top of page

CPC Section 23

CPC Section 23 defines the meaning of 'decree' and its significance in civil proceedings.

CPC Section 23 explains what constitutes a decree in civil proceedings. A decree is a formal expression of an adjudication by a court that conclusively determines the rights of parties involved in a suit. Understanding this section is crucial for anyone involved in civil litigation, as it marks the point where a court's decision becomes enforceable.

This section helps distinguish between different types of court orders and clarifies when a judgment attains the status of a decree. Knowing this aids litigants and legal practitioners in identifying enforceable decisions and planning subsequent legal steps.

CPC Section 23 – Exact Provision

This section defines a decree as the official decision by a court that settles the rights of parties in a civil suit. It can be final, resolving all issues, or preliminary, deciding certain points to facilitate further proceedings. The decree is distinct from a mere judgment or order and is enforceable by law.

  • Defines 'decree' as a formal court adjudication.

  • Distinguishes between preliminary and final decrees.

  • Determines when rights of parties are conclusively settled.

  • Forms the basis for execution proceedings.

Explanation of CPC Section 23

This section clarifies what a decree is in civil law.

  • What the section says:

    A decree is a formal court decision conclusively determining parties' rights.

  • Who it affects:

    Parties to a civil suit and courts handling civil disputes.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Must be an adjudication expressed formally by the court.

  • Triggering events:

    When the court delivers a judgment settling rights.

  • What is allowed:

    Both preliminary and final decrees are recognized.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Mere orders or judgments without conclusive rights determination are not decrees.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 23

The section aims to clearly define when a court's decision becomes a decree, marking the enforceable conclusion of rights in a suit. It ensures clarity in civil procedure by differentiating decrees from other court orders, facilitating proper execution and appeals.

  • Protecting civil rights by formalizing adjudications.

  • Ensuring fair civil process through clear decision status.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure by distinguishing orders from decrees.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering by defining enforceable decisions.

When CPC Section 23 Applies

This section applies whenever a civil court delivers a decision that settles rights between parties. It is relevant at the conclusion of trial stages or during interlocutory decisions that affect rights.

  • Conditions: Court must formally express adjudication.

  • Authority: Civil courts at various levels.

  • Jurisdiction limits: Applies within courts empowered to decide civil suits.

  • Scope: Covers all suits where rights are determined.

  • Limitations: Does not apply to orders or judgments lacking conclusive rights determination.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 23

Any civil court empowered to try suits under the Code of Civil Procedure can pass a decree as defined in Section 23. This includes district courts, subordinate courts, and courts of original jurisdiction. The section does not restrict which court may pass a decree but requires the court to have jurisdiction over the suit.

  • Applicable to courts competent to try civil suits.

  • Decree must be passed by a court with jurisdiction over the subject matter.

  • Higher courts can pass decrees on appeal or revision within their jurisdiction.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 23

Section 23 relates to the stage where a court formally adjudicates rights, resulting in a decree. This can occur after trial, during interlocutory proceedings, or at final judgment. The decree creates enforceable rights and obligations, enabling execution proceedings.

  • Involves formal adjudication of rights.

  • Creates enforceable orders (decrees).

  • Can be preliminary or final.

  • Triggers execution and appeal rights.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 23 Applies

Section 23 applies primarily at the conclusion of trial or hearing stages when the court delivers its formal decision. It can also apply during interlocutory stages when preliminary decrees are passed to decide specific issues.

  • After filing and trial of suit.

  • During final judgment or interlocutory decisions.

  • Before execution proceedings commence.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 23

Decrees passed under Section 23 can be challenged through appeals or revisions as provided under the CPC. The aggrieved party may file an appeal in a higher court within prescribed timelines, ensuring judicial review of the decree.

  • Appeal lies to the appropriate appellate court.

  • Revision may be sought in higher courts under certain conditions.

  • Timelines for appeal are governed by CPC rules.

Example of CPC Section 23 in Practical Use

Person X files a suit for recovery of money. After trial, the court passes a decree ordering the defendant to pay the amount. This decree conclusively determines the rights of both parties and can be executed if the defendant fails to comply.

  • Decree formalizes court's decision.

  • Enables enforcement of rights.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 23

Section 23 has been part of the CPC since its inception, providing a clear definition of decree. Over time, amendments have clarified distinctions between judgments, orders, and decrees to streamline civil procedure.

  • Established clarity in civil adjudications.

  • Distinguished decree from other court orders.

  • Adapted to evolving procedural needs.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 23

In 2026, Section 23 remains vital for digital courts and e-filing systems, ensuring that formal decrees are properly recorded and enforceable. Judicial reforms emphasize clarity in decrees to reduce litigation delays and improve justice delivery.

  • Supports digital filing and record-keeping.

  • Integral to judicial reforms for efficiency.

  • Ensures enforceability in modern civil procedure.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 2(2) – Definition of 'judgment'

  • Section 2(9) – Definition of 'order'

  • Section 35 – Decrees passed by courts of limited jurisdiction

  • Order XXI – Execution of decrees and orders

  • Section 96 – Appeal from original decree

Case References under CPC Section 23

  1. Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin (1970 AIR 269)

    – Clarified the distinction between decree and judgment for enforcement purposes.

  2. R.K. Verma v. Union of India (AIR 1965 SC 845)

    – Affirmed that only formal adjudications determining rights qualify as decrees.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 23

  • Section:

    23

  • Title:

    Meaning of Decree

  • Nature:

    Procedure / Decree

  • Applies To:

    Civil courts, parties to suits

  • Proceeding Type:

    Trial, interlocutory, final judgment

  • Related Remedies:

    Execution, appeal

  • Jurisdiction:

    Courts competent to try civil suits

Conclusion on CPC Section 23

CPC Section 23 is fundamental in civil procedure as it defines when a court's decision becomes a decree, marking the enforceable determination of parties' rights. This clarity is essential for litigants and courts to understand the status of decisions and the appropriate next steps.

By distinguishing decrees from other orders or judgments, the section ensures proper execution and appeal processes. It supports the orderly administration of justice and helps prevent confusion regarding enforceability of court decisions.

FAQs on CPC Section 23

What is the difference between a decree and a judgment under CPC Section 23?

A decree is a formal expression of adjudication that conclusively determines rights, whereas a judgment is the court's statement of reasons for the decision. Not all judgments result in decrees.

Can a decree be preliminary under Section 23?

Yes, Section 23 allows for preliminary decrees which decide certain issues but do not finally dispose of the entire suit.

Who can pass a decree as per Section 23?

Any civil court having jurisdiction over the suit can pass a decree formally adjudicating the rights of parties.

Is a decree enforceable immediately after it is passed?

Yes, once a decree is passed, it becomes enforceable unless stayed or set aside by an appellate court.

Can a decree be challenged?

Yes, parties aggrieved by a decree can file appeals or seek revision within the timelines prescribed by the CPC.

Related Sections

Section 207 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates notice for tax demand, ensuring taxpayers are informed before recovery actions in India.

Income Tax Act Section 80R provides deduction for interest paid on loans for higher education of self or relatives.

Growing hemp in India is legal under strict regulations with licensing and THC limits enforced by the government.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 11 empowers Consumer Commissions to issue interim orders during dispute resolution.

IPC Section 126 prohibits military personnel from communicating with enemies or assisting them, ensuring national security during war.

Understand the legality of a 3 months notice period in India and how it applies in employment contracts.

Lobotomy is illegal in India with no legal provision allowing its practice due to ethical and medical standards.

Ajinomoto is legal in India with regulated use as a food additive under food safety laws.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 88 empowers the Central Government to make rules for effective consumer protection.

Discover the legal status of 4Rabet in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about online betting.

Issuing fatwas is legal in India as religious opinions but they have no legal force under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 193 prohibits false statements in prospectus to protect investors and ensure truthful disclosures.

Recording conversations in India is conditionally legal with consent or under specific circumstances governed by law.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 82 covering tax deduction at source rules and compliance.

Section 168 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the procedure for rectification of mistakes in income tax orders in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 46 defines how facts can be proved by oral evidence, emphasizing the importance of witness testimony in legal proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 143 details the powers and duties of auditors in India, ensuring audit quality and accountability.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 75A defines the duties and liabilities of partners in firms regarding negotiable instruments.

CrPC Section 35 outlines the procedure for taking a person into custody by a police officer or private person without a warrant.

IPC Section 171D penalizes promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, or caste to disturb public tranquility.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 140 defines the presumption of ownership of documents, crucial for proving possession and authenticity in legal disputes.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 146 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 80L provides deductions for profits of certain undertakings in specified backward areas.

Income Tax Act Section 33ABA provides depreciation benefits for expenditure on scientific research related to business.

Promoting religion in India is legal with restrictions to maintain public order and secularism under the Constitution.

CrPC Section 455 defines the offence of house-trespass and its legal consequences under Indian law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 114 covers presumptions as to negotiable instruments, aiding legal proof in disputes.

bottom of page