top of page

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72 outlines penalties for non-compliance with orders by Consumer Commissions, ensuring enforcement of consumer rights.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72 deals with penalties imposed on parties who fail to comply with the orders issued by Consumer Commissions. This section is crucial for enforcing consumer rights and ensuring that decisions made by the commissions are respected and implemented promptly.

Understanding this section is important for both consumers and businesses as it highlights the consequences of ignoring legal orders, thereby promoting accountability and fair trade practices.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72 – Exact Provision

This section imposes a daily penalty on those who do not follow the orders of Consumer Commissions. The penalty is designed to encourage timely compliance and deter defiance of legal decisions. The maximum cap ensures penalties remain reasonable while emphasizing the importance of adherence.

  • Penalty up to ₹5,000 per day for non-compliance.

  • Maximum aggregate penalty capped at ₹1,00,000.

  • Applies to all persons bound by Consumer Commission orders.

  • Ensures enforcement of consumer rights.

Explanation of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

This section sets out the consequences for failing to comply with Consumer Commission orders. It affects consumers, traders, service providers, and others bound by such orders.

  • Mandates penalties for non-compliance with orders.

  • Affects all parties subject to Consumer Commission rulings.

  • Triggers when an order is ignored or disobeyed.

  • Rights granted include enforcement of decisions.

  • Prohibits disregard of legal orders.

Purpose and Rationale of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

The section aims to protect consumer interests by ensuring that orders are respected and enforced. It promotes fair trade and prevents exploitation by holding parties accountable.

  • Protects consumer rights through enforcement.

  • Promotes adherence to legal decisions.

  • Prevents exploitation by defaulters.

  • Enhances dispute resolution effectiveness.

When Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72 Applies

This section applies when a person fails to comply with an order from any Consumer Commission. It can be invoked by the commission or affected parties.

  • Triggered by non-compliance with commission orders.

  • Applicable to consumers, traders, service providers.

  • Relevant for goods, services, and digital transactions.

  • Exceptions not explicitly stated but subject to legal interpretation.

Legal Effect of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

This section strengthens consumer rights by imposing financial penalties on defaulters. It creates a legal duty for parties to comply with orders, impacting dispute resolution by ensuring enforcement. It interacts with other sections that define orders and procedures.

  • Enforces compliance through monetary penalties.

  • Imposes duties on traders and service providers.

  • Supports effective resolution of consumer disputes.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

The rights granted include enforcement of Consumer Commission orders. Obligations are strict and mandatory, requiring compliance. Breach results in daily penalties until compliance is achieved.

  • Rights to enforce commission orders.

  • Mandatory obligation to comply.

  • Strict penalties for breach.

  • Encourages prompt adherence.

Stage of Consumer Dispute Where This Section Applies

This section applies post-complaint, after the Consumer Commission has issued an order. It is relevant during enforcement and compliance stages.

  • Post-purchase grievance resolution.

  • Complaint filing and commission proceedings.

  • Enforcement of final orders.

Remedies and Penalties under Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

Penalties include daily fines up to ₹5,000 for non-compliance, capped at ₹1,00,000. Enforcement is through Consumer Commissions, which monitor and impose penalties to ensure adherence.

  • Daily monetary penalties.

  • Maximum aggregate penalty limit.

  • Enforcement by Consumer Commissions.

Example of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72 in Practical Use

X, a consumer, won a case against a service provider for deficient service. The commission ordered a refund, but the provider delayed payment. Under Section 72, the provider was fined ₹5,000 daily until the refund was made. This ensured timely compliance and protected X's rights.

  • Penalties encourage prompt order compliance.

  • Protects consumers from prolonged injustice.

Historical Background of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

The 2019 Act modernized consumer law, replacing the 1986 Act. Section 72 introduced clear penalties for non-compliance, enhancing enforcement mechanisms to address delays and defiance.

  • Modernized enforcement provisions.

  • Stronger penalties than earlier law.

  • Focus on effective dispute resolution.

Modern Relevance of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

With e-commerce growth, timely compliance is critical. Section 72 ensures orders related to digital transactions are respected, supporting consumer safety and fair trade online.

  • Applies to digital marketplace disputes.

  • Supports consumer safety in online transactions.

  • Ensures practical enforcement in 2026.

Related Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 2(7) – Definition of consumer.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 2(47) – Unfair trade practices.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 17 – Jurisdiction of State Commission.

  • Contract Act Section 73 – Compensation for loss caused by breach.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving defect or deficiency.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant for misleading advertisements.

Case References under Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

  • Section: 72

  • Title: Penalties for Non-Compliance

  • Category: Enforcement, Consumer Rights

  • Applies To: Consumers, Traders, Service Providers

  • Stage: Post-purchase, Complaint Enforcement

  • Legal Effect: Imposes daily penalties for ignoring orders

  • Related Remedies: Monetary fines, enforcement by commissions

Conclusion on Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

Section 72 is vital for ensuring that Consumer Commission orders are respected and enforced. By imposing daily penalties, it deters defiance and promotes accountability among traders and service providers.

This enforcement mechanism strengthens consumer protection by guaranteeing that legal decisions lead to real outcomes. Both consumers and businesses benefit from a clear framework that supports fair trade and timely dispute resolution.

FAQs on Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72

What happens if a trader ignores a Consumer Commission order?

The trader is liable to pay a daily penalty up to ₹5,000, capped at ₹1,00,000, until they comply with the order, ensuring enforcement of consumer rights.

Who can impose penalties under Section 72?

Consumer Commissions have the authority to impose penalties on parties who fail to comply with their orders under this section.

Is there a maximum limit on penalties under Section 72?

Yes, the total penalty cannot exceed ₹1,00,000, regardless of the number of days the non-compliance continues.

Does Section 72 apply to online transactions?

Yes, it applies equally to orders related to goods and services purchased online, ensuring enforcement in digital marketplaces.

Can consumers directly invoke Section 72?

Consumers can bring non-compliance to the attention of the Consumer Commission, which can then impose penalties under this section.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 59 details the procedure for police to release arrested persons on bond pending investigation.

Contract Act 1872 Section 13 defines consent and its role in forming valid contracts under Indian law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 127 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Quail meat is legal to sell and consume in India with some regional restrictions and wildlife protections.

IPC Section 121A defines conspiracy to commit offences against the state, addressing plans to disrupt national security.

IPC Section 265 defines the offence of making a false statement causing public mischief, aiming to protect public order and trust.

In India, committing suicide is decriminalized, but abetment to suicide remains illegal under the law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 79 defines the expert witness rule, allowing opinion evidence from qualified experts to assist courts in technical matters.

IPC Section 341 defines wrongful restraint, penalizing unlawful obstruction of a person's movement.

IPC Section 108A defines punishment for harbouring persons who have committed offences, ensuring legal accountability for aiding offenders.

Income Tax Act Section 269S prohibits acceptance of loans or deposits in cash exceeding specified limits to prevent tax evasion.

Contract Act 1872 Section 18 defines free consent and its role in making contracts valid and enforceable.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 137 mandates furnishing of accounts and documents during income tax proceedings.

Ripsaw EV2 vehicle is not legally approved for road use in India due to strict motor vehicle regulations and safety standards.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 90 addresses admissions by persons whose position or relationship makes their statements relevant in legal proceedings.

CrPC Section 367 details the procedure when a person accused of an offence absconds or cannot be found by the police.

Companies Act 2013 Section 280 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 358 governs the procedure for reduction of share capital by companies in India.

Playwin lottery is legal in India under state laws with specific regulations and restrictions varying by region.

IPC Section 179 defines the punishment for public servants who unlawfully disobey lawfully issued government orders.

Section 222 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows the tax officer to recover tax dues by attaching your movable or immovable property in India.

Kratom is illegal in India due to strict drug laws prohibiting its possession and use.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 140 defines the presumption of ownership of documents, crucial for proving possession and authenticity in legal disputes.

Guns are conditionally legal in India with strict licensing and regulations under the Arms Act, 1959.

CrPC Section 6 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, guiding where cases can be tried.

Companies Act 2013 Section 59 governs the issue of share certificates and their legal implications for shareholders.

Section 214 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for recovery of income tax arrears in India.

bottom of page