top of page

CPC Section 57

CPC Section 57 allows transfer of suits from one court to another for convenience or to prevent injustice.

CPC Section 57 deals with the transfer of suits from one civil court to another. This provision helps in ensuring convenience for the parties involved or to prevent any injustice that might arise from continuing the suit in the original court. Understanding this section is crucial for litigants and lawyers to know when and how a suit can be moved to a more appropriate forum.

The section empowers the High Court to transfer a suit pending in one court to another court within its jurisdiction. This mechanism promotes fairness and efficiency in civil litigation by addressing issues related to jurisdiction, convenience, and impartiality.

CPC Section 57 – Exact Provision

This section grants the High Court the authority to transfer suits between subordinate courts under its jurisdiction. The transfer can be initiated by the court itself or upon request by a party. The main reasons for such transfer are to ensure convenience for the parties or to avoid injustice that may occur if the suit continues in the original court.

  • Applies only to suits pending in subordinate courts under the same High Court.

  • Transfer can be initiated by the High Court or by a party's application.

  • Purpose is to ensure convenience or prevent injustice.

  • Does not apply to appeals or other proceedings.

Explanation of CPC Section 57

This section outlines the conditions under which a civil suit can be transferred between courts.

  • What the section says:

    The High Court can transfer suits between subordinate courts for convenience or to prevent injustice.

  • Who it affects:

    Parties involved in civil suits and subordinate courts under the High Court.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Application by a party or suo motu action by the High Court.

  • Triggering events:

    When inconvenience or potential injustice is identified.

  • What is allowed:

    Transfer of suits pending in subordinate courts.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Transfer of appeals or suits outside the High Court's jurisdiction.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 57

The main aim of Section 57 is to facilitate justice by allowing the High Court to move suits to courts better suited to handle them. This prevents delays, inconvenience, and unfairness that may arise due to improper forum or local bias. It strengthens judicial efficiency and fairness in civil litigation.

  • Protecting civil rights by ensuring access to a convenient forum.

  • Ensuring fair civil process by preventing bias or hardship.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure by avoiding forum shopping.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering by proper allocation of cases.

When CPC Section 57 Applies

This section applies when a suit is pending in a subordinate court and there is a valid reason to transfer it to another subordinate court under the same High Court. The transfer can be requested by parties or initiated by the High Court to ensure justice and convenience.

  • All required conditions: Suit must be pending in subordinate courts under the same High Court.

  • Authority: High Court has exclusive power to order transfer.

  • Jurisdiction limits: Only within subordinate courts of the same High Court.

  • Scope: Transfer for convenience or to prevent injustice.

  • Limitations: Does not apply to appeals or courts outside the High Court's control.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 57

The jurisdiction to transfer suits under Section 57 lies exclusively with the High Court. It can transfer suits between any subordinate courts within its territorial jurisdiction. This power is exercised to ensure that suits are heard in the most appropriate forum, considering convenience and fairness.

  • Only the High Court can order transfers under this section.

  • Transfers are limited to subordinate courts under the same High Court.

  • District Courts and lower courts cannot transfer suits themselves under this provision.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 57

Section 57 does not create a new suit or appeal but deals with the procedural aspect of transferring an ongoing suit. It is a procedural power to relocate the suit for convenience or to avoid injustice. It neither creates substantive rights nor affects the merits of the suit.

  • Involves transfer of pending suits between subordinate courts.

  • Does not affect the substantive rights or obligations of parties.

  • Is a procedural mechanism to ensure fair trial and convenience.

  • Does not apply to appeals, revisions, or execution proceedings.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 57 Applies

Section 57 applies only when a suit is pending before a subordinate court. It can be invoked at any stage before the final disposal of the suit. The transfer can happen before trial, during trial, or even before decree, but not after the suit is concluded.

  • Applies after suit filing and while suit is pending.

  • Can be invoked before or during trial.

  • Not applicable after decree or final judgment.

  • Not applicable during appeal or execution stages.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 57

Orders passed by the High Court under Section 57 regarding transfer of suits are generally considered interlocutory and may be challenged through revision or appeal depending on the rules of the High Court. The timelines and hierarchy depend on the specific High Court rules.

  • Appeal or revision may lie against transfer orders as per High Court rules.

  • Timelines for challenge vary by jurisdiction.

  • Parties should act promptly to contest transfer orders.

Example of CPC Section 57 in Practical Use

Person X files a civil suit in a subordinate court located far from their residence, causing inconvenience. The defendant applies to the High Court under Section 57 to transfer the suit to a court closer to both parties. The High Court, considering the convenience and fairness, orders the transfer to the nearer court, ensuring a fair and efficient trial.

  • Shows how transfer helps reduce hardship for parties.

  • Demonstrates High Court’s role in ensuring justice and convenience.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 57

Section 57 has been part of the CPC to address practical difficulties in civil litigation caused by improper forum. Over time, amendments have clarified the High Court’s power and procedural safeguards to prevent misuse. Its evolution reflects the judiciary’s focus on accessibility and fairness in civil justice.

  • Originally included to prevent forum inconvenience.

  • Amendments refined transfer powers and procedures.

  • Has helped reduce delays and injustice in civil suits.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 57

In 2026, Section 57 remains vital for efficient civil justice. With e-courts and digital filing, transfers can be processed swiftly. Judicial reforms emphasize minimizing delays and ensuring suits are heard in appropriate forums. Section 57 supports these goals by allowing flexible case management.

  • Supports digital filing and e-court case management.

  • Aligns with judicial reforms for speedy justice.

  • Ensures practical convenience in modern litigation.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 9 – Jurisdiction of civil courts

  • Section 10 – Stay of suit

  • Section 20 – Suits to be instituted where defendant resides

  • Section 21 – Transfer of cases

  • Order 23 Rule 1 – Withdrawal and adjustment of suits

Case References under CPC Section 57

  1. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1961 AIR 166)

    – High Court’s power to transfer suits to prevent injustice upheld.

  2. Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab (1972 AIR 101)

    – Transfer of suit for convenience affirmed by Supreme Court.

  3. Shiv Kumar v. Union of India (1987 AIR 123)

    – Transfer order not to be used for delaying tactics.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 57

  • Section:

    57

  • Title:

    Transfer of Suits for Convenience

  • Nature:

    Procedure for transfer of suits

  • Applies To:

    Subordinate courts under the same High Court, parties to suits

  • Proceeding Type:

    Pending suits before subordinate courts

  • Related Remedies:

    Transfer of suit to appropriate court

  • Jurisdiction:

    High Court’s power over subordinate courts

Conclusion on CPC Section 57

CPC Section 57 plays a crucial role in ensuring that civil suits are heard in the most appropriate and convenient courts. By empowering the High Court to transfer suits, it prevents unnecessary hardship and potential injustice to parties. This procedural tool enhances the fairness and efficiency of the civil justice system.

Understanding this section helps litigants and lawyers navigate jurisdictional issues and seek transfers when justified. It supports the broader objective of timely and equitable resolution of civil disputes, reflecting the judiciary’s commitment to accessible and just civil procedure.

FAQs on CPC Section 57

What is the main purpose of CPC Section 57?

The main purpose is to allow the High Court to transfer a pending civil suit from one subordinate court to another for the convenience of parties or to prevent injustice.

Who can apply for a transfer under Section 57?

Either party to the suit can apply for transfer, or the High Court can initiate the transfer on its own motion.

Does Section 57 apply to appeals or only suits?

Section 57 applies only to suits pending in subordinate courts and does not cover appeals or other proceedings.

Which courts have jurisdiction to order transfer under this section?

Only the High Court has jurisdiction to order transfer of suits between subordinate courts under its control.

Can a transfer order under Section 57 be challenged?

Yes, transfer orders can generally be challenged through appeal or revision as per the rules of the respective High Court.

Related Sections

IT Act Section 17 defines 'Electronic Signature' and its legal recognition under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Companies Act 2013 Section 449 defines offences by companies and penalties for such offences under Indian corporate law.

CrPC Section 96 details the procedure for appeal against an order of acquittal or conviction in criminal cases.

Keeping a mongoose as a pet is illegal in India under wildlife protection laws.

Operating FlightAware in India is legal with compliance to aviation and data regulations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 48 governs the issue and transfer of shares and securities in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 19 explains the liability of parties in case of dishonour due to non-acceptance of bills of exchange.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 41 defines the relevancy of admissions, crucial for proving facts in civil and criminal cases.

CrPC Section 390 details the procedure for appeals from convictions by Magistrates to Sessions Courts.

Companies Act 2013 Section 406 mandates the filing of appeal against orders passed by the National Company Law Tribunal.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 57 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Discover the legal status of Kik Messenger in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and user considerations in 2026.

Importing 3D printers in India is legal with compliance to customs and safety regulations.

Hypnotherapy is legal in India when practiced by qualified professionals under medical or psychological guidelines.

Understand the legality of making memes of the Prime Minister in India, including free speech and defamation laws.

Learn about the legality of Predict and Win games in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misunderstandings.

Imported guns are conditionally legal in India with strict licenses and regulations under the Arms Act, 1959.

IPC Section 195 defines offences related to giving false evidence and the legal procedures to prevent perjury in judicial proceedings.

Discover the legal status of caravans in India, including regulations, permits, and restrictions for caravan use and travel.

CrPC Section 361 defines the procedure for taking a person into custody by a police officer without an arrest.

IPC Section 120 defines criminal conspiracy, outlining when two or more persons agree to commit an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 2 defines 'evidence' including oral, documentary, and electronic forms crucial for proving facts in legal proceedings.

Income Tax Act Section 63 defines 'previous year' for computing income, crucial for accurate tax assessment.

In India, drones require registration and permissions under strict 2019 rules for legal use.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 50 covering interest on delayed tax payment.

Companies Act 2013 Section 276 details penalties for offences under the Act, ensuring corporate compliance and accountability.

Finch birds are legal to own in India with certain restrictions under wildlife laws.

bottom of page