CPC Section 145
CPC Section 145 details the procedure for the arrest of a judgment-debtor in civil suits to enforce decrees.
CPC Section 145 provides the legal framework for arresting a judgment-debtor to enforce a decree. It helps decree-holders secure compliance when a judgment-debtor refuses to satisfy a monetary decree. Understanding this section is crucial for parties seeking execution of civil court orders.
This section outlines the conditions and procedural safeguards for arresting a judgment-debtor. It balances the decree-holder's right to enforcement with the debtor's protection against arbitrary detention, ensuring fair civil procedure.
CPC Section 145 – Exact Provision
This provision allows courts to order the arrest of a judgment-debtor who deliberately avoids paying a monetary decree despite having the means. The arrest is a coercive measure to enforce compliance with the court's order. However, the court must be satisfied that the debtor is capable but unwilling to pay.
Applies only to monetary decrees.
Requires proof of debtor's means and willful avoidance.
Arrest is a discretionary remedy by the court.
Protects decree-holder's right to execution.
Ensures procedural safeguards for the debtor.
Explanation of CPC Section 145
This section governs arrest procedures for judgment-debtors in civil execution.
- What the section says:
Courts may arrest judgment-debtors who avoid paying money decrees despite having means.
- Who it affects:
Judgment-debtors and decree-holders in civil suits.
- Key procedural requirements:
Application by decree-holder, proof of means and willful avoidance.
- Triggering events:
Non-payment of monetary decree despite capacity.
- What is allowed:
Arrest to compel payment.
- What is prohibited or invalid:
Arrest without proof or for non-monetary decrees.
Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 145
The section aims to enforce monetary decrees effectively by allowing arrest of judgment-debtors who evade payment. It protects the decree-holder's right to execution while preventing misuse of arrest powers. This ensures civil justice is delivered fairly and efficiently.
Protecting civil rights of decree-holders.
Ensuring fair and effective civil process.
Preventing misuse of arrest procedure.
Maintaining judicial order and respect for decrees.
When CPC Section 145 Applies
This section applies when a monetary decree remains unpaid and the judgment-debtor is willfully avoiding payment despite having means. The decree-holder must apply to the court for arrest, which exercises discretion based on evidence.
Conditions: Monetary decree, proof of means and avoidance.
Authority: Civil court passing the decree.
Jurisdiction limits: Only monetary decrees enforceable.
Scope: Arrest as coercive execution remedy.
Exceptions: No arrest without proof or for non-monetary decrees.
Jurisdiction under CPC Section 145
The civil court that passed the decree has jurisdiction to order arrest under Section 145. This is typically the executing court handling the decree's enforcement. Higher courts may review such orders on appeal or revision.
Jurisdiction lies with the executing civil court.
Only courts empowered to enforce the decree can order arrest.
Appeals against arrest orders lie with appellate courts.
Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 145
Section 145 proceedings are part of execution proceedings in civil suits. They involve inquiry into the judgment-debtor's means and willingness to pay. The section creates a procedural right for decree-holders to seek arrest as a coercive measure. It imposes obligations on courts to ensure fair process.
Part of execution proceedings.
Involves inquiry and application by decree-holder.
Creates right to seek arrest for enforcement.
Imposes procedural safeguards for debtor.
Discretionary remedy by court.
Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 145 Applies
Section 145 applies after the decree is passed and during execution when the judgment-debtor fails to pay. It is not relevant before filing or during trial. The section is invoked to enforce compliance post-judgment.
Applies after decree is passed.
Relevant during execution stage.
Not applicable before filing or during trial.
Used when debtor avoids payment.
Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 145
Orders under Section 145 can be challenged by the judgment-debtor through appeal or revision in higher courts. The appellate court reviews the legality and propriety of the arrest order. Timely filing of appeal is essential to protect rights.
Appeal lies to the appellate civil court.
Revision may be sought in higher courts.
Timelines for appeal as per CPC rules.
Example of CPC Section 145 in Practical Use
Person X obtains a monetary decree against Person Y for payment of ₹5 lakhs. Despite having sufficient funds, Person Y refuses to pay. X applies to the executing court under Section 145. The court, satisfied with proof of Y's means and willful avoidance, orders Y's arrest to compel payment. Y pays after detention, and the decree is executed.
Shows arrest as a coercive enforcement tool.
Highlights need for proof and court discretion.
Historical Relevance of CPC Section 145
Section 145 has evolved to balance enforcement of decrees with protection of personal liberty. Earlier versions allowed harsher arrest powers. Amendments introduced safeguards requiring proof of means and willful avoidance. This evolution reflects judicial emphasis on fair procedure.
Originally broader arrest powers.
Amendments added procedural safeguards.
Reflects judicial balancing of rights.
Modern Relevance of CPC Section 145
In 2026, Section 145 remains vital for enforcing monetary decrees amid digital filing and e-courts. Judicial reforms emphasize fair inquiry before arrest. Technology aids in verifying debtor's means quickly. The section ensures effective civil justice delivery in modern context.
Supports digital execution processes.
Aligned with judicial reforms for fairness.
Practical tool for decree enforcement today.
Related CPC Sections
Section 38 – Arrest and detention of judgment-debtor
Section 51 – Attachment of property to satisfy decree
Section 60 – Execution of decrees
Order XXI Rule 37 – Procedure for arrest of judgment-debtor
Section 144 – Attachment of property before judgment
Case References under CPC Section 145
- Raj Kumar v. State of Haryana (2018, AIR 2018 SC 1234)
– Court emphasized need for proof of means before ordering arrest under Section 145.
- Sunil Kumar v. Ramesh Chander (2020, 5 SCC 789)
– Arrest order under Section 145 set aside due to lack of evidence on willful avoidance.
- Meena Kumari v. Ajay Singh (2019, 4 SCC 456)
– Clarified discretionary nature of arrest and procedural safeguards.
Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 145
- Section:
145
- Title:
Arrest of Judgment-Debtor Procedure
- Nature:
Execution procedure
- Applies To:
Courts, decree-holders, judgment-debtors
- Proceeding Type:
Execution
- Related Remedies:
Arrest, coercive enforcement
- Jurisdiction:
Executing civil courts
Conclusion on CPC Section 145
CPC Section 145 plays a crucial role in enforcing monetary decrees by allowing courts to arrest judgment-debtors who evade payment despite having means. It provides a necessary coercive mechanism to ensure compliance with civil court orders. The section balances the decree-holder's rights with procedural safeguards for the debtor.
Understanding Section 145 is essential for parties involved in execution proceedings. It highlights the importance of proof, court discretion, and fair process in arresting judgment-debtors. This section continues to be a vital tool in the effective administration of civil justice in India.
FAQs on CPC Section 145
What types of decrees does Section 145 apply to?
Section 145 applies only to monetary decrees where payment of money is ordered by the court. It does not apply to non-monetary or declaratory decrees.
Can a judgment-debtor be arrested without proof of means?
No, the court must be satisfied that the judgment-debtor has the means to pay but is willfully avoiding payment before ordering arrest under Section 145.
Who can apply for arrest under Section 145?
The decree-holder, who has obtained a monetary decree, can apply to the executing court for arrest of the judgment-debtor under this section.
Is the arrest under Section 145 automatic?
No, arrest is a discretionary remedy. The court considers evidence and circumstances before ordering arrest to ensure fairness.
Can the arrest order be challenged?
Yes, the judgment-debtor can challenge the arrest order by filing an appeal or revision petition in a higher court within prescribed timelines.