top of page

Contract Act 1872 Section 38

Contract Act 1872 Section 38 explains the effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contracts on original obligations.

Contract Act Section 38 deals with how contracts can be changed or replaced by new agreements. It explains when the original contract’s obligations end due to novation, rescission, or alteration. This section is important to understand how parties can legally modify their agreements without disputes.

Understanding Section 38 helps businesses and individuals manage contract changes smoothly. It clarifies when a new contract replaces the old one, ensuring clarity in obligations and rights. This is vital in commercial transactions where terms often evolve.

Contract Act Section 38 – Exact Provision

This means that if all parties agree to replace the original contract with a new one, or to cancel or change it, then the original contract’s duties no longer apply. The new agreement takes effect, preventing confusion about which terms govern the relationship.

  • Allows substitution of a new contract for the original.

  • Permits rescission (cancellation) of the original contract.

  • Enables alteration of contract terms by mutual consent.

  • Original contract obligations cease once replaced or altered.

Explanation of Contract Act Section 38

This section states that a contract can be legally replaced, cancelled, or changed if all parties agree. It affects all contracting parties involved in the agreement.

  • Section states that original contract need not be performed if replaced or altered.

  • Affects parties who mutually agree to change contract terms.

  • Requires clear consent from all parties for novation or rescission.

  • Triggers when parties enter into a new contract or alter existing one.

  • Valid novation extinguishes original contract obligations.

Purpose and Rationale of Contract Act Section 38

The purpose is to provide legal clarity when contracts are changed or replaced. It protects parties by ensuring that once a new agreement is made, the old one no longer binds them.

  • Protects contractual fairness by respecting mutual consent.

  • Ensures parties can freely modify or cancel contracts.

  • Prevents confusion over which contract governs.

  • Maintains certainty in commercial agreements.

When Contract Act Section 38 Applies

This section applies when parties mutually agree to substitute, rescind, or alter a contract. It covers various contract types and is invoked by any party involved.

  • Applies when parties agree to novation, rescission, or alteration.

  • Can be invoked by any contracting party.

  • Affects contracts of sale, service, lease, and others.

  • Scope limited to mutual consent changes.

  • Exceptions if consent is absent or contract prohibits changes.

Legal Effect of Contract Act Section 38

Section 38 affects the enforceability of contracts by terminating original obligations upon valid novation or alteration. It interacts with other sections like offer, acceptance, and consideration to ensure the new contract is valid.

  • Terminates original contract obligations upon valid substitution.

  • Ensures new contract governs parties’ rights and duties.

  • Requires fresh consideration for altered or new contracts.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Contract Act Section 38

This section creates rights to modify or replace contracts and imposes obligations to honor the new terms. Duties are mandatory once parties consent to changes, and non-performance can lead to breach claims.

  • Right to substitute or alter contracts by mutual consent.

  • Obligation to perform new or altered contract terms.

  • Duties are mandatory, not optional.

  • Non-performance may result in legal remedies.

Stage of Transaction Where Contract Act Section 38 Applies

Section 38 applies mainly at the contract modification stage but can also affect performance and enforcement stages when changes occur.

  • Contract modification stage.

  • During contract performance if terms are altered.

  • Enforcement stage if disputes arise over changes.

Remedies and Legal Consequences under Contract Act Section 38

Parties can sue for breach if the new contract is not performed. Remedies include damages or specific performance based on the altered agreement. The original contract becomes void once replaced.

  • Right to sue for breach of new or altered contract.

  • Damages or specific performance as remedies.

  • Original contract obligations cease upon valid novation.

Example of Contract Act Section 38 in Practical Use

Person X entered into a contract to supply goods to a retailer. Later, both agreed to change delivery dates and payment terms, creating a new contract. Under Section 38, the original contract’s terms no longer apply, and the new agreement governs their relationship.

  • Shows how mutual consent changes contract terms legally.

  • Demonstrates termination of original obligations upon novation.

Historical Background of Contract Act Section 38

This section was introduced to address practical needs for contract flexibility. Courts historically enforced novation only with clear consent. Over time, amendments clarified the effects of rescission and alteration.

  • Created to allow lawful contract modifications.

  • Courts required clear mutual consent for novation.

  • Amended to clarify rescission and alteration effects.

Modern Relevance of Contract Act Section 38

In 2026, Section 38 remains crucial for digital and e-commerce contracts. It supports contract updates via e-signatures and online agreements, ensuring legal certainty in fast-changing commercial environments.

  • Applies to digital contract modifications.

  • Supports e-signature based novation.

  • Essential for modern commercial flexibility.

Related Sections

  • Contract Act Section 2 – Definitions of contract terms.

  • Contract Act Section 10 – Requirements of a valid contract.

  • Contract Act Section 37 – Obligation of parties to contracts.

  • Contract Act Section 39 – Effect of rescission on contracts.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant where consent is obtained by deception.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving contract terms.

Case References under Contract Act Section 38

  1. Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry (1974 AIR 1549)

    – Established that novation requires clear mutual consent to extinguish original contract obligations.

  2. Chinnaya v. Ramayya (1882) ILR 5 Mad 25

    – Held that rescission of contract must be by mutual agreement to be valid.

Key Facts Summary for Contract Act Section 38

  • Section: 38

  • Title: Novation and Alteration of Contracts

  • Category: Contract modification, enforceability

  • Applies To: All contracting parties

  • Transaction Stage: Contract modification and performance

  • Legal Effect: Extinguishes original obligations upon valid substitution

  • Related Remedies: Damages, specific performance

Conclusion on Contract Act Section 38

Section 38 plays a vital role in contract law by allowing parties to replace, cancel, or change their agreements with mutual consent. This flexibility is essential in dynamic commercial environments where terms often need updating.

By clearly stating that original contract obligations cease upon valid novation or alteration, the section prevents confusion and disputes. Understanding this provision helps parties manage contract changes effectively and ensures enforceability of new agreements.

FAQs on Contract Act Section 38

What is novation under Section 38?

Novation is the substitution of a new contract in place of the original, with the consent of all parties, extinguishing the old contract’s obligations.

Can a contract be altered without mutual consent?

No, Section 38 requires all parties to agree to any alteration, rescission, or substitution of the contract.

Does rescission cancel the contract completely?

Yes, rescission means the contract is cancelled by mutual agreement, and original obligations no longer apply.

What happens if the new contract lacks consideration?

A new or altered contract generally requires fresh consideration to be valid and enforceable under contract law principles.

Is Section 38 applicable to digital contracts?

Yes, Section 38 applies to digital and electronic contracts, supporting modifications via e-signatures and online agreements.

Related Sections

IPC Section 457 defines lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night, focusing on unlawful entry with intent to commit an offence.

Understand the legal status of music sampling in India, including copyright rules, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Tyre resoling is legal in India under specific safety and regulatory conditions set by law.

Bitcoin betting in India faces legal uncertainty with strict gambling laws and no clear regulation on cryptocurrencies.

Kissing is not a legal offence in India, but public displays may face restrictions under certain laws.

Morphine is legal in India for medical use under strict regulations and licensing requirements.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 101 defines the burden of proof, specifying who must prove a fact in civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 322 defines voluntarily causing grievous hurt, detailing punishment and legal scope for serious bodily injuries.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 16 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Income Tax Act Section 271FAB imposes penalty for failure to furnish statement of financial transaction or reportable account.

Artemisia absinthium is legal in India with no specific restrictions, but its use is regulated under general herbal and medicinal laws.

Understand the legality of CR 70 in India, including its definition, use, and legal status under Indian law.

Income Tax Act Section 271GA imposes penalties for failure to file TDS statements within prescribed time limits.

Section 190 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for appeals against income tax orders in India.

IPC Section 398 punishes extortion by putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt to commit robbery.

IPC Section 227 defines the procedure for discharge of an accused when evidence is insufficient to proceed to trial.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 50 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

Xanax is illegal in India without prescription and controlled under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

Income Tax Act Section 271 prescribes penalties for various defaults and failures under the Act.

Golden Tobacco is legal in India but regulated under strict laws controlling sale and use of tobacco products.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 130 covering provisional attachment of property.

CrPC Section 60 defines the jurisdiction of Magistrates to try offences based on their nature and severity.

Contract Act 1872 Section 65 covers obligations arising from non-gratuitous acts when contracts fail.

Witchcraft is not legally recognized but not explicitly illegal in India; accusations and harmful acts linked to it are punishable.

Temple deities are recognized as legal entities in India with rights to own property and sue or be sued under specific conditions.

CrPC Section 263 empowers higher courts to revise orders to ensure justice and correct errors in criminal proceedings.

CrPC Section 58 details the procedure for medical examination of arrested persons to ensure their health and rights are protected.

bottom of page