top of page

CrPC Section 139

CrPC Section 139 mandates the filing of a police report (FIR) upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

CrPC Section 139 requires the police to file a First Information Report (FIR) when they receive information about the commission of a cognizable offence. This section ensures that the police act promptly and officially record complaints to initiate investigation. Understanding this section is vital for citizens and law enforcement to uphold transparency and accountability in criminal proceedings.

The section plays a crucial procedural role by mandating the registration of FIRs, which triggers the criminal justice process. It safeguards the rights of the complainant and ensures that police cannot ignore or delay action on serious offences. Readers should understand this section to know their rights and the police’s duties in reporting crimes.

CrPC Section 139 – Exact Provision

This section mandates the police officer to register the information received about a cognizable offence as an FIR. The officer must write down the details, read them to the informant, and provide a copy if requested. This ensures the complaint is officially recorded and the investigation process begins transparently.

  • Requires police to record information about cognizable offences.

  • Mandates reading the recorded information to the informant.

  • Entitles the informant to receive a copy of the FIR.

  • Triggers the start of police investigation.

  • Ensures accountability and transparency in complaint registration.

Explanation of CrPC Section 139

This section means that when someone reports a serious crime, the police must officially write it down and start the investigation process. It protects the complainant’s rights and ensures police cannot ignore the complaint.

  • The section says police must record information about cognizable offences.

  • Affects the police officer and the informant (complainant).

  • Triggered when information about a cognizable offence is received.

  • Police must write, read out, and provide a copy of the FIR if asked.

  • Police cannot refuse or delay registering the FIR.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 139

The purpose is to ensure that serious crimes are officially recorded and investigated without delay. It protects citizens by mandating police accountability and prevents neglect or refusal to register complaints. This section balances police powers with public rights and promotes trust in the criminal justice system.

  • Protects the right to have complaints recorded.

  • Ensures proper procedure for initiating investigations.

  • Balances police authority and citizen rights.

  • Prevents abuse or refusal to register FIRs.

When CrPC Section 139 Applies

This section applies whenever information about a cognizable offence is received by the police. It compels the officer in charge to register the FIR promptly and follow procedural safeguards.

  • Information must relate to a cognizable offence.

  • Officer in charge of the police station has authority.

  • Applies to all police stations across India.

  • No time limit for receiving information, but prompt action is required.

  • Exceptions do not apply for cognizable offences.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 139

Cognizance is taken by the police officer upon receiving information about a cognizable offence. The FIR registration marks the official start of investigation. The police must record the details accurately and initiate inquiry without delay.

  • Police officer records FIR based on informant’s information.

  • Reading the FIR to informant confirms accuracy.

  • Copy of FIR given to informant if requested.

Bailability under CrPC Section 139

Section 139 itself does not specify bailability but relates to cognizable offences, which can be bailable or non-bailable depending on the offence. Bail conditions depend on the nature of the crime registered in the FIR.

  • Bail depends on the offence recorded in the FIR.

  • Police must follow bail provisions under relevant sections.

  • Filing FIR does not affect bail rights directly.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 139)

The offences reported under Section 139 are cognizable and triable by Magistrate or Sessions courts depending on the offence’s severity. The FIR initiates the process leading to trial in the appropriate court.

  • Trial court depends on offence category.

  • Magistrate courts handle less serious cognizable offences.

  • Sessions courts handle serious offences.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 139

Appeals or revisions relate to orders passed during investigation or trial of the offence registered under Section 139. The FIR itself is not appealable, but subsequent actions can be challenged in higher courts.

  • Appeal lies against orders of Magistrate or Sessions court.

  • Revision petitions can be filed in High Court.

  • Timelines depend on specific orders challenged.

Example of CrPC Section 139 in Practical Use

Person X witnesses a theft and informs the police station. The officer records the information as an FIR under Section 139, reads it to X, and provides a copy. This FIR starts the investigation, ensuring the complaint is officially recognized and action is taken.

  • The section ensured the complaint was recorded officially.

  • Key takeaway: FIR registration triggers investigation and protects complainant rights.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 139

Section 139 has long been a fundamental provision to ensure police accountability in registering complaints. Over time, amendments have clarified procedures for FIR registration and informant rights to prevent police negligence.

  • Originally part of CrPC to formalize complaint registration.

  • Amendments improved informant rights and police duties.

  • Strengthened transparency in criminal process.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 139

In 2026, this section remains crucial for transparent policing and prompt investigation. It supports digital FIR systems and protects citizens’ rights in an era of increased awareness and legal literacy.

  • Supports e-FIR and online complaint registration.

  • Ensures police accountability in modern law enforcement.

  • Protects citizen rights amid evolving criminal justice demands.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 139

  • Section 154 – Information in cognizable cases

  • Section 156 – Police investigation powers

  • Section 157 – Procedure when no FIR is recorded

  • Section 160 – Police power to require attendance

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant

  • Section 173 – Report of police officer on completion of investigation

Case References under CrPC Section 139

  1. Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of UP (2014, 2 SCC 1)

    – Supreme Court ruled mandatory registration of FIR on receipt of information about cognizable offence.

  2. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992, Supp 1 SCC 335)

    – Guidelines on FIR registration and police investigation.

  3. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014, 8 SCC 273)

    – Emphasized safeguards against arbitrary arrests following FIR registration.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 139

  • Section:

    139

  • Title:

    Police Report (FIR) Filing

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Police officer, Informant

  • Cognizance:

    Taken upon FIR registration by police

  • Bailability:

    Depends on offence registered

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate/Sessions Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 139

CrPC Section 139 is a cornerstone of the criminal justice system, ensuring that police record complaints about cognizable offences promptly and transparently. It protects citizens by mandating official documentation of serious crime reports, which triggers investigation and legal action.

Understanding this section empowers individuals to demand their rights and holds police accountable for their duties. It balances the need for efficient law enforcement with safeguards against neglect or misuse, fostering trust in the justice process.

FAQs on CrPC Section 139

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 139?

Its main purpose is to require police to record information about cognizable offences as an FIR, ensuring official complaint registration and starting investigation.

Who can give information under Section 139?

Any person who has knowledge of a cognizable offence can provide information to the police officer in charge of a police station.

Can police refuse to register an FIR under this section?

No, police must register the FIR when information about a cognizable offence is received and cannot refuse or delay it.

Does Section 139 specify bail conditions?

No, bail depends on the nature of the offence recorded in the FIR, not directly on Section 139.

What happens after an FIR is registered under Section 139?

The police begin investigation based on the FIR, which leads to further legal proceedings depending on the findings.

Related Sections

Discover the legal status of Betwinner in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misunderstandings about online betting.

Learn about the legal status of Forever Living products in India and how regulations affect their sale and distribution.

IPC Section 365 defines the offence of kidnapping or abducting with intent to secretly and wrongfully confine a person.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 60 covering appeals to Appellate Authority under CGST Act.

Contract Act 1872 Section 25 defines agreements made without consideration and their exceptions under Indian law.

Contract Act 1872 Section 26 explains the effect of agreements made without consideration and their exceptions.

Legal Studies is recognized in India as a formal academic discipline with established degrees and professional pathways.

IPC Section 442 defines house trespass, covering unlawful entry into a property with intent to commit an offence or intimidate occupants.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 137 defines the liability of the drawer of a cheque in case of dishonour and outlines the drawer's responsibilities.

IMEI capture is legal in India under specific regulations for security and telecom purposes with strict privacy safeguards.

Companies Act 2013 Section 268 defines key managerial personnel and their appointment requirements in Indian companies.

Koenigsegg cars are not officially legal in India due to import restrictions and homologation rules.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 117 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

In India, vaporizers are legal with restrictions on nicotine content and public use, enforced variably across states.

Section 231 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish returns or comply with notices in India.

IPC Section 409 defines criminal breach of trust by public servants, bankers, merchants, or agents, addressing misuse of entrusted property.

IPC Section 66 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to extort property or valuable security.

Companies Act 2013 Section 205 governs the transfer of unpaid dividends to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

Petting bears is illegal in India due to wildlife protection laws and strict enforcement against animal cruelty.

Downloading Malayalam movies in India is illegal without proper authorization due to copyright laws.

Income Tax Act Section 115BAB offers concessional tax rates for new manufacturing companies to boost industrial growth.

IPC Section 271 penalizes disobedience to quarantine rules to prevent disease spread, ensuring public health safety.

IPC Section 176 addresses the punishment for concealing a birth or causing the death of a child to hide its birth.

Copybooking or copying homework is illegal in India and can lead to academic penalties and legal issues under education laws.

CrPC Section 21 defines the powers of police officers to investigate cognizable offences and outlines their authority during investigations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 10 defines when facts not otherwise relevant become relevant as they explain or illustrate relevant facts.

Companies Act 2013 Section 257 covers the procedure for removal of directors by members before expiry of term.

bottom of page