top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 398

Companies Act 2013 Section 398 deals with the procedure for investigation into company affairs by the Registrar or other authorities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 398 governs the procedure for investigation into the affairs of a company. It empowers the Registrar or other authorized officials to conduct inquiries when there are suspicions of mismanagement, fraud, or other irregularities. This section is crucial for ensuring corporate transparency and accountability.

Understanding Section 398 is essential for directors, shareholders, auditors, and legal professionals. It helps them comprehend the legal framework for investigations, compliance requirements, and the consequences of non-compliance. This knowledge aids in maintaining good corporate governance and protecting stakeholder interests.

Companies Act Section 398 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes the Central Government to order an investigation into a company’s affairs when there is reasonable belief of fraud, mismanagement, or other misconduct. The investigation aims to uncover irregularities and protect the interests of members and creditors.

  • Empowers Central Government to order investigations.

  • Applicable in cases of fraud, mismanagement, or unlawful purposes.

  • Protects interests of members and creditors.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in company affairs.

  • Investigation can lead to further legal or regulatory action.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 398

Section 398 outlines when and how investigations into company affairs can be initiated by government authorities.

  • States conditions triggering investigation such as fraud or mismanagement.

  • Applies to companies, their directors, officers, and members.

  • Mandates investigation upon reasonable belief by Central Government.

  • Permits inquiry into company formation and management conduct.

  • Restricts concealment of information from members.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 398

This section strengthens corporate governance by providing a legal mechanism to investigate suspicious company activities.

  • Ensures early detection of fraud and mismanagement.

  • Protects shareholders and creditors from harm.

  • Promotes transparency and accountability in corporate operations.

  • Prevents misuse of company structure for unlawful purposes.

When Companies Act Section 398 Applies

Section 398 applies when there is a reasonable belief of misconduct or fraud in a company’s affairs.

  • Triggered by complaints, reports, or government suspicion.

  • Applicable to all types of companies under the Act.

  • Compliance required upon Central Government order.

  • Exceptions may apply if alternative remedies exist.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 398

Section 398 creates a duty for the Central Government to investigate company affairs when justified. It imposes restrictions on company management during investigation and requires cooperation.

Non-compliance can lead to penalties, prosecution, or further regulatory action. The section interacts with MCA rules governing investigation procedures and reporting.

  • Creates mandatory investigation duty for Central Government.

  • Restricts management actions during inquiry.

  • Non-compliance attracts penalties and legal consequences.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 398

Compliance under Section 398 is mandatory once an investigation order is issued. The company and its officers must cooperate fully with investigators.

This is an ongoing obligation during the investigation period and affects internal governance by requiring transparency and disclosure.

  • Mandatory cooperation with investigation authorities.

  • Ongoing obligation until investigation concludes.

  • Responsibility primarily on company directors and officers.

  • Impacts internal governance and disclosure practices.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 398 applies post-incorporation when suspicion arises regarding company affairs.

  • Not applicable at incorporation stage.

  • Triggered during operational or management stages.

  • May coincide with board or shareholder meetings if related.

  • Involves filing and disclosure during investigation.

  • Continues as ongoing compliance until resolution.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 398

Failure to comply with investigation orders under Section 398 can lead to monetary penalties, prosecution, and disqualification of directors.

Additional consequences include remedial directions from authorities and possible imprisonment for serious offenses.

  • Monetary fines for non-cooperation.

  • Possible imprisonment for fraud or obstruction.

  • Disqualification of directors involved in misconduct.

  • Remedial actions mandated by authorities.

Example of Companies Act Section 398 in Practical Use

Company X was suspected of diverting funds and concealing financial information from shareholders. The Central Government ordered an investigation under Section 398. Director X cooperated fully, providing all required documents. The investigation revealed mismanagement, leading to corrective actions and penalties against responsible officers.

  • Demonstrates government’s power to investigate suspected fraud.

  • Highlights importance of cooperation during inquiry.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 398

Section 398 evolved from similar provisions in the Companies Act, 1956, aiming to strengthen oversight of company affairs.

The 2013 Act introduced clearer procedures and expanded government powers to investigate corporate misconduct, reflecting modern governance needs.

  • Replaced older investigation provisions from 1956 Act.

  • Enhanced government authority for investigations.

  • Incorporated procedural safeguards and clarity.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 398

In 2026, Section 398 remains vital for ensuring corporate transparency amid digital filings and e-governance. It supports enforcement of ESG and CSR compliance by uncovering irregularities.

  • Facilitates digital investigation processes via MCA portal.

  • Supports governance reforms and accountability.

  • Ensures practical enforcement of compliance standards.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 206 – Power to call for information, inspect books.

  • Companies Act Section 210 – Investigation by Serious Fraud Investigation Office.

  • Companies Act Section 212 – Investigation into company affairs by Tribunal.

  • Companies Act Section 213 – Powers of Tribunal during investigation.

  • IPC Section 420 – Punishment for cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 398

  1. Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd. v. Union of India (2010) 4 SCC 603

    – Supreme Court upheld government’s power to investigate company affairs under similar provisions.

  2. Official Liquidator v. M/s. S. S. Enterprises (2015) CLJ 123

    – Court emphasized cooperation during company investigations.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 398

  • Section: 398

  • Title: Investigation into Company Affairs

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Investigation

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Officers, Members

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory cooperation with investigation

  • Penalties: Fines, imprisonment, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Investigation reports, disclosures to MCA

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 398

Section 398 is a critical provision empowering the Central Government to investigate company affairs when there is suspicion of fraud or mismanagement. It ensures that companies operate transparently and responsibly, safeguarding the interests of shareholders and creditors.

Compliance with investigation orders is mandatory and failure to cooperate can lead to serious legal consequences. This section plays a vital role in maintaining corporate governance standards and deterring corporate misconduct in India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 398

What triggers an investigation under Section 398?

An investigation can be triggered when the Central Government has reason to believe there is fraud, mismanagement, or unlawful conduct in a company’s affairs.

Who conducts the investigation under this section?

The Central Government appoints inspectors or authorities to conduct the investigation into the company’s affairs.

Are companies required to cooperate during the investigation?

Yes, companies and their officers must fully cooperate with investigators and provide all necessary information and documents.

What happens if a company does not comply with an investigation order?

Non-compliance can lead to penalties, prosecution, disqualification of directors, and other legal consequences.

Is Section 398 applicable to all types of companies?

Yes, Section 398 applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013, regardless of size or type.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

CrPC Section 48 defines the jurisdiction of police officers to arrest without a warrant within their territorial limits.

IPC Section 376A punishes causing death or resulting in persistent vegetative state during rape, ensuring strict accountability.

Exporting Red Sanders from India is illegal without government permission under strict conservation laws.

Section 171 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the taxation of undisclosed income in India.

IPC Section 79 defines the legal exemption for acts done by a person bound by law or by mistake of fact.

Copybooking or copying homework is illegal in India and can lead to academic penalties and legal issues under education laws.

Trading US stocks from India requires following legal rules and brokerage regulations for cross-border investments.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 99 empowers the Assessing Officer to summon persons for inquiry during assessment proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 449 defines offences by companies and penalties for such offences under Indian corporate law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 92 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 205 governs the transfer of unpaid dividends to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

Companies Act 2013 Section 176 governs the prohibition on loans to directors and related parties, ensuring corporate governance and compliance.

IPC Section 33 defines the liability of a person for acts done by another under their direction or in their aid.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 46 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, detailing their obligations and rights.

Understand the legality of monthly service fees in India, including consumer rights and enforcement practices.

The Ducati V4 Panigale is conditionally street legal in India, subject to compliance with local motor vehicle laws and regulations.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 98 defines the term 'holder' and explains who is entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument.

Understand the legality of chain marketing in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 7 defines the scope of income deemed to accrue or arise in India for tax purposes.

Section 217 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates the appointment of an auditor for companies to ensure proper financial auditing.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269B prohibits cash repayments of loans above specified limits to curb black money.

IPC Section 296 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing disturbance to a religious assembly or procession.

Income Tax Act Section 271D penalizes undisclosed cash transactions exceeding Rs. 20,000 to curb black money.

Section 203 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source certificate issuance in India.

Section 174 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish return of income in India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 54G provides capital gains exemption on transfer of industrial undertakings for specified business relocations.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 85A defines the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed on behalf of a firm.

bottom of page