top of page

CrPC Section 371

CrPC Section 371 details the procedure for transferring cases from one High Court to another for justice and convenience.

CrPC Section 371 empowers the Supreme Court or a High Court to transfer cases pending before one High Court to another High Court. This provision ensures that justice is served efficiently and fairly when circumstances require shifting jurisdiction. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal professionals navigate inter-court transfers effectively.

Transfers under this section are procedural tools to avoid delays, inconvenience, or bias in trials. They maintain the integrity of the judicial process by allowing higher courts to reassign cases for the convenience of parties or the interest of justice.

CrPC Section 371 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes the Supreme Court and High Courts to transfer cases or appeals between High Courts. The transfer aims to serve justice or ease the burden on parties or witnesses. It is a discretionary power exercised to ensure fair trial and efficient administration of justice.

  • Allows transfer of cases or appeals between High Courts.

  • Transfers may be for justice or convenience.

  • Applicable to cases pending before High Courts or Supreme Court.

  • Ensures fair trial and reduces inconvenience.

Explanation of CrPC Section 371

This section lets the Supreme Court or any High Court move a case from one High Court to another. It helps when parties or witnesses find it difficult to attend the original court or when justice demands a change.

  • The section states transfer powers of Supreme Court and High Courts.

  • Affects litigants, courts, and witnesses involved in High Court cases.

  • Triggered by inconvenience or interest of justice.

  • Allows transfer of pending cases or appeals.

  • Prevents trials in inconvenient or biased courts.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 371

This section exists to maintain fairness and efficiency in the judicial system. It prevents delays and hardships caused by geographical or procedural difficulties. By allowing transfers, courts ensure that justice is accessible and not hindered by location or other obstacles.

  • Protects parties’ rights to a fair trial.

  • Ensures proper procedure in case transfers.

  • Balances judicial power with convenience of citizens.

  • Prevents misuse by enabling higher courts to intervene.

When CrPC Section 371 Applies

Section 371 applies when a case or appeal is pending before a High Court or the Supreme Court and there is a valid reason to transfer it to another High Court. The transfer must serve justice or ease inconvenience for parties or witnesses.

  • Case or appeal must be pending before a High Court or Supreme Court.

  • Transfer initiated by Supreme Court or any High Court.

  • Reasons include ends of justice or convenience.

  • No fixed time limit; discretion based on circumstances.

  • Exceptions if transfer harms justice or parties.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 371

Cognizance under Section 371 is taken when the Supreme Court or a High Court recognizes the need to transfer a case. This can be on application by a party or suo motu by the court. The court examines the reasons and decides whether transfer is justified.

  • Initiated by application or court’s own motion.

  • Consideration of convenience and justice.

  • Order passed transferring the case to another High Court.

Bailability under CrPC Section 371

Section 371 itself does not deal with bailability as it concerns procedural transfer of cases. Bailability depends on the nature of the offence involved in the case being transferred, governed by other relevant CrPC sections.

  • No direct impact on bail under this section.

  • Bail conditions depend on original offence.

  • Transfer does not affect existing bail orders.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 371)

Cases transferred under Section 371 are tried by the High Court to which they are transferred. The jurisdiction shifts accordingly, and the receiving High Court assumes full authority to proceed with the trial or appeal.

  • Receiving High Court gains jurisdiction.

  • Trial or appeal continues as per transferred court’s rules.

  • Original High Court relinquishes jurisdiction.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 371

Decisions regarding transfer under Section 371 can be challenged by appeal or revision in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has the final authority to confirm, modify, or set aside transfer orders to ensure justice.

  • Appeal lies to Supreme Court against transfer orders.

  • Revision petitions may be filed in Supreme Court.

  • Timelines depend on procedural rules of the courts.

Example of CrPC Section 371 in Practical Use

Person X files a civil appeal in the Bombay High Court. Due to X’s residence and majority witnesses being in Delhi, X requests transfer to Delhi High Court for convenience. The Supreme Court, considering the request, transfers the appeal to Delhi High Court under Section 371. This reduces travel hardship and ensures easier access to justice for X and witnesses.

  • Section 371 enabled transfer for convenience.

  • Ensured fair and accessible trial for parties involved.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 371

Section 371 was introduced to streamline judicial processes and reduce delays caused by jurisdictional issues. Over time, amendments have clarified transfer powers and expanded the scope to include appeals, reflecting evolving judicial needs.

  • Introduced to address inter-High Court jurisdiction conflicts.

  • Amended to include appeals and suo motu transfers.

  • Enhanced judicial efficiency and fairness.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 371

In 2026, Section 371 remains vital for managing court workloads and ensuring justice accessibility. With increased mobility and complex litigation, transfers help courts handle cases efficiently and reduce inconvenience for parties and witnesses.

  • Supports digital and physical case management.

  • Balances court workloads across regions.

  • Protects rights in multi-jurisdictional disputes.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 371

  • Section 406 – Transfer of cases by Supreme Court

  • Section 407 – Transfer of cases by High Court

  • Section 482 – Inherent powers of High Court

  • Section 156 – Police investigation powers

  • Section 190 – Cognizance of offences by Magistrate

Case References under CrPC Section 371

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Union of India (1977, AIR 1980 SC 182)

    – Supreme Court emphasized transfer powers to ensure fair trial and prevent injustice.

  2. Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Union of India (1964, AIR 1965 SC 1039)

    – Court held transfer powers are discretionary and exercised for ends of justice.

  3. Ranjit Thakur v. Union of India (1965, AIR 1966 SC 527)

    – Transfer should not be used to delay or obstruct justice.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 371

  • Section:

    371

  • Title:

    Transfer of Cases Between High Courts

  • Nature:

    Procedural power

  • Applies To:

    Supreme Court, High Courts, parties, witnesses

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Supreme Court or High Court on application or suo motu

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Receiving High Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 371

CrPC Section 371 plays a crucial role in ensuring justice is not hindered by geographical or jurisdictional barriers. It empowers higher courts to transfer cases between High Courts to serve fairness and convenience. This procedural tool helps maintain the integrity and efficiency of the judicial system.

By allowing transfers, the courts can reduce delays, avoid inconvenience to parties and witnesses, and prevent bias. Understanding this section is essential for litigants and legal practitioners to effectively manage cases involving multiple jurisdictions.

FAQs on CrPC Section 371

What types of cases can be transferred under Section 371?

Both civil and criminal cases or appeals pending before High Courts or the Supreme Court can be transferred under Section 371 for justice or convenience.

Who can initiate a transfer under this section?

The Supreme Court or any High Court can initiate transfer either on an application by a party or on their own motion (suo motu).

Does transfer affect the jurisdiction of the original court?

Yes, once a case is transferred, the receiving High Court assumes jurisdiction, and the original court relinquishes it for that case.

Can a transfer order be challenged?

Yes, transfer orders can be appealed or challenged by revision in the Supreme Court, which has the final say.

Does Section 371 affect bail or other procedural rights?

No, Section 371 deals only with transfer of cases and does not impact bail or substantive rights, which are governed by other sections.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 80GGA provides deductions for donations to scientific research and rural development projects.

Cannibalism is illegal in India under various laws with strict enforcement and serious penalties.

CPC Section 37 details the appeal process against orders from courts of original civil jurisdiction.

Understand the legality of owning and using Indian TV services worldwide, including licensing, content rights, and enforcement.

IPC Section 90 defines consent when obtained by fear of injury, clarifying its validity in criminal law.

IPC Section 317 defines causing death by negligence, covering unintentional fatal harm due to rash or negligent acts.

Understand the legality of chain marketing in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

In India, offering gifts for insurance is regulated and generally considered illegal under anti-corruption laws and insurance regulations.

Contract Act 1872 Section 12 defines who is competent to contract, ensuring valid agreements by capable parties.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 92 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 141 governs the appointment, qualifications, and duties of auditors in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 445 details the punishment for fraud committed by companies or their officers.

Understand the legality of nude photography in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement practices.

Slingshots are generally illegal in India due to weapon laws, with strict restrictions and penalties for possession and use.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 102 explains the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts a fact, crucial for civil and criminal cases.

SNRIs are prescription medicines in India and legal only when prescribed by a registered doctor.

Crossing railroad tracks in India is legal only at designated crossings with caution and following safety rules.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 137 empowers courts to exclude evidence obtained illegally or unfairly to ensure fair trial and justice.

Having designed number plates in India is conditionally legal with strict rules on size, font, and reflectivity under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(22) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

Companies Act 2013 Section 296 governs restrictions on powers of the Board of Directors regarding company property and contracts.

In India, driving a car wearing flip flops is not illegal but may be unsafe and discouraged by traffic authorities.

CPC Section 137 mandates the court to pronounce its judgment in open court after hearing the parties.

CrPC Section 51 empowers police to seize property connected with offences to aid investigation and prevent misuse.

Carrying knuckles is illegal in India under the Arms Act and can lead to penalties and arrest.

Using clone mobile phones is illegal in India due to laws against device cloning and telecom fraud.

CrPC Section 218 empowers a Magistrate to order investigation into offences without a police report under certain conditions.

bottom of page