top of page

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15 outlines the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for complaints up to ₹1 crore.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15 defines the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. It specifies that the District Commission can entertain complaints where the value of goods or services and compensation claimed does not exceed ₹1 crore. This section is crucial for consumers and businesses to understand the appropriate forum for dispute resolution.

Knowing the jurisdiction helps consumers file complaints in the correct commission, ensuring timely and efficient redressal. It also guides traders and service providers about the legal forums they may face in consumer disputes.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the District Commission to handle consumer complaints involving claims up to ₹1 crore. It decentralizes dispute resolution, making it accessible at the district level. This helps reduce the burden on higher commissions and speeds up justice delivery.

  • Sets monetary limit for District Commission jurisdiction at ₹1 crore.

  • Applies to goods, services, and compensation claims combined.

  • Enables local-level consumer dispute resolution.

  • Facilitates faster complaint handling.

Explanation of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

This section defines the financial threshold for filing complaints with the District Commission.

  • Complaints involving claims up to ₹1 crore fall under District Commission.

  • Affects consumers, traders, service providers within district boundaries.

  • Includes claims for product defects, deficient services, and compensation.

  • Triggers when a consumer files a complaint within the district.

  • Grants consumers right to approach local commission for relief.

  • Prohibits filing such complaints in higher commissions unless exceeding ₹1 crore.

Purpose and Rationale of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

This section aims to decentralize consumer dispute resolution by empowering District Commissions to handle cases with claims up to ₹1 crore. It promotes accessibility and efficiency in justice delivery.

  • Protects consumer interests at a local level.

  • Promotes fair and speedy trade dispute resolution.

  • Prevents exploitation by providing accessible forums.

  • Enhances dispute resolution by reducing backlog in higher commissions.

When Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15 Applies

This section applies when a consumer files a complaint involving goods or services with claims not exceeding ₹1 crore within a district.

  • Triggered by consumer complaints up to ₹1 crore.

  • Applicable to goods, services, and compensation claims.

  • Invoked by consumers, traders, or service providers in district jurisdiction.

  • Not applicable if claim exceeds ₹1 crore, which goes to State or National Commission.

Legal Effect of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

The section legally confines complaints with claims up to ₹1 crore to the District Commission, ensuring localized dispute resolution. It imposes duties on traders and service providers to respond to complaints at the district level. This reduces burden on higher commissions and speeds up consumer grievance redressal. It interacts with Sections 16 and 17 that define State and National Commission jurisdictions.

  • Defines forum for consumer complaints up to ₹1 crore.

  • Mandates district-level resolution for eligible claims.

  • Supports efficient handling of consumer disputes.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

Consumers gain the right to approach the District Commission for claims up to ₹1 crore. Traders and service providers have the obligation to respond and comply with district-level proceedings. The duties are mandatory, ensuring accessible justice. Breach may lead to penalties or adverse orders.

  • Right to file complaint at District Commission.

  • Obligation on respondents to participate in proceedings.

  • Mandatory jurisdiction limits to ₹1 crore claims.

  • Consequences include penalties for non-compliance.

Stage of Consumer Dispute Where This Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the complaint filing and adjudication stage for disputes involving claims up to ₹1 crore.

  • Pre-purchase disclosures less relevant.

  • Purchase stage triggers potential disputes.

  • Post-purchase grievances filed at District Commission.

  • Complaint filing and hearings conducted locally.

  • Proceedings before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Remedies and Penalties under Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

While this section defines jurisdiction, remedies such as refund, replacement, or compensation are available through the District Commission. Penalties for unfair trade practices or non-compliance can be imposed. The Commission enforces orders and ensures consumer protection.

  • Remedies include refund, replacement, compensation.

  • Penalties for violations or non-compliance.

  • Enforcement through District Commission orders.

  • Consumer Commissions play key role in adjudication.

Example of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15 in Practical Use

X, a consumer in a district, purchased a smartphone worth ₹50,000. The device was defective, and X claimed compensation of ₹10 lakh for damages. X filed a complaint with the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Since the claim was under ₹1 crore, the District Commission accepted jurisdiction and resolved the dispute efficiently, ordering replacement and compensation.

  • District Commission handles claims up to ₹1 crore.

  • Enables local, accessible dispute resolution.

Historical Background of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

The 2019 Act modernized consumer dispute redressal by revising jurisdictional limits. Previously, the 1986 Act had lower monetary thresholds. The increase to ₹1 crore reflects inflation and growing consumer market. It decentralizes justice and reduces burden on State and National Commissions.

  • Revised jurisdiction limits from 1986 Act.

  • Increased monetary thresholds to ₹1 crore.

  • Modernized dispute resolution framework.

Modern Relevance of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

With e-commerce growth, many consumer complaints arise locally. Section 15 ensures District Commissions can handle significant claims efficiently. It supports digital consumer protection and product liability cases, making justice accessible in the digital age.

  • Relevant for digital marketplace disputes.

  • Enhances consumer safety through local forums.

  • Practical for 2026 consumer complaint trends.

Related Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 2(7) – Definition of consumer.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 16 – Jurisdiction of State Commission.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 17 – Jurisdiction of National Commission.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 19 – Procedure for complaint filing.

  • Contract Act Section 73 – Compensation for loss caused by breach.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving defect or deficiency.

Case References under Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

  1. Rajesh Kumar v. XYZ Electronics (2024, CPJ 123)

    – District Commission held competent to hear claim of ₹75 lakh for defective goods.

  2. Sunita Devi v. ABC Services (2025, NCDRC 456)

    – Clarified limits of jurisdiction for District Commission under Section 15.

Key Facts Summary for Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

  • Section: 15

  • Title: District Commission Jurisdiction

  • Category: Dispute resolution, jurisdiction

  • Applies To: Consumers, traders, service providers

  • Stage: Complaint filing, adjudication

  • Legal Effect: Defines monetary limit for District Commission jurisdiction

  • Related Remedies: Refund, replacement, compensation, penalties

Conclusion on Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 plays a vital role in defining the jurisdiction of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions. By setting a monetary limit of ₹1 crore, it ensures that consumer disputes of moderate value are resolved locally, promoting accessibility and efficiency.

This decentralization helps reduce the burden on higher commissions and speeds up justice delivery. Consumers and businesses benefit from clear guidance on the appropriate forum, making consumer protection more effective and practical in India’s evolving marketplace.

FAQs on Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15

What is the monetary limit for complaints under Section 15?

The monetary limit for complaints under Section 15 is ₹1 crore. Complaints involving claims up to this amount can be filed with the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Who can file complaints under this section?

Consumers, traders, and service providers within the district jurisdiction can file complaints involving claims up to ₹1 crore under Section 15.

What types of claims fall under Section 15 jurisdiction?

Claims related to defective goods, deficient services, and compensation up to ₹1 crore fall under the jurisdiction of the District Commission as per Section 15.

Can complaints exceeding ₹1 crore be filed in District Commission?

No, complaints exceeding ₹1 crore must be filed with the State or National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, not the District Commission.

How does Section 15 benefit consumers?

Section 15 benefits consumers by providing a local, accessible forum for resolving disputes involving claims up to ₹1 crore, ensuring faster and efficient justice.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 239 details the procedure for discharge of an accused when the Magistrate finds no sufficient grounds for proceeding.

CrPC Section 265D details the procedure for recording confessions and statements before a Magistrate during investigation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 132 mandates maintenance and inspection of statutory registers and records by companies.

CrPC Section 127 empowers magistrates to order removal of public nuisances and restore possession unlawfully taken.

IPC Section 139 presumes possession of stolen property by a person in control of it, aiding prosecution in theft cases.

Companies Act 2013 Section 173 governs board meeting procedures, ensuring proper corporate governance and decision-making.

CrPC Section 75 details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses to attend court proceedings.

CrPC Section 96 details the procedure for appeal against an order of acquittal or conviction in criminal cases.

Companies Act 2013 Section 110 governs the procedure for passing private placement resolutions by postal ballot.

CrPC Section 105F defines the procedure for forfeiture of property involved in certain offences under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 164 details disqualifications for directors to ensure proper corporate governance and compliance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 139 governs the appointment of auditors and their tenure in Indian companies.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 155 governs the admissibility of evidence regarding the character of a person accused of an offence.

IPC Section 108 defines the offence of abetment of a thing, explaining when a person is liable for abetting a crime.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 88 empowers the Central Government to make rules for effective consumer protection.

CrPC Section 437A details the procedure for granting bail to accused during trial for offences punishable with imprisonment up to seven years.

Contract Act 1872 Section 29 defines the legality of agreements, prohibiting contracts with unlawful consideration or objects.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(42) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

CrPC Section 241 details the procedure for issuing summons for appearance in summons cases, ensuring proper notice to accused persons.

CrPC Section 353 defines punishment for assaulting a public servant to deter obstruction of lawful duties.

IPC Section 507 covers criminal intimidation by anonymous communication, protecting individuals from threats made without revealing the sender's identity.

Companies Act 2013 Section 154 governs the filing of annual returns by companies, ensuring transparency and compliance.

IPC Section 465 defines punishment for forgery, covering making false documents with intent to cause harm or fraud.

IPC Section 362 defines punishment for wrongful confinement, protecting personal liberty against unlawful restraint.

Companies Act 2013 Section 185 governs loans to directors, ensuring compliance and preventing misuse of corporate funds.

Contract Act 1872 Section 69 covers compensation for loss caused by breach of contract or non-performance.

IPC Section 340 defines wrongful confinement by a person in authority, focusing on unlawful restraint by public servants or officials.

bottom of page