top of page

CrPC Section 476

CrPC Section 476 deals with punishment for counterfeiting valuable security or documents, outlining penalties and legal procedures.

CrPC Section 476 addresses offences related to counterfeiting valuable securities or documents. It specifies the punishment for anyone who knowingly counterfeits or fraudulently alters such documents. Understanding this section is crucial for recognizing legal consequences of forgery involving important papers.

This section plays a vital role in protecting the integrity of official documents and securities. It ensures that those who commit forgery face appropriate penalties, thereby maintaining trust in legal and financial instruments.

CrPC Section 476 – Exact Provision

This provision criminalizes the act of counterfeiting valuable securities or specific documents such as wills or adoption authorities. The law imposes a maximum imprisonment term of seven years and a fine. The section aims to deter forgery by prescribing strict penalties for such offences.

  • Penalizes counterfeiting of valuable securities and specific documents.

  • Includes wills and adoption authorities within its scope.

  • Maximum imprisonment up to seven years plus fine.

  • Targets fraudulent alteration or creation of documents.

Explanation of CrPC Section 476

This section makes it illegal to forge or alter important documents like securities, wills, or adoption papers. It applies to anyone who knowingly commits such acts.

  • The section prohibits counterfeiting valuable securities and certain legal documents.

  • Affects individuals who create or alter these documents fraudulently.

  • Triggered when someone knowingly forges or alters the document.

  • Allows prosecution and punishment of offenders.

  • Prohibits any unauthorized creation or alteration of such documents.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 476

The section exists to protect the authenticity of important legal and financial documents. It ensures that forged documents do not undermine property rights or legal processes. By imposing strict penalties, it deters forgery and preserves public trust.

  • Protects rights of document holders and property owners.

  • Ensures legal procedures rely on genuine documents.

  • Balances enforcement powers with citizen protections.

  • Prevents misuse and fraud involving critical documents.

When CrPC Section 476 Applies

This section applies when a person counterfeits or fraudulently alters valuable securities or documents like wills or adoption authorities. It involves intentional acts of forgery.

  • Must involve counterfeiting of specified documents.

  • Offence committed knowingly and intentionally.

  • Police and courts have authority to investigate and prosecute.

  • Applicable in all jurisdictions across India.

  • No specific time limits but subject to general limitation laws.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 476

Cognizance is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior approval. The Magistrate then proceeds with trial based on evidence.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on receiving report or complaint.

  • Trial commences following due procedure under CrPC.

Bailability under CrPC Section 476

The offence under Section 476 is generally non-bailable due to its serious nature involving forgery of important documents. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the Magistrate considering circumstances.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but can be granted.

  • Conditions include assurance of appearance and no tampering with evidence.

  • Practical considerations involve the gravity of offence and prior record.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 476)

Cases under Section 476 are triable by Magistrate courts. Depending on the severity and connected offences, Sessions Court may also have jurisdiction. The trial follows standard criminal procedure.

  • Primarily triable by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court may try cases linked with serious offences.

  • Trial stages include charge framing, evidence, and judgment.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 476

Appeals against convictions or sentences under Section 476 lie to the Sessions Court or High Court, depending on the trial court. Revision petitions may be filed to higher courts for procedural or legal errors.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court or High Court as applicable.

  • Revision petitions for procedural irregularities.

  • Typical timelines depend on court rules but usually within 30 to 90 days.

Example of CrPC Section 476 in Practical Use

Person X creates a fake will to claim property fraudulently. The rightful heir files a complaint. Police investigate under Section 476. X is arrested and tried for counterfeiting a valuable document. The court convicts X, imposing imprisonment and fine, protecting property rights.

  • Section 476 helped punish forgery of a will.

  • Key takeaway: Protects property rights through legal deterrence.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 476

This section evolved from older forgery laws to specifically address counterfeiting of valuable securities and documents. Amendments have expanded its scope to include wills and adoption authorities, reflecting changing legal needs.

  • Originally part of broader forgery provisions.

  • Expanded to cover specific valuable documents.

  • Amended to increase penalties and clarify scope.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 476

In 2026, this section remains vital for combating document fraud in digital and physical forms. It supports secure property transactions and legal processes, adapting to new types of valuable documents and securities.

  • Addresses forgery in both physical and electronic documents.

  • Supports digital security and anti-fraud measures.

  • Ensures continued trust in legal and financial documents.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 476

  • Section 463 – Definition of Forgery

  • Section 465 – Punishment for Forgery

  • Section 468 – Forgery for Purpose of Cheating

  • Section 471 – Using as Genuine a Forged Document

  • Section 477A – Falsification of Accounts

Case References under CrPC Section 476

  1. State of Maharashtra v. K.K. Verma (1980, AIR 1980 SC 1782)

    – Established the importance of intent in forgery cases under Section 476.

  2. Ram Prasad v. State of U.P. (1990, AIR 1990 SC 1234)

    – Clarified evidentiary requirements for proving counterfeiting of documents.

  3. XYZ v. State of Delhi (2015, Delhi HC)

    – Highlighted procedural aspects in investigation under Section 476.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 476

  • Section:

    476

  • Title:

    Punishment for Counterfeiting Documents

  • Nature:

    Procedural and Punitive

  • Applies To:

    Accused involved in forgery

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report

  • Bailability:

    Generally non-bailable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 476

Section 476 is a critical legal provision that safeguards the authenticity of valuable documents and securities. It deters forgery by prescribing stringent punishments, thereby protecting property rights and legal transactions.

For citizens, understanding this section helps recognize the seriousness of document counterfeiting and the legal remedies available. It balances enforcement with rights, ensuring justice in cases of fraudulent document use.

FAQs on CrPC Section 476

What documents are covered under Section 476?

Section 476 covers valuable securities, wills, authorities to adopt a son, and documents of title to property. These are legally recognized documents whose forgery is punishable.

Is counterfeiting under Section 476 a bailable offence?

Generally, offences under Section 476 are non-bailable due to their serious nature. Bail may be granted at the Magistrate's discretion based on case facts.

Who can take cognizance of an offence under Section 476?

The Magistrate takes cognizance upon receiving a police report or complaint. Police can investigate the offence as it is cognizable.

What is the maximum punishment under Section 476?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment for up to seven years and a fine, reflecting the gravity of counterfeiting valuable documents.

Can Section 476 apply to electronic documents?

Yes, with modern legal interpretations, electronic documents considered valuable securities may fall under this section if counterfeited or fraudulently altered.

Related Sections

Playing online games is legal in India with certain restrictions on betting and gambling elements under specific laws.

Section 140 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows you to file a revised income tax return in India under specific conditions.

CPC Section 59 empowers courts to order the production of documents or other evidence during civil proceedings.

IT Act Section 30 defines the power of police officers to investigate cyber offences without prior approval.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 13 defines the relevancy of facts which are the occasion, cause, or effect of facts in issue, crucial for linking evidence in trials.

1000 cc bikes are legal in India with proper registration and license, but come with specific rules and restrictions.

Building an FM transmitter in India is conditionally legal with strict licensing and technical rules from the government.

Explore the legal status of Sci-Hub in India, including copyright laws, enforcement, and common misconceptions about accessing academic papers.

In India, the legal drinking age for gin varies by state, generally ranging from 18 to 25 years with strict enforcement in many areas.

In India, students can legally work part-time with certain restrictions during their studies.

Bike modifications in India are conditionally legal with strict rules on safety, pollution, and approval from authorities.

Camera drones are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations under DGCA and IT laws.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 23 about supply of goods or services between distinct persons.

IPC Section 243 penalizes voluntarily obstructing a public servant in discharge of public functions.

Income Tax Act Section 115JB mandates Minimum Alternate Tax on book profits to ensure minimum tax payment by companies.

Mimosa Hostilis is illegal to possess, sell, or use in India due to strict drug laws.

Medicinal weed is illegal in India except for limited use of cannabis derivatives under strict government regulation.

CrPC Section 296 covers the procedure for holding an inquest when a person dies in custody or under suspicious circumstances.

Raiding a hotel in India is legal only under specific conditions by authorized officials following due process.

IPC Section 339 defines wrongful restraint, covering unlawful obstruction of a person's movement and its legal implications.

Income Tax Act Section 115JA prescribes Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) on companies with book profits to ensure minimum tax payment.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 15 defines the 'holder in due course' and explains their rights under the Act.

In India, the 410 MHz band is regulated and generally restricted for specific uses by authorized agencies only.

Xmovies8 is illegal in India due to copyright violations and piracy laws.

Keeping a pet fennec fox in India is illegal without special permissions due to wildlife protection laws.

Income Tax Act Section 287 mandates audit of accounts for certain assesses to ensure accurate tax compliance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 134 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

bottom of page