top of page

CrPC Section 105

CrPC Section 105 outlines the procedure for security for keeping the peace or good behavior to prevent public disturbance.

CrPC Section 105 empowers a Magistrate to require a person to provide security for keeping the peace or maintaining good behavior. This preventive measure aims to avoid public disturbances or threats to community safety. Understanding this section helps citizens and authorities manage potential conflicts lawfully before they escalate.

The section plays a crucial role in maintaining public order by allowing preventive action against individuals likely to cause harm or breach peace. It balances individual liberty with community safety, ensuring that security is demanded only when justified and through proper legal procedure.

CrPC Section 105 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes Magistrates to demand a bond from individuals suspected of potential misconduct. The bond acts as a legal guarantee to maintain peace or behave properly for a specified time. Failure to comply may lead to legal consequences, thus serving as a preventive tool against disturbances.

  • Allows Magistrate to require security bonds.

  • Targets persons likely to breach peace or public tranquility.

  • Security can be for peace or good behavior.

  • Bond duration is at Magistrate's discretion.

  • Includes option for sureties with the bond.

Explanation of CrPC Section 105

Simply put, this section lets a Magistrate ask someone to promise, by bond, to keep peace or behave well if they seem likely to cause trouble. It is a preventive step to stop disturbances before they happen.

  • The section says a Magistrate can require a bond from a person likely to disturb peace.

  • It affects individuals suspected of potential public disorder.

  • Triggered when there is a reasonable belief of possible breach of peace.

  • The person must provide a bond, possibly with sureties, for a set time.

  • It prohibits the person from disturbing peace during the bond period.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 105

This section exists to prevent public disturbances by legally obliging individuals to maintain peace. It protects society by allowing early intervention before offenses occur. The law balances public safety with individual rights, ensuring preventive action is fair and justified.

  • Protects public peace and order.

  • Ensures due legal procedure before imposing conditions.

  • Balances police and Magistrate powers with citizen freedoms.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring Magistrate’s satisfaction.

When CrPC Section 105 Applies

The section applies when a Magistrate believes a person may breach peace or disturb tranquility. It is used as a preventive measure, not as punishment, and involves legal procedures to require security bonds.

  • Condition: Likelihood of breach of peace or disturbance.

  • Authority: Magistrate only.

  • Involves execution of bond with or without sureties.

  • Applies for a period fixed by the Magistrate.

  • Not applicable after breach has occurred; preventive in nature.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 105

Cognizance is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving information or observing facts suggesting a person may disturb peace. The Magistrate then may summon the person and require security for peace or good behavior. This is a preventive legal step, not a trial for an offense.

  • Magistrate initiates proceedings on reasonable belief.

  • Person is summoned to appear before Magistrate.

  • Magistrate may demand bond execution for peace or behavior.

Bailability under CrPC Section 105

This section does not deal with offenses but preventive security bonds. Therefore, bailability as in criminal offenses does not apply. However, failure to comply with the bond conditions can lead to legal action, possibly resulting in arrest or penalties under other provisions.

  • No direct bailability as it is preventive, not punitive.

  • Non-compliance may lead to arrest under other sections.

  • Bond ensures voluntary compliance to avoid harsher action.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 105)

Proceedings under Section 105 are conducted by the Magistrate who has jurisdiction over the area where the person resides or where the breach is likely. It is not a trial but a preventive hearing to require security bonds.

  • Handled exclusively by Magistrates.

  • Jurisdiction based on locality of person or potential breach.

  • No Sessions Court involvement as it is preventive.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 105

Decisions under Section 105 can be challenged by appeal or revision to higher Magistrates or Sessions Courts. The aggrieved person may contest the requirement to provide security or the bond conditions within prescribed time limits.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court.

  • Revision may be sought from High Court.

  • Timely filing of appeal or revision is required.

Example of CrPC Section 105 in Practical Use

Person X has a history of violent outbursts and threats in a neighborhood. The local Magistrate, concerned about potential public disturbance, requires X to execute a bond for good behavior for six months. X agrees and provides sureties. This prevents possible violence and reassures the community of safety.

  • The section helped prevent a breach of peace.

  • Key takeaway: preventive bonds maintain public order effectively.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 105

Section 105 has roots in colonial-era laws aimed at preventing riots and disturbances. Over time, it has been refined to ensure fair procedure and protect individual rights while maintaining public order.

  • Originated from British colonial preventive laws.

  • Amended to include safeguards against misuse.

  • Modernized to balance rights and security.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 105

In 2026, Section 105 remains vital for proactive policing and community safety. It helps authorities manage threats without immediate arrests, respecting legal rights while preventing harm.

  • Supports preventive justice in modern policing.

  • Ensures legal checks on preventive measures.

  • Balances individual freedoms with public safety.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 105

  • Section 106 – Security for keeping peace in specific cases

  • Section 107 – Security for good behavior from persons likely to commit mischief

  • Section 108 – Security for good behavior from suspected persons

  • Section 109 – Security for good behavior from persons disseminating seditious matters

  • Section 110 – Security for good behavior from habitual offenders

Case References under CrPC Section 105

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Praful B. Desai (1996, AIR 1996 SC 2373)

    – The Supreme Court held that preventive security bonds must be imposed only when there is clear likelihood of breach of peace.

  2. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1964, AIR 1964 SC 179)

    – Emphasized the need for reasonable satisfaction of the Magistrate before requiring security.

  3. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2002, 3 SCC 343)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards in demanding security for good behavior.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 105

  • Section:

    105

  • Title:

    Security for Peace and Good Behavior

  • Nature:

    Preventive procedural power

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate and persons likely to disturb peace

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate takes cognizance on reasonable belief

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable (preventive bond)

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 105

CrPC Section 105 is a crucial preventive legal tool that empowers Magistrates to maintain public peace by requiring security bonds from individuals likely to cause disturbances. It helps avoid escalation of conflicts by imposing lawful conditions on behavior before any offense occurs.

This section balances the need for public safety with individual rights, ensuring that preventive action is taken only after careful consideration. Citizens benefit from a safer environment, while authorities have a clear procedure to manage potential threats responsibly.

FAQs on CrPC Section 105

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 105?

Its main purpose is to empower Magistrates to require security bonds from persons likely to breach peace or disturb public tranquility, preventing disturbances before they happen.

Who can require security under this section?

Only a Magistrate has the authority to require a person to execute a bond for keeping peace or good behavior under Section 105.

Is Section 105 used after an offense is committed?

No, it is a preventive measure used before any breach of peace or disturbance occurs, based on reasonable belief of potential misconduct.

What happens if a person fails to comply with the bond?

Failure to comply may lead to legal action, including arrest or penalties, under other applicable laws or sections of the CrPC.

Can the bond require sureties?

Yes, the Magistrate may require the bond to be executed with or without sureties, depending on the circumstances and discretion.

Related Sections

IPC Section 153 addresses provocation with intent to cause riot, focusing on preventing public disorder and maintaining peace.

CrPC Section 269 covers the procedure when a person with a contagious disease negligently exposes others, focusing on public health safety.

Flunipam is a prescription medication in India, legal only when prescribed by a doctor and used under medical supervision.

Betting sites are mostly illegal in India, with a few exceptions under state laws and licenses.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 164 covering power to arrest and related procedures.

Explore the legality of hawking in India, including rules, enforcement, and common misunderstandings about street vending laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 20 defines 'previous year' for income tax computation and assessment purposes.

CrPC Section 292 deals with the punishment for selling or distributing obscene materials, protecting public morality under Indian law.

CrPC Section 166 details the procedure for magistrates to summon witnesses and compel their attendance in criminal cases.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 53 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

IPC Section 355 penalizes assault or criminal force intended to dishonour a person, protecting individual dignity and social respect.

In India, spanking an adult is illegal and can lead to criminal charges such as assault or battery.

CrPC Section 446A prescribes punishment for false information leading to wrongful arrest or detention.

Income Tax Act Section 115F provides tax exemption on capital gains from specified foreign currency assets transferred to India.

Filming police in India is generally legal but subject to restrictions and conditions under law and public order.

IT Act Section 33 empowers the Controller to suspend or revoke digital signature certificates to ensure trust in electronic authentication.

Gold mining in India is legal but regulated under strict government laws and licenses.

Animal euthanasia in India is legal under strict conditions regulated by law and veterinary guidelines.

Income Tax Act Section 80EE offers deduction on home loan interest for first-time homebuyers under specified conditions.

IPC Section 443 defines criminal trespass, covering unlawful entry into property with intent to commit an offence or intimidate.

CPC Section 31 defines the power of courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil cases.

IPC Section 257 covers the offence of causing obstruction or danger to public servants in the discharge of their duties.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 21 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Understand the legal status and importance of registered MoU documents in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 143 details the powers and duties of auditors in India, ensuring audit quality and accountability.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 8 defines the rule of relevancy for admissions, crucial for proving facts through statements by parties involved.

Pen cameras are conditionally legal in India, allowed for personal use but restricted under privacy and surveillance laws.

bottom of page