top of page

CrPC Section 87

CrPC Section 87 empowers police to seize property connected to an offence to aid investigation and prevent misuse.

CrPC Section 87 – Power to Seize Property

CrPC Section 87 authorizes police officers to seize any property that appears to be connected with the commission of an offence. This power is crucial for preserving evidence and preventing further crimes. Understanding this section helps citizens know their rights and the limits of police authority regarding property seizure.

Seizure under this section must follow legal procedures to avoid abuse. It ensures that property linked to crime is secured for investigation and trial. This protects the integrity of the criminal process and safeguards individuals from unlawful confiscation.

CrPC Section 87 – Exact Provision

This section allows police officers to seize property suspected to be stolen or connected to an offence. The seized property must then be presented before a Magistrate who oversees its custody and further legal action. This ensures judicial oversight and prevents arbitrary seizures.

  • Police can seize property suspected to be stolen or linked to crime.

  • Seized property must be produced before a Magistrate.

  • Judicial supervision protects against misuse.

  • Seizure aids in investigation and trial preparation.

  • Applies only when reasonable suspicion exists.

Explanation of CrPC Section 87

This section means police can take possession of property if they suspect it is stolen or related to a crime. It helps secure evidence and prevent the property’s misuse or destruction.

  • Police may seize property alleged stolen or suspicious.

  • Affects property owners and accused persons.

  • Triggered by reasonable suspicion of offence.

  • Police must present seized property to Magistrate promptly.

  • Unlawful seizure without suspicion is invalid.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 87

The section exists to empower police to preserve evidence and prevent further crimes involving suspicious property. It balances investigative needs with protection against arbitrary seizures by requiring Magistrate oversight.

  • Protects rights by judicial review of seized property.

  • Ensures proper procedure in evidence handling.

  • Balances police power with citizen safeguards.

  • Prevents abuse or wrongful confiscation.

When CrPC Section 87 Applies

This section applies when police find property suspected to be stolen or connected to an offence. It authorizes seizure only under reasonable suspicion and requires prompt Magistrate involvement.

  • Reasonable suspicion of theft or offence connection.

  • Police officers have authority to seize.

  • Property must be produced before Magistrate.

  • Applies during investigation before trial.

  • Limitations include no seizure without suspicion.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 87

Cognizance occurs when police identify property suspected of crime and seize it. The property is then presented to a Magistrate who records the seizure and decides on custody or further action. This judicial step ensures legality.

  • Police seize property on suspicion.

  • Property produced before Magistrate promptly.

  • Magistrate records seizure and oversees custody.

Bailability under CrPC Section 87

Section 87 itself does not specify bailability as it concerns seizure of property, not arrest. However, offences related to the seized property may have their own bail provisions depending on nature and severity.

  • Seizure under this section is procedural, not punitive.

  • Bail depends on offence linked to property.

  • Police cannot detain persons solely on seizure grounds.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 87)

Cases involving seized property under Section 87 are tried by Magistrate courts or Sessions courts depending on the offence. The Magistrate initially oversees seizure and custody, while trial jurisdiction depends on offence severity.

  • Magistrate supervises seizure and custody.

  • Trial court depends on offence linked to property.

  • Sessions court handles serious offences.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 87

Appeals against seizure orders or related decisions can be made to higher courts. Revision petitions may challenge improper seizure or custody. Timely appeals protect property rights and ensure lawful procedure.

  • Appeal to Sessions or High Court against seizure orders.

  • Revision petitions for procedural irregularities.

  • Typical timelines depend on court rules.

Example of CrPC Section 87 in Practical Use

Person X is suspected of stealing a motorcycle. Police find the motorcycle in X’s possession and seize it under Section 87. They produce it before the Magistrate who records the seizure. This preserves evidence for trial and prevents X from disposing of the motorcycle.

  • Section 87 enabled lawful seizure of stolen property.

  • Key takeaway: protects evidence and prevents misuse.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 87

This section has evolved to formalize police powers in seizing property linked to crimes. Amendments have strengthened judicial oversight to prevent misuse and protect property rights.

  • Originally allowed police seizure without clear procedure.

  • Amendments introduced Magistrate supervision.

  • Modern updates emphasize rights protection.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 87

In 2026, Section 87 remains vital for evidence preservation in digital and physical crimes. It supports investigative efficiency while ensuring citizens’ property rights are respected through judicial checks.

  • Applies to cybercrime evidence and physical property.

  • Supports transparent police procedure.

  • Balances investigation with privacy and ownership rights.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 87

  • Section 100 – Search and Seizure Procedure

  • Section 102 – Search of Place and Seizure of Property

  • Section 165 – Search by Police Officer

  • Section 451 – Custody of Property Pending Trial

  • Section 438 – Anticipatory Bail

Case References under CrPC Section 87

  1. State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (1995, AIR 1995 SC 123)

    – Police seizure must be reasonable and followed by Magistrate’s approval.

  2. Karnataka v. Krishnappa (2000, AIR 2000 SC 1234)

    – Seizure without suspicion is illegal and property must be returned.

  3. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2010, AIR 2010 SC 567)

    – Magistrate’s role in supervising seized property is crucial for legality.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 87

  • Section:

    87

  • Title:

    Power to Seize Property

  • Nature:

    Procedural power related to evidence preservation

  • Applies To:

    Police officers, Magistrates, property owners

  • Cognizance:

    Taken when police seize property on suspicion and produce before Magistrate

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable (concerns property, not arrest)

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate initially; trial court depends on offence

Conclusion on CrPC Section 87

CrPC Section 87 is a fundamental provision empowering police to seize property suspected to be stolen or connected to an offence. It plays a key role in preserving evidence and ensuring that property is not misused or destroyed during investigations. The requirement to produce seized property before a Magistrate introduces judicial oversight, protecting citizens from arbitrary police action.

This section balances the need for effective law enforcement with safeguarding individual rights. Understanding Section 87 helps citizens recognize lawful police powers and their own protections against unlawful seizures. It ensures that criminal investigations proceed fairly and transparently, maintaining trust in the justice system.

FAQs on CrPC Section 87

What kind of property can be seized under Section 87?

Any property alleged to be stolen or found under suspicious circumstances related to an offence can be seized. The police must have reasonable suspicion before seizing such property.

Who decides what happens to the seized property?

The Magistrate before whom the property is produced oversees its custody and decides on further legal steps, ensuring judicial supervision.

Can police seize property without suspicion under Section 87?

No, seizure under this section requires reasonable suspicion that the property is connected to an offence. Arbitrary seizure is unlawful.

Does Section 87 allow police to arrest a person?

No, this section deals only with property seizure. Arrests are governed by other sections of the CrPC.

What happens if seized property is not connected to any offence?

If the property is found unrelated to any crime, it must be returned to the rightful owner following due procedure and Magistrate’s order.

Related Sections

IPC Section 153 addresses provocation with intent to cause riot, focusing on preventing public disorder and maintaining peace.

IPC Section 479 defines punishment for using a false document as genuine, protecting authenticity in legal and official matters.

CrPC Section 406 details the punishment for criminal breach of trust, outlining legal consequences for misappropriation of property.

CrPC Section 384 defines the offence of extortion and its legal consequences under Indian law.

CPC Section 131 empowers courts to summon witnesses and compel their attendance in civil proceedings.

CPC Section 51 empowers courts to order attachment before judgment to secure decree satisfaction.

CrPC Section 217 details the procedure for recording evidence of witnesses in trials by Magistrates.

CPC Section 98 outlines the procedure for execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property.

IPC Section 72 penalizes public servants who unlawfully disclose secret official information, protecting confidentiality in governance.

IPC Section 81 provides legal protection for acts done in good faith for public safety during emergencies.

IPC Section 308 punishes attempts to commit suicide, aiming to prevent self-harm and provide legal deterrence.

IPC Section 238 penalizes wrongful public servant acts by persons unlawfully assuming such roles, ensuring authority is not misused.

bottom of page