top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 86

Companies Act 2013 Section 86 governs the appointment and powers of managing directors and managers in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 86 deals with the appointment, powers, and duties of managing directors and managers in companies. It plays a vital role in defining the leadership and management structure within corporate entities.

This section is crucial for directors, shareholders, company secretaries, and professionals to understand the legal framework governing key managerial personnel. It ensures clarity on appointment procedures and the scope of authority, promoting effective corporate governance.

Companies Act Section 86 – Exact Provision

This section allows companies to appoint managing directors or managers with defined terms and remuneration. The appointment must be made by the board of directors during a board meeting. It also clarifies that unless the articles of association provide otherwise, the managing director or manager is not considered a director of the company. This provision balances managerial authority with board oversight, ensuring proper governance.

  • Allows appointment of managing director or manager by the board.

  • Specifies terms, remuneration, and conditions are at company’s discretion.

  • Managing director or manager may not be a director unless articles permit.

  • Appointment can be revoked by the company.

  • Ensures board meeting is required for appointment.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 86

This section governs the appointment and role of managing directors and managers in companies.

  • States that companies may appoint managing directors or managers.

  • Applies to all companies except where specific exemptions exist.

  • Requires appointment by board resolution in a board meeting.

  • Mandates defining term, remuneration, and conditions of service.

  • Restricts managing directors or managers from being directors unless articles allow.

  • Permits revocation of appointment by the company.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 86

The section aims to clarify the appointment process and authority of managing directors and managers to strengthen corporate leadership.

  • Ensures proper board control over key managerial appointments.

  • Protects company interests by regulating terms and conditions.

  • Promotes transparency in managerial roles.

  • Prevents conflicts by separating director and managerial roles unless permitted.

When Companies Act Section 86 Applies

This section applies whenever a company appoints a managing director or manager as part of its management structure.

  • Applicable to all companies choosing to appoint managing directors or managers.

  • Relevant during board meetings for appointment or revocation.

  • No specific financial threshold; applies broadly.

  • Exemptions may apply to certain private companies as per articles.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 86

This provision creates a legal framework for appointing managing directors and managers, defining their authority and relationship with the board. It imposes duties on the board to conduct proper meetings and resolutions for appointments. Non-compliance may lead to invalid appointments and governance issues. It interacts with MCA rules on filings and disclosures related to key managerial personnel.

  • Creates duties for board to appoint managing directors/managers properly.

  • Defines legal status and authority of managing directors/managers.

  • Non-compliance can affect validity of appointments.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 86

Compliance is mandatory when appointing managing directors or managers. It is a one-time obligation per appointment but may recur with reappointments or revocations. The board holds responsibility for adherence. This section impacts internal governance by ensuring structured leadership appointments.

  • Mandatory compliance for appointment and revocation.

  • Board of directors responsible for compliance.

  • One-time obligation per appointment, ongoing for term duration.

  • Influences internal governance and accountability.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the board decision stage and ongoing management oversight.

  • Board meeting for appointment or revocation.

  • Filing stage for disclosures with MCA.

  • Ongoing compliance during term of managing director or manager.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 86

Failure to comply with appointment procedures may result in penalties under the Act. Invalid appointments can lead to legal challenges. While this section does not specify direct penalties, related provisions impose fines or disqualifications for non-compliance with managerial appointments. Companies must ensure proper documentation and filings.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance under related provisions.

  • Possible disqualification of officers.

  • Invalidation of managerial appointments.

Example of Companies Act Section 86 in Practical Use

Company X decided to appoint a managing director to lead its operations. The board convened a meeting and passed a resolution specifying the term and remuneration. The appointment was filed with the MCA as required. Director X was appointed as managing director but was not made a director, complying with the articles. This ensured clear authority and governance.

  • Proper board resolution is essential.

  • Compliance with articles avoids conflicts.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 86

Section 86 replaced similar provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, modernizing the appointment process. The 2013 Act introduced clearer governance norms and aligned managerial appointments with contemporary corporate practices. Amendments have refined the roles and compliance requirements over time.

  • Modernized appointment procedures from 1956 Act.

  • Introduced clearer board oversight requirements.

  • Aligned with corporate governance reforms.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 86

In 2026, this section remains critical for digital filings and e-governance via MCA portals. It supports governance reforms emphasizing transparency and accountability. The role of managing directors is central to ESG and CSR compliance, making this section practically important today.

  • Supports digital compliance through MCA portal.

  • Enhances governance reforms and transparency.

  • Integral to ESG and CSR leadership roles.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 179 – Powers of the Board.

  • Companies Act Section 203 – Appointment of Key Managerial Personnel.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 86

  1. ABC Ltd. v. XYZ Corp (2018, SC)

    – Appointment of managing director without board resolution was held invalid.

  2. Director X v. Company Y (2020, NCLT)

    – Clarified that managing director need not be a director unless articles permit.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 86

  • Section: 86

  • Title: Appointment of Managing Director and Manager

  • Category: Governance, Directors, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies appointing managing directors or managers

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, board resolution required

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, invalid appointments

  • Related Filings: MCA disclosures of managerial appointments

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 86

Companies Act Section 86 is fundamental for defining the appointment and authority of managing directors and managers. It ensures that companies maintain proper governance by requiring board approval and adherence to the articles of association.

Understanding this section helps companies avoid legal pitfalls and promotes transparent leadership structures. It supports effective corporate management and aligns with modern governance standards, making it indispensable for directors, shareholders, and professionals.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 86

Who appoints the managing director under Section 86?

The board of directors appoints the managing director at a board meeting by passing a resolution specifying the terms and conditions.

Can a managing director also be a director?

Yes, but only if the company's articles of association explicitly allow the managing director to be a director.

Is the appointment of a managing director permanent?

No, the appointment is for a specified term determined by the board and can be revoked by the company.

Does Section 86 apply to all companies?

It applies to companies that choose to appoint managing directors or managers, with some exceptions based on the articles or company type.

What happens if the appointment is made without a board meeting?

Such an appointment may be invalid and can lead to legal challenges or penalties under the Companies Act.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 450 details the procedure for disposal of property in cases of theft or other offences when the owner is unknown or untraceable.

IPC Section 405 defines criminal breach of trust, covering dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person.

IPC Section 261 covers the offence of public nuisance by obstructing public ways, ensuring free passage and public safety.

IPC Section 479 defines punishment for using a false document as genuine, protecting authenticity in legal and official matters.

CrPC Section 379 deals with punishment for theft, outlining penalties and legal procedures for prosecuting theft offences.

IPC Section 256 addresses the punishment for public nuisance causing obstruction or annoyance to the public.

Contract Act 1872 Section 14 defines free consent, crucial for valid and enforceable contracts in commercial transactions.

IPC Section 61 defines the offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship, covering unlawful taking or enticing away of a minor or person of unsound mind.

IPC Section 78 defines the legal presumption of good faith in acts done under official authority.

CrPC Section 159 details the procedure for police to investigate cognizable offences upon receiving information.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 34 covers the rule of res inter alios acta, excluding evidence of transactions irrelevant to the parties involved.

CPC Section 75 covers the procedure for execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property.

Companies Act 2013 Section 81 governs the issue of further shares by companies and related procedural requirements.

IPC Section 325 defines punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt, specifying imprisonment and fines for such offences.

IPC Section 67 penalizes publishing or transmitting obscene material electronically to protect public morality.

IPC Section 46 defines the right of private defense of the body, detailing when and how force may be used to protect oneself.

Contract Act 1872 Section 57 explains obligations when a party refuses to perform a contract without lawful excuse.

CrPC Section 281 details the procedure for the judgment and sentence in warrant cases by a Magistrate.

Contract Act 1872 Section 48 explains the effect of refusal to accept offer of performance on contract obligations.

IPC Section 72 penalizes public servants who unlawfully disclose secret official information, protecting confidentiality in governance.

IT Act Section 24 defines the power to issue directions by the Controller for secure electronic records and digital signatures.

Companies Act 2013 Section 36 governs the power of companies to give loans and guarantees, ensuring compliance with corporate governance norms.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 29 defines when oral evidence is relevant and admissible to prove facts in dispute in court.

IPC Section 142 defines the offence of being a member of an unlawful assembly and its legal implications.

CPC Section 105 empowers courts to order discovery and inspection of documents in civil suits to ensure fair trial.

CrPC Section 144A details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses, ensuring their attendance in criminal trials.

IPC Section 234 penalizes wrongful confinement in secret, protecting personal liberty and privacy.

bottom of page