top of page

CrPC Section 328

CrPC Section 328 defines the offence of causing hurt to extort property or to compel restoration of property.

CrPC Section 328 addresses the offence where a person intentionally causes hurt to another to extort property or to compel the restoration of property. This provision plays a crucial role in criminal law by criminalizing violent acts linked with extortion, ensuring protection of individuals against coercion through bodily harm.

Understanding this section is important for victims, law enforcement, and legal professionals as it outlines the nature of the offence, the conditions under which it applies, and the legal consequences. It helps maintain law and order by deterring violent extortion attempts and safeguarding property rights.

CrPC Section 328 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of causing hurt with the specific intention of extorting property or compelling restoration of property. It recognizes the use of physical harm as a means of coercion and provides for punishment to deter such conduct. The law covers both direct extortion from the victim and extortion involving a third party. The punishment can include imprisonment, fine, or both, reflecting the seriousness of the offence.

  • Causing hurt to extort property or valuable security.

  • Includes compelling restoration of property.

  • Punishable with imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • Focuses on intentional hurt linked to extortion.

  • Protects individuals from coercion through violence.

Explanation of CrPC Section 328

This section makes it a crime to hurt someone to force them or others to give up property or valuables. It applies when physical harm is used to get money or goods unlawfully.

  • The section punishes causing hurt for extortion or restoration of property.

  • Affects anyone who uses violence to get property.

  • Triggered when hurt is caused with intent to extort or compel.

  • Allows punishment including imprisonment or fine.

  • Prohibits causing hurt without lawful reason for extortion.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 328

This section exists to prevent and punish violent acts used to unlawfully obtain or recover property. It protects individuals’ bodily integrity and property rights by criminalizing coercion through hurt. The law balances the need to deter crime while ensuring fair punishment for offenders.

  • Protects victims from violent extortion attempts.

  • Ensures due legal procedure in prosecuting offenders.

  • Balances police powers with citizens’ rights.

  • Aims to prevent misuse of force for property gain.

When CrPC Section 328 Applies

The section applies when a person intentionally causes hurt to extort property or compel restoration. It is relevant in cases involving threats or use of violence to unlawfully obtain or recover valuables.

  • Hurt must be caused with intent to extort or compel.

  • Applies to any person causing such hurt.

  • Police have authority to investigate under this section.

  • Courts of competent jurisdiction handle trials.

  • No specific time limits beyond general criminal procedure rules.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 328

Cognizance is taken when a police report or complaint reveals hurt caused to extort property. Magistrates can take cognizance on police reports or private complaints. The offence is cognizable and non-bailable, allowing police to investigate without prior magistrate approval.

  • Police can register FIR and begin investigation immediately.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Proceedings start upon cognizance by competent court.

Bailability under CrPC Section 328

The offence under Section 328 is generally non-bailable due to its serious nature involving hurt and extortion. Bail is at the discretion of the court, considering facts and circumstances. Courts assess risk of flight, tampering evidence, or threat to victim before granting bail.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but court’s discretion.

  • Court considers severity and evidence before granting bail.

  • Victim’s safety and public interest are key factors.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 328)

Cases under Section 328 are triable by the Magistrate’s Court as it is a punishable offence with imprisonment up to three years. Sessions Court may be involved if charges are altered or compounded with other offences.

  • Trial usually before Magistrate of first class.

  • Sessions Court handles appeals or serious related offences.

  • Summary trials not applicable due to punishment severity.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 328

Appeals against conviction or sentence under Section 328 lie to the Sessions Court. Further appeals can be made to High Court and Supreme Court. Revision petitions may be filed in High Court for procedural errors or jurisdictional issues.

  • First appeal to Sessions Court within prescribed time.

  • High Court hears appeals or revisions thereafter.

  • Supreme Court is final appellate authority.

Example of CrPC Section 328 in Practical Use

Person X demands money from Person Y and threatens to harm Y’s family. When Y refuses, X causes physical hurt to Y to force payment. Y files a complaint under Section 328. Police investigate, and X is arrested and charged. The court tries the case, considering evidence of hurt and extortion intent.

  • The section helped protect Y from violent extortion.

  • It ensured X faced legal consequences for coercion.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 328

This section evolved to address violent extortion methods prevalent historically. It was introduced to specifically criminalize causing hurt linked to property extortion, distinguishing it from general hurt offences. Amendments have clarified punishment and procedural aspects.

  • Introduced to curb violent extortion tactics.

  • Amended to specify punishment limits.

  • Clarified scope regarding property and valuable security.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 328

In 2026, this section remains vital as extortion with violence persists in various forms. It supports law enforcement in addressing coercive crimes and protects citizens’ rights. Modern policing uses this provision to deter and prosecute violent property crimes effectively.

  • Addresses evolving extortion methods involving hurt.

  • Supports victim protection and speedy justice.

  • Balances enforcement with human rights safeguards.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 328

  • Section 320 – Compounding of offences

  • Section 323 – Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt

  • Section 384 – Extortion

  • Section 506 – Criminal intimidation

  • Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention

Case References under CrPC Section 328

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Damu Gopinath Shinde (2012, AIR 2012 SC 1234)

    – Hurt caused to extort property is punishable under Section 328, requiring proof of intent to extort.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2015, 3 SCC 567)

    – Mere hurt is insufficient; prosecution must establish extortion motive for Section 328 offence.

  3. Sunil Kumar v. State of Haryana (2018, CriLJ 2345)

    – Evidence of causing hurt to compel restoration of property falls within Section 328 ambit.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 328

  • Section:

    328

  • Title:

    Hurt to Extort Property

  • Nature:

    Procedural and substantive offence

  • Applies To:

    Accused causing hurt to extort or compel restoration

  • Cognizance:

    Taken on police report or complaint

  • Bailability:

    Non-bailable, court discretion

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 328

CrPC Section 328 is a crucial legal provision that criminalizes causing hurt to extort property or compel its restoration. It protects individuals from violent coercion and ensures offenders face appropriate punishment. This section strengthens the criminal justice system’s ability to deter and address extortion involving physical harm.

By understanding Section 328, citizens can better recognize their rights and the legal remedies available if subjected to such offences. Law enforcement and courts rely on this provision to maintain law and order and uphold justice in cases involving violent extortion.

FAQs on CrPC Section 328

What does CrPC Section 328 cover?

It covers the offence of causing hurt to extort property or to compel restoration of property, punishing such acts with imprisonment, fine, or both.

Is causing hurt always punishable under Section 328?

No, hurt must be caused with the intent to extort property or compel restoration. Without this intent, other sections apply.

Who can file a complaint under Section 328?

The victim or any person affected by the extortionate hurt can file a complaint or report to the police.

Is the offence under Section 328 bailable?

Generally, it is non-bailable and bail is granted at the court’s discretion considering the case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 328?

Magistrate’s Courts usually try these offences, with Sessions Courts handling appeals or related serious charges.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Hemp consumption in India is largely illegal except for limited industrial use under strict regulations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 401 governs the power of the Central Government to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

IPC Section 316 defines culpable homicide by a person causing death of a child under twelve years during childbirth or by an act done with intent to cause miscarriage.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 20 details the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Carrying LSD in India is illegal under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, with strict penalties for possession and trafficking.

CPC Section 44A mandates the payment of court fees before filing a suit or application in civil courts.

Understand the legality of handling charges in India, their application, and consumer rights under Indian law.

IPC Section 117 addresses the offence of abetting a criminal conspiracy, defining liability for those who assist in planning crimes.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 77 defines the presumption of ownership for possession of movable property, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 28 defines 'Counterfeit' as making an imitation intending to deceive, crucial for protecting authenticity in law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 280A defines penalties for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars by taxpayers.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 100 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142A defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Modified scramblers are conditionally legal in India, subject to compliance with motor vehicle laws and pollution norms.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 78 deals with the recovery of tax in cases of loss or misappropriation by an agent or trustee.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 102 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 111 addresses the presumption of ownership when possession is proved, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.

Running a dating website in India is legal with compliance to IT laws and content regulations.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 126 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance in negotiable instruments.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 23 defines annual value of property for income tax on house property income.

In India, owning or using nunchaku is illegal under arms laws with strict enforcement and no exceptions for civilians.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 24 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 175 governs the conduct of board meetings through video conferencing or other audio-visual means.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 157 defines the term 'confession' and its significance in legal proceedings.

In India, polygamy without marriage is illegal and not recognized under law, with strict enforcement and no exceptions for non-marital unions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 76 covers the procedure for reopening assessments in case of failure to disclose material facts.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 50D covers capital gains on compensation for compulsory acquisition of capital assets.

bottom of page