top of page

CPC Section 92

CPC Section 92 empowers courts to order temporary injunctions to prevent harm during civil suits.

CPC Section 92 allows courts to grant temporary injunctions to protect parties from irreparable harm during the pendency of a civil suit. This section plays a crucial role in preserving the status quo and preventing injustice before the final decision is made.

Understanding this section helps litigants and lawyers safeguard rights effectively by seeking timely interim relief. It ensures that the subject matter of the suit is not damaged or altered, maintaining fairness in civil proceedings.

CPC Section 92 – Exact Provision

This provision empowers courts to issue temporary injunctions or interlocutory orders to prevent injustice during a suit. It is a discretionary power used to maintain the status quo and protect parties from harm until the final judgment.

  • Allows courts to grant temporary injunctions.

  • Prevents defeat of justice during litigation.

  • Applies on application by any party.

  • Is a discretionary remedy.

  • Helps maintain status quo.

Explanation of CPC Section 92

This section permits courts to issue temporary injunctions to protect parties during civil suits.

  • What the section says:

    Courts may grant temporary injunctions or interlocutory orders to prevent injustice.

  • Who it affects:

    Parties involved in civil suits seeking interim relief.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Application by a party, court’s discretion, and consideration of facts.

  • Triggering events:

    When there is risk of harm or injustice before final judgment.

  • What is allowed:

    Temporary injunctions, interlocutory orders.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Orders beyond court’s discretion or without proper cause.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 92

The section aims to protect civil rights by preventing harm during litigation. It ensures fairness by maintaining the status quo and stopping acts that could defeat justice before the suit concludes.

  • Protecting civil rights during litigation.

  • Ensuring fair civil process and interim relief.

  • Preventing misuse or destruction of property.

  • Maintaining judicial order and effectiveness of final decree.

When CPC Section 92 Applies

This section applies when a party fears that without interim protection, the suit’s purpose may be frustrated. Courts use it to prevent harm before the final decision.

  • Application by any party to the suit.

  • Court’s discretion to grant or refuse injunction.

  • Limited to pendency of the suit.

  • Not applicable after final decree.

  • Requires showing of irreparable injury or risk.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 92

Any civil court having jurisdiction over the suit can apply Section 92. The power is exercised by the court hearing the suit, including district courts and subordinate courts, depending on the case’s nature and value.

  • Applicable in courts where suit is pending.

  • District courts and subordinate courts have authority.

  • Higher courts may grant injunctions in appellate jurisdiction.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 92

Section 92 proceedings are interlocutory and interim in nature. They do not decide the suit’s merits but provide temporary relief to prevent harm. The orders are binding until modified or vacated by the court.

  • Interim relief during pendency of suit.

  • Does not determine final rights.

  • Discretionary and fact-specific orders.

  • Can be modified or vacated later.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 92 Applies

This section applies after the suit is filed and before final judgment. It is relevant during trial or interim stages to protect parties’ interests.

  • After filing of suit.

  • During trial or hearing stages.

  • Before final decree is passed.

  • Not applicable post-judgment.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 92

Orders under Section 92 can be appealed or revised depending on the court’s hierarchy. Timely appeals ensure checks on the exercise of discretion in granting injunctions.

  • Appealable to higher courts as per CPC rules.

  • Revision petitions may be filed in some cases.

  • Appeal timelines depend on court’s procedural rules.

Example of CPC Section 92 in Practical Use

Person X files a suit claiming ownership of land. Before the final decision, the defendant tries to sell the land. X applies under Section 92 for a temporary injunction. The court grants it, preventing sale and preserving the property until the suit concludes.

  • Protects property from unauthorized transfer.

  • Maintains status quo during litigation.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 92

Section 92 has evolved to strengthen courts’ powers to grant interim relief. Amendments have clarified the scope and procedure for temporary injunctions, balancing discretion with fairness.

  • Introduced to prevent injustice during suits.

  • Expanded judicial discretion over time.

  • Procedural clarifications added in amendments.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 92

In 2026, Section 92 remains vital for interim relief in civil cases. Digital filing and e-courts have streamlined injunction applications, making timely protection accessible and efficient.

  • Supports digital filing of injunction applications.

  • Integral to judicial reforms for speedy relief.

  • Widely used in property and contract disputes.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 94 – Powers to grant injunctions and appointment of receivers.

  • Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 – Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders.

  • Section 151 – Court’s inherent powers.

  • Section 96 – Appeals from original decrees.

  • Order XXI – Execution of decrees.

Case References under CPC Section 92

  1. American Express Bank Ltd. v. Kalpana Rathore (1999) 2 SCC 39

    – Courts must balance equities before granting temporary injunctions.

  2. Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh (1993) 1 SCC 719

    – Temporary injunctions preserve status quo and prevent irreparable injury.

  3. Chintaman Rao v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1951) SCR 869

    – Discretionary power must be exercised judicially and not arbitrarily.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 92

  • Section:

    92

  • Title:

    Temporary Injunctions in Civil Suits

  • Nature:

    Procedure for interim relief

  • Applies To:

    Courts and parties in civil suits

  • Proceeding Type:

    Interim injunction

  • Related Remedies:

    Temporary injunction, interlocutory orders

  • Jurisdiction:

    Civil courts hearing the suit

Conclusion on CPC Section 92

CPC Section 92 is a crucial provision empowering courts to grant temporary injunctions that protect parties from harm during civil litigation. It ensures that the subject matter of the suit remains intact and that justice is not defeated by premature actions.

By enabling interim relief, this section balances the interests of both parties and upholds the integrity of the judicial process. Understanding its application helps litigants secure timely protection and promotes fair and orderly civil proceedings.

FAQs on CPC Section 92

What is the main purpose of CPC Section 92?

Its main purpose is to allow courts to grant temporary injunctions or interlocutory orders to prevent injustice during the pendency of a civil suit, protecting parties from irreparable harm.

Who can apply for a temporary injunction under Section 92?

Any party to a civil suit can apply to the court for a temporary injunction to safeguard their rights until the final judgment is delivered.

Does Section 92 decide the final rights of parties?

No, orders under Section 92 are interim and do not determine the final rights. They only provide temporary relief pending the suit’s conclusion.

Can the court refuse to grant a temporary injunction under this section?

Yes, granting a temporary injunction is discretionary. The court may refuse if the applicant fails to show risk of irreparable harm or if the balance of convenience does not favor injunction.

Are orders under Section 92 appealable?

Yes, parties can appeal or seek revision of orders passed under Section 92 according to the procedural rules and hierarchy of courts.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 80GGA provides deductions for donations to scientific research and rural development projects.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(43) defines 'product liability' and its scope under the Act.

Cannabis legality on Indian reservations varies by tribe and state, with some allowing use under tribal law while federal restrictions apply.

Contract Act 1872 Section 55 explains the consequences of breach of contract and remedies available to the aggrieved party.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 140 defines the presumption of ownership of documents, crucial for proving possession and authenticity in legal disputes.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 245B deals with the procedure for adjustment of refund against outstanding tax demands.

Understand the legality of hedging in India, its regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about this financial practice.

Contract Act 1872 Section 15 defines free consent and its role in valid contract formation.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 279 deals with prosecution for failure to comply with certain notices or requirements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 113 governs the procedure for service of documents to companies and their members.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 100 covering search and seizure provisions under GST law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 201 governs the filing of resolutions and agreements with the Registrar of Companies.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 164 covering power to arrest and related procedures.

Plastic surgery is legal in India with regulations ensuring qualified practice and patient safety.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 156 covering recovery of tax, interest, penalty, or other amounts.

Lifting an SUV in India is legal with compliance to vehicle modification rules and approval from authorities.

Income Tax Act Section 32A allows depreciation on goodwill in case of amalgamation of companies.

Section 206 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on specified payments in India.

Income Tax Act Section 92C defines the Arm's Length Price for international transactions and specified domestic transactions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 21 governs the alteration of a company's memorandum of association.

Understand the legal status of the Probo app in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Scanned documents are legally valid in India if they meet specific conditions under the IT Act and evidence laws.

Contract Act 1872 Section 10 explains when an agreement becomes a legally valid and enforceable contract.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 10A provides exemption for profits of units in Special Economic Zones (SEZs).

CPC Section 81 covers the procedure for transferring suits from one court to another for convenience or justice.

Income Tax Act Section 263 empowers the Commissioner to revise erroneous or prejudicial income tax assessments.

CPC Section 97 covers appeals from original decrees in civil suits, detailing who may appeal and procedural requirements.

bottom of page