153A – Promoting enmity between different groups.

  • Section 295A – Deliberate acts outraging religious feelings.

  • Section 505 – Statements conducing to public mischief.

  • Section 298 – Uttering words with deliberate intent to wound religious feelings.

  • Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.

Case References under IPC Section 171G

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Shanti Lal Shah (1996, AIR 2378, SC)

    – The Court held that promoting enmity includes acts that incite hatred likely to disturb public peace.

  2. Ramji Lal Modi v. State of U.P. (1957, AIR 620, SC)

    – Defined the scope of 'attempt to promote' enmity and emphasized intent behind the act.

  3. Arup Bhuyan v. State of Assam (2011, AIR 254, SC)

    – Recognized the applicability of Section 171G to online content promoting hostility.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 171G

  • Section:

    171G

  • Title:

    Promoting Enmity Between Groups

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court / Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 171G

IPC Section 171G plays a crucial role in preserving communal harmony and public order in India. By penalizing acts that promote enmity between different groups, it helps prevent social unrest and violence. Its broad scope covers various grounds such as religion, race, language, and community, reflecting the country's diversity.

In the modern context, this section is increasingly important due to the spread of hate speech through digital media. Courts continue to interpret it to balance freedom of expression with the need to maintain peace. Overall, Section 171G is a vital legal tool to uphold India's secular and pluralistic values.

FAQs on IPC Section 171G

What types of groups are protected under IPC Section 171G?

The section protects groups distinguished by religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste, community, or any other ground, preventing promotion of enmity among them.

Is IPC Section 171G applicable to online speech?

Yes, courts have held that promotion of enmity through social media or other online platforms falls within the ambit of Section 171G.

Can a person be punished for attempting to promote enmity?

Yes, both actual promotion and attempts to promote feelings of enmity or hatred are punishable under this section.

Is the offence under Section 171G bailable?

The offence is generally non-bailable, but bail may be granted at the court's discretion depending on the case circumstances.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 171G?

Typically, Magistrate courts try these offences, but Sessions Courts may have jurisdiction for serious cases or connected offences.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 271 governs the power of the Registrar to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 72 about inspection, search, and seizure procedures under GST.

Understand the legality of Akrapovic exhaust systems in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 39 outlines the procedure for filing complaints before Consumer Commissions, ensuring accessible dispute resolution.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 265 deals with penalties for failure to comply with TDS provisions under the Act.

Comprehensive guide to Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 62 on provisional assessment and its impact on GST compliance.

Moosad is not a recognized legal entity in India; understand its status and related legal implications here.

Contract Act 1872 Section 56 explains the law of frustration and when contracts become void due to impossible performance.

Income Tax Act Section 269UE prohibits cash transactions exceeding Rs. 20,000 to curb black money and ensure digital payments.

CrPC Section 251 covers the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in summons cases, ensuring proper notice before trial.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 57 mandates courts to judicially notice certain facts without requiring proof, ensuring efficiency and certainty in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 9 defines when facts not otherwise relevant become relevant as they explain or illustrate relevant facts.

Milftastic is not a legal entity or regulated service in India; understand the legal context and risks involved.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 46 defines how facts can be proved by oral evidence, emphasizing the importance of witness testimony in legal proceedings.

Replica cars are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations on registration, safety, and emissions compliance.

Illegal relationships are not legal in India and may attract legal consequences under various laws.

IT Act Section 59 empowers authorities to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information for security and investigation purposes.

Understand the legal status of Perfect Money in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Eating deer meat is conditionally legal in India, subject to wildlife protection laws and state regulations.

CrPC Section 67 details the procedure for search and seizure of property connected to offences, ensuring lawful evidence collection.

Tortoises are legal to own in India with restrictions under wildlife laws to protect native species.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 153 defines the burden of proof for facts that a party asserts, specifying who must prove what in civil and criminal cases.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(25) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 78 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

CrPC Section 313 mandates the examination of accused to ensure fair trial by allowing them to explain evidence against them.

Companies Act 2013 Section 322 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 77 defines the presumption of ownership for possession of movable property, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.

bottom of page