top of page

CrPC Section 350

CrPC Section 350 details the procedure for conducting an inquiry by a Magistrate into an offence, ensuring fair and lawful investigation.

CrPC Section 350 outlines the process a Magistrate must follow when conducting an inquiry into an offence. This section ensures that inquiries are carried out fairly and systematically, providing a foundation for justice. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal professionals appreciate the procedural safeguards in criminal investigations.

The section plays a crucial role in the criminal justice system by guiding Magistrates on how to examine evidence and witnesses before deciding on further legal action. It balances thorough investigation with protecting individual rights, making it essential knowledge for anyone involved in criminal proceedings.

CrPC Section 350 – Exact Provision

This provision empowers the Magistrate to conduct inquiries flexibly, adapting procedures to the specifics of each case. It emphasizes the importance of context in legal proceedings, allowing the Magistrate to gather evidence and assess facts appropriately. The section ensures that inquiries are neither rigid nor arbitrary but tailored to achieve justice effectively.

  • Empowers Magistrates to conduct inquiries into offences.

  • Allows procedural flexibility based on case nature.

  • Ensures inquiries are fair and context-sensitive.

  • Forms the basis for evidence collection and witness examination.

Explanation of CrPC Section 350

Section 350 means that a Magistrate must conduct an inquiry into an offence carefully, adjusting the process depending on the case details. It is not a fixed procedure but one that suits the situation.

  • The section states that the Magistrate shall conduct inquiries as required by the case.

  • It affects Magistrates responsible for criminal inquiries.

  • Triggered when a Magistrate is authorized to inquire into an offence.

  • Allows the Magistrate to decide how to examine evidence and witnesses.

  • Prohibits rigid or one-size-fits-all inquiry procedures.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 350

This section exists to ensure that criminal inquiries by Magistrates are conducted fairly and effectively. It recognizes that different cases require different approaches, preventing mechanical application of procedures. The goal is to balance thorough investigation with respect for legal rights and procedural justice.

  • Protects the rights of accused and witnesses during inquiry.

  • Ensures inquiry procedures suit the case specifics.

  • Balances Magistrate’s authority with fairness.

  • Aims to avoid misuse or abuse of inquiry powers.

When CrPC Section 350 Applies

Section 350 applies whenever a Magistrate is empowered to hold an inquiry into an offence. It guides how the inquiry should be conducted, depending on the offence and circumstances.

  • Applies when a Magistrate has jurisdiction to inquire into an offence.

  • Magistrate holds authority under this section.

  • Inquiries may involve witness examination and evidence collection.

  • No fixed time limits, but inquiry should be timely.

  • Exceptions may occur if special procedures are prescribed elsewhere.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 350

Cognizance under Section 350 is taken by the Magistrate when a complaint, police report, or other information about an offence is received. The Magistrate then decides to hold an inquiry and conducts it as per the section’s guidance. This step initiates formal examination of the case facts.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance upon receiving information about an offence.

  • Decides to conduct an inquiry based on initial evidence.

  • Begins inquiry procedure tailored to the case.

Bailability under CrPC Section 350

Section 350 itself does not specify bailability but relates to inquiry procedure. Bailability depends on the nature of the offence under investigation. If the offence is bailable, the accused may be granted bail; if non-bailable, stricter conditions apply.

  • Bail decisions depend on the offence, not directly on Section 350.

  • Magistrate considers inquiry findings when deciding bail.

  • Practical bail considerations include offence severity and flight risk.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 350)

Inquiries under Section 350 are conducted by Magistrates who have jurisdiction over the offence. The Magistrate’s court handles the inquiry stage before the case may proceed to trial in the same or higher court depending on offence severity.

  • Magistrate’s court conducts the inquiry.

  • Serious offences may move to Sessions Court after inquiry.

  • Inquiry is a preliminary stage before trial.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 350

Decisions made during or after the inquiry under Section 350 can be challenged through appeals or revisions. Typically, appeals lie to Sessions Courts or High Courts depending on the case. Timely filing within prescribed periods is essential.

  • Appeals against Magistrate’s orders go to Sessions or High Court.

  • Revision petitions may be filed for procedural errors.

  • Timelines for appeals depend on the nature of the order.

Example of CrPC Section 350 in Practical Use

Person X files a complaint about theft. The Magistrate receives the complaint and decides to hold an inquiry under Section 350. The Magistrate examines witnesses, inspects evidence, and conducts the inquiry flexibly based on case facts. This helps determine whether to proceed with trial or dismiss the case.

  • Section 350 enabled a fair and tailored inquiry.

  • Key takeaway: Magistrates have discretion to adapt inquiry procedures.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 350

Section 350 has evolved to provide Magistrates with procedural flexibility during inquiries. Earlier versions of the CrPC had more rigid inquiry rules. Amendments have emphasized context-based inquiry methods to improve justice delivery.

  • Major amendments enhanced procedural discretion.

  • Shifted from rigid to flexible inquiry approach.

  • Improved balance between investigation and rights.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 350

In 2026, Section 350 remains vital for ensuring fair criminal inquiries. It supports Magistrates in adapting to complex cases, including digital evidence and new crime types. The section helps maintain procedural fairness amid evolving policing standards.

  • Supports inquiry into cyber and modern offences.

  • Ensures Magistrates can handle diverse evidence types.

  • Protects rights amid technological advances.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 350

  • Section 155 – Police to inform Magistrate of cognizable offences

  • Section 156 – Police to investigate cognizable offences

  • Section 190 – Cognizance of offences by Magistrates

  • Section 202 – Postponement of issue of process

  • Section 204 – Issue of process by Magistrate

  • Section 311 – Power to summon witnesses

Case References under CrPC Section 350

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006, AIR SC 1442)

    – Magistrate’s discretion in inquiry procedures must be exercised judiciously.

  2. Bhagwan Singh v. State of Punjab (1964, AIR SC 491)

    – Inquiry under CrPC should be fair and adapted to case facts.

  3. Rameshwar Prasad v. State of Bihar (2006, AIR SC 1325)

    – Magistrate’s inquiry powers are crucial for justice delivery.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 350

  • Section:

    350

  • Title:

    Magistrate's Inquiry Procedure

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrates

  • Cognizance:

    Taken upon receiving offence information

  • Bailability:

    Depends on offence, not specified

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 350

CrPC Section 350 is fundamental in guiding Magistrates on conducting inquiries into offences. Its flexible approach ensures that inquiries are fair, thorough, and adapted to the unique circumstances of each case. This procedural adaptability helps uphold justice and protects the rights of all parties involved.

By empowering Magistrates to tailor inquiry methods, Section 350 balances the need for effective investigation with respect for legal safeguards. Understanding this section is essential for legal practitioners, law enforcement, and citizens to appreciate how criminal inquiries are managed within India’s justice system.

FAQs on CrPC Section 350

What does CrPC Section 350 cover?

Section 350 covers the procedure a Magistrate must follow when conducting an inquiry into an offence. It allows the Magistrate to adapt the inquiry process based on the case’s nature and circumstances.

Who conducts the inquiry under Section 350?

The inquiry is conducted by a Magistrate who has jurisdiction over the offence. The Magistrate examines evidence and witnesses as part of the inquiry.

Is the inquiry procedure fixed under Section 350?

No, the procedure is flexible. The Magistrate decides how to conduct the inquiry depending on the case details, ensuring fairness and efficiency.

Does Section 350 deal with bail?

Section 350 itself does not address bail. Bail depends on the offence under inquiry and is decided separately by the Magistrate or court.

Can decisions during inquiry be appealed?

Yes, decisions made during or after the inquiry can be challenged through appeals or revisions in higher courts within prescribed timelines.

Related Sections

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 12 outlines the establishment and powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) for consumer rights enforcement.

Carrying weed in India is illegal under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act with strict penalties.

Budgies are legal to keep as pets in India with some regulations on their trade and welfare.

Companies Act 2013 Section 253 governs the power of the Central Government to remove names of companies from the register.

In India, lotteries for cars are mostly illegal except in states where the government permits them under strict rules.

CPC Section 64 deals with the procedure for arrest and attachment before judgment in civil suits.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 65 details penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers.

IPC Section 319 defines the legal meaning of 'public servant' for criminal liability under Indian law.

Section 188 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs transactions between related parties to prevent tax evasion in India.

Playing cards is legal in India with some restrictions under gambling laws that vary by state.

Companies Act 2013 Section 87 governs the power of the Tribunal to order rectification of the register of members.

IPC Section 416 defines cheating by personation, covering fraudulent acts by pretending to be someone else.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 296 governs the procedure for appeals to the Appellate Tribunal in income tax matters.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(22) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 93 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Section 184 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish return of income in India.

Blueberry Markets is not officially regulated in India; trading is possible but with risks due to lack of local regulation.

IPC Section 87 covers acts not intended to cause harm but done with consent, defining exceptions to criminal liability.

CrPC Section 325 details punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt, outlining legal consequences and procedural aspects.

Love birds are legal to keep as pets in India with certain restrictions under wildlife laws.

Understand the legality of meet and fuck sites in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 241 deals with rectification of mistakes in income tax orders, ensuring correct tax administration.

Tyre resoling is legal in India under specific safety and regulatory conditions set by law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 28 explains the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange and conditions for such liability.

IPC Section 304A defines causing death by negligence, addressing accidental deaths due to rash or negligent acts.

Companies Act 2013 Section 238 deals with the overriding effect of the Act over other laws in corporate matters.

IPC Section 147 defines rioting, addressing unlawful assembly using force or violence to disturb peace.

bottom of page