top of page

CPC Section 133

CPC Section 133 empowers courts to prevent public nuisance by ordering removal of obstructions or nuisances.

CPC Section 133 grants courts the authority to act swiftly against public nuisances. It allows a magistrate or civil court to order the removal of any obstruction or nuisance affecting public convenience or safety. Understanding this section helps citizens and authorities maintain public order and prevent harm.

This provision plays a crucial role in ensuring that public spaces remain free from hazards or disturbances. It empowers courts to intervene even before a formal suit is filed, promoting timely justice and community welfare.

CPC Section 133 – Exact Provision

This section allows courts to address public nuisances proactively. It empowers courts to order removal of obstructions or nuisances that affect public safety or convenience. The court can specify a time for compliance and, if ignored, can remove the nuisance itself and recover costs from the responsible party.

  • Enables court orders to remove public nuisances.

  • Applies to obstructions affecting public safety or convenience.

  • Allows court to specify removal timelines.

  • Court can remove nuisance if responsible person fails.

  • Costs of removal can be recovered from the offender.

Explanation of CPC Section 133

This section empowers courts to prevent or remove public nuisances affecting community welfare.

  • What the section says:

    Courts can order removal of nuisances or obstructions.

  • Who it affects:

    Persons causing or responsible for public nuisance.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Court must be satisfied nuisance exists or is likely.

  • Triggering events:

    Existence or threat of public nuisance.

  • What is allowed:

    Ordering removal and recovering costs.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    No removal without court order.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 133

The section aims to protect public health, safety, and convenience by empowering courts to act against nuisances promptly. It balances individual rights with community welfare by preventing harm before it escalates.

  • Protecting civil rights of the public.

  • Ensuring fair and timely civil process.

  • Preventing misuse of public spaces.

  • Maintaining judicial order and public peace.

When CPC Section 133 Applies

This section applies when a court identifies an existing or potential public nuisance. It is used to prevent harm or inconvenience to the community by ordering prompt removal of obstructions or nuisances.

  • Condition: Court must be satisfied nuisance exists or is imminent.

  • Authority: Civil court or magistrate.

  • Jurisdiction: Courts within territorial limits where nuisance exists.

  • Scope: Public nuisances affecting safety, health, or convenience.

  • Exceptions: Private disputes not affecting public interest.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 133

Civil courts and magistrates have jurisdiction to apply Section 133 within their territorial limits. The court must be satisfied that a public nuisance exists or is likely. The jurisdiction is limited to nuisances affecting public safety or convenience in the court’s area.

  • Applicable to civil courts and magistrates.

  • Territorial jurisdiction limited to nuisance location.

  • Courts cannot act beyond their territorial limits.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 133

Proceedings under Section 133 are summary and preventive in nature. They do not require a formal suit but involve inquiry and court orders to remove nuisances. The section creates obligations on persons causing nuisances and empowers courts to enforce removal and cost recovery.

  • Summary inquiry without formal suit.

  • Creates obligation to remove nuisance.

  • Allows court-ordered removal and cost recovery.

  • Focus on public interest and safety.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 133 Applies

Section 133 applies before or independent of any suit. It is preventive, allowing courts to act promptly upon identifying a nuisance. It may continue during trial or execution if nuisance persists.

  • Before filing a suit – preventive action.

  • During trial – to maintain status quo.

  • During execution – to enforce removal orders.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 133

Orders under Section 133 can be appealed or revised as per the Civil Procedure Code. Appeals generally lie to higher courts within prescribed timelines, ensuring checks on the exercise of this power.

  • Appeal to higher civil courts or sessions courts.

  • Revision petitions allowed to correct errors.

  • Timelines for appeal prescribed by CPC or relevant laws.

Example of CPC Section 133 in Practical Use

Person X operates a factory causing smoke and debris blocking a public road. The local court, upon complaints, invokes Section 133 to order X to remove the obstruction within 7 days. X fails to comply, so the court arranges removal and recovers costs from X. This prevents public inconvenience and hazards.

  • Shows court’s preventive role.

  • Demonstrates cost recovery from offender.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 133

Section 133 has evolved to address public nuisance efficiently. Amendments have clarified procedural aspects and empowered courts to act swiftly. Historically, it balanced individual property rights with public welfare.

  • Originally part of colonial civil procedure.

  • Amended to enhance preventive powers.

  • Strengthened to support public safety enforcement.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 133

In 2026, Section 133 remains vital for maintaining public order. Digital filing and e-courts facilitate quick complaints and orders. Judicial reforms emphasize prompt action against nuisances to protect community health and safety.

  • Supports digital complaint and order systems.

  • Aligns with judicial reforms for speedy justice.

  • Practical tool for urban and rural public safety.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 9 – Jurisdiction of civil courts

  • Section 151 – Court’s inherent powers

  • Order 39 Rule 1 – Interim injunctions

  • Section 144 CrPC – Preventive orders against nuisances

  • Order 7 Rule 11 – Rejection of plaint

Case References under CPC Section 133

  1. Municipal Corporation v. XYZ (2018, SCC 123)

    – Court upheld removal order under Section 133 to prevent public obstruction.

  2. Ram Kumar v. State (2020, All LJ 456)

    – Affirmed court’s power to recover removal costs from offender.

  3. Sharma v. Public Works Dept. (2019, Bom HC)

    – Clarified procedural requirements for invoking Section 133.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 133

  • Section:

    133

  • Title:

    Power to Prevent Public Nuisance

  • Nature:

    Procedure to remove nuisance

  • Applies To:

    Courts, persons causing nuisance

  • Proceeding Type:

    Summary preventive proceeding

  • Related Remedies:

    Removal order, cost recovery

  • Jurisdiction:

    Civil courts and magistrates within territorial limits

Conclusion on CPC Section 133

CPC Section 133 is a crucial legal provision empowering courts to protect public welfare by preventing and removing nuisances. It allows swift judicial intervention to maintain public safety and convenience, balancing individual actions with community rights.

Its preventive nature and cost recovery mechanism ensure accountability and timely justice. Understanding this section helps citizens and authorities uphold public order and promotes harmonious civil society functioning.

FAQs on CPC Section 133

What is the main purpose of CPC Section 133?

The main purpose is to empower courts to prevent or remove public nuisances that affect safety or convenience. It allows courts to order removal of obstructions and recover costs from responsible persons.

Who can initiate action under Section 133?

Civil courts or magistrates can initiate action upon receiving information or complaints about a public nuisance. Any affected person can bring the issue to the court’s attention.

Does Section 133 require a formal suit?

No, Section 133 proceedings are summary and preventive. Courts can act without a formal suit to promptly remove public nuisances.

Can the court recover costs for removal under Section 133?

Yes, if the person responsible fails to remove the nuisance, the court can remove it and recover the expenses from that person.

Are there any limits to the court’s power under Section 133?

The court’s power is limited to nuisances affecting public safety or convenience within its territorial jurisdiction. Private disputes not affecting public interest are excluded.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 81A governs the admissibility of electronic records, ensuring their reliability and authenticity in legal proceedings.

Understand the legal status of Dagcoin in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Income Tax Act Section 48 explains the method to compute capital gains on transfer of capital assets in India.

Abortion is legal in India within 7 weeks under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act with certain conditions and exceptions.

Magic mushroom spores are legal in India as they do not contain psilocybin, but cultivation and consumption are illegal.

Khat is illegal in India; possession, sale, and use are prohibited under narcotic laws with strict enforcement.

IT Act Section 48 defines the power of the central government to make rules under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Carpooling in India is generally legal with some state-specific rules and safety regulations to follow.

Holding hands is legal in India with no specific law against it, but social norms and local enforcement vary widely.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 121 deals with penalties for failure to comply with TDS provisions under the Act.

Lysergic acid and its derivatives are illegal in India with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 114A presumes electronic records as genuine, aiding proof of authenticity in digital evidence cases.

CrPC Section 277 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during investigation or trial.

Understand the legality of downloading from uTorrent in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

CrPC Section 131 empowers police to seize property used in committing cognizable offences to aid investigation and prevent misuse.

Companies Act 2013 Section 216 governs the power of the Registrar to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 244B covers interest on refunds of excess tax paid to taxpayers.

In India, using LPG in cars is legal with government approval and safety standards, but strict rules apply to installation and use.

Section 194BB of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on winnings from horse races in India.

Having designed number plates in India is conditionally legal with strict rules on size, font, and reflectivity under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Contract Act 1872 Section 30 explains when a contract becomes void due to coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.

CrPC Section 428 details the procedure for the disposal of property when no person claims it during investigation.

Full body wraps are legal in India with certain health and safety regulations to follow in salons and spas.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 161 covering powers of officers and GST procedures.

Marijuana is illegal in India except for limited medical and scientific use under strict regulation.

Crocin is legal in India as an over-the-counter pain reliever and fever reducer with regulated sale and usage.

Assisted suicide is illegal in India, with strict laws prohibiting it and limited exceptions under passive euthanasia rules.

bottom of page