top of page

IPC Section 473

IPC Section 473 addresses the offence of forging a document with intent to cheat, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 473 – Forgery with Intent to Cheat

IPC Section 473 deals with the offence of forgery committed with the specific intent to cheat. It covers situations where a person forges a document or electronic record, intending to deceive another party. This section is crucial because forgery undermines trust in legal and commercial transactions, affecting individuals and institutions alike.

Understanding IPC Section 473 is important for recognizing how the law protects against fraudulent activities involving forged documents. It ensures that those who manipulate documents to gain unfair advantage face legal consequences.

IPC Section 473 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section punishes anyone who creates a fake document or electronic record intending to cheat or harm others. The key element is the intention to deceive or cause loss. It applies to various types of documents, including written papers and digital records.

  • Focuses on forgery with intent to cheat or cause harm.

  • Includes both physical documents and electronic records.

  • Requires proof of dishonest intention.

  • Protects public and private interests.

  • Forms the basis for prosecuting fraudulent document creation.

Purpose of IPC Section 473

The main legal objective of IPC Section 473 is to deter and punish forgery committed with fraudulent intent. It aims to maintain trust in documentation used in commerce, law, and personal dealings. By criminalizing such acts, the law safeguards individuals and organizations from deception and financial loss.

  • Prevent fraudulent manipulation of documents.

  • Protect property rights and contractual agreements.

  • Ensure reliability of official and private records.

Cognizance under IPC Section 473

Cognizance of offences under Section 473 is generally taken by courts upon receiving a complaint or police report. Since forgery with intent to cheat is a serious offence, courts act promptly to address such cases.

  • Courts take cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without court order.

  • Judicial magistrates or sessions courts can initiate proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 473

Offences under IPC Section 473 are non-bailable due to their serious nature involving fraud and deception. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court considering the facts and circumstances.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but subject to court's discretion.

  • Court considers factors like nature of offence and evidence.

  • Accused may have to satisfy stringent conditions for bail.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 473 are triable by Sessions Courts due to the gravity of the offence. However, depending on the value involved and other factors, Magistrate Courts may also handle certain cases.

  • Sessions Court tries serious forgery offences.

  • Magistrate Courts may try less severe cases or initial hearings.

  • Jurisdiction depends on offence particulars and monetary value.

Example of IPC Section 473 in Use

Suppose a person creates a fake property sale deed intending to cheat the rightful owner and sell the property to a third party. The forged document is presented to authorities to claim ownership. Under IPC Section 473, this act constitutes forgery with intent to cheat. If caught, the offender faces prosecution and punishment.

In contrast, if a person unknowingly uses a forged document without intent to cheat, Section 473 may not apply, but other provisions could be relevant.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 473

IPC Section 473 has evolved to address the increasing complexity of forgery, especially with the rise of electronic records. Originally focused on physical documents, the law now encompasses digital forgeries.

  • Introduced to combat traditional document forgery.

  • Amended to include electronic records with IT Act integration.

  • Landmark cases have expanded interpretation to modern contexts.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 473

In 2025, IPC Section 473 remains vital in combating fraud in digital and physical domains. Courts increasingly interpret this section to cover cyber forgery, reflecting technological advancements. Its enforcement helps maintain integrity in digital transactions and official records.

  • Addresses forgery in electronic documents and records.

  • Supports cybercrime laws and digital evidence frameworks.

  • Enhances trust in e-governance and online commerce.

Related Sections to IPC Section 473

  • Section 465 – Definition of Forgery

  • Section 466 – Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.

  • Section 468 – Forgery for purpose of cheating

  • Section 471 – Using as genuine a forged document

  • Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property

  • Section 474 – Counterfeiting a document or electronic record

Case References under IPC Section 473

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1980 AIR 1990, SC)

    – The Court held that intention to cheat is essential to establish forgery under Section 473.

  2. R. v. Kanhaiya Lal (1958 AIR 123, All)

    – Forgery involving electronic records falls within the ambit of Section 473.

  3. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1999 CriLJ 2340)

    – Use of forged documents to claim property was punishable under Section 473.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 473

  • Section:

    473

  • Title:

    Forgery with Intent to Cheat

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and/or fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court / Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 473

IPC Section 473 plays a critical role in the Indian Penal Code by criminalizing forgery committed with the intent to cheat. It protects individuals and institutions from fraudulent acts that can cause significant financial and reputational damage. The section’s broad scope, covering both physical and electronic documents, ensures comprehensive legal coverage against forgery.

As technology advances, the importance of Section 473 continues to grow, especially in tackling cyber forgery and digital fraud. Its application by courts helps maintain trust in legal documents and electronic records, reinforcing the rule of law in modern India.

FAQs on IPC Section 473

What is the main offence under IPC Section 473?

It is the offence of forging a document or electronic record with the intent to cheat or cause harm to others.

Is IPC Section 473 a bailable offence?

No, offences under Section 473 are generally non-bailable, but bail may be granted at the court’s discretion.

Which courts try offences under IPC Section 473?

Sessions Courts primarily try these offences, but Magistrate Courts may handle certain cases depending on severity.

Does IPC Section 473 cover electronic documents?

Yes, the section includes forgery of electronic records along with physical documents.

What is the punishment for forgery under IPC Section 473?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to seven years, a fine, or both, depending on the case facts.

Related Sections

IPC Section 1 introduces the Indian Penal Code, its extent, and commencement across India.

CPC Section 149 defines the power of the court to order the arrest of a judgment-debtor for willful disobedience of its decree.

CrPC Section 416 defines the procedure for taking cognizance of offences by Magistrates upon police reports or complaints.

CrPC Section 329 details the procedure for punishing false evidence to maintain judicial integrity.

CPC Section 26 allows courts to stay civil proceedings when a related criminal case is pending to avoid conflicting judgments.

CrPC Section 236 details the procedure for committing accused persons to Sessions Court for trial after preliminary inquiry.

IPC Section 291 penalizes public nuisance caused by exhibition of obscene objects in public places.

CrPC Section 255 details the procedure for framing charges by a Magistrate after considering the evidence presented.

CrPC Section 44 empowers police to arrest without warrant when a person obstructs lawful arrest or escapes custody.

CrPC Section 105I details the procedure for police to record statements of victims or witnesses in certain cases.

IPC Section 112 defines the presumption of legitimacy of a child born during marriage, establishing legal parentage and rights.

IPC Section 284 penalizes negligent acts that may cause harm to public health by handling noxious substances.

bottom of page