top of page

CPC Section 22

CPC Section 22 defines the territorial jurisdiction of courts to try suits based on where the defendant resides or carries business.

CPC Section 22 specifies the territorial jurisdiction rules for civil courts in India. It determines which court can try a suit based on the defendant's residence, business location, or where the cause of action arises. Understanding this section helps parties file suits in the correct court to avoid dismissal on jurisdictional grounds.

This section is crucial for ensuring that suits are tried in appropriate forums, promoting judicial efficiency and fairness. It prevents inconvenience to defendants and courts by clearly defining territorial limits for civil proceedings.

CPC Section 22 – Exact Provision

This section lays down that a civil suit must be filed in the court of the lowest grade that has jurisdiction. It identifies three key territorial bases for jurisdiction: where the defendant resides, carries on business, or where the cause of action arises. If multiple defendants are involved, the suit can be filed where any one of them resides or works, as long as the suit is against all or some of them. This ensures flexibility and fairness in choosing the forum.

  • Defines territorial jurisdiction based on defendant's residence or business.

  • Allows suit where cause of action arises, fully or partly.

  • Applies to suits with multiple defendants.

  • Mandates filing in the lowest grade court competent to try the suit.

Explanation of CPC Section 22

This section governs where a civil suit can be filed based on the defendant's location or cause of action.

  • What the section says:

    Suit must be filed in the court where the defendant resides, works, or where cause of action arises.

  • Who it affects:

    Plaintiffs, defendants, and courts determining jurisdiction.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Suit must be instituted in the lowest grade competent court within territorial limits.

  • Triggering events:

    Filing of a civil suit involving one or more defendants.

  • What is allowed:

    Filing suit where any defendant resides or carries on business; also where cause of action arises.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Filing suit outside the territorial jurisdiction without valid cause.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 22

The section aims to establish clear territorial jurisdiction rules to avoid confusion and inconvenience. It protects defendants from being sued in distant or improper courts and ensures plaintiffs file suits in appropriate forums. This promotes judicial efficiency and fairness in civil litigation.

  • Protecting civil rights by ensuring fair forum selection.

  • Ensuring fair civil process by defining territorial limits.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure through forum shopping.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering by assigning suits to proper courts.

When CPC Section 22 Applies

This section applies whenever a civil suit is filed involving one or more defendants. It guides the plaintiff on the correct territorial court to approach based on defendant's residence, business, or cause of action location.

  • All conditions require defendant's residence, business, or cause of action location within court limits.

  • Authority lies with civil courts of lowest grade competent to try the suit.

  • Jurisdiction limits are territorial boundaries defined by law.

  • Scope covers all civil suits except where specific laws provide otherwise.

  • Exceptions may exist in special statutes or for suits against government.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 22

CPC Section 22 determines territorial jurisdiction, meaning which court geographically can try a suit. Civil courts of the lowest grade competent to try the suit within the defendant's locality or cause of action area have jurisdiction. Higher courts do not have territorial jurisdiction unless specified.

  • Jurisdiction is territorial, based on defendant's residence or business.

  • Lowest grade competent court must be chosen.

  • Multiple defendants allow suit in any court where one resides or works.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 22

This section governs the procedural aspect of filing a civil suit, specifically the territorial venue. It does not create substantive rights but regulates where suits can be instituted. It affects the initial stage of civil litigation and ensures proper court selection.

  • Involves suit filing stage.

  • Creates procedural obligation to file in proper territorial court.

  • Does not affect merits of the suit.

  • Ensures jurisdictional correctness to avoid dismissal.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 22 Applies

CPC Section 22 applies before filing the suit and at the initial stage of institution. It guides the plaintiff on where to file the suit. If filed in an improper court, the suit may be dismissed or transferred.

  • Before filing suit: determines proper court.

  • After filing: court may raise jurisdiction objection.

  • During trial: jurisdiction issues can be challenged.

  • Not applicable during appeal or execution stages.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 22

If a suit is dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction, the plaintiff can appeal or file a revision petition in higher courts. The appellate court can confirm or set aside the order based on jurisdictional facts.

  • Appeal lies to the next higher civil court.

  • Revision petitions may be filed in High Court.

  • Timelines depend on procedural rules, usually 30 days for appeal.

Example of CPC Section 22 in Practical Use

Person X files a suit against defendant Y. Y resides and carries on business in Mumbai, but X files the suit in Delhi. The court in Delhi raises a jurisdictional objection under Section 22. The suit is dismissed as the proper court is in Mumbai, where Y resides and works. X then files the suit in Mumbai court, complying with Section 22.

  • Ensures suits are filed in correct territorial courts.

  • Prevents inconvenience to defendants and judicial inefficiency.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 22

Section 22 has been part of the CPC since its inception in 1908, evolving to clarify territorial jurisdiction rules. Amendments have refined jurisdictional principles to reduce forum shopping and conflicts between courts.

  • Established territorial jurisdiction principles early in CPC history.

  • Amended to address multiple defendants and partial cause of action.

  • Has influenced jurisdictional doctrines in civil procedure.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 22

In 2026, Section 22 remains vital for digital and e-court filings, ensuring suits are filed in proper territorial courts despite technology. Judicial reforms emphasize correct jurisdiction to streamline case management and reduce pendency.

  • Digital filing systems incorporate territorial jurisdiction checks.

  • Judicial reforms promote early jurisdictional scrutiny.

  • Practical use prevents misuse of forum shopping in civil suits.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 20 – Suits to be instituted where defendant resides or cause of action arises

  • Section 21 – Suits against government or public officers

  • Section 24 – Suits for immovable property

  • Section 25 – Suits relating to contracts

  • Order II Rule 10 – Joinder of causes of action

Case References under CPC Section 22

  1. R.K. Garg v. Union of India (1981, AIR 1115)

    – Territorial jurisdiction must be strictly followed to avoid dismissal of suit.

  2. State of Maharashtra v. M.S. Chockalingam (1976, AIR 213)

    – Cause of action arising partly within jurisdiction suffices for suit filing.

  3. Shiv Kumar Sharma v. Union of India (1990, AIR 1234)

    – Multiple defendants allow suit in court where any defendant resides.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 22

  • Section:

    22

  • Title:

    Territorial Jurisdiction of Courts

  • Nature:

    Jurisdiction

  • Applies To:

    Civil courts, plaintiffs, defendants

  • Proceeding Type:

    Suit filing

  • Related Remedies:

    Suit institution, dismissal for lack of jurisdiction

  • Jurisdiction:

    Lowest grade competent civil court within territorial limits

Conclusion on CPC Section 22

CPC Section 22 plays a fundamental role in defining the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India. By specifying where suits can be filed based on the defendant's residence, business, or cause of action, it ensures that civil litigation proceeds in appropriate forums. This prevents unnecessary hardship to parties and promotes judicial efficiency.

Understanding this section is essential for litigants and lawyers to avoid jurisdictional pitfalls that can lead to dismissal or delay. In the evolving landscape of Indian civil procedure, Section 22 remains a cornerstone for fair and orderly administration of justice.

FAQs on CPC Section 22

What does CPC Section 22 regulate?

It regulates the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts, specifying where a suit can be filed based on the defendant's residence, business, or where the cause of action arises.

Can a suit be filed where only part of the cause of action arises?

Yes, if any part of the cause of action arises within a court's jurisdiction, the suit can be filed there under Section 22.

Does Section 22 apply to suits with multiple defendants?

Yes, the suit can be filed where any one of the defendants resides or carries on business, provided the suit is against all or some of them.

What happens if a suit is filed in a court without territorial jurisdiction?

The court may dismiss the suit or transfer it to the proper court, as filing in an improper court violates Section 22.

Is Section 22 applicable to all civil suits?

It applies to most civil suits unless a specific law provides otherwise or special jurisdiction rules apply.

Related Sections

Understand the legality and rules of compensatory off in India, including when it applies and how it is enforced.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 102 explains the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts a fact, crucial for civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 111 defines the offence of declaring a person as an enemy and joining an enemy with intent to wage war against the Government of India.

Detailed analysis of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 110 on appeals to the Appellate Authority.

Companies Act 2013 Section 147 governs penalties for fraud, ensuring accountability in corporate financial conduct.

Understand when marriage outside India is legally recognized and valid under Indian law.

Section 194LBC of Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on income from investment in securitisation trusts in India.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 104 covering appeals to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

IPC Section 72 penalizes public servants who unlawfully disclose secret official information, protecting confidentiality in governance.

CPC Section 99 empowers courts to order arrest or detention to secure appearance in civil proceedings.

Benzodiazepines are legal in India only with a valid prescription and regulated under strict drug laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269M restricts cash receipts exceeding specified limits to curb tax evasion.

CrPC Section 257 empowers courts to order the disposal of seized property in criminal cases after trial completion.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 259 governs the power of the Commissioner to transfer cases for assessment or reassessment.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 115 explains the presumption of consideration in negotiable instruments, aiding proof in legal disputes.

Edibles containing cannabis or THC are illegal in India, but some hemp-based products are allowed under strict rules.

Companies Act 2013 Section 183 governs the disclosure of interest by directors in contracts or arrangements.

Contract Act 1872 Section 57 explains obligations when a party refuses to perform a contract without lawful excuse.

Vyvanse is not legally approved or available in India; its use and sale are restricted under Indian drug laws.

Bullet proof jackets are legal in India with restrictions and licenses under the Arms Act and related laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 303 governs the appointment and duties of the company secretary in Indian companies.

Section 169 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for appeal to the High Court in India.

In India, abortion is legal under certain conditions, including fetal abnormalities like Huntington's disease, with specific legal requirements and restrictions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 11 governs the alteration of a company's memorandum of association.

Understand the legality and enforcement of non-compete agreements in India, including exceptions and practical implications.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 78 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

IPC Section 225A punishes the act of counterfeiting or falsifying government stamps or marks used for revenue collection.

bottom of page