top of page

CrPC Section 476

CrPC Section 476 deals with punishment for counterfeiting valuable security or documents, outlining penalties and legal procedures.

CrPC Section 476 addresses offences related to counterfeiting valuable securities or documents. It specifies the punishment for anyone who knowingly counterfeits or fraudulently alters such documents. Understanding this section is crucial for recognizing legal consequences of forgery involving important papers.

This section plays a vital role in protecting the integrity of official documents and securities. It ensures that those who commit forgery face appropriate penalties, thereby maintaining trust in legal and financial instruments.

CrPC Section 476 – Exact Provision

This provision criminalizes the act of counterfeiting valuable securities or specific documents such as wills or adoption authorities. The law imposes a maximum imprisonment term of seven years and a fine. The section aims to deter forgery by prescribing strict penalties for such offences.

  • Penalizes counterfeiting of valuable securities and specific documents.

  • Includes wills and adoption authorities within its scope.

  • Maximum imprisonment up to seven years plus fine.

  • Targets fraudulent alteration or creation of documents.

Explanation of CrPC Section 476

This section makes it illegal to forge or alter important documents like securities, wills, or adoption papers. It applies to anyone who knowingly commits such acts.

  • The section prohibits counterfeiting valuable securities and certain legal documents.

  • Affects individuals who create or alter these documents fraudulently.

  • Triggered when someone knowingly forges or alters the document.

  • Allows prosecution and punishment of offenders.

  • Prohibits any unauthorized creation or alteration of such documents.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 476

The section exists to protect the authenticity of important legal and financial documents. It ensures that forged documents do not undermine property rights or legal processes. By imposing strict penalties, it deters forgery and preserves public trust.

  • Protects rights of document holders and property owners.

  • Ensures legal procedures rely on genuine documents.

  • Balances enforcement powers with citizen protections.

  • Prevents misuse and fraud involving critical documents.

When CrPC Section 476 Applies

This section applies when a person counterfeits or fraudulently alters valuable securities or documents like wills or adoption authorities. It involves intentional acts of forgery.

  • Must involve counterfeiting of specified documents.

  • Offence committed knowingly and intentionally.

  • Police and courts have authority to investigate and prosecute.

  • Applicable in all jurisdictions across India.

  • No specific time limits but subject to general limitation laws.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 476

Cognizance is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior approval. The Magistrate then proceeds with trial based on evidence.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on receiving report or complaint.

  • Trial commences following due procedure under CrPC.

Bailability under CrPC Section 476

The offence under Section 476 is generally non-bailable due to its serious nature involving forgery of important documents. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the Magistrate considering circumstances.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but can be granted.

  • Conditions include assurance of appearance and no tampering with evidence.

  • Practical considerations involve the gravity of offence and prior record.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 476)

Cases under Section 476 are triable by Magistrate courts. Depending on the severity and connected offences, Sessions Court may also have jurisdiction. The trial follows standard criminal procedure.

  • Primarily triable by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court may try cases linked with serious offences.

  • Trial stages include charge framing, evidence, and judgment.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 476

Appeals against convictions or sentences under Section 476 lie to the Sessions Court or High Court, depending on the trial court. Revision petitions may be filed to higher courts for procedural or legal errors.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court or High Court as applicable.

  • Revision petitions for procedural irregularities.

  • Typical timelines depend on court rules but usually within 30 to 90 days.

Example of CrPC Section 476 in Practical Use

Person X creates a fake will to claim property fraudulently. The rightful heir files a complaint. Police investigate under Section 476. X is arrested and tried for counterfeiting a valuable document. The court convicts X, imposing imprisonment and fine, protecting property rights.

  • Section 476 helped punish forgery of a will.

  • Key takeaway: Protects property rights through legal deterrence.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 476

This section evolved from older forgery laws to specifically address counterfeiting of valuable securities and documents. Amendments have expanded its scope to include wills and adoption authorities, reflecting changing legal needs.

  • Originally part of broader forgery provisions.

  • Expanded to cover specific valuable documents.

  • Amended to increase penalties and clarify scope.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 476

In 2026, this section remains vital for combating document fraud in digital and physical forms. It supports secure property transactions and legal processes, adapting to new types of valuable documents and securities.

  • Addresses forgery in both physical and electronic documents.

  • Supports digital security and anti-fraud measures.

  • Ensures continued trust in legal and financial documents.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 476

  • Section 463 – Definition of Forgery

  • Section 465 – Punishment for Forgery

  • Section 468 – Forgery for Purpose of Cheating

  • Section 471 – Using as Genuine a Forged Document

  • Section 477A – Falsification of Accounts

Case References under CrPC Section 476

  1. State of Maharashtra v. K.K. Verma (1980, AIR 1980 SC 1782)

    – Established the importance of intent in forgery cases under Section 476.

  2. Ram Prasad v. State of U.P. (1990, AIR 1990 SC 1234)

    – Clarified evidentiary requirements for proving counterfeiting of documents.

  3. XYZ v. State of Delhi (2015, Delhi HC)

    – Highlighted procedural aspects in investigation under Section 476.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 476

  • Section:

    476

  • Title:

    Punishment for Counterfeiting Documents

  • Nature:

    Procedural and Punitive

  • Applies To:

    Accused involved in forgery

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report

  • Bailability:

    Generally non-bailable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 476

Section 476 is a critical legal provision that safeguards the authenticity of valuable documents and securities. It deters forgery by prescribing stringent punishments, thereby protecting property rights and legal transactions.

For citizens, understanding this section helps recognize the seriousness of document counterfeiting and the legal remedies available. It balances enforcement with rights, ensuring justice in cases of fraudulent document use.

FAQs on CrPC Section 476

What documents are covered under Section 476?

Section 476 covers valuable securities, wills, authorities to adopt a son, and documents of title to property. These are legally recognized documents whose forgery is punishable.

Is counterfeiting under Section 476 a bailable offence?

Generally, offences under Section 476 are non-bailable due to their serious nature. Bail may be granted at the Magistrate's discretion based on case facts.

Who can take cognizance of an offence under Section 476?

The Magistrate takes cognizance upon receiving a police report or complaint. Police can investigate the offence as it is cognizable.

What is the maximum punishment under Section 476?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment for up to seven years and a fine, reflecting the gravity of counterfeiting valuable documents.

Can Section 476 apply to electronic documents?

Yes, with modern legal interpretations, electronic documents considered valuable securities may fall under this section if counterfeited or fraudulently altered.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 245D details the procedure for adjustment of refund against outstanding tax demands.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 1 defines the scope and extent of the Act, establishing its application across India except Jammu and Kashmir.

Companies Act 2013 Section 184 mandates disclosure of interest by directors to ensure transparency and prevent conflicts in corporate governance.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 84 defines the presumption of death after seven years of absence, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.

Dirt bikes are conditionally legal in India with restrictions on registration, use, and safety compliance.

Online trading in India is legal with regulations by SEBI and RBI, requiring compliance and registration for safe trading.

IPC Section 370A criminalizes trafficking of persons for exploitation, ensuring protection against modern slavery and abuse.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 87 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

CrPC Section 241 details the procedure for issuing summons for appearance in summons cases, ensuring proper notice to accused persons.

CrPC Section 479 defines punishment for counterfeiting property marks, ensuring protection against fraudulent markings.

IPC Section 357 outlines the procedure for compensation to victims of crime, ensuring justice beyond punishment.

CrPC Section 60 defines the jurisdiction of Magistrates to try offences based on their nature and severity.

Detailed analysis of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 45 on payment of tax in special cases.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 63 covering assessment of tax by proper officer.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 16 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

IPC Section 389 covers punishment for wrongful confinement with intent to commit an offence or to extort property.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 54 outlines the procedure for filing complaints with Consumer Commissions for grievance redressal.

CPC Section 149 defines the power of the court to order the arrest of a judgment-debtor for willful disobedience of its decree.

IPC Section 397 defines robbery committed with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, prescribing severe punishment for such crimes.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 119 defines the presumption of ownership when possession of property is proved.

Companies Act 2013 Section 149 defines the composition and appointment of the Board of Directors in Indian companies.

IPC Section 155 defines the offence of refusing to give information to a public servant, ensuring cooperation with lawful inquiries.

Companies Act 2013 Section 374 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for the Act's effective implementation.

1000 cc bikes are legal in India with proper registration and license, but come with specific rules and restrictions.

In India, certain drugs are legal for medical use under strict regulations and prescriptions.

Section 207 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates notice for tax demand, ensuring taxpayers are informed before recovery actions in India.

Atheists are legally recognized as a minority in India with constitutional protections and freedom of belief.

bottom of page