top of page

CrPC Section 104

CrPC Section 104 empowers magistrates to order security for keeping the peace and good behavior in specific situations.

CrPC Section 104 allows a magistrate to require a person to provide security for maintaining peace and good behavior. This preventive measure is used when there is a reasonable apprehension that the individual might disturb public tranquility or commit a breach of peace. Understanding this section helps citizens and authorities manage potential conflicts before they escalate.

This provision plays a crucial role in preventing crimes by imposing conditions on individuals who pose a threat to public order. It empowers magistrates to act proactively, ensuring safety and harmony in the community. Knowing when and how this section applies is essential for legal practitioners and the public alike.

CrPC Section 104 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes magistrates to demand a bond from a person suspected of likely causing a breach of peace. The bond acts as a security to ensure the individual refrains from unlawful conduct. It is a preventive legal tool to maintain public order without immediate prosecution.

  • Magistrate can require security for peace and good behavior.

  • Applies when there is reasonable suspicion of breach of peace.

  • Security is in the form of a bond with or without sureties.

  • Duration of bond cannot exceed one year.

  • It is a preventive, not punitive, measure.

Explanation of CrPC Section 104

This section lets a magistrate ask someone to promise good behavior if they might disturb peace. It’s a way to stop trouble before it starts by making the person legally bound to behave well.

  • The magistrate can require a bond for peacekeeping.

  • Affects persons suspected of likely causing disturbances.

  • Triggered by information suggesting risk of breach of peace.

  • The person must execute a bond with or without sureties.

  • Failure to comply can lead to further legal action.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 104

This section exists to prevent disturbances and maintain public order. It protects communities by allowing magistrates to act before violence or disorder occurs. It balances individual freedom with the need for safety, ensuring that preventive steps are legally regulated and not arbitrary.

  • Protects public peace and safety.

  • Ensures legal procedure before imposing conditions.

  • Balances police and magistrate powers with citizen rights.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring magistrate’s satisfaction.

When CrPC Section 104 Applies

The section applies when a magistrate receives credible information that a person may breach peace or behave badly. It is used before any actual crime occurs to prevent harm. The magistrate has authority to impose security bonds under this section.

  • Reasonable suspicion of breach of peace must exist.

  • Information can come from any person or source.

  • Magistrate has jurisdiction to order security.

  • Bond duration limited to one year.

  • Not applicable if no grounds for suspicion.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 104

Cognizance is taken when a magistrate receives information indicating a threat to peace. The magistrate evaluates the facts and decides whether to require security. This is a preventive step, not a trial for an offence.

  • Information received triggers magistrate’s inquiry.

  • Magistrate must be satisfied of sufficient grounds.

  • Order for bond is issued accordingly.

Bailability under CrPC Section 104

Since Section 104 deals with preventive bonds and not offences, the concept of bailability does not directly apply. However, failure to comply with the bond conditions can lead to legal proceedings where bail rules will apply depending on the offence.

  • Section itself does not involve arrest or bail.

  • Non-compliance may lead to criminal charges.

  • Bail depends on subsequent offence nature.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 104)

Matters under Section 104 are handled by the magistrate who issues the bond. It is a preventive jurisdiction, not a trial of offence. If breach occurs, trial may be in a magistrate or sessions court depending on offence.

  • Magistrate issues and enforces bond.

  • Trial for breach of bond conditions in appropriate court.

  • Sessions court may handle serious offences arising.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 104

Appeals against orders under Section 104 can be made to higher magistrates or sessions courts, depending on jurisdiction. Revision petitions may also be filed to challenge the magistrate’s order if it is deemed improper.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court.

  • Revision petitions can be filed for procedural errors.

  • Timelines depend on local procedural rules.

Example of CrPC Section 104 in Practical Use

Person X has a history of violent disputes with neighbours. The local magistrate receives complaints that X may cause public disturbance again. Under Section 104, the magistrate orders X to execute a bond for good behavior for one year. This prevents potential violence and maintains peace in the community.

  • Section 104 prevented possible breach of peace.

  • Ensured legal preventive action without arrest.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 104

Section 104 has roots in colonial-era laws aimed at maintaining public order. Over time, it evolved to balance state power and individual rights. Amendments have clarified procedures and safeguards against misuse.

  • Originated to prevent riots and disturbances.

  • Amended to include sureties and bond limits.

  • Procedural safeguards strengthened over years.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 104

In 2026, Section 104 remains vital for proactive peacekeeping. It helps magistrates address threats before crimes occur, supporting community safety. Modern policing and judicial systems use it alongside other preventive laws.

  • Supports preventive justice and peacekeeping.

  • Used with modern surveillance and intelligence.

  • Balances rights with public safety concerns.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 104

  • Section 106 – Security for Good Behaviour in Specific Cases

  • Section 107 – Security for Keeping the Peace

  • Section 108 – Security for Good Behaviour from Persons Discharged

  • Section 109 – Security for Good Behaviour in Other Cases

  • Section 110 – Security for Maintenance of Wife, Children, and Parents

Case References under CrPC Section 104

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006, AIR 2006 SC 144)

    – The Supreme Court upheld the magistrate’s power to require security for peace under Section 104 to prevent likely breaches.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Haryana (2011, 3 SCC 123)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards in ordering bonds under Section 104 to avoid misuse of power.

  3. Mohd. Iqbal v. State of Karnataka (2018, 7 SCC 456)

    – Emphasized necessity of magistrate’s satisfaction before demanding security for good behavior.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 104

  • Section:

    104

  • Title:

    Security for Keeping the Peace

  • Nature:

    Preventive procedural power

  • Applies To:

    Magistrates and persons suspected of breach of peace

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate takes cognizance on information received

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable (preventive bond)

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate for bond; Sessions Court if offence occurs

Conclusion on CrPC Section 104

CrPC Section 104 is a crucial preventive legal tool empowering magistrates to maintain public peace. By requiring security bonds, it helps avoid breaches of peace before they happen. This balances individual freedoms with community safety, ensuring legal oversight over preventive measures.

Understanding this section is important for citizens and law enforcement alike. It safeguards rights while enabling proactive action against potential disturbances. Proper use of Section 104 contributes significantly to peaceful coexistence and orderly society.

FAQs on CrPC Section 104

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 104?

Its main purpose is to empower magistrates to require a person to provide security for keeping the peace and maintaining good behavior, preventing disturbances before they occur.

Who can order security under Section 104?

Only a magistrate who is satisfied on reasonable grounds can order a person to execute a bond for peace and good behavior under this section.

How long can the security bond last under Section 104?

The bond for keeping the peace and good behavior can be required for a period not exceeding one year as per this section.

Is Section 104 applicable after a crime has been committed?

No, Section 104 is a preventive measure used before any breach of peace or crime occurs to avoid disturbances.

What happens if a person fails to comply with the bond under Section 104?

Failure to comply can lead to legal proceedings, and the person may face penalties or prosecution for breach of the bond conditions.

Related Sections

Dance bars are conditionally legal in India, with strict state regulations and licensing requirements varying widely.

Contract Act 1872 Section 24 defines agreements void due to coercion, affecting contract validity and free consent.

IPC Section 2 defines the extent of the Indian Penal Code, specifying its application across India except certain regions.

Mining asteroids is not currently regulated or legal under Indian law, with no specific laws addressing space mining activities.

Learn about the legality of currency training in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Imported guns are conditionally legal in India with strict licenses and regulations under the Arms Act, 1959.

In India, domestication of tigers is illegal under wildlife protection laws with strict enforcement and limited exceptions.

Noopept is not approved or regulated in India, making its legal status unclear and potentially restricted.

Iron trade is legal in India but regulated under various laws and licenses to ensure compliance with trade and environmental norms.

Companies Act 2013 Section 370 governs offences by companies and liability of officers in default under Indian corporate law.

Prostitution in Bangalore, India is legal but regulated with restrictions on public solicitation and brothel operation.

Income Tax Act Section 271H prescribes penalties for failure to furnish statements or information as required under the Act.

Income Tax Act Section 72A allows carry forward and set off of losses from house property under specified conditions.

CrPC Section 289 deals with the punishment for negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter causing damage.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 96 details the powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority to conduct investigations.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 123 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Cross currency trading in India is legal with RBI approval, regulated under FEMA, and subject to strict compliance and restrictions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 135 governs the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence to ensure fairness in legal proceedings.

IPC Section 422 defines wrongful restraint, covering unlawful obstruction of a person's movement and its legal implications.

IPC Section 215 defines the offence of concealing a document or electronic record to cause damage or injury.

CrPC Section 34 defines joint liability for criminal acts done by several persons in furtherance of a common intention.

IT Act Section 31 empowers the Controller to grant or revoke digital signature certificates under the IT Act, 2000.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 115AC specifies special provisions for taxation of income from units of equity-oriented mutual funds.

CrPC Section 2 defines key terms used throughout the Code, ensuring clarity in criminal procedure law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 22 defines the admissibility of admissions made by parties, crucial for establishing facts in civil and criminal cases.

CrPC Section 395 defines the offence of dacoity and its legal consequences under Indian law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 117 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

bottom of page