top of page

Contract Act 1872 Section 38

Contract Act 1872 Section 38 explains the effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contracts on original obligations.

Contract Act Section 38 deals with how contracts can be changed or replaced by new agreements. It explains when the original contract’s obligations end due to novation, rescission, or alteration. This section is important to understand how parties can legally modify their agreements without disputes.

Understanding Section 38 helps businesses and individuals manage contract changes smoothly. It clarifies when a new contract replaces the old one, ensuring clarity in obligations and rights. This is vital in commercial transactions where terms often evolve.

Contract Act Section 38 – Exact Provision

This means that if all parties agree to replace the original contract with a new one, or to cancel or change it, then the original contract’s duties no longer apply. The new agreement takes effect, preventing confusion about which terms govern the relationship.

  • Allows substitution of a new contract for the original.

  • Permits rescission (cancellation) of the original contract.

  • Enables alteration of contract terms by mutual consent.

  • Original contract obligations cease once replaced or altered.

Explanation of Contract Act Section 38

This section states that a contract can be legally replaced, cancelled, or changed if all parties agree. It affects all contracting parties involved in the agreement.

  • Section states that original contract need not be performed if replaced or altered.

  • Affects parties who mutually agree to change contract terms.

  • Requires clear consent from all parties for novation or rescission.

  • Triggers when parties enter into a new contract or alter existing one.

  • Valid novation extinguishes original contract obligations.

Purpose and Rationale of Contract Act Section 38

The purpose is to provide legal clarity when contracts are changed or replaced. It protects parties by ensuring that once a new agreement is made, the old one no longer binds them.

  • Protects contractual fairness by respecting mutual consent.

  • Ensures parties can freely modify or cancel contracts.

  • Prevents confusion over which contract governs.

  • Maintains certainty in commercial agreements.

When Contract Act Section 38 Applies

This section applies when parties mutually agree to substitute, rescind, or alter a contract. It covers various contract types and is invoked by any party involved.

  • Applies when parties agree to novation, rescission, or alteration.

  • Can be invoked by any contracting party.

  • Affects contracts of sale, service, lease, and others.

  • Scope limited to mutual consent changes.

  • Exceptions if consent is absent or contract prohibits changes.

Legal Effect of Contract Act Section 38

Section 38 affects the enforceability of contracts by terminating original obligations upon valid novation or alteration. It interacts with other sections like offer, acceptance, and consideration to ensure the new contract is valid.

  • Terminates original contract obligations upon valid substitution.

  • Ensures new contract governs parties’ rights and duties.

  • Requires fresh consideration for altered or new contracts.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Contract Act Section 38

This section creates rights to modify or replace contracts and imposes obligations to honor the new terms. Duties are mandatory once parties consent to changes, and non-performance can lead to breach claims.

  • Right to substitute or alter contracts by mutual consent.

  • Obligation to perform new or altered contract terms.

  • Duties are mandatory, not optional.

  • Non-performance may result in legal remedies.

Stage of Transaction Where Contract Act Section 38 Applies

Section 38 applies mainly at the contract modification stage but can also affect performance and enforcement stages when changes occur.

  • Contract modification stage.

  • During contract performance if terms are altered.

  • Enforcement stage if disputes arise over changes.

Remedies and Legal Consequences under Contract Act Section 38

Parties can sue for breach if the new contract is not performed. Remedies include damages or specific performance based on the altered agreement. The original contract becomes void once replaced.

  • Right to sue for breach of new or altered contract.

  • Damages or specific performance as remedies.

  • Original contract obligations cease upon valid novation.

Example of Contract Act Section 38 in Practical Use

Person X entered into a contract to supply goods to a retailer. Later, both agreed to change delivery dates and payment terms, creating a new contract. Under Section 38, the original contract’s terms no longer apply, and the new agreement governs their relationship.

  • Shows how mutual consent changes contract terms legally.

  • Demonstrates termination of original obligations upon novation.

Historical Background of Contract Act Section 38

This section was introduced to address practical needs for contract flexibility. Courts historically enforced novation only with clear consent. Over time, amendments clarified the effects of rescission and alteration.

  • Created to allow lawful contract modifications.

  • Courts required clear mutual consent for novation.

  • Amended to clarify rescission and alteration effects.

Modern Relevance of Contract Act Section 38

In 2026, Section 38 remains crucial for digital and e-commerce contracts. It supports contract updates via e-signatures and online agreements, ensuring legal certainty in fast-changing commercial environments.

  • Applies to digital contract modifications.

  • Supports e-signature based novation.

  • Essential for modern commercial flexibility.

Related Sections

  • Contract Act Section 2 – Definitions of contract terms.

  • Contract Act Section 10 – Requirements of a valid contract.

  • Contract Act Section 37 – Obligation of parties to contracts.

  • Contract Act Section 39 – Effect of rescission on contracts.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant where consent is obtained by deception.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving contract terms.

Case References under Contract Act Section 38

  1. Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry (1974 AIR 1549)

    – Established that novation requires clear mutual consent to extinguish original contract obligations.

  2. Chinnaya v. Ramayya (1882) ILR 5 Mad 25

    – Held that rescission of contract must be by mutual agreement to be valid.

Key Facts Summary for Contract Act Section 38

  • Section: 38

  • Title: Novation and Alteration of Contracts

  • Category: Contract modification, enforceability

  • Applies To: All contracting parties

  • Transaction Stage: Contract modification and performance

  • Legal Effect: Extinguishes original obligations upon valid substitution

  • Related Remedies: Damages, specific performance

Conclusion on Contract Act Section 38

Section 38 plays a vital role in contract law by allowing parties to replace, cancel, or change their agreements with mutual consent. This flexibility is essential in dynamic commercial environments where terms often need updating.

By clearly stating that original contract obligations cease upon valid novation or alteration, the section prevents confusion and disputes. Understanding this provision helps parties manage contract changes effectively and ensures enforceability of new agreements.

FAQs on Contract Act Section 38

What is novation under Section 38?

Novation is the substitution of a new contract in place of the original, with the consent of all parties, extinguishing the old contract’s obligations.

Can a contract be altered without mutual consent?

No, Section 38 requires all parties to agree to any alteration, rescission, or substitution of the contract.

Does rescission cancel the contract completely?

Yes, rescission means the contract is cancelled by mutual agreement, and original obligations no longer apply.

What happens if the new contract lacks consideration?

A new or altered contract generally requires fresh consideration to be valid and enforceable under contract law principles.

Is Section 38 applicable to digital contracts?

Yes, Section 38 applies to digital and electronic contracts, supporting modifications via e-signatures and online agreements.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 11 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, specifying where cases can be tried.

IPC Section 225A punishes the act of counterfeiting or falsifying government stamps or marks used for revenue collection.

IT Act Section 66C addresses identity theft and fraudulent use of electronic identity information.

Companies Act 2013 Section 79 governs the appointment and powers of the Company Secretary in Indian companies.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 161 covers the examination of witnesses by police during investigation, crucial for admissibility and proof in trials.

CPC Section 64 deals with the procedure for arrest and attachment before judgment in civil suits.

CrPC Section 436A mandates release of undertrial prisoners detained beyond prescribed time without trial, ensuring speedy justice.

Companies Act 2013 Section 47 governs the rectification of register of members and related corporate compliance.

CrPC Section 4 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, guiding where cases can be tried.

CrPC Section 240 defines the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons to appear before a Magistrate in criminal cases.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 72 outlines penalties for non-compliance with orders by Consumer Commissions, ensuring enforcement of consumer rights.

IPC Section 174 covers the procedure for reporting and investigating suspicious deaths or unnatural occurrences.

CrPC Section 368 details the procedure for the transfer of cases from one court to another to ensure fair trial and justice.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 129 defines the term 'confession' and its role in legal proceedings as an admission against interest.

CrPC Section 221 details the procedure when a Magistrate finds no sufficient ground to proceed with a case.

CrPC Section 350 details the procedure for conducting an inquiry by a Magistrate into an offence, ensuring fair and lawful investigation.

CPC Section 1 defines the title and extent of the Code of Civil Procedure in India.

CrPC Section 32 details the admissibility of statements made by a person who is dead or cannot be found as evidence in court.

Companies Act 2013 Section 174 governs the convening of board meetings, ensuring proper corporate governance and decision-making.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 90A defines the presumption of genuineness for electronic records, crucial for digital evidence admissibility.

CrPC Section 40 defines the powers of police to investigate cognizable offences and outlines the process for preliminary inquiry.

IPC Section 438 provides anticipatory bail to protect individuals from arrest in non-bailable offences.

CrPC Section 429 details the procedure for trial of offences related to mischief by fire or explosive substances.

IPC Section 171B penalizes knowingly joining or continuing in an unlawful assembly to commit an offence.

Companies Act 2013 Section 28 governs the alteration of a company’s memorandum of association.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 30 details the powers of Consumer Commissions to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses and production of documents.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 106 deals with the burden of proving facts especially when a party relies on a fact to prove their case.

bottom of page