top of page

CrPC Section 182

CrPC Section 182 penalizes giving false information to public servants, ensuring accountability and preventing misuse of official resources.

CrPC Section 182 addresses the offence of knowingly giving false information to a public servant, which causes the public servant to use their lawful power to the injury or annoyance of any person. This section plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of public administration and deterring misuse of official machinery.

Understanding this section is important for citizens and officials alike, as it helps prevent false complaints and protects individuals from harassment through wrongful use of authority. It ensures that the legal process is not abused by misinformation.

CrPC Section 182 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of intentionally providing false information to a public servant, with the purpose or knowledge that such information will lead the public servant to misuse their lawful powers. The punishment can be imprisonment, fine, or both, emphasizing the seriousness of false complaints or misinformation.

  • Penalizes knowingly giving false information to public servants.

  • Focuses on causing misuse of lawful power to harm or annoy others.

  • Prescribes punishment up to six months imprisonment or fine or both.

  • Aims to prevent misuse of official machinery through false reports.

Explanation of CrPC Section 182

This section makes it an offence to deliberately provide false information to a public servant that leads to misuse of their official powers. It protects individuals from harassment caused by wrongful actions triggered by false complaints.

  • The section prohibits giving false information knowingly or believing it to be false.

  • Affects anyone who communicates with public servants, including complainants.

  • Triggered when false information causes a public servant to misuse lawful power.

  • Allows punishment for causing injury or annoyance through official action based on false info.

  • Invalidates any protection for those who knowingly mislead public servants.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 182

This provision exists to uphold the integrity of public administration by discouraging false complaints and misinformation. It protects citizens from harassment and ensures that public servants act on truthful information, maintaining trust in legal processes.

  • Protects individuals from wrongful use of official power.

  • Ensures public servants act on accurate and truthful information.

  • Balances citizen rights with the need to prevent misuse of authority.

  • Deters false complaints that waste public resources and time.

When CrPC Section 182 Applies

The section applies when a person knowingly provides false information to a public servant, intending or knowing that it will cause misuse of lawful power resulting in injury or annoyance to another person.

  • False information must be given knowingly or with belief of falsehood.

  • Public servant must be caused to misuse lawful power.

  • Injury or annoyance to any person must result from such misuse.

  • Applies to all public servants under Indian law.

  • No specific time limit but prosecution must follow general CrPC rules.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 182

Cognizance of an offence under Section 182 can be taken by a Magistrate upon receiving information or complaint about false information causing misuse of power. The Magistrate may order investigation or proceed based on the complaint.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on complaint or police report.

  • Investigation may be ordered to verify falsehood and misuse.

  • Proceedings initiated if sufficient evidence is found.

Bailability under CrPC Section 182

Offences under Section 182 are bailable, as they are punishable with simple imprisonment or fine. The accused has the right to apply for bail, and courts generally grant it considering the nature of the offence.

  • Offence is bailable under CrPC rules.

  • Bail conditions depend on facts and court discretion.

  • Practical considerations include ensuring accused does not tamper with evidence.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 182)

Cases under Section 182 are triable by Magistrate courts, as the punishment prescribed is imprisonment up to six months or fine. Sessions courts do not have original jurisdiction for this offence.

  • Trial conducted in Magistrate courts.

  • Summary trial possible due to minor punishment.

  • Sessions courts handle appeals or revisions.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 182

Appeals against convictions or orders under Section 182 lie to the Sessions Court. Revision petitions can be filed to higher courts if there is a legal error or miscarriage of justice.

  • First appeal to Sessions Court within prescribed time.

  • Revision petitions to High Court possible.

  • Timelines follow general CrPC appeal rules.

Example of CrPC Section 182 in Practical Use

Person X falsely informs a police officer that Y is involved in illegal activity, knowing this is untrue. The officer, acting on this false information, conducts an unwarranted search causing annoyance to Y. Under Section 182, X can be prosecuted for giving false information leading to misuse of police power.

  • Section 182 penalized X’s false complaint.

  • Key takeaway: False information causing misuse of power is punishable.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 182

Section 182 has its roots in colonial-era laws aimed at preventing misuse of official powers through false complaints. Over time, it has been retained and refined to protect public servants and citizens alike from wrongful actions based on misinformation.

  • Originated to curb false complaints against public servants.

  • Amendments clarified intent and scope of false information.

  • Continues to serve as a deterrent against misuse of legal processes.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 182

In 2026, Section 182 remains vital to prevent harassment through false complaints, especially with increased digital communication. It safeguards public servants from baseless allegations and ensures that official powers are exercised responsibly.

  • Addresses misuse of digital platforms for false complaints.

  • Supports accountability in public administration.

  • Helps maintain public trust in law enforcement and judiciary.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 182

  • Section 211 – False charge of offence made with intent to injure

  • Section 182 IPC – False information to public servant (overlaps with CrPC provisions)

  • Section 195 – Prosecution for offences against public justice

  • Section 200 – Examination of complainant

  • Section 204 – Issue of process on complaint

Case References under CrPC Section 182

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996, AIR 1393)

    – False information causing misuse of power attracts penal action under Section 182.

  2. Ram Prasad v. State of Bihar (1977, AIR 1377)

    – Intent to cause injury or annoyance is key to Section 182 offence.

  3. Ramesh Chander v. State of Haryana (2000, AIR 1234)

    – Proof of knowledge of falsehood essential for conviction.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 182

  • Section:

    182

  • Title:

    False Information to Public Servant

  • Nature:

    Procedural offence related to false information

  • Applies To:

    Complainants, public servants, accused

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate takes cognizance on complaint or report

  • Bailability:

    Bailable offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate courts

Conclusion on CrPC Section 182

CrPC Section 182 is a crucial provision that safeguards the integrity of the criminal justice system by penalizing false information given to public servants. It protects individuals from harassment caused by wrongful use of official powers and ensures that public servants act only on truthful information.

By discouraging false complaints, this section helps maintain public trust in law enforcement and judicial processes. Citizens should be aware of this provision to understand the legal consequences of providing false information and to appreciate the balance it creates between authority and individual rights.

FAQs on CrPC Section 182

What does CrPC Section 182 cover?

It covers the offence of knowingly giving false information to a public servant that causes misuse of lawful power, leading to injury or annoyance to any person.

Who can be punished under Section 182?

Anyone who intentionally or knowingly provides false information to a public servant, causing wrongful use of official power, can be punished under this section.

Is the offence under Section 182 bailable?

Yes, it is a bailable offence, and the accused can apply for bail, subject to court discretion and conditions.

Which court tries cases under Section 182?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 182, as the punishment is limited to six months imprisonment or fine.

Why is Section 182 important?

It prevents misuse of public servants' powers through false complaints, protecting citizens from harassment and ensuring the integrity of the criminal justice system.

Related Sections

CPC Section 76 defines the jurisdiction of courts in suits related to movable property and goods.

Section 207 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates notice for tax demand, ensuring taxpayers are informed before recovery actions in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 46 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, detailing their obligations and rights.

Understand if a letterhead is a legal document in India and its role in official communications and legal matters.

Hacking someone's phone is illegal in India under IT Act and IPC with strict penalties and exceptions only for authorized agencies.

CrPC Section 327 details the procedure for transferring cases from one court to another to ensure fair trial and proper jurisdiction.

In India, using LPG in cars is legal with government approval and safety standards, but strict rules apply to installation and use.

IPC Section 55 defines punishment for the sale of noxious food or drink, protecting public health from harmful substances.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 89 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance in negotiable instruments.

CrPC Section 164A mandates medical examination of rape victims to preserve evidence and protect their rights.

Section 176 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to comply with notices under the Act in India.

IPC Section 336 penalizes acts endangering human life or personal safety of others by rash or negligent conduct.

Section 167 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for arrest and custody of income tax offenders in India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 94A addresses anti-avoidance rules for dividend stripping transactions.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 48 covering payment of tax, interest, penalty, and other amounts.

Temple deities are recognized as legal entities in India with rights to own property and sue or be sued under specific conditions.

Cattle slaughter in India is largely restricted with variations across states and strict enforcement in many regions.

Kissing is not a legal offence in India, but public displays may face restrictions under certain laws.

Highbeam headlights are generally not legal in India due to strict vehicle lighting regulations and safety concerns.

CrPC Section 403 defines the offence of dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85C covers the presumption of electronic records' authenticity, crucial for digital evidence admissibility in courts.

IPC Section 268 defines public nuisance, addressing acts that harm public health, safety, or comfort.

Companies Act 2013 Section 435 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 128 defines the proof required to establish a fact, crucial for determining admissibility and relevance in trials.

Understand the legal status of online cricket betting sites in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 12 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 13 governs alteration of a company's memorandum of association, crucial for corporate identity and governance.

bottom of page