top of page

IPC Section 319

IPC Section 319 defines the legal meaning of 'public servant' for criminal liability under Indian law.

IPC Section 319 provides a clear definition of who qualifies as a 'public servant' under Indian criminal law. This section is crucial because it determines the applicability of various offences related to corruption, abuse of power, and official misconduct. Understanding this section helps in identifying individuals who are accountable under laws designed to maintain integrity in public administration.

The classification of a person as a public servant affects the investigation and prosecution of crimes involving public duty. It ensures that those holding public office or entrusted with public functions are held to legal standards that protect public interest and prevent misuse of authority.

IPC Section 319 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section defines a public servant as anyone employed by the government or paid to perform public duties. This includes government officials, employees, and others who carry out functions on behalf of the state. The definition is broad to cover various roles that impact public administration.

  • Defines who qualifies as a public servant under IPC.

  • Includes government employees and those paid for public duties.

  • Essential for applying laws related to official misconduct.

  • Helps identify persons liable under corruption laws.

Purpose of IPC Section 319

The main objective of Section 319 is to establish a clear legal understanding of who is considered a public servant. This clarity is necessary to enforce laws against corruption, bribery, and abuse of power effectively. By defining public servants, the law ensures that individuals in positions of public trust are held accountable for their actions.

  • To identify persons accountable under public service laws.

  • To support prosecution in cases of official misconduct.

  • To maintain integrity in public administration.

Cognizance under IPC Section 319

Cognizance under this section arises when an offence involves a person identified as a public servant. Courts take cognizance based on complaints, police reports, or official investigations where the accused fits the definition.

  • Cognizance is taken when a public servant is involved in an offence.

  • Initiated on police report or complaint.

  • Essential for cases under Prevention of Corruption Act and related laws.

Bail under IPC Section 319

Since Section 319 itself defines a category of persons rather than an offence, it does not prescribe bail conditions. However, offences involving public servants often attract non-bailable status due to their serious nature.

  • Section 319 does not specify bail conditions.

  • Offences involving public servants may be non-bailable.

  • Bail depends on the specific offence charged.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases involving public servants can be tried by different courts depending on the offence's nature and severity. Minor offences may be tried by Magistrate courts, while serious crimes fall under Sessions courts.

  • Magistrate courts try minor offences involving public servants.

  • Sessions courts handle serious offences like corruption.

  • Special courts may be designated for specific public servant offences.

Example of IPC Section 319 in Use

Consider a government clerk who accepts a bribe to expedite a license application. Under IPC Section 319, this clerk qualifies as a public servant. If charged with bribery, the court will apply laws related to public servants, such as the Prevention of Corruption Act. Conversely, if a private individual commits a similar act, these laws would not apply.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 319

Section 319 was included in the Indian Penal Code to provide a foundational definition for legal proceedings involving public officials. It has evolved alongside anti-corruption laws to broaden the scope of accountability.

  • Introduced with the IPC in 1860 to define public servants.

  • Expanded through amendments to include various government roles.

  • Supported landmark anti-corruption cases in Indian judiciary.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 319

In 2025, Section 319 remains vital for prosecuting corruption and abuse of power. Courts have interpreted it broadly to include elected representatives, contractors, and others performing public functions. This ensures comprehensive coverage against misuse of public office.

  • Broad judicial interpretation to include diverse public roles.

  • Supports enforcement of anti-corruption statutes.

  • Enhances public trust by holding officials accountable.

Related Sections to IPC Section 319

  • Section 409 – Criminal breach of trust by public servant

  • Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property

  • Section 467 – Forgery of valuable security or will

  • Section 468 – Forgery for purpose of cheating

  • Section 471 – Using as genuine a forged document

  • Section 120B – Criminal conspiracy

Case References under IPC Section 319

  1. State of Maharashtra v. M.H. George (1965 AIR 722, SC)

    – The Court clarified the scope of 'public servant' including government contractors under certain conditions.

  2. R.K. Jain v. Union of India (1981 AIR 487, SC)

    – Held that persons appointed by the government for public duties are public servants.

  3. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016 AIR 4039, SC)

    – Expanded the definition to include elected representatives under anti-corruption laws.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 319

  • Section:

    319

  • Title:

    Definition of Public Servant

  • Offence Type:

    Not an offence; definitional provision

  • Punishment:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Depends on offence involving public servant

Conclusion on IPC Section 319

IPC Section 319 plays a foundational role in Indian criminal law by defining who is a public servant. This definition is crucial for applying various laws that regulate the conduct of government officials and others entrusted with public duties. It ensures that accountability mechanisms are clearly targeted at those holding public office.

As governance and public administration evolve, the importance of this section continues to grow. It supports the enforcement of anti-corruption laws and helps maintain public confidence in government institutions by ensuring that those in power are subject to legal scrutiny.

FAQs on IPC Section 319

What does IPC Section 319 define?

It defines who is considered a public servant under Indian criminal law, including government employees and others performing public duties.

Is IPC Section 319 itself an offence?

No, it is a definitional section that helps identify public servants for applying other offences.

Can private individuals be public servants under this section?

Only if they are paid or employed by the government or perform public duties as defined by law.

Which courts try offences involving public servants?

Depending on the offence, Magistrate courts or Sessions courts may have jurisdiction.

Why is the definition of public servant important?

It ensures that laws against corruption and misconduct apply correctly to those holding public office.

Related Sections

Contract Act 1872 Section 4 defines what constitutes a proposal and acceptance in contract formation.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 241 deals with rectification of mistakes in income tax orders, ensuring correct tax administration.

Alexandrine parrots are conditionally legal in India with permits under wildlife laws.

Contract Act 1872 Section 49 covers contracts contingent on an event happening within a specified time, ensuring clarity in conditional agreements.

Income Tax Act Section 44AF defines presumptive income for freight and goods transport businesses.

IPC Section 120A defines criminal conspiracy, outlining when an agreement to commit an illegal act becomes punishable under law.

Taking two degrees simultaneously is legal in India with certain conditions and university rules to follow.

ClickBank is legal in India, but users must follow local laws on online business and taxation.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 111 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Watching porn images on the internet is conditionally legal in India with strict restrictions on content and access.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 120 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Dog meat is illegal in India with strict laws protecting dogs from slaughter and consumption.

CPC Section 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order necessary for ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142A defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Tyre retreading is legal in India under strict regulations to ensure safety and environmental standards.

Income Tax Act Section 80-O provides deductions for profits of business of exporting articles or things.

Companies Act 2013 Section 150 governs the appointment and qualifications of company secretaries in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 107 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 429 governs the power of the Central Government to investigate companies in India.

CrPC Section 121 defines the offence of waging war against the Government of India and its legal consequences.

IPC Section 405 defines criminal breach of trust, covering dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person.

Medical Termination of Pregnancy is legal in India under specific conditions governed by the MTP Act with certain restrictions and procedural requirements.

Section 194L of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on income from units of specified mutual funds in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 79 defines the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed in the firm's name.

Income Tax Act Section 80P provides deductions for cooperative societies on specified income under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

CrPC Section 207 mandates the supply of the accused with a copy of the police report and documents before trial begins.

Marital rape is not legally recognized as a crime in India, with limited exceptions and ongoing debates on enforcement and reform.

bottom of page