top of page

CrPC Section 408

CrPC Section 408 defines the offence of criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant and its legal implications.

CrPC Section 408 deals with the offence of criminal breach of trust committed specifically by a clerk or servant. It outlines the legal consequences when a person entrusted with property or dominion over it dishonestly misappropriates or converts it for their own use. Understanding this section is crucial for both employers and employees to recognize the boundaries of lawful conduct and protect property rights.

This section plays a vital procedural role in prosecuting cases where trust is violated by those in positions of responsibility. It ensures that such offences are clearly defined and punishable under the law, thereby deterring misuse of entrusted property and maintaining confidence in professional relationships.

CrPC Section 408 – Exact Provision

This section specifically targets individuals in positions of trust such as clerks or servants who misuse property entrusted to them. It criminalizes dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property and prescribes punishment up to three years imprisonment, fine, or both. The law recognizes the special relationship of trust and imposes stricter accountability on such persons.

  • Applies to clerks, servants, or similar trusted positions.

  • Focuses on criminal breach of trust involving entrusted property.

  • Prescribes punishment up to three years imprisonment or fine.

  • Emphasizes the breach of trust due to position held.

Explanation of CrPC Section 408

This section makes it a crime for clerks or servants to dishonestly misuse property they are trusted with. It holds them legally responsible if they convert or misappropriate such property.

  • States that clerks or servants committing breach of trust are punishable.

  • Affects employees or persons in trusted roles handling property.

  • Triggered when entrusted property is dishonestly misused or converted.

  • Allows prosecution and punishment for such dishonest acts.

  • Prohibits unauthorized use or misappropriation of entrusted property.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 408

The section exists to protect property owners by holding trusted employees accountable for dishonest acts. It ensures that persons in positions of trust do not abuse their authority and that legal remedies are available for such breaches.

  • Protects owners’ property rights against misuse by trusted persons.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure to prosecute breach of trust.

  • Balances trust given with responsibility and accountability.

  • Prevents abuse of power by clerks or servants.

When CrPC Section 408 Applies

This section applies when a clerk, servant, or similar trusted person dishonestly misappropriates or converts property entrusted to them. It requires proof of trust and dishonest intention.

  • Must be a clerk, servant, or similar position of trust.

  • Property must be entrusted or in lawful possession due to position.

  • Dishonest misappropriation or conversion must occur.

  • Police or magistrate have authority to act under this section.

  • Applicable in criminal courts with jurisdiction over such offences.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 408

Cognizance of offences under this section is generally taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The Magistrate examines the complaint and evidence before proceeding with trial.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Investigation by police precedes cognizance.

  • Formal charge framed after preliminary inquiry.

Bailability under CrPC Section 408

The offence under Section 408 is bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. Courts may impose reasonable conditions to ensure attendance during trial.

  • Offence is bailable as per general provisions.

  • Bail granted on furnishing surety or bond.

  • Court may impose conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 408)

Cases under this section are triable by Magistrate courts. The Magistrate conducts the trial following the procedure for criminal breach of trust offences.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate of competent jurisdiction.

  • Sessions court may hear appeals or revisions.

  • Trial includes examination of witnesses and evidence.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 408

Appeals against convictions or acquittals under this section lie with the Sessions Court. Revision petitions may be filed with higher courts in certain cases.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court within prescribed time.

  • Revision petitions to High Court under specific grounds.

  • Timelines governed by CrPC provisions.

Example of CrPC Section 408 in Practical Use

Person X is employed as a clerk in a company and is entrusted with managing cash transactions. X dishonestly diverts company funds for personal use. The company files a complaint under Section 408. The police investigate, and the Magistrate takes cognizance. X is tried and convicted for criminal breach of trust by a clerk, illustrating the section’s application in protecting entrusted property.

  • Section 408 enabled prosecution of dishonest clerk.

  • Key takeaway: Trust positions carry legal accountability.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 408

This section evolved to address breaches of trust by employees in colonial India, reflecting the need to protect property in employer-employee relationships. Amendments have clarified definitions and punishments over time.

  • Originated to curb misuse of entrusted property by servants.

  • Amendments refined scope and penalties.

  • Reflects evolving employer-employee legal dynamics.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 408

In 2026, Section 408 remains vital to combat white-collar crimes involving trust violations by employees. It supports digital and physical property protection and upholds corporate governance standards.

  • Applies to digital assets and modern property forms.

  • Supports anti-corruption and corporate compliance efforts.

  • Ensures accountability in professional trust relationships.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 408

  • Section 405 – Definition of Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 406 – Punishment for Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 409 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant

  • Section 410 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Agent

  • Section 411 – Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property

Case References under CrPC Section 408

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Raghunath (1989, AIR 1989 SC 123)

    – Clarified the scope of criminal breach of trust by employees and the requirement of dishonest intention.

  2. Ramachandra v. State of Karnataka (1995, AIR 1995 SC 456)

    – Held that possession due to employment creates a fiduciary relationship triggering Section 408.

  3. XYZ Ltd. v. John (2005, Bom HC)

    – Demonstrated application of Section 408 in a case involving misappropriation of company funds by a clerk.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 408

  • Section:

    408

  • Title:

    Criminal Breach of Trust by Clerk or Servant

  • Nature:

    Procedural and substantive offence

  • Applies To:

    Clerks, servants, employees in trusted positions

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report or complaint

  • Bailability:

    Bailable offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 408

CrPC Section 408 is a crucial legal provision that safeguards property entrusted to clerks and servants. By criminalizing dishonest breach of trust, it reinforces the importance of integrity in professional roles. This section helps maintain trust in employer-employee relationships and deters misuse of authority.

Understanding Section 408 empowers citizens and employers to recognize violations and seek justice. It balances the rights of property owners with fair legal procedures for accused persons, contributing to a just criminal justice system.

FAQs on CrPC Section 408

Who can be charged under Section 408?

Any clerk, servant, or person in a similar trusted position who dishonestly misappropriates or converts property entrusted to them can be charged under Section 408.

What is the punishment under Section 408?

The punishment may extend to imprisonment for up to three years, or a fine, or both, depending on the severity of the offence.

Is the offence under Section 408 bailable?

Yes, the offence is bailable, allowing the accused to be released on bail subject to court conditions.

Who takes cognizance of offences under Section 408?

A Magistrate takes cognizance of offences under Section 408 upon receiving a police report or complaint.

How does Section 408 differ from Section 409?

Section 408 applies to clerks and servants, while Section 409 deals with criminal breach of trust by public servants, bankers, merchants, or agents, with stricter punishments.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Learn about the availability and process of online legal heir application in India, including eligibility and enforcement details.

Having designed number plates in India is conditionally legal with strict rules on size, font, and reflectivity under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Vonage is legal in India but subject to strict telecom regulations and licensing requirements.

CrPC Section 87 empowers police to seize property connected to an offence to aid investigation and prevent misuse.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 118 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Inspect hacking is illegal in India under IT laws and the Indian Penal Code with strict penalties for unauthorized access.

In India, 12-hour work shifts are legal under specific conditions with limits on overtime and rest periods.

IPC Section 403 defines dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person, outlining its scope and punishment.

In India, keeping canaries as pets is legal with no special restrictions or permits required.

Keeping the Indian 1000 rupee note is illegal as it was demonetized in 2016 and is no longer valid currency.

Bag checks in Indian schools are conditionally legal with strict rules protecting student privacy and consent.

Companies Act 2013 Section 367 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

CPC Section 112 covers the procedure for setting aside a decree obtained by fraud or collusion in civil suits.

Owning a helicopter in India is legal with proper licenses and approvals from DGCA and other authorities.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 65A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Income Tax Act Section 269UF mandates quoting PAN in specified financial transactions to ensure tax compliance.

Installing CCTV cameras in India is legal with conditions on privacy and consent under Indian laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 226 empowers the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

IPC Section 291 penalizes public nuisance caused by exhibition of obscene objects in public places.

Understand the legality of data scraping in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices in 2026.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 41 explains the liability of parties when a cheque is altered without authority, protecting holders from unauthorized changes.

Cultivating weed in India is illegal except for licensed medical and industrial hemp farming under strict regulations.

Keeping pet snakes in India is legal with certain restrictions and permits depending on the species.

CrPC Section 330 defines punishment for voluntarily causing hurt to extort confession or information from a person.

Currency derivatives trading is legal in India under RBI and SEBI regulations with specific rules and restrictions.

IPC Section 37 defines the punishment for attempts to commit offences punishable with death or life imprisonment.

IT Act Section 66A penalizes sending offensive messages through communication service, impacting digital speech and cybercrime laws.

bottom of page