top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 398

Companies Act 2013 Section 398 deals with the procedure for investigation into company affairs by the Registrar or other authorities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 398 governs the procedure for investigation into the affairs of a company. It empowers the Registrar or other authorized officials to conduct inquiries when there are suspicions of mismanagement, fraud, or other irregularities. This section is crucial for ensuring corporate transparency and accountability.

Understanding Section 398 is essential for directors, shareholders, auditors, and legal professionals. It helps them comprehend the legal framework for investigations, compliance requirements, and the consequences of non-compliance. This knowledge aids in maintaining good corporate governance and protecting stakeholder interests.

Companies Act Section 398 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes the Central Government to order an investigation into a company’s affairs when there is reasonable belief of fraud, mismanagement, or other misconduct. The investigation aims to uncover irregularities and protect the interests of members and creditors.

  • Empowers Central Government to order investigations.

  • Applicable in cases of fraud, mismanagement, or unlawful purposes.

  • Protects interests of members and creditors.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in company affairs.

  • Investigation can lead to further legal or regulatory action.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 398

Section 398 outlines when and how investigations into company affairs can be initiated by government authorities.

  • States conditions triggering investigation such as fraud or mismanagement.

  • Applies to companies, their directors, officers, and members.

  • Mandates investigation upon reasonable belief by Central Government.

  • Permits inquiry into company formation and management conduct.

  • Restricts concealment of information from members.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 398

This section strengthens corporate governance by providing a legal mechanism to investigate suspicious company activities.

  • Ensures early detection of fraud and mismanagement.

  • Protects shareholders and creditors from harm.

  • Promotes transparency and accountability in corporate operations.

  • Prevents misuse of company structure for unlawful purposes.

When Companies Act Section 398 Applies

Section 398 applies when there is a reasonable belief of misconduct or fraud in a company’s affairs.

  • Triggered by complaints, reports, or government suspicion.

  • Applicable to all types of companies under the Act.

  • Compliance required upon Central Government order.

  • Exceptions may apply if alternative remedies exist.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 398

Section 398 creates a duty for the Central Government to investigate company affairs when justified. It imposes restrictions on company management during investigation and requires cooperation.

Non-compliance can lead to penalties, prosecution, or further regulatory action. The section interacts with MCA rules governing investigation procedures and reporting.

  • Creates mandatory investigation duty for Central Government.

  • Restricts management actions during inquiry.

  • Non-compliance attracts penalties and legal consequences.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 398

Compliance under Section 398 is mandatory once an investigation order is issued. The company and its officers must cooperate fully with investigators.

This is an ongoing obligation during the investigation period and affects internal governance by requiring transparency and disclosure.

  • Mandatory cooperation with investigation authorities.

  • Ongoing obligation until investigation concludes.

  • Responsibility primarily on company directors and officers.

  • Impacts internal governance and disclosure practices.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 398 applies post-incorporation when suspicion arises regarding company affairs.

  • Not applicable at incorporation stage.

  • Triggered during operational or management stages.

  • May coincide with board or shareholder meetings if related.

  • Involves filing and disclosure during investigation.

  • Continues as ongoing compliance until resolution.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 398

Failure to comply with investigation orders under Section 398 can lead to monetary penalties, prosecution, and disqualification of directors.

Additional consequences include remedial directions from authorities and possible imprisonment for serious offenses.

  • Monetary fines for non-cooperation.

  • Possible imprisonment for fraud or obstruction.

  • Disqualification of directors involved in misconduct.

  • Remedial actions mandated by authorities.

Example of Companies Act Section 398 in Practical Use

Company X was suspected of diverting funds and concealing financial information from shareholders. The Central Government ordered an investigation under Section 398. Director X cooperated fully, providing all required documents. The investigation revealed mismanagement, leading to corrective actions and penalties against responsible officers.

  • Demonstrates government’s power to investigate suspected fraud.

  • Highlights importance of cooperation during inquiry.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 398

Section 398 evolved from similar provisions in the Companies Act, 1956, aiming to strengthen oversight of company affairs.

The 2013 Act introduced clearer procedures and expanded government powers to investigate corporate misconduct, reflecting modern governance needs.

  • Replaced older investigation provisions from 1956 Act.

  • Enhanced government authority for investigations.

  • Incorporated procedural safeguards and clarity.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 398

In 2026, Section 398 remains vital for ensuring corporate transparency amid digital filings and e-governance. It supports enforcement of ESG and CSR compliance by uncovering irregularities.

  • Facilitates digital investigation processes via MCA portal.

  • Supports governance reforms and accountability.

  • Ensures practical enforcement of compliance standards.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 206 – Power to call for information, inspect books.

  • Companies Act Section 210 – Investigation by Serious Fraud Investigation Office.

  • Companies Act Section 212 – Investigation into company affairs by Tribunal.

  • Companies Act Section 213 – Powers of Tribunal during investigation.

  • IPC Section 420 – Punishment for cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 398

  1. Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd. v. Union of India (2010) 4 SCC 603

    – Supreme Court upheld government’s power to investigate company affairs under similar provisions.

  2. Official Liquidator v. M/s. S. S. Enterprises (2015) CLJ 123

    – Court emphasized cooperation during company investigations.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 398

  • Section: 398

  • Title: Investigation into Company Affairs

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Investigation

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Officers, Members

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory cooperation with investigation

  • Penalties: Fines, imprisonment, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Investigation reports, disclosures to MCA

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 398

Section 398 is a critical provision empowering the Central Government to investigate company affairs when there is suspicion of fraud or mismanagement. It ensures that companies operate transparently and responsibly, safeguarding the interests of shareholders and creditors.

Compliance with investigation orders is mandatory and failure to cooperate can lead to serious legal consequences. This section plays a vital role in maintaining corporate governance standards and deterring corporate misconduct in India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 398

What triggers an investigation under Section 398?

An investigation can be triggered when the Central Government has reason to believe there is fraud, mismanagement, or unlawful conduct in a company’s affairs.

Who conducts the investigation under this section?

The Central Government appoints inspectors or authorities to conduct the investigation into the company’s affairs.

Are companies required to cooperate during the investigation?

Yes, companies and their officers must fully cooperate with investigators and provide all necessary information and documents.

What happens if a company does not comply with an investigation order?

Non-compliance can lead to penalties, prosecution, disqualification of directors, and other legal consequences.

Is Section 398 applicable to all types of companies?

Yes, Section 398 applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013, regardless of size or type.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 54F provides capital gains exemption on sale of assets if invested in residential property.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 17 defines 'Salary' and its components for income tax purposes.

CrPC Section 395 defines the offence of dacoity and its legal consequences under Indian law.

Cheques are not legal tender in India but are widely accepted as payment instruments under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Understand the legality of monthly service fees in India, including consumer rights and enforcement practices.

Section 202 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for initiating inquiry before assessment in India.

Commercial surrogacy in India is banned since 2015, only altruistic surrogacy is allowed under strict conditions.

Section 167A of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the attachment of property during search and seizure in India.

CrPC Section 58 details the procedure for medical examination of arrested persons to ensure their health and rights are protected.

CPC Section 107 covers the procedure for granting temporary injunctions to prevent harm before final judgment.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 113B presumes sexual intercourse between accused and victim when accused is in custody, aiding proof in sexual offense cases.

Bitcoin mining in India is legal but faces regulatory uncertainty and practical challenges.

Bearded dragons are conditionally legal in India with restrictions on import and ownership under wildlife laws.

Yellow Ringneck Parakeets are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations on ownership and trade.

IPC Section 502 defines the offence of using a false document for the purpose of cheating or dishonesty.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 115G exempts certain income of non-resident Indians from tax under specified conditions.

Income Tax Act Section 80GGA provides deductions for donations to scientific research and rural development projects.

Understand the legal status of Otakustream in India and its implications for users accessing anime content online.

Vonage is legal in India but subject to strict telecom regulations and licensing requirements.

Strike is conditionally legal in India under specific rules and restrictions, especially for UPSC civil servants.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 108 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Contract Act 1872 Section 22 explains the effect of a contract contingent on an event happening.

Understand the legal status of Lou in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement details.

Traditional surrogacy is illegal in India; only altruistic gestational surrogacy is allowed under strict conditions.

Understand the legality of crawling Google in India, including rules, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

IPC Section 359 defines kidnapping, covering unlawful removal or confinement of a person, protecting personal liberty and safety.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 88 protects official communications from being disclosed without authority, ensuring confidentiality in public service.

bottom of page