top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 79

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 79 governs carry forward and set off of losses in case of change in shareholding.

Income Tax Act Section 79 deals with the carry forward and set off of losses incurred by a company when there is a change in its shareholding pattern. This provision is crucial for companies and their shareholders to understand how losses can be preserved or disallowed after ownership changes.

It primarily concerns the treatment of losses during assessment and aims to prevent misuse of loss carry forward provisions. Taxpayers, professionals, and businesses must grasp this section to ensure compliance and proper tax planning.

Income Tax Act Section 79 – Exact Provision

This section restricts companies from carrying forward losses if there is a substantial change in ownership. It ensures that losses are not used as tax shields by new shareholders who did not bear the original business risks. The 51% voting power threshold is critical to determine continuity of ownership.

  • Applies to companies only.

  • Focuses on change in shareholding pattern.

  • Requires 51% voting power continuity for loss carry forward.

  • Prevents misuse of loss carry forward after ownership change.

  • Losses before shareholding change cannot be set off without meeting conditions.

Explanation of Income Tax Act Section 79

Section 79 states that if a company undergoes a change in shareholding, losses from prior years cannot be carried forward unless certain conditions are met.

  • Applies to companies, including private and public limited companies.

  • Triggers when there is any change in shareholding pattern.

  • 51% or more voting power must remain with original shareholders to carry forward losses.

  • Losses incurred before the change cannot be set off if ownership continuity is not maintained.

  • Ensures losses are linked to the same business ownership.

Purpose and Rationale of Income Tax Act Section 79

This section aims to prevent tax avoidance by companies that change ownership to exploit accumulated losses. It promotes fairness in taxation by linking loss benefits to consistent ownership.

  • Ensures fair taxation by restricting loss carry forward on ownership change.

  • Prevents tax evasion through transfer of loss-making companies.

  • Encourages genuine business continuity.

  • Supports government revenue protection.

When Income Tax Act Section 79 Applies

Section 79 applies during assessment of losses when a company’s shareholding changes within a financial year or between years.

  • Relevant in the financial year when shareholding changes.

  • Applies to losses from previous years before change.

  • Impacts companies undergoing mergers, acquisitions, or restructuring.

  • Exceptions may apply in certain amalgamation cases under other provisions.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under Income Tax Act Section 79

Under Section 79, losses incurred before a change in shareholding cannot be carried forward or set off unless the original shareholders retain at least 51% voting power. This affects computation of total income by disallowing certain loss adjustments.

The section interacts with other provisions on loss carry forward and set off, ensuring losses are only utilized by the same ownership group.

  • Losses disallowed if ownership continuity is below 51%.

  • Reduces taxable losses available for set off.

  • Ensures losses are linked to original shareholders.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under Income Tax Act Section 79

Section 79 creates a compliance obligation for companies to verify shareholding continuity before claiming loss carry forward. It benefits the revenue by restricting loss misuse and benefits genuine shareholders maintaining control.

  • Creates compliance duty to track shareholding changes.

  • Conditional benefit of loss carry forward based on ownership.

  • Mandatory restriction to prevent tax avoidance.

  • Applies only to companies.

Stage of Tax Process Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the assessment or reassessment stage when losses are claimed for carry forward or set off.

  • Relevant during income computation and assessment.

  • Triggered when company files returns claiming loss carry forward.

  • May be examined during scrutiny or reassessment proceedings.

  • Not applicable at TDS or return filing stages directly.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under Income Tax Act Section 79

Non-compliance with Section 79 can lead to disallowance of loss carry forward, increasing tax liability. While the section itself does not prescribe penalties, incorrect claims may attract interest and penalties under other provisions.

  • Loss carry forward disallowed if conditions unmet.

  • Additional tax liability due to disallowance.

  • Possible penalties for concealment or misreporting.

  • Interest on unpaid tax may apply.

Example of Income Tax Act Section 79 in Practical Use

Assessee X is a private company that incurred losses in FY 2022-23. In FY 2023-24, more than 60% of its shares were sold to new investors. When filing returns for FY 2023-24, Assessee X claims to carry forward losses from FY 2022-23. However, due to the change in shareholding exceeding 49%, Section 79 disallows the loss carry forward. Assessee X must pay tax without adjusting previous losses.

  • Shows impact of shareholding change on loss utilization.

  • Highlights importance of ownership continuity.

Historical Background of Income Tax Act Section 79

Section 79 was introduced to curb tax avoidance through transfer of loss-making companies. Over time, amendments have refined the voting power threshold and clarified exceptions for amalgamations. Judicial interpretations have reinforced the principle of ownership continuity for loss claims.

  • Introduced to prevent misuse of loss carry forward.

  • Amended to fix 51% voting power continuity rule.

  • Judicial rulings emphasize strict application.

Modern Relevance of Income Tax Act Section 79

In 2026, Section 79 remains vital due to increasing mergers and acquisitions. Digital filings and AIS reports help track shareholding changes, ensuring compliance. Companies must carefully evaluate ownership before claiming losses.

  • Digital compliance aids tracking ownership changes.

  • Important for tax planning in corporate restructuring.

  • Supports government revenue protection in modern economy.

Related Sections

  • Income Tax Act Section 32 – Depreciation.

  • Income Tax Act Section 72 – Carry forward and set off of losses (other than those covered by Section 79).

  • Income Tax Act Section 47 – Transactions not regarded as transfer.

  • Income Tax Act Section 2(22) – Dividends.

  • Income Tax Act Section 115JB – Minimum Alternate Tax.

  • Income Tax Act Section 140 – Losses to be set off in order.

Case References under Income Tax Act Section 79

  1. ACIT v. Gujarat NRE Coke Ltd. (2011) 132 TTJ 1 (Ahd)

    – Clarified that loss carry forward is disallowed if voting power continuity is not maintained.

  2. DCIT v. Mafatlal Industries Ltd. (2007) 291 ITR 338 (SC)

    – Affirmed strict application of Section 79 on shareholding change.

Key Facts Summary for Income Tax Act Section 79

  • Section:

    79

  • Title:

    Carry Forward and Set Off of Losses in Case of Change in Shareholding

  • Category:

    Assessment, Loss Carry Forward

  • Applies To:

    Companies

  • Tax Impact:

    Restricts loss carry forward if shareholding changes

  • Compliance Requirement:

    Verify 51% voting power continuity

  • Related Forms/Returns:

    ITR-6, Audit Reports

Conclusion on Income Tax Act Section 79

Section 79 plays a critical role in regulating the carry forward of losses for companies undergoing changes in ownership. By requiring continuity of at least 51% voting power, it ensures that tax benefits from losses are not transferred to unrelated parties. This provision safeguards the tax base and promotes genuine business continuity.

Companies must carefully monitor their shareholding patterns and comply with Section 79 to avoid disallowance of losses. Tax professionals should advise clients on the implications of ownership changes to optimize tax planning and maintain compliance with the Income Tax Act.

FAQs on Income Tax Act Section 79

What is the main condition for loss carry forward under Section 79?

The main condition is that shareholders holding at least 51% of voting power before the change must continue to hold the same percentage after the change to carry forward losses.

Does Section 79 apply to individuals or firms?

No, Section 79 applies only to companies, including private and public limited companies.

What happens if the shareholding change exceeds 49%?

If the change exceeds 49%, losses incurred before the change cannot be carried forward or set off under Section 79.

Are there exceptions to Section 79 for mergers?

Yes, certain exceptions exist under other provisions for amalgamations and demergers where losses may be carried forward despite shareholding changes.

When is Section 79 examined during the tax process?

Section 79 is primarily examined during assessment or reassessment when a company claims to carry forward losses from previous years.

Related Sections

IT Act Section 4 defines electronic records and their legal recognition in digital transactions.

Replica guns are conditionally legal in India but face strict regulations and restrictions under arms laws.

Tor is legal in India but its use involves privacy risks and legal limits. Learn about its safety and legal status here.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 25 defines 'Company' for tax purposes, crucial for determining tax liability and compliance.

IPC Section 297 penalizes trespassing on places of worship or burial with intent to insult religious feelings.

CrPC Section 105J details the procedure for police to record statements of witnesses in cases involving offences against women and children.

CPC Section 37 details the appeal process against orders from courts of original civil jurisdiction.

Hoosexuality is legal in India following the 2018 Supreme Court ruling decriminalizing consensual same-sex relations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 458 deals with the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Drafts are not legal tender money in India; they are negotiable instruments used for payments but must be accepted voluntarily.

Income Tax Act Section 80IB provides deductions for profits from specified industrial undertakings and housing projects.

CrPC Section 413 details the procedure for disposal of property when no person claims it after seizure.

In India, the coca plant is illegal to grow, possess, or use due to strict narcotic laws.

The death penalty is legal in India but used sparingly for the most serious crimes under strict legal safeguards.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 125 defines 'Income' for tax purposes, crucial for determining taxable earnings.

CPC Section 6 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India, guiding where suits can be filed.

Section 228 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for search and seizure by income tax authorities in India.

Donation-based crowdfunding is legal in India with specific regulations and compliance requirements to follow.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 33 covers the relevancy of facts showing the existence of any state of mind, including intention, knowledge, and good faith.

Benzodiazepines are legal in India only with a valid prescription and regulated under strict drug laws.

Income Tax Act Section 115JB mandates Minimum Alternate Tax on book profits to ensure minimum tax payment by companies.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 85 defines the term 'holder in due course' and explains its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Cousin marriage in India is generally prohibited under Hindu law but allowed under Muslim personal law with regional variations.

CPC Section 133 empowers courts to prevent public nuisance by ordering removal of obstructions or nuisances.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 131 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

CrPC Section 474 deals with punishment for using a false document as genuine in legal proceedings.

CrPC Section 350 details the procedure for conducting an inquiry by a Magistrate into an offence, ensuring fair and lawful investigation.

bottom of page