top of page

CrPC Section 299

CrPC Section 299 defines the offence of culpable homicide and its legal implications under Indian criminal law.

CrPC Section 299 defines the offence of culpable homicide, which involves causing death with the intention or knowledge that the act is likely to cause death. Understanding this section is crucial as it forms the basis for distinguishing culpable homicide from other offences like murder. It guides courts and law enforcement in classifying and prosecuting cases involving unlawful death.

This section plays a vital procedural role by setting the legal threshold for culpable homicide, ensuring that only acts with requisite mens rea are punished. Readers should understand it to grasp how Indian law treats acts causing death under different circumstances.

CrPC Section 299 – Exact Provision

This section defines culpable homicide as causing death through an act done with intention or knowledge that death is likely. It emphasizes the mental element (mens rea) required for this offence. The act must be the direct cause of death, and the offender must have intended or known the probable fatal outcome.

  • Defines culpable homicide based on intention or knowledge.

  • Focuses on causing death by an act.

  • Establishes mental element for the offence.

  • Forms the basis for distinguishing from murder.

  • Essential for criminal liability in death cases.

Explanation of CrPC Section 299

Simply put, this section says that if someone causes death intentionally or knowing their act could cause death, they commit culpable homicide. It sets the foundation for legal responsibility in cases involving death caused by deliberate or knowing acts.

  • The section states that causing death with intention or knowledge is culpable homicide.

  • Affects anyone who causes death through their actions.

  • Triggered when death results from an act done with intent or knowledge.

  • Allows prosecution for causing death under these mental conditions.

  • Prohibits holding someone liable without proof of intention or knowledge.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 299

This section exists to clearly define culpable homicide, distinguishing it from other offences like accidental death or murder. It ensures that only those who intentionally or knowingly cause death are held criminally responsible. This clarity protects individuals from wrongful prosecution and guides fair judicial process.

  • Protects individual rights by requiring mens rea.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure in death cases.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen protections.

  • Prevents misuse by setting clear offence criteria.

When CrPC Section 299 Applies

The section applies when a death occurs due to an act done with intention or knowledge of causing death. It is relevant in investigations and trials involving death caused by deliberate or knowing acts.

  • Death must be caused by an act with intention or knowledge.

  • Police and courts have authority to apply this section.

  • Applicable in all jurisdictions across India.

  • No specific time limits but subject to general limitation laws.

  • Exceptions include deaths caused without intention or knowledge.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 299

Cognizance is taken by a Magistrate when a complaint, police report, or information indicates death caused with intention or knowledge as defined. The Magistrate evaluates the evidence to decide whether to proceed with trial.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Requires prima facie evidence of intention or knowledge.

  • Initiates formal criminal proceedings upon cognizance.

Bailability under CrPC Section 299

Offence under Section 299 is generally bailable as culpable homicide is not always punishable with severe penalties like murder. Bail depends on case facts and judicial discretion, considering the nature of the act and offender’s background.

  • Bail is usually granted unless aggravating factors exist.

  • Court considers risk of flight or tampering with evidence.

  • Conditions may be imposed to ensure court appearance.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 299)

Cases under Section 299 are triable by a Magistrate’s court, as culpable homicide is a serious offence but not necessarily punishable by death. The Magistrate conducts trial, examines evidence, and delivers judgment.

  • Trial begins in Magistrate’s court.

  • Sessions court may hear appeals or more serious related offences.

  • Trial stages include framing charges, evidence, and judgment.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 299

Appeals against conviction or acquittal under Section 299 lie with the Sessions Court. Further revision or appeal can be made to High Courts and Supreme Court depending on case merits and legal questions.

  • First appeal to Sessions Court within prescribed time.

  • Revision petitions to High Court possible.

  • Special leave petitions to Supreme Court in exceptional cases.

Example of CrPC Section 299 in Practical Use

Person X, in a heated argument, strikes Y intending to cause serious injury, knowing it could cause death. Y dies from the injury. Police charge X under Section 299 for culpable homicide. The court examines X’s intention and knowledge before deciding guilt.

  • Section 299 helped establish X’s criminal liability.

  • Key takeaway: intention or knowledge is crucial for culpable homicide.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 299

This section evolved from common law principles to define culpable homicide distinctly from murder. Amendments have clarified mental elements and scope to ensure precise application in Indian criminal law.

  • Adapted from British Indian Penal Code origins.

  • Refined mental element definitions over time.

  • Clarified distinctions from murder in amendments.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 299

In 2026, Section 299 remains vital for prosecuting unlawful deaths with intent or knowledge. It supports fair trials, protects rights, and guides police in classifying offences accurately amid evolving legal standards.

  • Ensures accountability for intentional death-causing acts.

  • Balances police investigation and citizen rights.

  • Supports modern forensic and evidentiary practices.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 299

  • Section 300 – Definition of Murder

  • Section 304 – Punishment for Culpable Homicide not Amounting to Murder

  • Section 302 – Punishment for Murder

  • Section 304A – Causing Death by Negligence

  • Section 34 – Acts done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention

Case References under CrPC Section 299

  1. Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab (1958, AIR 465)

    – Clarified intention and knowledge in culpable homicide.

  2. State of Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George (1965, AIR 722)

    – Distinguished between murder and culpable homicide.

  3. Dalbir Singh v. State of Punjab (1962, AIR 1401)

    – Emphasized mens rea requirement under Section 299.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 299

  • Section:

    299

  • Title:

    Definition of Culpable Homicide

  • Nature:

    Procedural and substantive offence definition

  • Applies To:

    Accused causing death with intention or knowledge

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report or complaint

  • Bailability:

    Generally bailable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 299

CrPC Section 299 is fundamental in Indian criminal law as it defines culpable homicide by setting clear mental and physical elements for the offence. It ensures that only those who cause death intentionally or knowingly are held accountable, providing a legal framework for fair prosecution and justice.

Understanding this section helps citizens and legal practitioners recognize the boundaries between different offences involving death. It balances the need for justice with protection against wrongful accusations, supporting the rule of law and human rights in criminal proceedings.

FAQs on CrPC Section 299

What is the difference between culpable homicide and murder under Section 299?

Culpable homicide involves causing death with intention or knowledge, but murder requires additional factors like premeditation or extreme cruelty. Section 299 defines culpable homicide, while Section 300 defines murder.

Can a person be convicted under Section 299 without intending to kill?

Yes, if the person intended to cause bodily injury likely to cause death or knew their act was likely to cause death, they can be convicted under Section 299 even without direct intent to kill.

Is culpable homicide under Section 299 always punishable by imprisonment?

Yes, culpable homicide is a punishable offence, but the severity depends on circumstances and whether it amounts to murder or a lesser offence under related sections.

Who takes cognizance of offences under Section 299?

A Magistrate takes cognizance of offences under Section 299 based on police reports, complaints, or information about the death caused with intention or knowledge.

Is bail available for accused under Section 299?

Bail is generally available for offences under Section 299, but courts consider factors like the nature of the act, evidence, and risk before granting bail.

Related Sections

Wearing headphones while driving is conditionally legal in India, with restrictions to ensure road safety and avoid distractions.

Kidney transplant is legal in India with strict regulations under the Transplantation of Human Organs Act to prevent illegal trade and ensure ethical practices.

E-prescribing is legal in India with specific regulations ensuring secure and authorized digital prescriptions.

IPC Section 75 defines the punishment for attempts to commit offences punishable with death or life imprisonment.

Understand the legality and rules of depositions in India, including how they differ from other countries and their role in Indian legal proceedings.

Section 207 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates notice for tax demand, ensuring taxpayers are informed before recovery actions in India.

Section 234B of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates interest on default in advance tax payment in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 46 defines how facts can be proved by oral evidence, emphasizing the importance of witness testimony in legal proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 39 governs the issue of shares at a discount and related compliance requirements.

CrPC Section 236 details the procedure for committing accused persons to Sessions Court for trial after preliminary inquiry.

Raiding a hotel in India is legal only under specific conditions by authorized officials following due process.

Housie game is conditionally legal in India, allowed as a social game but restricted under gambling laws.

CrPC Section 92 empowers courts to require security for keeping the peace or good behaviour in public interest.

Companies Act 2013 Section 249 governs the right of shareholders to requisition a general meeting in Indian companies.

Terrarium TV is illegal in India due to copyright violations and streaming unauthorized content.

Learn if special coins are legal tender in India and how their use is regulated under Indian law.

CPC Section 99A deals with the procedure for arrest and detention in civil suits to ensure lawful custody.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 3 defines the charge of income tax on total income of individuals and entities.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 44 prescribes presumptive taxation for professionals under specified conditions.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(16) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

CrPC Section 386 details the procedure for the execution of a sentence or order passed by a criminal court.

Massage parlours are conditionally legal in India, subject to licensing and strict regulations under local laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 75 covers the liability of partners for tax dues of the firm and its implications.

IPC Section 475 defines the offence of counterfeiting valuable security or will, covering forgery and its legal consequences.

Pangaea is not legally recognized in India; understand the legal status and implications of Pangaea-related activities in India.

Prenatal testing for Huntington's disease (HD) is legal in India under specific regulations and guidelines.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(41) defines 'product liability' and its scope under the Act.

bottom of page