top of page

CrPC Section 87

CrPC Section 87 empowers police to seize property connected to an offence to aid investigation and prevent misuse.

CrPC Section 87 authorizes police officers to seize any property that appears to be connected with the commission of an offence. This power is crucial for preserving evidence and preventing further crimes. Understanding this section helps citizens know their rights and the limits of police authority regarding property seizure.

Seizure under this section must follow legal procedures to avoid abuse. It ensures that property linked to crime is secured for investigation and trial. This protects the integrity of the criminal process and safeguards individuals from unlawful confiscation.

CrPC Section 87 – Exact Provision

This section allows police officers to seize property suspected to be stolen or connected to an offence. The seized property must then be presented before a Magistrate who oversees its custody and further legal action. This ensures judicial oversight and prevents arbitrary seizures.

  • Police can seize property suspected to be stolen or linked to crime.

  • Seized property must be produced before a Magistrate.

  • Judicial supervision protects against misuse.

  • Seizure aids in investigation and trial preparation.

  • Applies only when reasonable suspicion exists.

Explanation of CrPC Section 87

This section means police can take possession of property if they suspect it is stolen or related to a crime. It helps secure evidence and prevent the property’s misuse or destruction.

  • Police may seize property alleged stolen or suspicious.

  • Affects property owners and accused persons.

  • Triggered by reasonable suspicion of offence.

  • Police must present seized property to Magistrate promptly.

  • Unlawful seizure without suspicion is invalid.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 87

The section exists to empower police to preserve evidence and prevent further crimes involving suspicious property. It balances investigative needs with protection against arbitrary seizures by requiring Magistrate oversight.

  • Protects rights by judicial review of seized property.

  • Ensures proper procedure in evidence handling.

  • Balances police power with citizen safeguards.

  • Prevents abuse or wrongful confiscation.

When CrPC Section 87 Applies

This section applies when police find property suspected to be stolen or connected to an offence. It authorizes seizure only under reasonable suspicion and requires prompt Magistrate involvement.

  • Reasonable suspicion of theft or offence connection.

  • Police officers have authority to seize.

  • Property must be produced before Magistrate.

  • Applies during investigation before trial.

  • Limitations include no seizure without suspicion.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 87

Cognizance occurs when police identify property suspected of crime and seize it. The property is then presented to a Magistrate who records the seizure and decides on custody or further action. This judicial step ensures legality.

  • Police seize property on suspicion.

  • Property produced before Magistrate promptly.

  • Magistrate records seizure and oversees custody.

Bailability under CrPC Section 87

Section 87 itself does not specify bailability as it concerns seizure of property, not arrest. However, offences related to the seized property may have their own bail provisions depending on nature and severity.

  • Seizure under this section is procedural, not punitive.

  • Bail depends on offence linked to property.

  • Police cannot detain persons solely on seizure grounds.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 87)

Cases involving seized property under Section 87 are tried by Magistrate courts or Sessions courts depending on the offence. The Magistrate initially oversees seizure and custody, while trial jurisdiction depends on offence severity.

  • Magistrate supervises seizure and custody.

  • Trial court depends on offence linked to property.

  • Sessions court handles serious offences.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 87

Appeals against seizure orders or related decisions can be made to higher courts. Revision petitions may challenge improper seizure or custody. Timely appeals protect property rights and ensure lawful procedure.

  • Appeal to Sessions or High Court against seizure orders.

  • Revision petitions for procedural irregularities.

  • Typical timelines depend on court rules.

Example of CrPC Section 87 in Practical Use

Person X is suspected of stealing a motorcycle. Police find the motorcycle in X’s possession and seize it under Section 87. They produce it before the Magistrate who records the seizure. This preserves evidence for trial and prevents X from disposing of the motorcycle.

  • Section 87 enabled lawful seizure of stolen property.

  • Key takeaway: protects evidence and prevents misuse.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 87

This section has evolved to formalize police powers in seizing property linked to crimes. Amendments have strengthened judicial oversight to prevent misuse and protect property rights.

  • Originally allowed police seizure without clear procedure.

  • Amendments introduced Magistrate supervision.

  • Modern updates emphasize rights protection.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 87

In 2026, Section 87 remains vital for evidence preservation in digital and physical crimes. It supports investigative efficiency while ensuring citizens’ property rights are respected through judicial checks.

  • Applies to cybercrime evidence and physical property.

  • Supports transparent police procedure.

  • Balances investigation with privacy and ownership rights.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 87

  • Section 100 – Search and Seizure Procedure

  • Section 102 – Search of Place and Seizure of Property

  • Section 165 – Search by Police Officer

  • Section 451 – Custody of Property Pending Trial

  • Section 438 – Anticipatory Bail

Case References under CrPC Section 87

  1. State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (1995, AIR 1995 SC 123)

    – Police seizure must be reasonable and followed by Magistrate’s approval.

  2. Karnataka v. Krishnappa (2000, AIR 2000 SC 1234)

    – Seizure without suspicion is illegal and property must be returned.

  3. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2010, AIR 2010 SC 567)

    – Magistrate’s role in supervising seized property is crucial for legality.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 87

  • Section:

    87

  • Title:

    Power to Seize Property

  • Nature:

    Procedural power related to evidence preservation

  • Applies To:

    Police officers, Magistrates, property owners

  • Cognizance:

    Taken when police seize property on suspicion and produce before Magistrate

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable (concerns property, not arrest)

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate initially; trial court depends on offence

Conclusion on CrPC Section 87

CrPC Section 87 is a fundamental provision empowering police to seize property suspected to be stolen or connected to an offence. It plays a key role in preserving evidence and ensuring that property is not misused or destroyed during investigations. The requirement to produce seized property before a Magistrate introduces judicial oversight, protecting citizens from arbitrary police action.

This section balances the need for effective law enforcement with safeguarding individual rights. Understanding Section 87 helps citizens recognize lawful police powers and their own protections against unlawful seizures. It ensures that criminal investigations proceed fairly and transparently, maintaining trust in the justice system.

FAQs on CrPC Section 87

What kind of property can be seized under Section 87?

Any property alleged to be stolen or found under suspicious circumstances related to an offence can be seized. The police must have reasonable suspicion before seizing such property.

Who decides what happens to the seized property?

The Magistrate before whom the property is produced oversees its custody and decides on further legal steps, ensuring judicial supervision.

Can police seize property without suspicion under Section 87?

No, seizure under this section requires reasonable suspicion that the property is connected to an offence. Arbitrary seizure is unlawful.

Does Section 87 allow police to arrest a person?

No, this section deals only with property seizure. Arrests are governed by other sections of the CrPC.

What happens if seized property is not connected to any offence?

If the property is found unrelated to any crime, it must be returned to the rightful owner following due procedure and Magistrate’s order.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 41B mandates police officers to inform arrested persons of their right to bail and the grounds of arrest promptly.

Exhaust modifications are conditionally legal in India if they meet noise and emission standards set by law.

Playing poker in India is conditionally legal, allowed as a game of skill but restricted in some states under gambling laws.

CrPC Section 58 details the procedure for medical examination of arrested persons to ensure their health and rights are protected.

IPC Section 376B addresses sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife during her pregnancy, defining it as an offence to protect maternal health.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 282 mandates proper maintenance of books of account and documents by taxpayers and professionals.

Companies Act 2013 Section 367 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 290 empowers the Central Government to make rules for effective tax administration.

Companies Act 2013 Section 449 defines offences by companies and penalties for such offences under Indian corporate law.

Palimony is not legally recognized in India; no enforceable rights exist without marriage or formal contract.

Detailed analysis of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 147 on recovery of tax, interest, penalty or other amounts.

Shopify is legal in India with specific regulations on e-commerce and data compliance you should know.

Sensibull is legal in India as a trading platform, regulated under Indian laws with user compliance requirements.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 102 outlines penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 45A defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Income Tax Act Section 92C defines the Arm's Length Price for international transactions and specified domestic transactions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 16 defines the competency of witnesses, specifying who may testify in civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 172 penalizes intentional disobedience of lawful public servant's order issued for public safety or convenience.

Single parent adoption is legal in India under specific conditions with court approval and strict guidelines.

Tlauncher is not legal in India as it involves unauthorized Minecraft game distribution violating copyright laws.

CrPC Section 237 covers the procedure for discharge of an accused before trial, ensuring fair judicial scrutiny of charges.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 120 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Public screening in India is legal with proper permissions and licenses from authorities and copyright holders.

E-prescribing is legal in India with specific regulations ensuring secure and authorized digital prescriptions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 2 defines 'evidence' including oral, documentary, and electronic forms crucial for proving facts in legal proceedings.

Income Tax Act Section 297 governs the procedure for recovery of tax dues from defaulters under the Act.

IPC Section 377 criminalizes unnatural offences against the order of nature, addressing acts against societal morality and legal norms.

bottom of page