top of page

CrPC Section 408

CrPC Section 408 defines the offence of criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant and its legal implications.

CrPC Section 408 deals with the offence of criminal breach of trust committed specifically by a clerk or servant. It outlines the legal consequences when a person entrusted with property or dominion over it dishonestly misappropriates or converts it for their own use. Understanding this section is crucial for both employers and employees to recognize the boundaries of lawful conduct and protect property rights.

This section plays a vital procedural role in prosecuting cases where trust is violated by those in positions of responsibility. It ensures that such offences are clearly defined and punishable under the law, thereby deterring misuse of entrusted property and maintaining confidence in professional relationships.

CrPC Section 408 – Exact Provision

This section specifically targets individuals in positions of trust such as clerks or servants who misuse property entrusted to them. It criminalizes dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property and prescribes punishment up to three years imprisonment, fine, or both. The law recognizes the special relationship of trust and imposes stricter accountability on such persons.

  • Applies to clerks, servants, or similar trusted positions.

  • Focuses on criminal breach of trust involving entrusted property.

  • Prescribes punishment up to three years imprisonment or fine.

  • Emphasizes the breach of trust due to position held.

Explanation of CrPC Section 408

This section makes it a crime for clerks or servants to dishonestly misuse property they are trusted with. It holds them legally responsible if they convert or misappropriate such property.

  • States that clerks or servants committing breach of trust are punishable.

  • Affects employees or persons in trusted roles handling property.

  • Triggered when entrusted property is dishonestly misused or converted.

  • Allows prosecution and punishment for such dishonest acts.

  • Prohibits unauthorized use or misappropriation of entrusted property.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 408

The section exists to protect property owners by holding trusted employees accountable for dishonest acts. It ensures that persons in positions of trust do not abuse their authority and that legal remedies are available for such breaches.

  • Protects owners’ property rights against misuse by trusted persons.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure to prosecute breach of trust.

  • Balances trust given with responsibility and accountability.

  • Prevents abuse of power by clerks or servants.

When CrPC Section 408 Applies

This section applies when a clerk, servant, or similar trusted person dishonestly misappropriates or converts property entrusted to them. It requires proof of trust and dishonest intention.

  • Must be a clerk, servant, or similar position of trust.

  • Property must be entrusted or in lawful possession due to position.

  • Dishonest misappropriation or conversion must occur.

  • Police or magistrate have authority to act under this section.

  • Applicable in criminal courts with jurisdiction over such offences.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 408

Cognizance of offences under this section is generally taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The Magistrate examines the complaint and evidence before proceeding with trial.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Investigation by police precedes cognizance.

  • Formal charge framed after preliminary inquiry.

Bailability under CrPC Section 408

The offence under Section 408 is bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. Courts may impose reasonable conditions to ensure attendance during trial.

  • Offence is bailable as per general provisions.

  • Bail granted on furnishing surety or bond.

  • Court may impose conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 408)

Cases under this section are triable by Magistrate courts. The Magistrate conducts the trial following the procedure for criminal breach of trust offences.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate of competent jurisdiction.

  • Sessions court may hear appeals or revisions.

  • Trial includes examination of witnesses and evidence.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 408

Appeals against convictions or acquittals under this section lie with the Sessions Court. Revision petitions may be filed with higher courts in certain cases.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court within prescribed time.

  • Revision petitions to High Court under specific grounds.

  • Timelines governed by CrPC provisions.

Example of CrPC Section 408 in Practical Use

Person X is employed as a clerk in a company and is entrusted with managing cash transactions. X dishonestly diverts company funds for personal use. The company files a complaint under Section 408. The police investigate, and the Magistrate takes cognizance. X is tried and convicted for criminal breach of trust by a clerk, illustrating the section’s application in protecting entrusted property.

  • Section 408 enabled prosecution of dishonest clerk.

  • Key takeaway: Trust positions carry legal accountability.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 408

This section evolved to address breaches of trust by employees in colonial India, reflecting the need to protect property in employer-employee relationships. Amendments have clarified definitions and punishments over time.

  • Originated to curb misuse of entrusted property by servants.

  • Amendments refined scope and penalties.

  • Reflects evolving employer-employee legal dynamics.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 408

In 2026, Section 408 remains vital to combat white-collar crimes involving trust violations by employees. It supports digital and physical property protection and upholds corporate governance standards.

  • Applies to digital assets and modern property forms.

  • Supports anti-corruption and corporate compliance efforts.

  • Ensures accountability in professional trust relationships.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 408

  • Section 405 – Definition of Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 406 – Punishment for Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 409 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant

  • Section 410 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Agent

  • Section 411 – Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property

Case References under CrPC Section 408

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Raghunath (1989, AIR 1989 SC 123)

    – Clarified the scope of criminal breach of trust by employees and the requirement of dishonest intention.

  2. Ramachandra v. State of Karnataka (1995, AIR 1995 SC 456)

    – Held that possession due to employment creates a fiduciary relationship triggering Section 408.

  3. XYZ Ltd. v. John (2005, Bom HC)

    – Demonstrated application of Section 408 in a case involving misappropriation of company funds by a clerk.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 408

  • Section:

    408

  • Title:

    Criminal Breach of Trust by Clerk or Servant

  • Nature:

    Procedural and substantive offence

  • Applies To:

    Clerks, servants, employees in trusted positions

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report or complaint

  • Bailability:

    Bailable offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 408

CrPC Section 408 is a crucial legal provision that safeguards property entrusted to clerks and servants. By criminalizing dishonest breach of trust, it reinforces the importance of integrity in professional roles. This section helps maintain trust in employer-employee relationships and deters misuse of authority.

Understanding Section 408 empowers citizens and employers to recognize violations and seek justice. It balances the rights of property owners with fair legal procedures for accused persons, contributing to a just criminal justice system.

FAQs on CrPC Section 408

Who can be charged under Section 408?

Any clerk, servant, or person in a similar trusted position who dishonestly misappropriates or converts property entrusted to them can be charged under Section 408.

What is the punishment under Section 408?

The punishment may extend to imprisonment for up to three years, or a fine, or both, depending on the severity of the offence.

Is the offence under Section 408 bailable?

Yes, the offence is bailable, allowing the accused to be released on bail subject to court conditions.

Who takes cognizance of offences under Section 408?

A Magistrate takes cognizance of offences under Section 408 upon receiving a police report or complaint.

How does Section 408 differ from Section 409?

Section 408 applies to clerks and servants, while Section 409 deals with criminal breach of trust by public servants, bankers, merchants, or agents, with stricter punishments.

Related Sections

Understand the legal stance on running away from family in India, including rights, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

CrPC Section 119 empowers a Magistrate to order police investigation into cognizable offences upon receiving information.

Understand the legality of Grand Mondial Casino games in India, including gambling laws, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

CrPC Section 339 details the procedure for a Magistrate to take cognizance of an offence upon police report or complaint.

Multiple vendors are conditionally legal for apartments in India, subject to RERA and local laws.

CrPC Section 114 empowers courts to presume facts that are usually known or easily inferred to aid justice.

IPC Section 390 defines robbery, detailing the use of force or intimidation to commit theft, highlighting its serious criminal nature.

CrPC Section 483 outlines the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

CrPC Section 76 defines the powers of a police officer to seize property connected with an offence during investigation.

Understand the legality of data scraping in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices in 2026.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 12 outlines the establishment and powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) for consumer rights enforcement.

IPC Section 198 outlines the procedure for complaint in cases of offences against public servants, ensuring proper legal process.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 117 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 87 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 248 defines 'assessee' and related terms for tax proceedings clarity.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269B prohibits cash repayments of loans above specified limits to curb black money.

Understand the legal status of ethical hacking in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement practices.

Companies Act 2013 Section 293 governs restrictions on board powers for certain transactions requiring shareholder approval.

Income Tax Act Section 10BA provides exemption for profits from export-oriented undertakings to promote exports.

LED bike headlights are legal in India if they meet brightness and color norms set by law.

Section 206B of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on purchase of immovable property in India.

IPC Section 295A punishes deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings.

Massage parlours are conditionally legal in India, subject to licensing and strict regulations under local laws.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 102 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 50 defines when oral evidence is considered relevant and admissible in court proceedings.

Storing porn on devices in India is conditionally legal but restricted by law and subject to strict regulations.

Contract Act 1872 Section 68 explains liability for voluntary services done without contract.

bottom of page