top of page

CrPC Section 138

CrPC Section 138 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases to ensure their presence in court.

CrPC Section 138 governs the issuance of summons to accused persons in criminal proceedings. It ensures that the accused are formally notified to appear before the court, safeguarding their right to a fair trial and preventing unnecessary arrests or detention. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal practitioners navigate procedural fairness in criminal cases.

This section plays a crucial role in the criminal justice system by providing a lawful method to bring accused persons to court without resorting to arrest. It balances the need for effective prosecution with the protection of individual liberty, making it essential knowledge for anyone involved in criminal law.

CrPC Section 138 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that courts must serve summons to accused individuals to notify them of their required court appearance. The service of summons must be recorded officially. If the accused does not comply, the court gains authority to issue an arrest warrant. This procedure ensures that accused persons are given an opportunity to respond voluntarily before any coercive action is taken.

  • Summons must be served to the accused person.

  • The court must record the service of summons.

  • Failure to appear can lead to an arrest warrant.

  • Ensures accused are notified before arrest.

  • Protects the accused’s right to be heard.

Explanation of CrPC Section 138

Section 138 explains how courts notify accused persons to appear in criminal cases. It ensures they receive a formal summons before any arrest is considered.

  • The section requires courts to issue summons to accused individuals.

  • It affects accused persons in criminal proceedings.

  • Summons must be properly served and recorded.

  • If the accused ignores the summons, the court may order arrest.

  • Arrest without summons is generally avoided under this section.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 138

This section exists to protect the rights of accused persons by ensuring they are informed of court proceedings through summons. It promotes voluntary appearance in court, reducing unnecessary arrests and respecting personal liberty while maintaining judicial efficiency.

  • Protects the accused’s right to be informed.

  • Ensures proper judicial procedure is followed.

  • Balances court authority with individual rights.

  • Prevents misuse of arrest powers.

When CrPC Section 138 Applies

Section 138 applies when a court needs to notify an accused person to appear for trial or hearing. It is the initial step before any arrest or coercive measure.

  • Summons issued after complaint or charge is filed.

  • Magistrates or courts have authority to issue summons.

  • Applies to all criminal cases requiring accused’s presence.

  • Service of summons must be within jurisdiction.

  • Exceptions may apply in urgent or serious cases.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 138

Cognizance is taken when the court receives information about an offence and decides to summon the accused. The court issues a summons, which must be served and recorded. If the accused fails to appear, the court may proceed to issue an arrest warrant.

  • Court reviews complaint or police report.

  • Summons issued to accused person.

  • Service of summons recorded officially.

Bailability under CrPC Section 138

Section 138 itself does not specify bailability but relates to the summons process. When an accused appears voluntarily, bail considerations arise based on the offence. If arrested after failing to appear, bail depends on the nature of the offence and court discretion.

  • Summons does not affect bailability directly.

  • Bail granted based on offence severity and court rules.

  • Voluntary appearance may facilitate easier bail.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 138)

Cases involving summons under Section 138 are triable by the Magistrate or court issuing the summons. The section applies to all criminal courts empowered to summon accused persons in their jurisdiction.

  • Magistrate courts primarily issue summons.

  • Sessions courts may also issue summons in certain cases.

  • Trial proceeds in the court that issued summons.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 138

Decisions related to summons issuance or failure to appear can be challenged through appeals or revisions. Higher courts review such matters to ensure procedural fairness and legality of arrest warrants issued after summons are ignored.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court depending on case.

  • Revision petitions can challenge summons or arrest warrant orders.

  • Timelines for appeal follow general CrPC rules.

Example of CrPC Section 138 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of theft. The Magistrate issues a summons under Section 138, which is served to X. X ignores the summons and does not appear in court. The court records the non-appearance and issues an arrest warrant. This ensures X is given a chance to appear voluntarily before arrest.

  • The section ensured X was notified before arrest.

  • Key takeaway: summons protect accused rights and court process.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 138

Section 138 has evolved to formalize the summons process, replacing arbitrary arrests with a structured notification system. Amendments have clarified service procedures and recording requirements to enhance fairness.

  • Introduced to reduce unnecessary arrests.

  • Amended to specify service and recording of summons.

  • Strengthened procedural safeguards for accused.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 138

In 2026, Section 138 remains vital for ensuring accused persons are properly notified. It supports digital summons service methods and aligns with human rights standards, balancing efficient justice with personal freedoms.

  • Supports electronic summons delivery innovations.

  • Ensures compliance with fair trial rights.

  • Prevents misuse of arrest powers in modern policing.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 138

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant

  • Section 56 – Summons to witnesses

  • Section 61 – Service of summons

  • Section 82 – Procedure for issuing warrant

  • Section 204 – Summons or warrant before charge

Case References under CrPC Section 138

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999, AIR 1999 SC 2378)

    – Summons must be properly served to ensure accused’s right to fair trial.

  2. Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan (2005, AIR 2005 SC 3546)

    – Court must record service of summons; failure affects validity of arrest warrant.

  3. Bhajan Lal v. State of Haryana (1992, AIR 1992 SC 604)

    – Arrest warrants after summons ignored must follow due procedure.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 138

  • Section:

    138

  • Title:

    Summons to Accused Persons

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Accused persons, Magistrates, Courts

  • Cognizance:

    Summons issued and served before arrest

  • Bailability:

    Depends on offence, not specified in section

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate or competent court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 138

CrPC Section 138 is fundamental in criminal procedure, ensuring accused persons receive formal notice to appear in court. This protects personal liberty by preventing arbitrary arrests and promoting voluntary compliance with the judicial process.

By mandating service and recording of summons, the section upholds fairness and transparency. It balances the court’s authority to proceed with cases and the accused’s right to be informed, making it a cornerstone of procedural justice in India’s criminal law system.

FAQs on CrPC Section 138

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 138?

Its main purpose is to ensure accused persons are formally notified through summons to appear in court before any arrest is made, protecting their right to a fair trial.

Who issues summons under Section 138?

Magistrates or other competent courts issue summons to accused persons to require their presence in criminal proceedings.

What happens if the accused ignores the summons?

If the accused fails to appear after summons service, the court may issue a warrant for their arrest to secure their presence.

Does Section 138 specify bail conditions?

No, Section 138 does not specify bail conditions; bail depends on the nature of the offence and court discretion after arrest.

Can summons be served electronically under this section?

Modern practices allow electronic service of summons, provided the court records the service properly, aligning with Section 138 requirements.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Understand the legal status of importing lithium polymer (LiPo) batteries into India, including regulations and restrictions.

Understand the legal status of GB Road in India, including its regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85B deals with presumption of electronic records' authenticity, crucial for digital evidence admissibility in courts.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 153 covering penalties for offences under CGST Act.

IPC Section 84 provides legal protection for acts committed by persons of unsound mind, exempting them from criminal liability.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 92A defines 'Associated Enterprise' for transfer pricing and related party transactions.

IPC Section 5 defines the territorial scope of the Indian Penal Code, specifying where its provisions apply within and beyond India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 200 governs the power to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries by the Registrar.

IT Act Section 66 covers computer-related offences including hacking, data theft, and fraudulent digital acts under Indian cyber law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 10 lists incomes exempt from tax, helping taxpayers understand non-taxable earnings.

Understand the legality of bait and switch advertising in India, its enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Giving cash discounts in India is legal but must comply with GST rules and consumer protection laws.

Section 194H of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on commission or brokerage payments in India.

Keeping guns in India is legal only with a valid license under strict regulations governed by the Arms Act, 1959.

Explore the legality of Softcore69 content in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 240 governs the power of the Tribunal to order inspection of books of accounts and other records.

Liposuction is legal in India with regulations ensuring it is performed by qualified medical professionals in approved facilities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 241 addresses oppression and mismanagement remedies for shareholders and stakeholders.

Section 194EE of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on payments for deposits under NSS in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 222 governs the power of the Registrar to call for information and inspect books of a company.

IPC Section 177 defines punishment for knowingly disobeying an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant.

Section 206CA of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates PAN quoting for certain transactions to avoid higher TDS rates in India.

Understand the legality of pranks in India, including legal limits, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Milftastic is not a legal entity or regulated service in India; understand the legal context and risks involved.

Detailed analysis of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 77 on provisional attachment of property to protect tax interests.

IPC Section 401 defines criminal breach of trust by a public servant, emphasizing misuse of entrusted property or dominion.

Grand Moundal is not a recognized legal term or activity in India; understand the legal framework and common misconceptions here.

bottom of page