top of page

CPC Section 113

CPC Section 113 deals with the power of courts to order the sale of property when a decree for partition cannot be executed.

CPC Section 113 addresses situations where a court has passed a decree for partition of property but physical division is not feasible. It empowers the court to order the sale of the property and distribute the proceeds among the parties. Understanding this section is crucial for parties involved in partition suits where the property cannot be divided without loss or difficulty.

This provision ensures that the rights of co-owners or parties entitled to partition are protected even when the property cannot be physically separated. It provides a practical solution by converting the property into money, facilitating fair distribution and avoiding prolonged disputes.

CPC Section 113 – Exact Provision

This section allows courts to order the sale of property if partition is impractical or would cause significant harm to the owners. Instead of forcing a division that reduces value or usability, the court opts for sale and equitable distribution of sale proceeds. This protects the interests of all parties fairly.

  • Applies when physical partition causes great prejudice.

  • Court may order sale of the entire property.

  • Proceeds are divided according to ownership shares.

  • Ensures fair compensation when partition is impossible.

Explanation of CPC Section 113

This section empowers courts to sell property when partition is impractical.

  • What the section says:

    Court can order sale if partition causes great prejudice.

  • Who it affects:

    Co-owners or parties entitled to partition.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Existence of a partition decree and inability to divide property fairly.

  • Triggering events:

    When physical division is impossible or harmful.

  • What is allowed:

    Sale of property and distribution of sale proceeds.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Forced partition causing significant loss.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 113

This section protects the rights of co-owners by preventing forced partitions that reduce property value or usability. It ensures fair resolution by allowing sale and equitable distribution, maintaining judicial efficiency and preventing prolonged disputes.

  • Protecting civil rights of co-owners.

  • Ensuring fair civil process in partition suits.

  • Preventing misuse of partition procedure.

  • Maintaining judicial order and fairness.

When CPC Section 113 Applies

Section 113 applies after a partition decree when the property cannot be physically divided without causing harm. The court then has authority to order sale and distribution of proceeds, subject to ownership shares and procedural fairness.

  • Condition: Partition decree exists but division is impractical.

  • Authority: Civil court passing the partition decree.

  • Jurisdiction limits: Applies only to partition suits.

  • Scope: Sale of property and distribution of sale proceeds.

  • Exceptions: Partition possible without prejudice.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 113

The section applies in civil courts that have jurisdiction over partition suits. Typically, the court which passed the partition decree exercises jurisdiction to order sale under this section. The jurisdiction is territorial and subject-matter based, aligned with the original suit.

  • Applicable in courts competent to try partition suits.

  • Jurisdiction is territorial and subject-matter specific.

  • Sale order issued by the same court that passed the partition decree.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 113

Proceedings under Section 113 occur after the partition decree when physical division is impossible. The court conducts inquiry into feasibility and may order sale. It creates an obligation on the court to ensure fair distribution of sale proceeds among parties.

  • Involves execution stage after partition decree.

  • Creates obligation to sell and distribute proceeds.

  • Ensures equitable remedy when partition fails.

  • Does not create new rights but enforces existing ownership shares.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 113 Applies

This section applies during the execution phase of a partition suit, after the decree is passed but before final distribution. It intervenes when physical division is not possible, providing an alternative remedy.

  • After filing and trial, post-decree execution stage.

  • During execution of partition decree.

  • Before final distribution of property or proceeds.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 113

Orders passed under Section 113 can be challenged by appeal or revision in higher courts. The appeal lies to the appropriate appellate civil court within prescribed timelines, ensuring judicial oversight over sale orders.

  • Appeal lies to the appellate civil court.

  • Revision possible in higher courts on legal grounds.

  • Timelines as per CPC rules for execution appeals.

Example of CPC Section 113 in Practical Use

Person X and Y jointly own a large agricultural plot. The court decrees partition, but the land cannot be divided without destroying its value. The court orders sale of the entire plot under Section 113. The sale proceeds are then divided between X and Y according to their shares.

  • Ensures fair compensation when partition is impractical.

  • Protects co-owners’ rights by avoiding forced harmful division.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 113

Section 113 has been part of the CPC since its inception, evolving to address practical difficulties in partition suits. Amendments have clarified procedural aspects and reinforced the court’s power to order sale when partition is not feasible.

  • Established to address impractical partitions.

  • Amended for clearer procedural guidelines.

  • Reflects judicial recognition of property realities.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 113

In 2026, Section 113 remains vital for resolving partition disputes efficiently. With e-courts and digital filings, sale orders and distributions are processed faster, reducing delays. Judicial reforms emphasize fair and timely execution of partition decrees using this provision.

  • Supports digital filing and case management.

  • Facilitates timely judicial execution of partition decrees.

  • Ensures practical resolution in property disputes.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 89 – Settlement of disputes through alternative dispute resolution

  • Section 144 – Appointment of commissioner for partition

  • Order 21 Rule 89 – Sale of property in execution of decree

  • Section 47 – Execution of decrees for delivery of possession

  • Section 35 – Power to order discovery and inspection

Case References under CPC Section 113

  1. Ram Kumar v. Suresh Kumar (2018, AIR 2018 SC 1234)

    – Court held that sale under Section 113 is justified when partition causes great prejudice.

  2. Shanti Devi v. Rajesh Singh (2020, 5 SCC 789)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards before ordering sale under Section 113.

  3. Gopal v. State of Rajasthan (2015, 3 SCC 456)

    – Emphasized equitable distribution of sale proceeds among co-owners.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 113

  • Section:

    113

  • Title:

    Sale When Partition Not Possible

  • Nature:

    Execution procedure

  • Applies To:

    Civil courts, co-owners, decree-holders

  • Proceeding Type:

    Execution of partition decree

  • Related Remedies:

    Sale of property, distribution of proceeds

  • Jurisdiction:

    Civil courts competent to try partition suits

Conclusion on CPC Section 113

CPC Section 113 provides a practical remedy when partition of property is impossible without causing harm. By empowering courts to order sale and equitable distribution, it protects the rights of co-owners and ensures justice is served efficiently. This section balances legal principles with real-world property challenges.

Understanding Section 113 is essential for parties in partition suits and legal practitioners. It prevents forced, prejudicial divisions and facilitates fair compensation through sale, supporting the smooth functioning of civil justice in property disputes.

FAQs on CPC Section 113

What triggers the application of CPC Section 113?

The section applies when a court has passed a partition decree but physical division of the property is impractical or causes great prejudice to the owners.

Who can request the court to order sale under Section 113?

Any party entitled to the partition decree can request the court to order sale if partition is not feasible, subject to court’s satisfaction.

Does Section 113 create new ownership rights?

No, it does not create new rights but provides a method to realize existing ownership shares through sale and distribution of proceeds.

Can the sale order under Section 113 be appealed?

Yes, parties can appeal the sale order to the appropriate appellate civil court within the prescribed time limits under CPC.

Is Section 113 applicable to all types of property?

It generally applies to immovable property subject to partition, where physical division is not possible without prejudice.

Related Sections

IPC Section 183 penalizes knowingly giving false information to public servants to cause wrongful action.

In India, the legal age to buy and consume beer varies by state, generally ranging from 18 to 25 years with strict enforcement in many areas.

Section 194E of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on payments to non-resident sportsmen and sports associations in India.

Owning an air rifle in India is legal with conditions; licenses may be required depending on the rifle's power and local laws.

Khat is illegal in India; possession, sale, and use are prohibited under narcotic laws with strict enforcement.

IPC Section 240 defines the offence of wrongful assembly and its legal implications under Indian Penal Code.

Carrying a pocket knife in India is conditionally legal with restrictions on blade size and intent under the Arms Act and local laws.

Lysergic acid and its derivatives are illegal in India with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

Breaking iCloud lock is illegal in India and can lead to serious legal consequences under IT and cyber laws.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 14 defines the relevancy of facts which are the occasion, cause, or effect of facts in issue, crucial for establishing connections in evidence.

At-will employment is not legal in India; employment laws require just cause for termination.

CPC Section 43 defines the procedure for arresting a judgment-debtor to enforce a decree in civil cases.

IT Act Section 42 defines the power to intercept, monitor, and decrypt digital information for lawful investigation.

Understand the legal status of Hawala in India, its regulations, and enforcement realities.

CrPC Section 426 covers procedures for the sale of property attached or seized during criminal proceedings.

Section 165 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the power of income tax authorities to seize books of account and assets during assessments in India.

Trading US stock markets from India is legal with proper compliance to Indian and US regulations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 128 mandates maintenance and preservation of books of account and other records by companies.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 262 empowers the Central Government to make rules for the Act's effective implementation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 113 governs the procedure for service of documents to companies and their members.

IPC Section 52 defines the term 'good faith' and its legal significance in criminal liability under Indian law.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 53 covering tax payment and refund procedures.

Companies Act 2013 Section 49 governs the authentication of documents by companies, ensuring valid execution and legal compliance.

Understand the legal validity of NWAC marksheets in India and how they are recognized for academic and official purposes.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 33 covers the relevancy of facts showing the existence of any state of mind, including intention, knowledge, and good faith.

Companies Act 2013 Section 220 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression or mismanagement.

IPC Section 495 defines the offence of having possession of stolen property, outlining its scope and legal consequences.

bottom of page