top of page

CrPC Section 408

CrPC Section 408 defines the offence of criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant and its legal implications.

CrPC Section 408 deals with the offence of criminal breach of trust committed specifically by a clerk or servant. It outlines the legal consequences when a person entrusted with property or dominion over it dishonestly misappropriates or converts it for their own use. Understanding this section is crucial for both employers and employees to recognize the boundaries of lawful conduct and protect property rights.

This section plays a vital procedural role in prosecuting cases where trust is violated by those in positions of responsibility. It ensures that such offences are clearly defined and punishable under the law, thereby deterring misuse of entrusted property and maintaining confidence in professional relationships.

CrPC Section 408 – Exact Provision

This section specifically targets individuals in positions of trust such as clerks or servants who misuse property entrusted to them. It criminalizes dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property and prescribes punishment up to three years imprisonment, fine, or both. The law recognizes the special relationship of trust and imposes stricter accountability on such persons.

  • Applies to clerks, servants, or similar trusted positions.

  • Focuses on criminal breach of trust involving entrusted property.

  • Prescribes punishment up to three years imprisonment or fine.

  • Emphasizes the breach of trust due to position held.

Explanation of CrPC Section 408

This section makes it a crime for clerks or servants to dishonestly misuse property they are trusted with. It holds them legally responsible if they convert or misappropriate such property.

  • States that clerks or servants committing breach of trust are punishable.

  • Affects employees or persons in trusted roles handling property.

  • Triggered when entrusted property is dishonestly misused or converted.

  • Allows prosecution and punishment for such dishonest acts.

  • Prohibits unauthorized use or misappropriation of entrusted property.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 408

The section exists to protect property owners by holding trusted employees accountable for dishonest acts. It ensures that persons in positions of trust do not abuse their authority and that legal remedies are available for such breaches.

  • Protects owners’ property rights against misuse by trusted persons.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure to prosecute breach of trust.

  • Balances trust given with responsibility and accountability.

  • Prevents abuse of power by clerks or servants.

When CrPC Section 408 Applies

This section applies when a clerk, servant, or similar trusted person dishonestly misappropriates or converts property entrusted to them. It requires proof of trust and dishonest intention.

  • Must be a clerk, servant, or similar position of trust.

  • Property must be entrusted or in lawful possession due to position.

  • Dishonest misappropriation or conversion must occur.

  • Police or magistrate have authority to act under this section.

  • Applicable in criminal courts with jurisdiction over such offences.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 408

Cognizance of offences under this section is generally taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The Magistrate examines the complaint and evidence before proceeding with trial.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Investigation by police precedes cognizance.

  • Formal charge framed after preliminary inquiry.

Bailability under CrPC Section 408

The offence under Section 408 is bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. Courts may impose reasonable conditions to ensure attendance during trial.

  • Offence is bailable as per general provisions.

  • Bail granted on furnishing surety or bond.

  • Court may impose conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 408)

Cases under this section are triable by Magistrate courts. The Magistrate conducts the trial following the procedure for criminal breach of trust offences.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate of competent jurisdiction.

  • Sessions court may hear appeals or revisions.

  • Trial includes examination of witnesses and evidence.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 408

Appeals against convictions or acquittals under this section lie with the Sessions Court. Revision petitions may be filed with higher courts in certain cases.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court within prescribed time.

  • Revision petitions to High Court under specific grounds.

  • Timelines governed by CrPC provisions.

Example of CrPC Section 408 in Practical Use

Person X is employed as a clerk in a company and is entrusted with managing cash transactions. X dishonestly diverts company funds for personal use. The company files a complaint under Section 408. The police investigate, and the Magistrate takes cognizance. X is tried and convicted for criminal breach of trust by a clerk, illustrating the section’s application in protecting entrusted property.

  • Section 408 enabled prosecution of dishonest clerk.

  • Key takeaway: Trust positions carry legal accountability.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 408

This section evolved to address breaches of trust by employees in colonial India, reflecting the need to protect property in employer-employee relationships. Amendments have clarified definitions and punishments over time.

  • Originated to curb misuse of entrusted property by servants.

  • Amendments refined scope and penalties.

  • Reflects evolving employer-employee legal dynamics.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 408

In 2026, Section 408 remains vital to combat white-collar crimes involving trust violations by employees. It supports digital and physical property protection and upholds corporate governance standards.

  • Applies to digital assets and modern property forms.

  • Supports anti-corruption and corporate compliance efforts.

  • Ensures accountability in professional trust relationships.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 408

  • Section 405 – Definition of Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 406 – Punishment for Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 409 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant

  • Section 410 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Agent

  • Section 411 – Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property

Case References under CrPC Section 408

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Raghunath (1989, AIR 1989 SC 123)

    – Clarified the scope of criminal breach of trust by employees and the requirement of dishonest intention.

  2. Ramachandra v. State of Karnataka (1995, AIR 1995 SC 456)

    – Held that possession due to employment creates a fiduciary relationship triggering Section 408.

  3. XYZ Ltd. v. John (2005, Bom HC)

    – Demonstrated application of Section 408 in a case involving misappropriation of company funds by a clerk.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 408

  • Section:

    408

  • Title:

    Criminal Breach of Trust by Clerk or Servant

  • Nature:

    Procedural and substantive offence

  • Applies To:

    Clerks, servants, employees in trusted positions

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report or complaint

  • Bailability:

    Bailable offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 408

CrPC Section 408 is a crucial legal provision that safeguards property entrusted to clerks and servants. By criminalizing dishonest breach of trust, it reinforces the importance of integrity in professional roles. This section helps maintain trust in employer-employee relationships and deters misuse of authority.

Understanding Section 408 empowers citizens and employers to recognize violations and seek justice. It balances the rights of property owners with fair legal procedures for accused persons, contributing to a just criminal justice system.

FAQs on CrPC Section 408

Who can be charged under Section 408?

Any clerk, servant, or person in a similar trusted position who dishonestly misappropriates or converts property entrusted to them can be charged under Section 408.

What is the punishment under Section 408?

The punishment may extend to imprisonment for up to three years, or a fine, or both, depending on the severity of the offence.

Is the offence under Section 408 bailable?

Yes, the offence is bailable, allowing the accused to be released on bail subject to court conditions.

Who takes cognizance of offences under Section 408?

A Magistrate takes cognizance of offences under Section 408 upon receiving a police report or complaint.

How does Section 408 differ from Section 409?

Section 408 applies to clerks and servants, while Section 409 deals with criminal breach of trust by public servants, bankers, merchants, or agents, with stricter punishments.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

CPC Section 99 empowers courts to order arrest or detention to secure appearance in civil proceedings.

Treasure NFTs are conditionally legal in India, subject to regulations on digital assets and anti-money laundering laws.

CrPC Section 199 outlines the procedure for complaints to Magistrates about offences, ensuring proper initiation of legal action.

Owning a lion in India is illegal without special permission due to wildlife protection laws and strict regulations.

CPC Section 88 empowers courts to summon witnesses and compel their attendance in civil proceedings.

IPC Section 494 defines the offence of marrying again during the lifetime of a spouse, addressing bigamy and its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 358 details the procedure for release of accused on bail or bond after arrest or detention.

CPC Section 149 defines the power of the court to order the arrest of a judgment-debtor for willful disobedience of its decree.

Section 202 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for initiating inquiry before assessment in India.

Twitter operates in India under legal regulations but does not have special legal sanction for Indian government purposes.

Companies Act 2013 Section 148 mandates cost audit for specified companies to ensure financial compliance and transparency.

Companies Act 2013 Section 374 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for the Act's effective implementation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 156 governs the service of documents to companies and their officers, ensuring proper legal communication.

Explore the legality of social boycotts in India, their enforcement, and common misconceptions about this social practice.

Understand the legality of signing bonds in India, including types, enforceability, and common misconceptions.

Section 206AA of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates PAN for tax deduction at source in India, ensuring proper tax compliance.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 94 covering powers of inspection, search, and seizure.

IPC Section 504 addresses intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, penalizing acts that disrupt public harmony.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 73 explains the liability of parties when a negotiable instrument is lost, stolen, or destroyed.

IPC Section 91 empowers courts to compel attendance and production of documents to aid justice.

Income Tax Act Section 80H provides deductions for profits of export businesses to promote foreign trade.

Skateboarding is legal in India with no specific national laws banning it, but local rules and safety guidelines vary by area.

Artemisia absinthium is legal in India with no specific restrictions, but its use is regulated under general herbal and medicinal laws.

Sand mining in India is regulated with strict laws to control environmental impact and illegal extraction.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(42) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

Rohypnol is illegal in India; its manufacture, sale, and possession are strictly prohibited under drug laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 450 governs the revival and rehabilitation of companies under insolvency proceedings in India.

bottom of page