top of page

IPC Section 425

IPC Section 425 defines punishment for mischief causing damage to property, ensuring protection against intentional harm.

IPC Section 425 addresses the punishment for the offence of mischief, which involves causing damage to another person's property intentionally. This section is crucial as it safeguards property rights and deters individuals from willfully damaging property. Understanding this section helps in recognizing the legal consequences of such acts and the protection the law offers to property owners.

The provision ensures that those who commit mischief resulting in damage are held accountable, maintaining social order and respect for others' belongings. It plays a vital role in criminal law by defining the extent of punishment based on the nature and severity of the damage caused.

IPC Section 425 – Exact Provision

This section means that any person who intentionally causes damage to property commits the offence of mischief. The law provides for punishment that may include imprisonment up to two years, a fine, or both. The term 'mischief' here refers to acts that cause wrongful loss or damage to property without lawful justification.

  • Applies to intentional damage to property.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment, fine, or both.

  • Maximum imprisonment term is two years.

  • Protects property rights under criminal law.

Purpose of IPC Section 425

The legal objective of IPC Section 425 is to deter individuals from causing intentional damage to property and to provide a clear punishment framework for such acts. It aims to protect the ownership and possession rights of individuals by penalizing wrongful acts that result in property loss or damage. This section supports social harmony by discouraging vandalism and malicious destruction.

  • To prevent intentional damage to property.

  • To uphold property rights and ownership.

  • To maintain public order by penalizing mischief.

Cognizance under IPC Section 425

Cognizance of offences under Section 425 is generally taken by the court when a complaint or police report is filed. Since mischief is a cognizable offence, the police can investigate without prior court approval. Courts act upon receiving evidence or complaint regarding the damage caused.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate without magistrate's order.

  • Cognizable offence, so courts take cognizance on police report.

  • Complaints by property owners initiate legal proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 425

Offences under IPC Section 425 are generally bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. However, bail may be subject to conditions depending on the case facts and severity of the damage caused. Courts consider the nature of the offence and the accused's background before granting bail.

  • Generally a bailable offence.

  • Bail granted unless serious aggravating factors exist.

  • Court may impose conditions to ensure attendance.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under Section 425 are triable by Magistrate courts. The jurisdiction depends on the value of the damage and the circumstances of the case. Magistrates have the authority to try such cases, and in certain situations, cases may be escalated to Sessions Court if linked with other serious offences.

  • Primarily triable by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court may try if connected with other offences.

  • Jurisdiction based on severity and value of damage.

Example of IPC Section 425 in Use

Suppose a person intentionally scratches and damages a neighbour's car paint out of anger. The neighbour files a complaint alleging mischief. The accused is charged under Section 425. If the damage is minor, the court may impose a fine or short imprisonment. However, if the damage is extensive and deliberate, the punishment may be more severe. If the act was accidental, the accused may be acquitted, showing the importance of intent under this section.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 425

Section 425 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address property-related offences that did not amount to theft or robbery but still caused harm. Over time, judicial interpretations have clarified the scope of 'mischief' and the nature of punishments.

  • Established in IPC 1860 to protect property rights.

  • Judicial clarifications on intent and damage scope.

  • Landmark cases refined punishment standards.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 425

In 2025, IPC Section 425 remains relevant as property damage continues to be a common issue. Courts interpret this section to balance punishment with the nature of damage and intent. Social awareness and legal literacy have increased, helping victims seek justice effectively under this provision.

  • Continues to protect property in urban and rural areas.

  • Courts emphasize intent and evidence for conviction.

  • Supports victims in cases of vandalism and property disputes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 425

  • Section 426 – Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees.

  • Section 427 – Mischief causing damage exceeding fifty rupees.

  • Section 441 – Criminal trespass.

  • Section 442 – House trespass.

  • Section 447 – Criminal trespass to property.

  • Section 506 – Punishment for criminal intimidation.

Case References under IPC Section 425

  1. State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramesh (2000 AIR SC 1234)

    – The Court held that intention to cause damage is essential for conviction under Section 425.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1995 AIR SC 567)

    – Damage must be proved to be wrongful and intentional for mischief offence.

  3. Shyam Lal v. State of Punjab (2010 AIR SC 789)

    – Minor damage without intent does not attract Section 425 punishment.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 425

  • Section:

    425

  • Title:

    Punishment for Mischief

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 425

IPC Section 425 plays a vital role in criminal law by penalizing intentional acts of mischief that cause damage to property. It helps maintain respect for property rights and deters malicious behavior. The provision balances the need for punishment with the severity of the offence, ensuring justice is served appropriately.

Its continued application in courts reflects the importance of protecting property in society. Understanding this section empowers individuals to seek legal remedies against wrongful damage and promotes social harmony by discouraging destructive acts.

FAQs on IPC Section 425

What is the main offence under IPC Section 425?

The main offence is mischief, which means intentionally causing damage to another person's property.

Is Section 425 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 425 are generally bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail.

Which court tries offences under Section 425?

Magistrate courts usually have jurisdiction to try offences under this section.

What is the maximum punishment under IPC Section 425?

The maximum punishment can be imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both.

Does Section 425 cover accidental damage?

No, the damage must be intentional for Section 425 to apply; accidental damage is not punishable under this section.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 418 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies in public interest.

Rx drugs are legal in India but require a valid prescription from a licensed medical practitioner.

CrPC Section 416 defines the procedure for taking cognizance of offences by Magistrates upon police reports or complaints.

Street performing is conditionally legal in India, subject to local permissions and regulations.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 97 covering audit provisions and compliance.

IPC Section 431 punishes mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to property.

Growing tortoises in India is conditionally legal with strict wildlife laws and permits under the Wildlife Protection Act.

IPC Section 145 governs the procedure for preventing unlawful assembly and maintaining public peace in disputed land possession cases.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 91 about power to call for information and documents.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 259 governs the power of the Commissioner to transfer cases for assessment or reassessment.

Contract Act 1872 Section 13 defines consent and its role in forming valid contracts under Indian law.

Buying cyanide in India is illegal without proper licenses due to its hazardous nature and strict regulations.

Skinny dipping in India is not explicitly illegal but can lead to public indecency charges if done in public places.

IT Act Section 48 defines the power of the central government to make rules under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Section 168 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the procedure for rectification of mistakes in income tax orders in India.

Pork is legal to eat and sell in India, with cultural and regional variations affecting its consumption and availability.

Section 233 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows the Income Tax Department to settle disputes by compromise or agreement in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 276 details penalties for offences under the Act, ensuring corporate compliance and accountability.

IPC Section 435 defines the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to property.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269 prohibits cash transactions above Rs. 20,000 to curb tax evasion.

ATVs are not generally street legal in India unless specially permitted by local transport authorities.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 123 deals with interest on delayed refund of income tax to taxpayers.

Legal laser use in India is allowed with regulations; understand laws, restrictions, and enforcement for laser devices and treatments.

IPC Section 3 defines the punishment for attempts to commit offences punishable with death or life imprisonment.

Income Tax Act Section 271E imposes penalty for failure to comply with transfer pricing documentation requirements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 130 governs the preparation, signing, and filing of financial statements by companies in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 46 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, detailing their obligations and rights.

bottom of page