top of page

CrPC Section 105

CrPC Section 105 outlines the procedure for security for keeping the peace or good behavior to prevent public disturbance.

CrPC Section 105 empowers a Magistrate to require a person to provide security for keeping the peace or maintaining good behavior. This preventive measure aims to avoid public disturbances or threats to community safety. Understanding this section helps citizens and authorities manage potential conflicts lawfully before they escalate.

The section plays a crucial role in maintaining public order by allowing preventive action against individuals likely to cause harm or breach peace. It balances individual liberty with community safety, ensuring that security is demanded only when justified and through proper legal procedure.

CrPC Section 105 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes Magistrates to demand a bond from individuals suspected of potential misconduct. The bond acts as a legal guarantee to maintain peace or behave properly for a specified time. Failure to comply may lead to legal consequences, thus serving as a preventive tool against disturbances.

  • Allows Magistrate to require security bonds.

  • Targets persons likely to breach peace or public tranquility.

  • Security can be for peace or good behavior.

  • Bond duration is at Magistrate's discretion.

  • Includes option for sureties with the bond.

Explanation of CrPC Section 105

Simply put, this section lets a Magistrate ask someone to promise, by bond, to keep peace or behave well if they seem likely to cause trouble. It is a preventive step to stop disturbances before they happen.

  • The section says a Magistrate can require a bond from a person likely to disturb peace.

  • It affects individuals suspected of potential public disorder.

  • Triggered when there is a reasonable belief of possible breach of peace.

  • The person must provide a bond, possibly with sureties, for a set time.

  • It prohibits the person from disturbing peace during the bond period.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 105

This section exists to prevent public disturbances by legally obliging individuals to maintain peace. It protects society by allowing early intervention before offenses occur. The law balances public safety with individual rights, ensuring preventive action is fair and justified.

  • Protects public peace and order.

  • Ensures due legal procedure before imposing conditions.

  • Balances police and Magistrate powers with citizen freedoms.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring Magistrate’s satisfaction.

When CrPC Section 105 Applies

The section applies when a Magistrate believes a person may breach peace or disturb tranquility. It is used as a preventive measure, not as punishment, and involves legal procedures to require security bonds.

  • Condition: Likelihood of breach of peace or disturbance.

  • Authority: Magistrate only.

  • Involves execution of bond with or without sureties.

  • Applies for a period fixed by the Magistrate.

  • Not applicable after breach has occurred; preventive in nature.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 105

Cognizance is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving information or observing facts suggesting a person may disturb peace. The Magistrate then may summon the person and require security for peace or good behavior. This is a preventive legal step, not a trial for an offense.

  • Magistrate initiates proceedings on reasonable belief.

  • Person is summoned to appear before Magistrate.

  • Magistrate may demand bond execution for peace or behavior.

Bailability under CrPC Section 105

This section does not deal with offenses but preventive security bonds. Therefore, bailability as in criminal offenses does not apply. However, failure to comply with the bond conditions can lead to legal action, possibly resulting in arrest or penalties under other provisions.

  • No direct bailability as it is preventive, not punitive.

  • Non-compliance may lead to arrest under other sections.

  • Bond ensures voluntary compliance to avoid harsher action.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 105)

Proceedings under Section 105 are conducted by the Magistrate who has jurisdiction over the area where the person resides or where the breach is likely. It is not a trial but a preventive hearing to require security bonds.

  • Handled exclusively by Magistrates.

  • Jurisdiction based on locality of person or potential breach.

  • No Sessions Court involvement as it is preventive.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 105

Decisions under Section 105 can be challenged by appeal or revision to higher Magistrates or Sessions Courts. The aggrieved person may contest the requirement to provide security or the bond conditions within prescribed time limits.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court.

  • Revision may be sought from High Court.

  • Timely filing of appeal or revision is required.

Example of CrPC Section 105 in Practical Use

Person X has a history of violent outbursts and threats in a neighborhood. The local Magistrate, concerned about potential public disturbance, requires X to execute a bond for good behavior for six months. X agrees and provides sureties. This prevents possible violence and reassures the community of safety.

  • The section helped prevent a breach of peace.

  • Key takeaway: preventive bonds maintain public order effectively.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 105

Section 105 has roots in colonial-era laws aimed at preventing riots and disturbances. Over time, it has been refined to ensure fair procedure and protect individual rights while maintaining public order.

  • Originated from British colonial preventive laws.

  • Amended to include safeguards against misuse.

  • Modernized to balance rights and security.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 105

In 2026, Section 105 remains vital for proactive policing and community safety. It helps authorities manage threats without immediate arrests, respecting legal rights while preventing harm.

  • Supports preventive justice in modern policing.

  • Ensures legal checks on preventive measures.

  • Balances individual freedoms with public safety.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 105

  • Section 106 – Security for keeping peace in specific cases

  • Section 107 – Security for good behavior from persons likely to commit mischief

  • Section 108 – Security for good behavior from suspected persons

  • Section 109 – Security for good behavior from persons disseminating seditious matters

  • Section 110 – Security for good behavior from habitual offenders

Case References under CrPC Section 105

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Praful B. Desai (1996, AIR 1996 SC 2373)

    – The Supreme Court held that preventive security bonds must be imposed only when there is clear likelihood of breach of peace.

  2. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1964, AIR 1964 SC 179)

    – Emphasized the need for reasonable satisfaction of the Magistrate before requiring security.

  3. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2002, 3 SCC 343)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards in demanding security for good behavior.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 105

  • Section:

    105

  • Title:

    Security for Peace and Good Behavior

  • Nature:

    Preventive procedural power

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate and persons likely to disturb peace

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate takes cognizance on reasonable belief

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable (preventive bond)

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 105

CrPC Section 105 is a crucial preventive legal tool that empowers Magistrates to maintain public peace by requiring security bonds from individuals likely to cause disturbances. It helps avoid escalation of conflicts by imposing lawful conditions on behavior before any offense occurs.

This section balances the need for public safety with individual rights, ensuring that preventive action is taken only after careful consideration. Citizens benefit from a safer environment, while authorities have a clear procedure to manage potential threats responsibly.

FAQs on CrPC Section 105

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 105?

Its main purpose is to empower Magistrates to require security bonds from persons likely to breach peace or disturb public tranquility, preventing disturbances before they happen.

Who can require security under this section?

Only a Magistrate has the authority to require a person to execute a bond for keeping peace or good behavior under Section 105.

Is Section 105 used after an offense is committed?

No, it is a preventive measure used before any breach of peace or disturbance occurs, based on reasonable belief of potential misconduct.

What happens if a person fails to comply with the bond?

Failure to comply may lead to legal action, including arrest or penalties, under other applicable laws or sections of the CrPC.

Can the bond require sureties?

Yes, the Magistrate may require the bond to be executed with or without sureties, depending on the circumstances and discretion.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Owning a gun in India is legal with strict licensing; learn the legal age, process, and restrictions for firearm ownership.

Income Tax Act Section 269R prohibits cash transactions exceeding ₹20,000 to curb tax evasion and ensure digital payments.

Companies Act 2013 Section 283 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for winding up of companies.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 115BA provides concessional tax rates for domestic companies opting for a new tax regime.

Learn if court marriage is a legal form of marriage in India and understand its rights, procedures, and common misconceptions.

Income Tax Act Section 43 defines 'actual cost' for asset valuation, crucial for depreciation and capital gains calculations.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 246 defines the appellate authorities and procedures for income tax disputes.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 157 defines the term 'confession' and its significance in legal proceedings.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 59 covering assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 116 explains the presumption against persons who destroy evidence, aiding courts in inferring guilt or liability.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 10 covering composition levy provisions under GST.

IPC Section 416 defines cheating by personation, covering fraudulent acts by pretending to be someone else.

Understand the legality and rules of sting operations in India, including their use, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Vital Cell is not legally recognized or approved in India; its use and sale face strict regulatory restrictions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 44 governs the authentication of documents by companies for legal validity.

IPC Section 227 defines the procedure for discharge of an accused when evidence is insufficient to proceed to trial.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 69 covering inspection, search, and seizure provisions under GST law.

Brothels are illegal in India under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, but some activities occur under strict legal restrictions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 117 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

CPC Section 100 details the appeal process from original decrees in civil suits, outlining grounds and procedures for second appeals.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 292C mandates furnishing of information by persons responsible for paying income to non-residents.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 1 defines key terms and scope of the Act, essential for understanding negotiable instruments law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 391 governs compromise, arrangement, and reconstruction procedures for companies in India.

Learn about the legitimacy of OnlineLegalIndia.com, its services, and how to verify if it's a real legal website in India.

Using garbage bags is legal in India but subject to environmental rules and municipal regulations.

Section 185 of the Income Tax Act 1961 restricts loans and advances by companies to their directors and specified persons in India.

IPC Section 117 addresses the offence of abetting a criminal conspiracy, defining liability for those who assist in planning crimes.

bottom of page