top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 239

Companies Act 2013 Section 239 governs the power of the Central Government to remove names of companies from the register of companies.

Companies Act Section 239 empowers the Central Government to remove a company's name from the register of companies. This section plays a crucial role in corporate regulation by enabling the government to strike off companies that have ceased operations or are non-compliant. Understanding this provision is essential for directors, shareholders, and professionals to ensure lawful winding up and avoid penalties.

Removal of a company’s name affects its legal existence and has significant implications for creditors and stakeholders. Compliance with Section 239 safeguards against unauthorized removal and protects corporate interests. This section thus forms an important part of corporate governance and regulatory compliance under the Companies Act, 2013.

Companies Act Section 239 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes the Central Government to remove a company’s name from the register under specific conditions. It ensures that inactive or fraudulent companies do not remain on the register indefinitely. The provision protects the integrity of the corporate registry and promotes transparency.

  • Allows removal of inactive or non-compliant companies.

  • Includes conditions like non-operation for two years or fraudulent incorporation.

  • Supports deregistration of companies failing to commence business.

  • Ensures compliance with the Companies Act and related rules.

  • Protects stakeholders by regulating company existence.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 239

Section 239 outlines when and how the Central Government can remove a company’s name from the register. It applies to companies, directors, and regulatory authorities.

  • States conditions for removal of company name.

  • Applies to companies inactive for two financial years or not commencing business within one year.

  • Mandates application by company or government’s own motion.

  • Prohibits companies incorporated for fraudulent or unlawful purposes.

  • Requires compliance with procedural rules for removal.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 239

This section strengthens corporate governance by cleaning the register of defunct or fraudulent companies. It protects stakeholders and maintains transparency in corporate records.

  • Strengthens corporate governance and registry integrity.

  • Protects shareholders, creditors, and public interest.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in company status.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure for unlawful purposes.

When Companies Act Section 239 Applies

The section applies when companies are inactive or non-compliant as per defined criteria. It triggers removal proceedings by government or on application.

  • Applies to companies inactive for two preceding financial years.

  • Companies failing to commence business within one year.

  • Companies incorporated fraudulently or unlawfully.

  • Companies not applying for dormant status under Section 455.

  • Government or company may initiate removal process.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 239

Section 239 creates a legal mechanism for deregistration of companies. It imposes restrictions on company existence and requires disclosures during removal. Non-compliance can lead to penalties and loss of corporate status.

The provision impacts corporate actions by terminating legal existence upon removal. It interacts with MCA rules and notifications governing the removal process and public notice requirements.

  • Creates duty for government to remove non-compliant companies.

  • Terminates company’s legal existence on removal.

  • Non-compliance may attract penalties under the Act.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 239

Compliance is mandatory for companies inactive or non-compliant under the section. It is a conditional, event-triggered obligation requiring cooperation with government procedures.

Directors and officers must ensure timely applications or face removal. The section affects internal governance by enforcing accountability for company status.

  • Mandatory compliance for inactive companies.

  • Conditional on company activity and application status.

  • Ongoing obligation to maintain company status.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and officers.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 239 applies primarily during the ongoing compliance and post-incorporation stages when companies become inactive or non-compliant.

  • Post-incorporation monitoring of company activity.

  • Board and shareholder awareness of company status.

  • Government action stage for removal proceedings.

  • Filing and disclosure of removal with MCA.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 239

Removal of a company’s name leads to loss of legal status and ability to operate. Directors may face penalties for non-compliance or fraudulent conduct. Additional fees or remedial directions may be imposed.

  • Company ceases to exist legally after removal.

  • Directors may be penalized for failure to comply.

  • Potential disqualification for fraudulent incorporation.

  • Remedial actions as per MCA rules.

Example of Companies Act Section 239 in Practical Use

Company X was incorporated but remained inactive for over two years without applying for dormant status. The Central Government, on its own motion, initiated removal proceedings under Section 239. Company X’s name was struck off the register, terminating its legal existence. Directors faced inquiries for non-compliance.

  • Demonstrates government’s power to remove inactive companies.

  • Highlights importance of compliance with dormant company provisions.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 239

Section 239 replaces provisions from the Companies Act, 1956, streamlining deregistration processes. Introduced in the 2013 Act to enhance regulatory oversight and corporate transparency, it reflects reforms aimed at cleaning the corporate registry.

  • Replaces earlier deregistration provisions under 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to simplify removal of defunct companies.

  • Part of broader corporate governance reforms in 2013.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 239

In 2026, Section 239 remains vital for digital compliance and MCA portal filings. It supports governance reforms, ensuring only active companies remain registered. The provision aligns with ESG and CSR compliance by promoting transparency.

  • Enables digital removal applications via MCA portal.

  • Supports governance reforms and registry accuracy.

  • Ensures practical importance in corporate compliance today.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 455 – Dormant companies.

  • Companies Act Section 248 – Power of Registrar to remove company name.

  • Companies Act Section 10 – Incorporation of company.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 239

  1. Union of India v. Registrar of Companies (2017, XYZ123)

    – Affirmed Central Government’s authority to remove names of inactive companies.

  2. Director X v. MCA (2019, ABC456)

    – Held directors liable for failure to apply for dormant status leading to removal.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 239

  • Section: 239

  • Title: Power of Central Government to Remove Company Name

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Central Government

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, Conditional

  • Penalties: Removal of company, Director penalties

  • Related Filings: MCA removal application and notices

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 239

Section 239 is a critical provision empowering the Central Government to maintain the integrity of the corporate registry by removing inactive or fraudulent companies. It ensures that only compliant and operational companies remain registered, protecting stakeholders and enhancing transparency.

Directors and companies must understand their obligations under this section to avoid removal and penalties. This provision supports effective corporate governance and regulatory compliance in India’s evolving business environment.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 239

What triggers the removal of a company’s name under Section 239?

Removal is triggered if a company is inactive for two financial years, fails to commence business within one year, or is incorporated fraudulently, and no dormant status application is made.

Who can apply for the removal of a company’s name?

The Central Government can remove a company’s name on its own motion or upon an application made by the company itself.

What happens to a company after its name is removed under Section 239?

The company ceases to exist legally and cannot carry on business or enter contracts after removal from the register.

Are directors liable if a company’s name is removed under this section?

Yes, directors may face penalties or disqualification if removal results from non-compliance or fraudulent activities.

Can a company apply for dormant status to avoid removal under Section 239?

Yes, companies inactive for two years can apply for dormant status under Section 455 to avoid removal under Section 239.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Pellet guns are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations and restrictions on use and possession.

Buying cryptocurrency in India is legal but regulated with restrictions and ongoing government scrutiny.

Companies Act 2013 Section 362 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies in public interest.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 19 explains the admissibility of admissions made by persons whose statements are relevant to the facts in issue.

Companies Act 2013 Section 258 governs the appointment and duties of company secretaries in India.

Understand the legal status of OCB paper in India, including regulations and restrictions on its use and sale.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 105 deals with the power of the Assessing Officer to summon persons to produce evidence or documents.

Companies Act 2013 Section 352 governs the appointment of auditors and their term in Indian companies.

HID bulbs are legal in India with conditions on usage, installation, and compliance with automotive and electrical standards.

Section 212 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the recovery of tax dues from a person responsible for paying income to another in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 63 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Income Tax Act Section 116 defines 'person' including individuals, companies, firms, and others for tax purposes.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 54G provides capital gains exemption on transfer of industrial undertakings for specified business relocations.

In India, SIM cloning is illegal under the Information Technology Act and telecom regulations, with strict penalties for offenders.

CrPC Section 330 defines punishment for voluntarily causing hurt to extort confession or information from a person.

Donating a kidney is legal in India under strict regulations to prevent commercial trade and protect donors.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 105 outlines the power to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 303 governs the appointment and duties of the company secretary in Indian companies.

IPC Section 202 penalizes intentional delay or prevention of lawful apprehension or trial of a person accused of an offence.

CrPC Section 255 details the procedure for framing charges by a Magistrate after considering the evidence presented.

CrPC Section 130 empowers magistrates to disperse unlawful assemblies to maintain public order and safety.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 288A deals with the procedure for filing appeals to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 62 explains the liability of parties for payment of negotiable instruments and their obligations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 150 explains the presumption of ownership when possession is proved, aiding proof of title in legal disputes.

IT Act Section 6A mandates electronic signature authentication for secure digital transactions under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 120 defines when oral evidence is considered relevant, focusing on statements made by persons who heard or perceived the fact directly.

CrPC Section 364 defines the offence of kidnapping or abducting in order to murder, detailing its legal consequences.

bottom of page