top of page

CrPC Section 265C

CrPC Section 265C defines the procedure for recording confessions and statements before a Magistrate, ensuring legal validity and protection of rights.

CrPC Section 265C outlines the procedure for recording confessions and statements made by accused persons or witnesses before a Magistrate. This section ensures that such recordings are done lawfully, protecting the rights of individuals and maintaining the integrity of evidence. Understanding this section is crucial for legal practitioners and citizens alike to appreciate how confessions are documented in criminal proceedings.

The section plays a vital role in criminal trials by providing a clear framework for Magistrates to record statements, which can be used as evidence. It prevents coercion and safeguards the accused’s rights, ensuring that confessions are voluntary and statements are accurately captured.

CrPC Section 265C – Exact Provision

This provision mandates that confessions or statements must be recorded by the Magistrate personally in the language understood by the person. The Magistrate must ensure the person is aware of their right to review and correct the record, guaranteeing transparency and voluntariness. This protects against forced or misrepresented confessions.

  • Confession or statement must be recorded by Magistrate.

  • Recorded in language understood by the person.

  • Person has right to read and correct the record.

  • Magistrate must sign the recorded statement.

  • Ensures voluntariness and accuracy of confessions.

Explanation of CrPC Section 265C

This section requires the Magistrate to personally record any confession or statement made during proceedings. It ensures the accused or witness understands what is recorded and can correct errors, preventing misuse of confessions.

  • The section mandates Magistrate’s direct involvement in recording.

  • Affects accused persons and witnesses giving statements.

  • Triggers when a confession or statement is made before a Magistrate.

  • Allows the person to review and correct the record.

  • Prohibits recording without informing the person or in an unknown language.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 265C

The section exists to protect individuals from coercion and ensure that confessions and statements are recorded accurately and voluntarily. It balances the need for reliable evidence with safeguarding personal rights during criminal trials.

  • Protects the accused’s right against forced confessions.

  • Ensures procedural fairness in recording statements.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Prevents abuse or misrepresentation of confessions.

When CrPC Section 265C Applies

This section applies whenever a confession or statement is made before a Magistrate during investigation or trial. It governs the recording process to maintain legal validity and fairness.

  • Applies to all confessions/statements before Magistrates.

  • Magistrate has authority to record and sign the statement.

  • Relevant in criminal investigations and trials.

  • No specific time limit but applies at the time of confession.

  • Exceptions do not allow bypassing the recording procedure.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 265C

Cognizance under this section occurs when a Magistrate receives a confession or statement. The Magistrate must personally record it, ensuring the person understands and consents to the recorded content. This step is crucial for the statement’s admissibility in court.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance upon receiving confession/statement.

  • Records the statement in the person’s language.

  • Ensures person’s right to read and correct the record.

Bailability under CrPC Section 265C

The section itself does not specify bailability but relates to the recording of confessions/statements which may influence bail decisions. Whether an offence is bailable depends on other sections and the nature of the offence.

  • Section does not determine bailability directly.

  • Bail depends on offence related to the confession.

  • Confession may impact bail considerations by courts.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 265C)

Matters involving confessions and statements under this section are handled by Magistrates who record them. The trial jurisdiction depends on the offence but initial recording is always before a Magistrate.

  • Confessions recorded by Magistrate of competent jurisdiction.

  • Trial may proceed in Magistrate or Sessions Court depending on offence.

  • Magistrate’s recording is foundational for trial evidence.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 265C

Appeals related to confessions recorded under this section usually arise during trial or conviction challenges. Higher courts may review the validity of confessions if procedural lapses are alleged.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court depending on case.

  • Revision petitions can challenge improper recording.

  • Timelines follow general criminal appeal rules.

Example of CrPC Section 265C in Practical Use

Person X is accused of theft and voluntarily confesses before a Magistrate. The Magistrate records the confession in the local language, reads it back to X, and allows corrections. X confirms the statement is accurate and signs it. This recorded confession becomes key evidence in X’s trial, ensuring the confession was voluntary and properly documented.

  • Ensured confession was voluntary and accurate.

  • Protected accused’s rights during recording.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 265C

This section evolved to prevent forced confessions and ensure judicial oversight in recording statements. Earlier practices allowed police to record confessions without safeguards, leading to abuses. Amendments introduced Magistrate involvement and rights to review statements.

  • Introduced to curb police coercion in confessions.

  • Major amendments enhanced Magistrate’s role.

  • Improved protections for accused’s rights over time.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 265C

In 2026, this section remains vital for protecting human rights and ensuring fair trials. With increased awareness of custodial abuses, Magistrate-recorded confessions help maintain transparency and trust in the criminal justice system.

  • Supports rights-based policing and judicial fairness.

  • Prevents misuse of confessions in digital and physical forms.

  • Ensures evidence reliability in modern courts.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 265C

  • Section 164 – Recording of confessions and statements by Magistrate

  • Section 265A – Procedure for recording evidence

  • Section 26 – Confession to police officer not to be proved

  • Section 27 – Confession made in consequence of information

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant

  • Section 313 – Examination of accused

Case References under CrPC Section 265C

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996, AIR 1393)

    – Magistrate’s recording of confession must be voluntary and free from coercion for admissibility.

  2. Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Union of India (1964, AIR 1319)

    – Confession recorded by Magistrate must be in language understood by accused and signed by him.

  3. Haricharan Kurmi v. State of Bihar (1966, AIR 82)

    – Magistrate must inform accused of right to make corrections in recorded confession.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 265C

  • Section:

    265C

  • Title:

    Recording Confessions and Statements

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, accused, witnesses

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate records confession/statement personally

  • Bailability:

    Not specified; depends on offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 265C

CrPC Section 265C is a crucial procedural safeguard ensuring that confessions and statements recorded before a Magistrate are accurate, voluntary, and legally valid. It protects individuals from coercion and misrepresentation, thereby upholding the integrity of the criminal justice process.

By mandating Magistrate involvement and allowing the person to review and correct the record, this section balances the need for reliable evidence with the protection of personal rights. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal professionals appreciate the importance of fair procedures in criminal trials.

FAQs on CrPC Section 265C

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 265C?

The main purpose is to ensure that confessions and statements made before a Magistrate are recorded accurately and voluntarily, protecting the rights of the accused or witness during criminal proceedings.

Who records the confession or statement under this section?

The Magistrate personally records the confession or statement in the language understood by the person making it and signs the record to validate it.

Can the accused correct the recorded confession?

Yes, the accused or witness has the right to have the recorded confession or statement read back and make corrections if necessary before signing it.

Does this section determine if an offence is bailable?

No, CrPC Section 265C does not specify bailability; bail depends on the nature of the offence and other relevant sections of the law.

Why is Magistrate involvement important in recording confessions?

Magistrate involvement ensures that confessions are recorded fairly, voluntarily, and without coercion, maintaining the integrity of evidence and protecting individual rights.

Related Sections

Halal meat is legal in India with regulations ensuring proper slaughter methods and labeling for consumer rights.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269UT mandates reporting of specified financial transactions by entities to prevent tax evasion.

Contract Act 1872 Section 72 explains liability for loss caused by a third party's wrongful act in contract performance.

Buying from Banggood is legal in India but subject to customs rules, taxes, and import restrictions.

Raiding a hotel in India is legal only under specific conditions by authorized officials following due process.

Understand the legality of photocopying books in India, including copyright rules and exceptions.

CrPC Section 74 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 141 defines offences by companies for cheque dishonour and liability of officers in default.

Currency derivatives trading is legal in India under RBI and SEBI regulations with specific rules and restrictions.

CrPC Section 440 details the procedure for compounding offences with the court's permission to promote settlement and reduce litigation.

Understand the legality of Qnet in India, its regulatory status, and common misconceptions about its business model.

Poker earnings are conditionally legal in India, subject to state laws and whether poker is classified as a game of skill or chance.

Income Tax Act Section 269UA prohibits cash transactions above Rs. 2 lakh to curb black money and promote digital payments.

Having an offshore company is legal in India if you comply with RBI and tax laws, but strict reporting is required.

IPC Section 356 addresses the punishment for criminal trespass by a public servant in a place of worship or sacred precincts.

Parkour is legal in India with no specific laws banning it, but safety and public space rules apply.

IPC Section 456 defines lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night, focusing on unlawful entry with intent to commit an offence.

Companies Act 2013 Section 379 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for winding up of companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 94 mandates maintenance and inspection of the Register of Members by companies.

Desoxyn is a controlled substance in India, legal only with strict medical prescription and regulation.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 39 details the carry forward and set off of losses under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 160 governs the procedure for nomination of directors by members in Indian companies.

CrPC Section 471 defines punishment for using forged documents as genuine in legal proceedings.

Ganja is illegal at Indian airports; possession or use can lead to strict penalties under Indian law.

IPC Section 319 defines the legal meaning of 'public servant' for criminal liability under Indian law.

IPC Section 73 addresses the punishment for counterfeiting property marks, protecting property authenticity and ownership rights.

Section 194O of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on e-commerce sales in India.

bottom of page