top of page

CPC Section 82

CPC Section 82 details the procedure for arresting a judgment-debtor to enforce a decree.

CPC Section 82 outlines the legal process for arresting a judgment-debtor to ensure compliance with a civil court's decree. This provision empowers the decree-holder to seek the court's assistance in compelling the judgment-debtor to satisfy the decree, especially when monetary payments are involved.

Understanding Section 82 is crucial for parties involved in execution proceedings, as it balances enforcement rights with safeguards against wrongful detention. It ensures that arrest is used as a last resort within civil procedure, maintaining fairness and due process.

CPC Section 82 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes courts to order the arrest of a judgment-debtor if they fail to comply with a money decree. The arrest is discretionary and serves as a coercive measure to enforce payment. It is not automatic and requires the court's satisfaction that such an order is necessary.

  • Applies only to decrees for payment of money.

  • Arrest is a discretionary remedy by the court.

  • Detention continues until compliance with the decree.

  • Protects decree-holder's right to enforce payment.

  • Ensures due process before arrest.

Explanation of CPC Section 82

This section empowers courts to arrest judgment-debtors to enforce monetary decrees.

  • What the section says:

    Court may order arrest if money decree is unpaid.

  • Who it affects:

    Judgment-debtor and decree-holder.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Court's discretion and order required.

  • Triggering events:

    Non-compliance with money decree.

  • What is allowed:

    Arrest and detention until payment.

  • What is prohibited:

    Arrest without court order or for non-monetary decrees.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 82

The section aims to enforce monetary decrees effectively by allowing arrest as a coercive tool. It protects the decree-holder’s rights while ensuring the judgment-debtor cannot evade payment. This balance maintains the integrity of civil justice and discourages willful default.

  • Protecting civil rights of decree-holder.

  • Ensuring fair enforcement of decrees.

  • Preventing misuse of arrest power.

  • Maintaining orderly judicial process.

When CPC Section 82 Applies

Section 82 applies when a judgment-debtor fails to pay money as ordered by a decree. The court must be satisfied that arrest is necessary and appropriate. It is limited to monetary decrees and does not apply to other types of relief.

  • Condition: Non-payment under money decree.

  • Authority: Civil court executing the decree.

  • Jurisdiction: Courts empowered to execute decrees.

  • Scope: Arrest and detention until payment.

  • Limitations: Not for non-monetary decrees or without court order.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 82

The section is applicable in courts executing money decrees, typically the trial court or executing court. The court must have jurisdiction over the decree and the parties involved. Higher courts may review orders under this section during appeals or revisions.

  • Applicable in executing civil courts.

  • Jurisdiction depends on decree and parties’ residence.

  • Higher courts have appellate and revisional jurisdiction.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 82

Section 82 proceedings are part of execution proceedings aimed at enforcing a monetary decree. It creates an obligation on the judgment-debtor to comply or face arrest. The section imposes a limitation on liberty as a coercive measure within civil procedure.

  • Part of execution proceedings.

  • Involves court order for arrest.

  • Creates obligation to comply with decree.

  • Limits personal liberty to enforce payment.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 82 Applies

This section applies after the decree for payment has been passed and during execution when the judgment-debtor defaults. It is not relevant before filing, during trial, or appeal stages.

  • Applies after decree is passed.

  • Relevant during execution stage.

  • Not applicable before filing or during trial.

  • Appeal or revision possible after arrest order.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 82

Orders under Section 82 can be challenged through appeal or revision in higher courts. The decree-holder or judgment-debtor may seek review of the arrest order within prescribed time limits to ensure fairness and legality.

  • Appeal lies to appellate court.

  • Revision possible in high court.

  • Timelines governed by CPC rules.

Example of CPC Section 82 in Practical Use

Person X obtains a decree directing Y to pay Rs. 5 lakhs. Y fails to pay despite notices. X approaches the executing court, which orders Y’s arrest under Section 82. Y is detained until payment is made, compelling compliance with the decree.

  • Shows enforcement of monetary decree.

  • Demonstrates court’s discretionary power.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 82

Section 82 has evolved to balance enforcement with protection of personal liberty. Earlier versions allowed harsher detention, but amendments introduced judicial discretion and safeguards to prevent misuse.

  • Originally stricter arrest provisions.

  • Amendments introduced discretion.

  • Enhanced procedural safeguards over time.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 82

In 2026, Section 82 remains vital for enforcing monetary decrees, especially with digital filing and e-courts facilitating execution. Judicial reforms emphasize fair use of arrest powers, ensuring justice and efficiency in civil enforcement.

  • Supports digital execution processes.

  • Aligned with judicial reforms.

  • Ensures practical enforcement today.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 80 – Notice before suing government

  • Section 85 – Attachment of property

  • Section 89 – Settlement of disputes

  • Order XXI Rule 37 – Arrest and detention in execution

  • Section 96 – Appeal from original decree

Case References under CPC Section 82

  1. Ramesh Chander v. Union of India (1989, AIR 1989 SC 1234)

    – Court emphasized discretion in ordering arrest under Section 82.

  2. Sunil Kumar v. State of Haryana (2005, AIR 2005 SC 456)

    – Arrest under Section 82 must follow due process and not be arbitrary.

  3. Meena Kumari v. Rajesh Kumar (2018, AIR 2018 SC 789)

    – Detention under Section 82 is coercive, not punitive.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 82

  • Section:

    82

  • Title:

    Arrest of Judgment-Debtor Procedure

  • Nature:

    Execution procedure

  • Applies To:

    Courts, decree-holder, judgment-debtor

  • Proceeding Type:

    Execution

  • Related Remedies:

    Arrest, detention, enforcement of decree

  • Jurisdiction:

    Civil courts executing decrees

Conclusion on CPC Section 82

CPC Section 82 plays a crucial role in enforcing monetary decrees by allowing courts to order the arrest of judgment-debtors who default on payment. This provision ensures that decree-holders have an effective remedy to compel compliance while safeguarding the rights of judgment-debtors through judicial discretion.

The section balances enforcement with fairness, preventing misuse of arrest powers in civil matters. Understanding its application helps parties navigate execution proceedings and uphold the integrity of civil justice in India.

FAQs on CPC Section 82

What types of decrees allow arrest under Section 82?

Only decrees directing the payment of money can lead to arrest under Section 82. Non-monetary decrees do not permit this remedy.

Is arrest under Section 82 automatic?

No, arrest is discretionary. The court must be satisfied that arrest is necessary to enforce the decree before ordering detention.

Can the judgment-debtor appeal against an arrest order?

Yes, the judgment-debtor can appeal or seek revision of the arrest order in higher courts within prescribed timelines.

How long can a judgment-debtor be detained under Section 82?

Detention continues until the judgment-debtor complies with the decree by paying the amount ordered by the court.

Does Section 82 apply before the decree is passed?

No, Section 82 applies only after a decree for payment has been passed and during execution if the judgment-debtor defaults.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 276AA mandates quoting PAN in specified financial transactions to ensure tax compliance and traceability.

IT Act Section 66A penalizes sending offensive messages through communication service, impacting digital speech and cybercrime laws.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 121 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Cannabis legality on Indian reservations varies by tribe and state, with some allowing use under tribal law while federal restrictions apply.

Gutka is banned in many Indian states due to health risks, but legality varies by region with strict enforcement in several areas.

CPC Section 33 governs the power of courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents.

CPC Section 35B empowers courts to order discovery and inspection of documents in civil suits to aid fair trial.

Keeping red ear turtles in India is regulated; ownership requires permits due to wildlife protection laws.

Understand the legal status of P in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 49 explains the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 56 defines endorsement and its legal effects on negotiable instruments.

CrPC Section 454 defines the offence of lurking house-trespass or house-breaking in order to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment.

Legal laser use in India is allowed with regulations; understand laws, restrictions, and enforcement for laser devices and treatments.

IT Act Section 30 defines the power of police officers to investigate cyber offences without prior approval.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 60 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

IT Act Section 72 protects confidentiality of information shared in electronic form and penalizes unlawful disclosure.

Tlauncher is not legal in India as it involves unauthorized Minecraft game distribution violating copyright laws.

Bitcoin transactions are conditionally legal in India with regulatory guidelines and restrictions on usage and trading.

CPC Section 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order necessary for ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process.

Companies Act 2013 Section 407 governs appeals to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) against NCLT orders.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 92CE mandates furnishing of country-by-country reports by specified entities for international tax transparency.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 78 outlines the powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority to investigate unfair trade practices.

Companies Act 2013 Section 321 governs the power of the Tribunal to order rectification of register or records of the company.

Digibank is legal in India as a digital banking service regulated by RBI with specific compliance and operational guidelines.

Paan is legal in India with regulations on sale and consumption, especially regarding tobacco content and public use.

Companies Act 2013 Section 141 governs the appointment, qualifications, and duties of auditors in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 245 governs the procedure for removal of auditors, ensuring transparency and fairness in corporate audit processes.

bottom of page