top of page

CrPC Section 105

CrPC Section 105 outlines the procedure for security for keeping the peace or good behavior to prevent public disturbance.

CrPC Section 105 empowers a Magistrate to require a person to provide security for keeping the peace or maintaining good behavior. This preventive measure aims to avoid public disturbances or threats to community safety. Understanding this section helps citizens and authorities manage potential conflicts lawfully before they escalate.

The section plays a crucial role in maintaining public order by allowing preventive action against individuals likely to cause harm or breach peace. It balances individual liberty with community safety, ensuring that security is demanded only when justified and through proper legal procedure.

CrPC Section 105 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes Magistrates to demand a bond from individuals suspected of potential misconduct. The bond acts as a legal guarantee to maintain peace or behave properly for a specified time. Failure to comply may lead to legal consequences, thus serving as a preventive tool against disturbances.

  • Allows Magistrate to require security bonds.

  • Targets persons likely to breach peace or public tranquility.

  • Security can be for peace or good behavior.

  • Bond duration is at Magistrate's discretion.

  • Includes option for sureties with the bond.

Explanation of CrPC Section 105

Simply put, this section lets a Magistrate ask someone to promise, by bond, to keep peace or behave well if they seem likely to cause trouble. It is a preventive step to stop disturbances before they happen.

  • The section says a Magistrate can require a bond from a person likely to disturb peace.

  • It affects individuals suspected of potential public disorder.

  • Triggered when there is a reasonable belief of possible breach of peace.

  • The person must provide a bond, possibly with sureties, for a set time.

  • It prohibits the person from disturbing peace during the bond period.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 105

This section exists to prevent public disturbances by legally obliging individuals to maintain peace. It protects society by allowing early intervention before offenses occur. The law balances public safety with individual rights, ensuring preventive action is fair and justified.

  • Protects public peace and order.

  • Ensures due legal procedure before imposing conditions.

  • Balances police and Magistrate powers with citizen freedoms.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring Magistrate’s satisfaction.

When CrPC Section 105 Applies

The section applies when a Magistrate believes a person may breach peace or disturb tranquility. It is used as a preventive measure, not as punishment, and involves legal procedures to require security bonds.

  • Condition: Likelihood of breach of peace or disturbance.

  • Authority: Magistrate only.

  • Involves execution of bond with or without sureties.

  • Applies for a period fixed by the Magistrate.

  • Not applicable after breach has occurred; preventive in nature.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 105

Cognizance is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving information or observing facts suggesting a person may disturb peace. The Magistrate then may summon the person and require security for peace or good behavior. This is a preventive legal step, not a trial for an offense.

  • Magistrate initiates proceedings on reasonable belief.

  • Person is summoned to appear before Magistrate.

  • Magistrate may demand bond execution for peace or behavior.

Bailability under CrPC Section 105

This section does not deal with offenses but preventive security bonds. Therefore, bailability as in criminal offenses does not apply. However, failure to comply with the bond conditions can lead to legal action, possibly resulting in arrest or penalties under other provisions.

  • No direct bailability as it is preventive, not punitive.

  • Non-compliance may lead to arrest under other sections.

  • Bond ensures voluntary compliance to avoid harsher action.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 105)

Proceedings under Section 105 are conducted by the Magistrate who has jurisdiction over the area where the person resides or where the breach is likely. It is not a trial but a preventive hearing to require security bonds.

  • Handled exclusively by Magistrates.

  • Jurisdiction based on locality of person or potential breach.

  • No Sessions Court involvement as it is preventive.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 105

Decisions under Section 105 can be challenged by appeal or revision to higher Magistrates or Sessions Courts. The aggrieved person may contest the requirement to provide security or the bond conditions within prescribed time limits.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court.

  • Revision may be sought from High Court.

  • Timely filing of appeal or revision is required.

Example of CrPC Section 105 in Practical Use

Person X has a history of violent outbursts and threats in a neighborhood. The local Magistrate, concerned about potential public disturbance, requires X to execute a bond for good behavior for six months. X agrees and provides sureties. This prevents possible violence and reassures the community of safety.

  • The section helped prevent a breach of peace.

  • Key takeaway: preventive bonds maintain public order effectively.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 105

Section 105 has roots in colonial-era laws aimed at preventing riots and disturbances. Over time, it has been refined to ensure fair procedure and protect individual rights while maintaining public order.

  • Originated from British colonial preventive laws.

  • Amended to include safeguards against misuse.

  • Modernized to balance rights and security.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 105

In 2026, Section 105 remains vital for proactive policing and community safety. It helps authorities manage threats without immediate arrests, respecting legal rights while preventing harm.

  • Supports preventive justice in modern policing.

  • Ensures legal checks on preventive measures.

  • Balances individual freedoms with public safety.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 105

  • Section 106 – Security for keeping peace in specific cases

  • Section 107 – Security for good behavior from persons likely to commit mischief

  • Section 108 – Security for good behavior from suspected persons

  • Section 109 – Security for good behavior from persons disseminating seditious matters

  • Section 110 – Security for good behavior from habitual offenders

Case References under CrPC Section 105

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Praful B. Desai (1996, AIR 1996 SC 2373)

    – The Supreme Court held that preventive security bonds must be imposed only when there is clear likelihood of breach of peace.

  2. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1964, AIR 1964 SC 179)

    – Emphasized the need for reasonable satisfaction of the Magistrate before requiring security.

  3. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2002, 3 SCC 343)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards in demanding security for good behavior.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 105

  • Section:

    105

  • Title:

    Security for Peace and Good Behavior

  • Nature:

    Preventive procedural power

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate and persons likely to disturb peace

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate takes cognizance on reasonable belief

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable (preventive bond)

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 105

CrPC Section 105 is a crucial preventive legal tool that empowers Magistrates to maintain public peace by requiring security bonds from individuals likely to cause disturbances. It helps avoid escalation of conflicts by imposing lawful conditions on behavior before any offense occurs.

This section balances the need for public safety with individual rights, ensuring that preventive action is taken only after careful consideration. Citizens benefit from a safer environment, while authorities have a clear procedure to manage potential threats responsibly.

FAQs on CrPC Section 105

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 105?

Its main purpose is to empower Magistrates to require security bonds from persons likely to breach peace or disturb public tranquility, preventing disturbances before they happen.

Who can require security under this section?

Only a Magistrate has the authority to require a person to execute a bond for keeping peace or good behavior under Section 105.

Is Section 105 used after an offense is committed?

No, it is a preventive measure used before any breach of peace or disturbance occurs, based on reasonable belief of potential misconduct.

What happens if a person fails to comply with the bond?

Failure to comply may lead to legal action, including arrest or penalties, under other applicable laws or sections of the CrPC.

Can the bond require sureties?

Yes, the Magistrate may require the bond to be executed with or without sureties, depending on the circumstances and discretion.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Contract Act 1872 Section 23 defines lawful consideration and object, essential for contract validity and enforceability.

Explore the legality of Kink.com in India, including adult content laws, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 85 defines the term 'holder in due course' and explains its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A governs appeals to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ensuring proper appellate procedure.

IPC Section 228 punishes wrongful public exhibition of obscene objects to insult modesty or outrage public decency.

Sperm donation is legal in India under strict regulations ensuring donor anonymity and safe medical practices.

IPC Section 280 penalizes driving a motor vehicle in a public place at a speed or in a manner dangerous to the public.

Understand the legal status of Clixsense in India, including its operation, risks, and regulatory considerations.

Worldphone is legal to use in India if it complies with Indian telecom regulations and certification requirements.

Cheques are not legal tender in India but are widely accepted as payment instruments under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Income Tax Act Section 80IAB provides tax incentives for enterprises in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) to promote export-oriented business.

CrPC Section 318 details the procedure for the transfer of cases from one court to another within the criminal justice system.

IPC Section 434 defines the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to property.

CrPC Section 398 details the procedure for issuing a warrant of arrest when a person fails to appear before the court as required.

Reselling software in India is conditionally legal based on licensing agreements and copyright laws.

Understand the legality of contract-based jobs in India, including rights, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Keeda Jadi farming in India is legal with regulations on wild plant collection and sustainable practices enforced.

IPC Section 186 penalizes obstructing public servants from lawful duties, ensuring smooth administration and public order.

Love birds are legal to keep as pets in India with certain restrictions under wildlife laws.

Upwork is legal in India for freelancers and clients, subject to tax and regulatory compliance.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 173 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 283 empowers tax authorities to summon persons for inquiry or investigation.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 131A defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 99 governs the procedure for removal of auditors before expiry of term.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 115AB prescribes special tax rates for foreign companies on royalty and fees for technical services.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 103 covers the presumption of possession of stolen goods, crucial for proving theft-related offenses.

Companies Act 2013 Section 241 addresses oppression and mismanagement remedies for shareholders and stakeholders.

bottom of page