top of page

CrPC Section 131

CrPC Section 131 empowers police to seize property used in committing cognizable offences to aid investigation and prevent misuse.

CrPC Section 131 authorizes police officers to seize any property which may be alleged to have been stolen, or obtained by criminal means, or used as a means of committing a cognizable offence. This power is crucial for effective investigation and ensuring that evidence or instruments of crime are preserved.

Understanding this section helps citizens and law enforcement know when seizure is lawful, protecting rights and aiding justice. It prevents misuse of property and supports the criminal justice process by securing relevant materials.

CrPC Section 131 – Exact Provision

This section grants police the authority to seize property connected to a cognizable offence. It ensures that evidence or stolen items are preserved for investigation and trial. The seizure must be reported promptly to the Magistrate to maintain judicial oversight and prevent abuse.

  • Police can seize property linked to cognizable offences.

  • Seizure includes stolen goods or items used in crime.

  • Property must be forwarded to Magistrate quickly.

  • Ensures preservation of evidence for investigation.

  • Prevents misuse or unlawful retention of property.

Explanation of CrPC Section 131

This section allows police to take possession of property suspected to be involved in a crime. It helps secure evidence and prevents suspects from hiding or destroying important items.

  • Police may seize property allegedly stolen or used in crime.

  • Affects accused, victims, and police officers.

  • Triggered when property is found under suspicious circumstances.

  • Police must forward seized property to Magistrate promptly.

  • Property cannot be kept indefinitely without Magistrate's approval.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 131

The section exists to empower police to secure evidence and prevent criminals from benefiting from or hiding illegal property. It balances investigative needs with safeguards to protect citizens’ property rights by involving Magistrate oversight.

  • Protects rights of property owners by judicial supervision.

  • Ensures proper procedure in seizure and custody.

  • Balances police powers with citizen protections.

  • Prevents misuse or arbitrary seizure of property.

When CrPC Section 131 Applies

This section applies when police encounter property suspected to be stolen, recovered during investigation, or found under suspicious circumstances related to a cognizable offence. It guides lawful seizure and custody of such property.

  • Property must be linked to a cognizable offence.

  • Police officers have authority to seize.

  • Property must be forwarded to Magistrate without delay.

  • Magistrate supervises further custody or disposal.

  • Exceptions if property is not connected to offence.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 131

Cognizance is taken when police seize property during investigation of a cognizable offence. The seized property is forwarded to the Magistrate who examines the case and decides on custody or release. This ensures judicial control over seized items.

  • Police seize property during investigation.

  • Property forwarded to Magistrate promptly.

  • Magistrate reviews and orders custody or disposal.

Bailability under CrPC Section 131

Section 131 itself does not deal with bailability but relates to property seizure. However, offences connected to seized property may be bailable or non-bailable depending on their nature under other sections of CrPC.

  • Bail depends on offence linked to seized property.

  • Seizure does not affect bail rights directly.

  • Police must follow due process for arrest and bail.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 131)

Cases involving seized property under Section 131 are generally tried by Magistrate courts, as seizure relates to cognizable offences. The Magistrate oversees property custody and related proceedings.

  • Magistrate courts handle seizure-related matters.

  • Sessions courts try connected offences if serious.

  • Magistrate supervises property custody and disposal.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 131

Appeals against Magistrate orders on seized property can be filed in Sessions Court. Revisions may be sought to challenge improper seizure or custody decisions, ensuring checks and balances.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court against Magistrate orders.

  • Revision petitions can be filed for procedural errors.

  • Timely appeals protect property rights.

Example of CrPC Section 131 in Practical Use

Person X is suspected of stealing electronic goods. Police find these goods at X’s residence during investigation. Under Section 131, police seize the items and send them to the Magistrate. The Magistrate orders safe custody, preserving evidence for trial and preventing tampering or resale.

  • Section 131 enabled lawful seizure of stolen goods.

  • Ensured evidence preservation and judicial oversight.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 131

Section 131 has evolved to strengthen police powers while ensuring judicial control over seized property. Amendments have clarified procedures to prevent misuse and protect citizens’ property rights.

  • Originally empowered police seizure in colonial law.

  • Amendments improved safeguards and Magistrate oversight.

  • Modern updates focus on balancing rights and investigation.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 131

In 2026, Section 131 remains vital for effective policing and evidence preservation. It supports digital and physical property seizure in cyber and traditional crimes, balancing investigative needs with citizens’ rights.

  • Applies to physical and digital property seizure.

  • Supports investigation of complex modern crimes.

  • Ensures judicial supervision to prevent abuse.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 131

  • Section 102 – Search and seizure of property

  • Section 165 – Search by police officer

  • Section 451 – Custody of property pending trial

  • Section 457 – Disposal of property in custody

  • Section 173 – Police report and investigation

Case References under CrPC Section 131

  1. State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (1995, AIR 1995 SC 1944)

    – Police seizure of property must be followed by Magistrate’s supervision to prevent misuse.

  2. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1990, AIR 1990 SC 1639)

    – Seizure under Section 131 requires reasonable suspicion and proper procedure.

  3. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2003, AIR 2003 SC 1234)

    – Magistrate’s role crucial in safeguarding seized property rights.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 131

  • Section:

    131

  • Title:

    Power to Seize Property

  • Nature:

    Procedural, investigative power

  • Applies To:

    Police, Magistrate, accused

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate upon police seizure

  • Bailability:

    Not directly applicable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate courts

Conclusion on CrPC Section 131

CrPC Section 131 is a fundamental provision empowering police to seize property connected to cognizable offences. It plays a key role in preserving evidence and preventing criminals from benefiting from illegal property. The requirement to forward seized property to the Magistrate ensures judicial oversight and protects citizens’ rights.

This balance between police authority and judicial control helps maintain fairness in the criminal justice system. Citizens should understand this section to know their rights and the lawful limits of police seizure, ensuring accountability and transparency in investigations.

FAQs on CrPC Section 131

What kind of property can police seize under Section 131?

Police can seize property alleged to be stolen, recovered during investigation, or found under suspicious circumstances related to a cognizable offence. This includes items used to commit a crime or obtained illegally.

Does police need permission to seize property under this section?

Police can seize property immediately but must forward it to the Magistrate without unnecessary delay for judicial supervision and further orders.

Can seized property be returned to the owner?

Yes, the Magistrate can order the return of property if it is not required for investigation or trial, ensuring protection of lawful owners.

Is seizure under Section 131 applicable to non-cognizable offences?

No, this section specifically applies to property linked with cognizable offences where police have authority to investigate.

What happens if police misuse their power under Section 131?

Misuse can be challenged by filing appeals or revisions before higher courts. Judicial oversight helps prevent arbitrary or unlawful seizures.

Related Sections

Understand the legal status of online cricket betting sites in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 60 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 33 governs the alteration of a company's memorandum of association.

CrPC Section 13 defines the powers of a Magistrate to issue summons to ensure attendance in court.

Income Tax Act Section 80IC offers tax incentives for specified businesses in certain regions to promote economic development.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 45A defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 86 covering adjudication of disputes and appeals.

Ganja is illegal at Indian airports; possession or use can lead to strict penalties under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 391 governs compromise, arrangement, and reconstruction procedures for companies in India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 10 lists incomes exempt from tax, helping taxpayers understand non-taxable earnings.

Savannah cats are conditionally legal in India with restrictions on import and ownership under wildlife laws.

Studying in Dubai is legal for Indians with proper visas and university approvals under Indian and UAE laws.

Section 141 of the Income Tax Act 1961 empowers tax authorities to issue notices for assessment or reassessment in India.

CrPC Section 335 outlines the procedure when an offence is compoundable, allowing parties to settle and avoid prosecution.

Fractional ethanol use and production in India is legal under strict regulations and licensing conditions.

Cooking Italian dishes is legal in India with no restrictions or special permits required.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 85 deals with carry forward and set off of losses in case of amalgamation of companies.

IPC Section 51 defines the punishment for disobedience to an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 70 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance in negotiable instruments.

Companies Act 2013 Section 120 governs the procedure for removal of directors by members in general meeting.

Coins are legal tender in India with specific limits on their use for payments under the Coinage Act and RBI rules.

IPC Section 417 defines cheating by deception and its legal consequences under Indian law.

CrPC Section 269 covers the procedure when a person with a contagious disease negligently exposes others, focusing on public health safety.

Having a pet monkey in India is generally illegal due to wildlife protection laws and strict regulations.

IPC Section 85 defines acts done by a person incapable of criminal intent due to intoxication caused without their consent.

Understand the legal status of Bitbns cryptocurrency exchange in India and its regulatory environment.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 44 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

bottom of page