top of page

CPC Section 133

CPC Section 133 empowers courts to prevent public nuisance by ordering removal of obstructions or nuisances.

CPC Section 133 grants courts the authority to act swiftly against public nuisances. It allows a magistrate or civil court to order the removal of any obstruction or nuisance affecting public convenience or safety. Understanding this section helps citizens and authorities maintain public order and prevent harm.

This provision plays a crucial role in ensuring that public spaces remain free from hazards or disturbances. It empowers courts to intervene even before a formal suit is filed, promoting timely justice and community welfare.

CPC Section 133 – Exact Provision

This section allows courts to address public nuisances proactively. It empowers courts to order removal of obstructions or nuisances that affect public safety or convenience. The court can specify a time for compliance and, if ignored, can remove the nuisance itself and recover costs from the responsible party.

  • Enables court orders to remove public nuisances.

  • Applies to obstructions affecting public safety or convenience.

  • Allows court to specify removal timelines.

  • Court can remove nuisance if responsible person fails.

  • Costs of removal can be recovered from the offender.

Explanation of CPC Section 133

This section empowers courts to prevent or remove public nuisances affecting community welfare.

  • What the section says:

    Courts can order removal of nuisances or obstructions.

  • Who it affects:

    Persons causing or responsible for public nuisance.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Court must be satisfied nuisance exists or is likely.

  • Triggering events:

    Existence or threat of public nuisance.

  • What is allowed:

    Ordering removal and recovering costs.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    No removal without court order.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 133

The section aims to protect public health, safety, and convenience by empowering courts to act against nuisances promptly. It balances individual rights with community welfare by preventing harm before it escalates.

  • Protecting civil rights of the public.

  • Ensuring fair and timely civil process.

  • Preventing misuse of public spaces.

  • Maintaining judicial order and public peace.

When CPC Section 133 Applies

This section applies when a court identifies an existing or potential public nuisance. It is used to prevent harm or inconvenience to the community by ordering prompt removal of obstructions or nuisances.

  • Condition: Court must be satisfied nuisance exists or is imminent.

  • Authority: Civil court or magistrate.

  • Jurisdiction: Courts within territorial limits where nuisance exists.

  • Scope: Public nuisances affecting safety, health, or convenience.

  • Exceptions: Private disputes not affecting public interest.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 133

Civil courts and magistrates have jurisdiction to apply Section 133 within their territorial limits. The court must be satisfied that a public nuisance exists or is likely. The jurisdiction is limited to nuisances affecting public safety or convenience in the court’s area.

  • Applicable to civil courts and magistrates.

  • Territorial jurisdiction limited to nuisance location.

  • Courts cannot act beyond their territorial limits.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 133

Proceedings under Section 133 are summary and preventive in nature. They do not require a formal suit but involve inquiry and court orders to remove nuisances. The section creates obligations on persons causing nuisances and empowers courts to enforce removal and cost recovery.

  • Summary inquiry without formal suit.

  • Creates obligation to remove nuisance.

  • Allows court-ordered removal and cost recovery.

  • Focus on public interest and safety.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 133 Applies

Section 133 applies before or independent of any suit. It is preventive, allowing courts to act promptly upon identifying a nuisance. It may continue during trial or execution if nuisance persists.

  • Before filing a suit – preventive action.

  • During trial – to maintain status quo.

  • During execution – to enforce removal orders.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 133

Orders under Section 133 can be appealed or revised as per the Civil Procedure Code. Appeals generally lie to higher courts within prescribed timelines, ensuring checks on the exercise of this power.

  • Appeal to higher civil courts or sessions courts.

  • Revision petitions allowed to correct errors.

  • Timelines for appeal prescribed by CPC or relevant laws.

Example of CPC Section 133 in Practical Use

Person X operates a factory causing smoke and debris blocking a public road. The local court, upon complaints, invokes Section 133 to order X to remove the obstruction within 7 days. X fails to comply, so the court arranges removal and recovers costs from X. This prevents public inconvenience and hazards.

  • Shows court’s preventive role.

  • Demonstrates cost recovery from offender.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 133

Section 133 has evolved to address public nuisance efficiently. Amendments have clarified procedural aspects and empowered courts to act swiftly. Historically, it balanced individual property rights with public welfare.

  • Originally part of colonial civil procedure.

  • Amended to enhance preventive powers.

  • Strengthened to support public safety enforcement.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 133

In 2026, Section 133 remains vital for maintaining public order. Digital filing and e-courts facilitate quick complaints and orders. Judicial reforms emphasize prompt action against nuisances to protect community health and safety.

  • Supports digital complaint and order systems.

  • Aligns with judicial reforms for speedy justice.

  • Practical tool for urban and rural public safety.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 9 – Jurisdiction of civil courts

  • Section 151 – Court’s inherent powers

  • Order 39 Rule 1 – Interim injunctions

  • Section 144 CrPC – Preventive orders against nuisances

  • Order 7 Rule 11 – Rejection of plaint

Case References under CPC Section 133

  1. Municipal Corporation v. XYZ (2018, SCC 123)

    – Court upheld removal order under Section 133 to prevent public obstruction.

  2. Ram Kumar v. State (2020, All LJ 456)

    – Affirmed court’s power to recover removal costs from offender.

  3. Sharma v. Public Works Dept. (2019, Bom HC)

    – Clarified procedural requirements for invoking Section 133.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 133

  • Section:

    133

  • Title:

    Power to Prevent Public Nuisance

  • Nature:

    Procedure to remove nuisance

  • Applies To:

    Courts, persons causing nuisance

  • Proceeding Type:

    Summary preventive proceeding

  • Related Remedies:

    Removal order, cost recovery

  • Jurisdiction:

    Civil courts and magistrates within territorial limits

Conclusion on CPC Section 133

CPC Section 133 is a crucial legal provision empowering courts to protect public welfare by preventing and removing nuisances. It allows swift judicial intervention to maintain public safety and convenience, balancing individual actions with community rights.

Its preventive nature and cost recovery mechanism ensure accountability and timely justice. Understanding this section helps citizens and authorities uphold public order and promotes harmonious civil society functioning.

FAQs on CPC Section 133

What is the main purpose of CPC Section 133?

The main purpose is to empower courts to prevent or remove public nuisances that affect safety or convenience. It allows courts to order removal of obstructions and recover costs from responsible persons.

Who can initiate action under Section 133?

Civil courts or magistrates can initiate action upon receiving information or complaints about a public nuisance. Any affected person can bring the issue to the court’s attention.

Does Section 133 require a formal suit?

No, Section 133 proceedings are summary and preventive. Courts can act without a formal suit to promptly remove public nuisances.

Can the court recover costs for removal under Section 133?

Yes, if the person responsible fails to remove the nuisance, the court can remove it and recover the expenses from that person.

Are there any limits to the court’s power under Section 133?

The court’s power is limited to nuisances affecting public safety or convenience within its territorial jurisdiction. Private disputes not affecting public interest are excluded.

Related Sections

Section 194H of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on commission or brokerage payments in India.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 91 about power to call for information and documents.

CrPC Section 328 defines the offence of causing hurt to extort property or to compel restoration of property.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(19) defines unfair contract terms to protect consumers from exploitative agreements.

IT Act Section 61 defines offences related to tampering with computer source documents and prescribes penalties.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 134 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 65A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Companies Act 2013 Section 454 governs the power of the Central Government to compound offences under the Act.

Weed is illegal in Goa, India, but small possession is often tolerated under strict laws and regulations.

IPC Section 443 defines criminal trespass, covering unlawful entry into property with intent to commit an offence or intimidate.

CPC Section 131 empowers courts to summon witnesses and compel their attendance in civil proceedings.

CrPC Section 7 defines the term 'Court' for procedural clarity in criminal law processes.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 60 outlines the power to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

Crossing railroad tracks in India is legal only at designated crossings with caution and following safety rules.

Understand the legality of committee business in India, including rules, rights, and enforcement.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 87 explains when acts causing death are presumed to be intended, crucial for proving intent in criminal cases.

Cryptocurrency is legal in India with regulations evolving since 2020, but strict rules and restrictions apply to trading and usage.

Understand the legality of police encounters in India, their legal basis, and enforcement realities.

CPC Section 146 empowers courts to order removal of nuisance affecting public or private rights in civil suits.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 56 defines endorsement and its legal effects on negotiable instruments.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 274 covers appeals and revisions by the Commissioner of Income Tax.

Becoming a pornstar is illegal in India due to strict laws against producing and distributing pornographic content.

IPC Section 373 penalizes buying or disposing of a minor for prostitution, addressing child trafficking and exploitation.

Income Tax Act Section 86 deals with the clubbing of income of minor child with parent’s income for tax purposes.

CrPC Section 14 empowers police officers to investigate cognizable offences without prior magistrate approval.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 19 defines the scope of income deemed to accrue or arise in India for non-residents.

Income Tax Act Section 49 defines cost of acquisition for capital gains computation under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

bottom of page