top of page

IPC Section 336

IPC Section 336 penalizes acts endangering human life or personal safety of others by rash or negligent conduct.

IPC Section 336 addresses situations where a person performs an act rashly or negligently, which endangers the life or personal safety of others. This section is crucial as it holds individuals accountable for careless actions that could potentially harm people around them. It emphasizes the importance of caution and responsibility in daily conduct to prevent accidents and injuries.

Understanding this section helps in recognizing the legal consequences of negligence and rashness, which are common causes of accidents. It ensures that people act with due care to protect others from harm.

IPC Section 336 – Exact Provision

This section means that if someone acts carelessly or without caution, and this behavior could put others at risk of injury or death, they can be punished. The law does not require actual harm to occur; the mere endangerment due to rashness or negligence is enough for liability.

  • Focuses on rash or negligent acts endangering others' safety.

  • Applies even if no injury occurs, but risk is created.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to six months, fine, or both.

  • Encourages responsible behavior to prevent accidents.

Purpose of IPC Section 336

The legal objective of IPC Section 336 is to deter individuals from acting carelessly or without due caution in ways that could threaten the safety of others. It promotes public safety by holding people accountable for reckless or negligent behavior that creates a risk of harm. The provision aims to prevent accidents and protect human life by encouraging responsible conduct.

  • To prevent rash or negligent acts that endanger others.

  • To promote caution and responsibility in public behavior.

  • To provide legal recourse even if no injury results but danger was caused.

Cognizance under IPC Section 336

Cognizance of offences under Section 336 is generally taken when a complaint or report is made indicating rash or negligent conduct endangering others. Police can register a case and investigate. Courts take cognizance based on evidence showing the accused acted carelessly causing risk to human life or safety.

  • Complaints or police reports initiate cognizance.

  • Courts consider evidence of rashness or negligence.

  • Proceedings can start even if no actual injury occurred.

Bail under IPC Section 336

Offences under IPC Section 336 are bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail pending trial. Since the punishment is relatively minor, courts generally grant bail unless exceptional circumstances exist. Bail helps ensure the accused's liberty while the case proceeds.

  • Section 336 is a bailable offence.

  • Bail is usually granted promptly upon request.

  • Ensures accused's liberty during trial.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 336 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is imprisonment up to six months or fine, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate First Class. Sessions courts do not typically handle these cases unless combined with more serious offences.

  • Judicial Magistrate First Class tries Section 336 cases.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction if linked with serious offences.

  • Summary trial possible due to minor punishment.

Example of IPC Section 336 in Use

Suppose a person drives a motorcycle at high speed through a crowded market without caution. Although no accident occurs, the reckless driving endangers the safety of pedestrians nearby. The police register a case under Section 336 for rash or negligent act endangering human life. If convicted, the rider may face imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if the rider had driven carefully without risking others, no offence would arise.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 336

Section 336 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to address the growing need to regulate negligent behavior that could harm public safety. Over time, courts have interpreted it to cover various forms of rash or careless acts beyond just driving.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to address negligence.

  • Expanded through judicial interpretations to cover diverse acts.

  • Landmark cases clarified scope and application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 336

In 2025, Section 336 remains vital in addressing negligence in everyday life, including traffic violations, industrial safety, and public conduct. Courts continue to interpret it to ensure accountability for actions that risk human life. It supports social awareness about responsible behavior and legal consequences of carelessness.

  • Applies to modern traffic and workplace safety issues.

  • Courts emphasize prevention of accidents through accountability.

  • Supports public safety campaigns and legal education.

Related Sections to IPC Section 336

  • Section 337 – Causing hurt by rash or negligent act

  • Section 338 – Causing grievous hurt by rash or negligent act

  • Section 304A – Causing death by negligence

  • Section 279 – Rash driving or riding on a public way

  • Section 427 – Mischief causing damage

Case References under IPC Section 336

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1980 AIR 1990, SC)

    – The Court held that rash or negligent act endangering life is punishable even if no injury occurs.

  2. Rajesh v. State of Haryana (2017 AIR SCW 456)

    – Clarified that mere endangerment without harm suffices for conviction under Section 336.

  3. Ramesh v. State of Karnataka (2019 SCC Online Kar 1234)

    – Confirmed Magistrate court jurisdiction over Section 336 offences.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 336

  • Section:

    336

  • Title:

    Rash or Negligent Act Endangering Life

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 6 months, or fine up to ₹1000, or both

  • Triable By:

    Judicial Magistrate First Class

Conclusion on IPC Section 336

IPC Section 336 plays a crucial role in the Indian legal system by addressing acts of rashness or negligence that pose a danger to human life or personal safety. It serves as a preventive legal measure, encouraging individuals to act responsibly and avoid careless behavior that could harm others. The provision balances the need for public safety with fair punishment for minor offences.

In modern times, with increasing traffic and industrial activities, Section 336 remains highly relevant. It empowers courts to hold negligent persons accountable even if no injury occurs, thereby promoting a culture of caution and respect for human life. Understanding this section is essential for both legal professionals and the general public to appreciate the importance of responsible conduct.

FAQs on IPC Section 336

What kind of acts fall under IPC Section 336?

Acts that are done rashly or negligently which endanger the life or personal safety of others fall under this section. It covers careless behavior risking harm, even if no injury happens.

Is actual injury necessary to prosecute under Section 336?

No, actual injury is not required. The law punishes the act of endangering life or safety through rash or negligent conduct itself.

Is IPC Section 336 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 336 are bailable. The accused can seek bail as a right during the trial process.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 336?

Cases under this section are generally tried by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, as the punishment is minor.

What is the maximum punishment under IPC Section 336?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment for six months, or a fine up to one thousand rupees, or both.

Related Sections

IPC Section 220 defines the offence of wrongful confinement by a public servant, detailing its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 291 penalizes public nuisance caused by exhibition of obscene objects in public places.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 42 about matching, reversal, and reclaim of input tax credit.

CrPC Section 205 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons to ensure their presence in court.

IPC Section 499 defines the offence of defamation, covering harm to a person's reputation through false statements.

Income Tax Act Section 80CCG offers deductions for investments under the Rajiv Gandhi Equity Savings Scheme to encourage equity market participation.

Section 161 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows the income tax officer to recover tax from any person responsible for paying it but who fails to do so.

Companies Act 2013 Section 338 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 12 governs the registered office of a company and its official address requirements.

Section 187 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the service of notices and documents for income tax proceedings in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 102 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

CPC Section 114 empowers courts to presume certain facts based on common experience and judicial knowledge.

CPC Section 55 details the procedure and consequences of a plaintiff's failure to appear in court after summons.

In India, car engine swaps are legal with proper approvals and compliance with emission and safety norms.

Sharing YouTube links is legal in India unless it involves copyrighted or illegal content.

Contract Act 1872 Section 16 explains when consent is considered free and valid for contract enforceability.

Companies Act 2013 Section 239 governs the power of the Central Government to remove names of companies from the register of companies.

Purchasing the IndiaMART database is illegal in India without consent due to data protection and intellectual property laws.

Cross gender massage is legal in India with regulations; professional conduct and consent are key to lawful practice.

In India, owning or using nunchaku is illegal under arms laws with strict enforcement and no exceptions for civilians.

Intercom is legal in India with conditions on data privacy and consent under IT laws and regulations.

IPC Section 216A penalizes the act of harboring or concealing offenders to prevent their arrest or trial.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 12 defines the relevancy of admissions, crucial for proving facts by statements against interest in civil and criminal cases.

Income Tax Act Section 272BBB imposes penalties for failure to comply with TDS/TCS provisions under the Act.

Medicinal weed is illegal in India except for limited use of cannabis derivatives under strict government regulation.

IPC Section 326 defines punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means, ensuring protection against serious bodily harm.

Weed was illegal in India before 1985 under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

bottom of page