top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 86

Companies Act 2013 Section 86 governs the appointment and powers of managing directors and managers in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 86 deals with the appointment, powers, and duties of managing directors and managers in companies. It plays a vital role in defining the leadership and management structure within corporate entities.

This section is crucial for directors, shareholders, company secretaries, and professionals to understand the legal framework governing key managerial personnel. It ensures clarity on appointment procedures and the scope of authority, promoting effective corporate governance.

Companies Act Section 86 – Exact Provision

This section allows companies to appoint managing directors or managers with defined terms and remuneration. The appointment must be made by the board of directors during a board meeting. It also clarifies that unless the articles of association provide otherwise, the managing director or manager is not considered a director of the company. This provision balances managerial authority with board oversight, ensuring proper governance.

  • Allows appointment of managing director or manager by the board.

  • Specifies terms, remuneration, and conditions are at company’s discretion.

  • Managing director or manager may not be a director unless articles permit.

  • Appointment can be revoked by the company.

  • Ensures board meeting is required for appointment.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 86

This section governs the appointment and role of managing directors and managers in companies.

  • States that companies may appoint managing directors or managers.

  • Applies to all companies except where specific exemptions exist.

  • Requires appointment by board resolution in a board meeting.

  • Mandates defining term, remuneration, and conditions of service.

  • Restricts managing directors or managers from being directors unless articles allow.

  • Permits revocation of appointment by the company.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 86

The section aims to clarify the appointment process and authority of managing directors and managers to strengthen corporate leadership.

  • Ensures proper board control over key managerial appointments.

  • Protects company interests by regulating terms and conditions.

  • Promotes transparency in managerial roles.

  • Prevents conflicts by separating director and managerial roles unless permitted.

When Companies Act Section 86 Applies

This section applies whenever a company appoints a managing director or manager as part of its management structure.

  • Applicable to all companies choosing to appoint managing directors or managers.

  • Relevant during board meetings for appointment or revocation.

  • No specific financial threshold; applies broadly.

  • Exemptions may apply to certain private companies as per articles.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 86

This provision creates a legal framework for appointing managing directors and managers, defining their authority and relationship with the board. It imposes duties on the board to conduct proper meetings and resolutions for appointments. Non-compliance may lead to invalid appointments and governance issues. It interacts with MCA rules on filings and disclosures related to key managerial personnel.

  • Creates duties for board to appoint managing directors/managers properly.

  • Defines legal status and authority of managing directors/managers.

  • Non-compliance can affect validity of appointments.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 86

Compliance is mandatory when appointing managing directors or managers. It is a one-time obligation per appointment but may recur with reappointments or revocations. The board holds responsibility for adherence. This section impacts internal governance by ensuring structured leadership appointments.

  • Mandatory compliance for appointment and revocation.

  • Board of directors responsible for compliance.

  • One-time obligation per appointment, ongoing for term duration.

  • Influences internal governance and accountability.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the board decision stage and ongoing management oversight.

  • Board meeting for appointment or revocation.

  • Filing stage for disclosures with MCA.

  • Ongoing compliance during term of managing director or manager.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 86

Failure to comply with appointment procedures may result in penalties under the Act. Invalid appointments can lead to legal challenges. While this section does not specify direct penalties, related provisions impose fines or disqualifications for non-compliance with managerial appointments. Companies must ensure proper documentation and filings.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance under related provisions.

  • Possible disqualification of officers.

  • Invalidation of managerial appointments.

Example of Companies Act Section 86 in Practical Use

Company X decided to appoint a managing director to lead its operations. The board convened a meeting and passed a resolution specifying the term and remuneration. The appointment was filed with the MCA as required. Director X was appointed as managing director but was not made a director, complying with the articles. This ensured clear authority and governance.

  • Proper board resolution is essential.

  • Compliance with articles avoids conflicts.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 86

Section 86 replaced similar provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, modernizing the appointment process. The 2013 Act introduced clearer governance norms and aligned managerial appointments with contemporary corporate practices. Amendments have refined the roles and compliance requirements over time.

  • Modernized appointment procedures from 1956 Act.

  • Introduced clearer board oversight requirements.

  • Aligned with corporate governance reforms.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 86

In 2026, this section remains critical for digital filings and e-governance via MCA portals. It supports governance reforms emphasizing transparency and accountability. The role of managing directors is central to ESG and CSR compliance, making this section practically important today.

  • Supports digital compliance through MCA portal.

  • Enhances governance reforms and transparency.

  • Integral to ESG and CSR leadership roles.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 179 – Powers of the Board.

  • Companies Act Section 203 – Appointment of Key Managerial Personnel.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 86

  1. ABC Ltd. v. XYZ Corp (2018, SC)

    – Appointment of managing director without board resolution was held invalid.

  2. Director X v. Company Y (2020, NCLT)

    – Clarified that managing director need not be a director unless articles permit.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 86

  • Section: 86

  • Title: Appointment of Managing Director and Manager

  • Category: Governance, Directors, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies appointing managing directors or managers

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, board resolution required

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, invalid appointments

  • Related Filings: MCA disclosures of managerial appointments

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 86

Companies Act Section 86 is fundamental for defining the appointment and authority of managing directors and managers. It ensures that companies maintain proper governance by requiring board approval and adherence to the articles of association.

Understanding this section helps companies avoid legal pitfalls and promotes transparent leadership structures. It supports effective corporate management and aligns with modern governance standards, making it indispensable for directors, shareholders, and professionals.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 86

Who appoints the managing director under Section 86?

The board of directors appoints the managing director at a board meeting by passing a resolution specifying the terms and conditions.

Can a managing director also be a director?

Yes, but only if the company's articles of association explicitly allow the managing director to be a director.

Is the appointment of a managing director permanent?

No, the appointment is for a specified term determined by the board and can be revoked by the company.

Does Section 86 apply to all companies?

It applies to companies that choose to appoint managing directors or managers, with some exceptions based on the articles or company type.

What happens if the appointment is made without a board meeting?

Such an appointment may be invalid and can lead to legal challenges or penalties under the Companies Act.

Related Sections

SSRIs are legal in India but require a prescription and must be used under medical supervision.

IPC Section 506 defines punishment for criminal intimidation, covering threats causing fear of injury to person or property.

Publishing erotica books in India is conditionally legal but subject to strict obscenity laws and censorship regulations.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 170 covering transitional provisions and their impact.

Companies Act 2013 Section 342 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies for public interest.

Stem cell therapy is legal in India under strict regulations and guidelines set by authorities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 283 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for winding up of companies.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 95 empowers the Central Government to make rules for effective consumer protection enforcement.

CrPC Section 364 defines the offence of kidnapping or abducting in order to murder, detailing its legal consequences.

IPC Section 11 defines 'Court of Justice' and clarifies which courts are recognized under the Indian Penal Code.

CrPC Section 366 details the procedure for sending a person accused of an offence to another jurisdiction for trial or investigation.

IPC Section 448 defines house trespass, covering unlawful entry into a property with intent to commit an offence.

Income Tax Act Section 271H prescribes penalties for failure to furnish statements or information as required under the Act.

CBD oil was illegal in India in 2019 under the Narcotic Drugs Act with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

Walking rickshaws are legal in India with specific regulations varying by state and city.

Tyre retreading is legal in India under strict regulations to ensure safety and environmental standards.

Chit funds are legal in India under strict regulations governed by the Chit Funds Act, 1982, with specific rules and enforcement practices.

Discover the legal status of betting in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement practices across states.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 276AB penalizes failure to file TDS statements within prescribed time limits.

Income Tax Act Section 269R prohibits cash transactions exceeding ₹20,000 to curb tax evasion and ensure digital payments.

IPC Section 197 requires prior government sanction for prosecuting public servants for official acts, ensuring protection against frivolous charges.

Contract Act 1872 Section 53 explains the rules on the time and place for performance of contracts.

CrPC Section 157 details the procedure for police to register an FIR and begin investigation upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 83 defines the presumption of death when a person has been missing for seven years, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.

Having a pet monkey in India is generally illegal due to wildlife protection laws and strict regulations.

Stake.com is not legally authorized in India; online betting faces strict regulations and enforcement varies by state.

CrPC Section 333 details punishment for public servants who intentionally cause injury to deter duty performance.

bottom of page