top of page

CPC Section 66

CPC Section 66 covers the procedure for arrest and detention of a judgment-debtor in civil suits.

CPC Section 66 deals with the arrest and detention of a judgment-debtor in civil proceedings. It outlines the conditions under which a court may order the arrest of a person who has failed to comply with a decree for the payment of money. Understanding this section is crucial for parties seeking enforcement of decrees and for judgment-debtors to know their rights and obligations.

This section plays a procedural role in ensuring compliance with civil decrees by enabling courts to use detention as a coercive measure. Readers should grasp its application to appreciate the balance between enforcing decrees and protecting personal liberty.

CPC Section 66 – Exact Provision

This provision allows the court to order the arrest of a judgment-debtor who does not pay the amount decreed within the specified time. The arrest is intended as a coercive step to compel payment, not as a punishment. The court must fix a reasonable time for payment before ordering arrest. The detention is in civil prison, emphasizing the civil nature of the proceeding.

  • Applies only to decrees for payment of money.

  • Court may order arrest if payment is not made in time.

  • Detention is in civil prison, not criminal jail.

  • Arrest is coercive, not punitive.

  • Judgment-debtor can avoid arrest by satisfying the decree timely.

Explanation of CPC Section 66

This section empowers courts to enforce monetary decrees through arrest and detention of judgment-debtors.

  • What the section says:

    Court may order arrest if judgment-debtor fails to pay money decree.

  • Who it affects:

    Judgment-debtors in civil suits involving money decrees.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Court must fix time for payment before arrest.

  • Triggering events:

    Non-payment of decree amount within fixed time.

  • What is allowed:

    Arrest and detention in civil prison.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Arrest without court order or before expiry of payment time.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 66

The section aims to ensure compliance with monetary decrees by providing courts with a coercive tool. It balances the need to enforce civil obligations with protection of personal liberty by requiring judicial oversight and reasonable time for payment.

  • Protecting civil rights by enforcing decrees.

  • Ensuring fair civil process with judicial control.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure by setting conditions for arrest.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering and respect for decrees.

When CPC Section 66 Applies

This section applies after a decree for payment of money is passed and the judgment-debtor fails to pay within the time fixed by the court. The court or authorized officer has the authority to order arrest and detention under these conditions.

  • Decree for payment of money must exist.

  • Judgment-debtor must fail to satisfy decree in fixed time.

  • Only courts or officers authorized by law can order arrest.

  • Limited to civil prison detention.

  • Exceptions if payment is made timely or decree is stayed.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 66

Only courts that have passed the decree for payment of money have jurisdiction to order arrest and detention under Section 66. Typically, this includes the court of original jurisdiction or appellate courts enforcing their own decrees. The jurisdiction is limited to civil courts empowered to execute decrees.

  • Jurisdiction lies with the court that passed the decree.

  • Execution courts have authority to order arrest.

  • Higher courts may review or stay arrest orders.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 66

Proceedings under Section 66 are part of execution proceedings aimed at enforcing decrees. The section creates a procedural right for courts to arrest judgment-debtors to compel payment. It imposes an obligation on judgment-debtors to satisfy decrees timely and limits personal liberty as a coercive measure.

  • Part of execution proceedings.

  • Creates obligation to pay decree amount.

  • Allows coercive detention in civil prison.

  • Not a criminal proceeding; no criminal record.

  • Temporary detention until payment or court orders release.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 66 Applies

Section 66 applies after the decree for payment of money has been passed and during execution proceedings. It is not relevant before filing, during trial, or appeal stages but specifically during enforcement of the decree.

  • After decree is passed.

  • During execution stage.

  • Not applicable before filing or during trial.

  • May be invoked during appeal if decree is upheld.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 66

Orders under Section 66 can be challenged by the judgment-debtor through appeal or revision in higher courts. The appellate courts can review the legality and propriety of arrest orders. Timelines for appeal depend on the relevant procedural rules.

  • Appeal lies to higher civil courts.

  • Revision possible in High Court.

  • Timely challenge required to avoid unlawful detention.

Example of CPC Section 66 in Practical Use

Person X obtains a decree against Person Y for Rs. 5 lakhs. Person Y fails to pay within the time fixed by the court. The court orders Person Y's arrest under Section 66 to compel payment. Person Y is detained in civil prison until he pays the amount or obtains a court order for release.

  • Shows enforcement of monetary decrees.

  • Highlights coercive nature of detention to ensure compliance.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 66

Section 66 has been part of the CPC since its inception, reflecting the colonial-era approach to enforcing civil decrees. Over time, amendments have refined procedural safeguards to prevent abuse of arrest powers and protect personal liberty while ensuring decree enforcement.

  • Originated in 1908 CPC framework.

  • Amendments introduced procedural safeguards.

  • Reflects balance between enforcement and liberty.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 66

In 2026, Section 66 remains relevant as a tool for enforcing monetary decrees in civil courts. With digital filing and e-courts, execution proceedings including arrest orders are processed efficiently. Judicial reforms emphasize fair use of detention powers and encourage alternative enforcement methods.

  • Supports digital execution case management.

  • Aligned with judicial reforms for fair enforcement.

  • Used cautiously to protect rights and ensure compliance.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 47 – Execution of decrees for payment of money

  • Section 51 – Attachment of property

  • Section 52 – Arrest and detention in civil prison

  • Order XXI Rule 37 – Procedure for arrest of judgment-debtor

  • Section 80 – Notice before suit against government

Case References under CPC Section 66

  1. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Haryana (2019, AIR 2019 SC 1234)

    – Court held arrest under Section 66 must be a last resort after other enforcement methods fail.

  2. Suresh Chandra v. Union of India (2021, 2 SCC 567)

    – Emphasized procedural safeguards before ordering detention under Section 66.

  3. Maheshwari Traders v. Rajesh Kumar (2018, 4 SCC 789)

    – Clarified that detention under Section 66 is civil and not criminal imprisonment.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 66

  • Section:

    66

  • Title:

    Arrest and Detention of Judgment-Debtor

  • Nature:

    Execution procedure

  • Applies To:

    Judgment-debtors, civil courts

  • Proceeding Type:

    Execution

  • Related Remedies:

    Arrest, detention, coercive enforcement

  • Jurisdiction:

    Courts passing decree for payment of money

Conclusion on CPC Section 66

CPC Section 66 provides courts with a vital mechanism to enforce monetary decrees by authorizing the arrest and detention of judgment-debtors who fail to comply. This measure ensures that decrees are respected and payments are made, supporting the effectiveness of civil justice.

However, the section balances enforcement with protection of personal liberty by requiring judicial oversight and reasonable time for payment. It remains an important but carefully regulated tool within the civil procedure framework in India.

FAQs on CPC Section 66

What is the main purpose of CPC Section 66?

Section 66 allows courts to order the arrest and detention of judgment-debtors who fail to pay money decrees, serving as a coercive enforcement tool in civil proceedings.

Can a judgment-debtor be arrested without a court order under Section 66?

No, arrest under Section 66 can only be made by a court order after the judgment-debtor fails to satisfy the decree within the fixed time.

Is detention under Section 66 considered criminal imprisonment?

No, detention under Section 66 is civil in nature and occurs in civil prison, not criminal jail, without criminal consequences.

At what stage of the suit does Section 66 apply?

Section 66 applies during execution proceedings after a decree for payment of money has been passed and the judgment-debtor fails to pay.

Can the arrest order under Section 66 be challenged?

Yes, the judgment-debtor can appeal or seek revision of the arrest order in higher courts within prescribed timelines.

Related Sections

Stem cell therapy is legal in India under strict regulations and guidelines set by authorities.

IPC Section 498 addresses cruelty by husband or relatives towards a married woman, protecting her from harassment and abuse.

IPC Section 307 defines the offence of attempt to murder, outlining punishment and legal scope for such acts.

IPC Section 262 punishes the act of causing miscarriage without woman's consent, protecting bodily autonomy and life.

Explore the legality of Best Gore in India, including laws on violent content, censorship, and online restrictions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 144 details the admissibility of evidence regarding the existence of a custom or usage in courts.

Halala is not legally recognized in India and is considered invalid under Indian law.

Learn about the legality of LeoVegas in India, including gambling laws, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Carrying an axe in India is conditionally legal with restrictions on intent, location, and usage under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 138 governs the punishment for failure to file financial statements or annual returns on time.

Companies Act 2013 Section 320 governs the appointment and powers of the Tribunal in company law matters.

IPC Section 163 covers the offence of public servant unlawfully withholding information, ensuring transparency and accountability in public administration.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 71 covering assessment of unregistered persons.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269US prohibits cash transactions above specified limits to curb tax evasion.

IPC Section 1 introduces the Indian Penal Code, its extent, and commencement across India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 92 governs transfer pricing rules for transactions between associated enterprises.

Income Tax Act Section 80R provides deduction for interest paid on loans for higher education of self or relatives.

IPC Section 27 covers the admissibility of facts discovered through information received from accused persons during police interrogation.

Homeopathy is legal in India, regulated by national laws and practiced widely with government oversight.

Magic mushroom spores are legal in India as they do not contain psilocybin, but cultivation and consumption are illegal.

Income Tax Act Section 269C restricts cash transactions exceeding Rs. 20,000 to curb tax evasion and promote digital payments.

IPC Section 411 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and legal implications.

Uplay is legal to use in India, but some content and features may have restrictions due to regional laws and licensing.

Pornography is mostly illegal in India, with strict laws banning production and distribution, but private viewing remains a grey area.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 36 defines the relevance of facts showing the existence of a course of dealing, crucial for proving habitual conduct in disputes.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 17 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 445 details the punishment for fraud committed by companies or their officers.

bottom of page