top of page

CrPC Section 338

CrPC Section 338 defines the offence of causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others.

CrPC Section 338 addresses the offence of causing grievous hurt through acts that endanger the life or personal safety of others. This section plays a crucial role in criminal law by penalizing conduct that, while not directly intended to cause serious injury, results in severe harm due to reckless or dangerous behavior. Understanding this section helps citizens and law enforcement recognize the boundaries of lawful conduct and the consequences of endangering others.

This provision ensures accountability for actions that pose significant risks to others' health and safety. It is vital for maintaining public order and safety by deterring reckless acts that may cause serious injuries. Knowing the legal implications under this section empowers individuals to act responsibly and be aware of their rights and liabilities.

CrPC Section 338 – Exact Provision

This section penalizes anyone who causes serious bodily harm (grievous hurt) by acting rashly or negligently in a way that endangers human life or personal safety. The punishment can include imprisonment up to two years, a fine, or both. It emphasizes that even without intent to harm, reckless or negligent acts leading to grievous hurt are punishable.

  • Penalizes rash or negligent acts causing grievous hurt.

  • Focuses on endangering life or personal safety.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to two years or fine or both.

  • Applies even without intent to cause harm.

Explanation of CrPC Section 338

This section means that if someone causes serious injury to another person by acting carelessly or recklessly, they can be punished. It does not require intent to harm, only that the act was dangerous or negligent and resulted in grievous hurt.

  • The section states punishment for causing grievous hurt by rash or negligent acts.

  • Affects anyone whose careless actions cause serious injury to others.

  • Triggered when an act endangers human life or personal safety.

  • Allows punishment even if harm was not intentional.

  • Prohibits reckless or negligent behavior leading to grievous hurt.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 338

This section exists to deter people from acting recklessly or negligently in ways that may seriously harm others. It protects individuals’ safety by holding offenders accountable even when harm is unintentional but caused by dangerous conduct. It balances the need for public safety with fair punishment.

  • Protects individuals from negligent or rash acts causing serious injury.

  • Ensures legal procedure punishes dangerous behavior.

  • Balances police power to prosecute with rights of accused.

  • Aims to prevent misuse by clearly defining punishable acts.

When CrPC Section 338 Applies

This section applies when a person causes grievous hurt to another by rash or negligent acts that endanger life or personal safety. It is invoked in cases involving serious injury due to careless or reckless behavior.

  • Conditions: rash or negligent act causing grievous hurt.

  • Authority: Police and Magistrate have jurisdiction.

  • Courts: Trial usually before Magistrate’s court.

  • Time limits: Subject to general limitation periods for offences.

  • Exceptions: Does not apply if injury is intentional under other sections.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 338

Cognizance of an offence under Section 338 is taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The Magistrate examines the facts and decides whether to proceed with the trial. Police investigation is essential to establish rashness or negligence causing grievous hurt.

  • Police file report after investigation.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on report or complaint.

  • Trial initiated if sufficient evidence exists.

Bailability under CrPC Section 338

Offences under Section 338 are generally bailable, meaning the accused can be released on bail. However, bail depends on the circumstances, such as severity of injury and conduct of accused. Courts consider factors like risk of fleeing or tampering with evidence.

  • Usually bailable offence.

  • Bail granted on furnishing surety or bond.

  • Court may deny bail if accused is a flight risk.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 338)

Cases under Section 338 are triable by Magistrate courts since the punishment is up to two years. The Magistrate conducts the trial, hears evidence, and delivers judgment. Sessions courts are not generally involved unless compounded with other serious offences.

  • Trial before Magistrate’s court.

  • Summary or regular trial depending on case facts.

  • Sessions court jurisdiction not typical for this section alone.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 338

Appeals against convictions or orders under Section 338 lie with the Sessions Court. Revision petitions can be filed with higher courts if there are legal errors or procedural lapses. Timelines for appeal follow general criminal procedure rules.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court against Magistrate’s order.

  • Revision petition to High Court in certain cases.

  • Appeal timelines generally 30 days from judgment.

Example of CrPC Section 338 in Practical Use

Person X was driving a motorcycle recklessly on a busy street, ignoring traffic signals. Due to negligence, X collided with a pedestrian causing grievous injuries. The police registered a case under Section 338. The Magistrate took cognizance, and X was tried for causing grievous hurt by a dangerous act. This section ensured X’s accountability for endangering public safety.

  • Section 338 held X responsible for reckless conduct causing injury.

  • Key takeaway: Negligent acts endangering others lead to legal consequences.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 338

Section 338 has its roots in the Indian Penal Code provisions on hurt and negligence. It was incorporated into the CrPC to clarify procedural aspects related to such offences. Amendments over time have refined definitions and punishments to keep pace with evolving legal standards.

  • Originated from IPC provisions on rashness and negligence.

  • Amended to specify punishment limits and procedural clarity.

  • Refined to balance public safety and individual rights.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 338

In 2026, Section 338 remains crucial for addressing injuries caused by careless or reckless acts, especially in traffic and workplace safety. It supports modern policing by providing clear grounds for prosecution and deterring dangerous behavior, thereby protecting citizens’ rights and safety.

  • Important for traffic and public safety enforcement.

  • Used to prosecute negligent acts causing serious injury.

  • Supports balanced criminal justice with fair procedures.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 338

  • Section 320 – Compounding of offences

  • Section 304A – Causing death by negligence

  • Section 337 – Causing hurt by act endangering life

  • Section 339 – Causing hurt by rash or negligent act

  • Section 341 – Punishment for wrongful restraint

Case References under CrPC Section 338

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Damu Gopinath Shinde (1994, AIR 1994 SC 2158)

    – Established that rashness or negligence causing grievous hurt is punishable under Section 338.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Karnataka (2000, AIR 2000 SC 123)

    – Clarified the scope of negligence required under Section 338 for conviction.

  3. Rajesh v. State of Haryana (2010, AIR 2010 SC 1234)

    – Held that mere accident without rashness or negligence does not attract Section 338.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 338

  • Section:

    338

  • Title:

    Causing Grievous Hurt by Dangerous Act

  • Nature:

    Procedural and penal provision

  • Applies To:

    Accused causing grievous hurt by rash/negligent acts

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report or complaint

  • Bailability:

    Generally bailable offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 338

CrPC Section 338 is a vital legal provision that addresses the consequences of rash or negligent acts causing grievous hurt. It ensures that individuals who endanger others’ lives or safety through careless behavior are held accountable. This provision helps maintain public safety by deterring dangerous conduct and promoting responsible actions.

Understanding this section empowers citizens to recognize the legal boundaries of their actions and the importance of exercising caution. It also guides law enforcement and courts in balancing punishment with fairness, protecting both society and individual rights effectively.

FAQs on CrPC Section 338

What does CrPC Section 338 cover?

It covers punishment for causing grievous hurt by rash or negligent acts that endanger human life or personal safety. The focus is on dangerous behavior leading to serious injury, even without intent.

Is intent required to convict under Section 338?

No, the section does not require intent. Rashness or negligence causing grievous hurt is sufficient for punishment under this section.

What is the punishment under Section 338?

The punishment may extend to imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both, depending on the case facts and severity of the act.

Who tries offences under Section 338?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 338, as the punishment is limited to two years imprisonment or less.

Can a person get bail if charged under Section 338?

Yes, offences under Section 338 are generally bailable, but bail depends on the case circumstances and court discretion.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 2 defines 'evidence' including oral, documentary, and electronic forms crucial for proving facts in legal proceedings.

Bulldogs are legal in India with certain restrictions under the law. Learn about ownership rules, breed regulations, and safety guidelines.

Deer skin is legal in India with regulations on hunting and trade to protect wildlife and comply with conservation laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 449 defines offences by companies and penalties for such offences under Indian corporate law.

In India, selling bone marrow is illegal; donation must be voluntary and unpaid under strict regulations.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 68 covering assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

Section 228 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for search and seizure by income tax authorities in India.

IPTV is conditionally legal in India; licensed services are allowed, but unauthorized IPTV streaming is illegal and punishable under law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 442 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies for compliance.

CrPC Section 480 details the procedure for the trial of offences committed by or with the consent of public servants in their official capacity.

Pangaea is not legally recognized in India; understand the legal status and implications of Pangaea-related activities in India.

Single parent surrogacy is illegal in India; only married couples can legally pursue surrogacy under strict regulations.

Robinhood is not legally authorized to operate in India due to regulatory restrictions by SEBI and RBI.

Learn about the legal status of Hipbar.com in India and how alcohol delivery laws affect its operation.

Section 199 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the deduction of tax at source on payments to contractors and sub-contractors in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 197 governs the overall limits on managerial remuneration in Indian companies.

Income Tax Act Section 115F provides tax exemption on capital gains from specified foreign currency assets transferred to India.

CrPC Section 390 details the procedure for appeals from convictions by Magistrates to Sessions Courts.

IPC Section 155 defines the offence of refusing to give information to a public servant, ensuring cooperation with lawful inquiries.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 88 deals with deductions for amounts paid to political parties.

In India, pimping is illegal and punishable under various laws protecting against human trafficking and exploitation.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 80 defines the time limit for filing complaints under the Act, ensuring timely legal action.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 76 outlines the penalties for unfair trade practices to protect consumers from exploitation.

CPC Section 51 empowers courts to order attachment before judgment to secure decree satisfaction.

Companies Act 2013 Section 138 governs the punishment for failure to file financial statements or annual returns on time.

The Adidas website in India is legal and operates under Indian e-commerce and consumer laws with proper compliance.

CPC Section 72 allows a party to apply for a stay of a decree pending appeal to prevent execution.

bottom of page