top of page

CrPC Section 476

CrPC Section 476 deals with punishment for counterfeiting valuable security or documents, outlining penalties and legal procedures.

CrPC Section 476 addresses offences related to counterfeiting valuable securities or documents. It specifies the punishment for anyone who knowingly counterfeits or fraudulently alters such documents. Understanding this section is crucial for recognizing legal consequences of forgery involving important papers.

This section plays a vital role in protecting the integrity of official documents and securities. It ensures that those who commit forgery face appropriate penalties, thereby maintaining trust in legal and financial instruments.

CrPC Section 476 – Exact Provision

This provision criminalizes the act of counterfeiting valuable securities or specific documents such as wills or adoption authorities. The law imposes a maximum imprisonment term of seven years and a fine. The section aims to deter forgery by prescribing strict penalties for such offences.

  • Penalizes counterfeiting of valuable securities and specific documents.

  • Includes wills and adoption authorities within its scope.

  • Maximum imprisonment up to seven years plus fine.

  • Targets fraudulent alteration or creation of documents.

Explanation of CrPC Section 476

This section makes it illegal to forge or alter important documents like securities, wills, or adoption papers. It applies to anyone who knowingly commits such acts.

  • The section prohibits counterfeiting valuable securities and certain legal documents.

  • Affects individuals who create or alter these documents fraudulently.

  • Triggered when someone knowingly forges or alters the document.

  • Allows prosecution and punishment of offenders.

  • Prohibits any unauthorized creation or alteration of such documents.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 476

The section exists to protect the authenticity of important legal and financial documents. It ensures that forged documents do not undermine property rights or legal processes. By imposing strict penalties, it deters forgery and preserves public trust.

  • Protects rights of document holders and property owners.

  • Ensures legal procedures rely on genuine documents.

  • Balances enforcement powers with citizen protections.

  • Prevents misuse and fraud involving critical documents.

When CrPC Section 476 Applies

This section applies when a person counterfeits or fraudulently alters valuable securities or documents like wills or adoption authorities. It involves intentional acts of forgery.

  • Must involve counterfeiting of specified documents.

  • Offence committed knowingly and intentionally.

  • Police and courts have authority to investigate and prosecute.

  • Applicable in all jurisdictions across India.

  • No specific time limits but subject to general limitation laws.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 476

Cognizance is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior approval. The Magistrate then proceeds with trial based on evidence.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on receiving report or complaint.

  • Trial commences following due procedure under CrPC.

Bailability under CrPC Section 476

The offence under Section 476 is generally non-bailable due to its serious nature involving forgery of important documents. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the Magistrate considering circumstances.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but can be granted.

  • Conditions include assurance of appearance and no tampering with evidence.

  • Practical considerations involve the gravity of offence and prior record.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 476)

Cases under Section 476 are triable by Magistrate courts. Depending on the severity and connected offences, Sessions Court may also have jurisdiction. The trial follows standard criminal procedure.

  • Primarily triable by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court may try cases linked with serious offences.

  • Trial stages include charge framing, evidence, and judgment.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 476

Appeals against convictions or sentences under Section 476 lie to the Sessions Court or High Court, depending on the trial court. Revision petitions may be filed to higher courts for procedural or legal errors.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court or High Court as applicable.

  • Revision petitions for procedural irregularities.

  • Typical timelines depend on court rules but usually within 30 to 90 days.

Example of CrPC Section 476 in Practical Use

Person X creates a fake will to claim property fraudulently. The rightful heir files a complaint. Police investigate under Section 476. X is arrested and tried for counterfeiting a valuable document. The court convicts X, imposing imprisonment and fine, protecting property rights.

  • Section 476 helped punish forgery of a will.

  • Key takeaway: Protects property rights through legal deterrence.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 476

This section evolved from older forgery laws to specifically address counterfeiting of valuable securities and documents. Amendments have expanded its scope to include wills and adoption authorities, reflecting changing legal needs.

  • Originally part of broader forgery provisions.

  • Expanded to cover specific valuable documents.

  • Amended to increase penalties and clarify scope.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 476

In 2026, this section remains vital for combating document fraud in digital and physical forms. It supports secure property transactions and legal processes, adapting to new types of valuable documents and securities.

  • Addresses forgery in both physical and electronic documents.

  • Supports digital security and anti-fraud measures.

  • Ensures continued trust in legal and financial documents.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 476

  • Section 463 – Definition of Forgery

  • Section 465 – Punishment for Forgery

  • Section 468 – Forgery for Purpose of Cheating

  • Section 471 – Using as Genuine a Forged Document

  • Section 477A – Falsification of Accounts

Case References under CrPC Section 476

  1. State of Maharashtra v. K.K. Verma (1980, AIR 1980 SC 1782)

    – Established the importance of intent in forgery cases under Section 476.

  2. Ram Prasad v. State of U.P. (1990, AIR 1990 SC 1234)

    – Clarified evidentiary requirements for proving counterfeiting of documents.

  3. XYZ v. State of Delhi (2015, Delhi HC)

    – Highlighted procedural aspects in investigation under Section 476.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 476

  • Section:

    476

  • Title:

    Punishment for Counterfeiting Documents

  • Nature:

    Procedural and Punitive

  • Applies To:

    Accused involved in forgery

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report

  • Bailability:

    Generally non-bailable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 476

Section 476 is a critical legal provision that safeguards the authenticity of valuable documents and securities. It deters forgery by prescribing stringent punishments, thereby protecting property rights and legal transactions.

For citizens, understanding this section helps recognize the seriousness of document counterfeiting and the legal remedies available. It balances enforcement with rights, ensuring justice in cases of fraudulent document use.

FAQs on CrPC Section 476

What documents are covered under Section 476?

Section 476 covers valuable securities, wills, authorities to adopt a son, and documents of title to property. These are legally recognized documents whose forgery is punishable.

Is counterfeiting under Section 476 a bailable offence?

Generally, offences under Section 476 are non-bailable due to their serious nature. Bail may be granted at the Magistrate's discretion based on case facts.

Who can take cognizance of an offence under Section 476?

The Magistrate takes cognizance upon receiving a police report or complaint. Police can investigate the offence as it is cognizable.

What is the maximum punishment under Section 476?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment for up to seven years and a fine, reflecting the gravity of counterfeiting valuable documents.

Can Section 476 apply to electronic documents?

Yes, with modern legal interpretations, electronic documents considered valuable securities may fall under this section if counterfeited or fraudulently altered.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 7 – Scope of Supply for taxpayers and GST officers.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 112 covering offences and penalties under CGST law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 126 governs the procedure for service of documents to shareholders.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269UP prohibits cash transactions exceeding prescribed limits to curb tax evasion.

Income Tax Act Section 11 provides exemption on income derived from property held for charitable or religious purposes.

Ola and Uber are legal in India with specific regulations governing ride-hailing services and driver requirements.

Section 143 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the assessment process of income tax returns in India.

CrPC Section 258 empowers a Magistrate to issue a warrant for arrest when a person absconds or conceals to avoid summons or appearance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 27 defines the holder in due course and its legal significance under the Act.

Smoking in roadside cafes in India is generally prohibited by law, with strict enforcement in public places including cafes.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 95 defines 'business connection' for non-resident taxation purposes.

Email marketing is legal in India with rules under the IT Act and TRAI regulations to protect recipients from spam.

1000 cc bikes are legal in India with proper registration and license, but come with specific rules and restrictions.

Lobotomy is illegal in India with no legal provision allowing its practice due to ethical and medical standards.

Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) are currently illegal in India due to regulatory restrictions by the RBI and SEBI.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 109 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

Owning a lion in India is illegal without special permission due to wildlife protection laws and strict regulations.

IPC Section 332 punishes voluntarily causing hurt to public servants to deter obstruction of official duties.

IPC Section 224 penalizes intentional resistance or obstruction to a public servant discharging official duties.

Understand the legal status of music sampling in India, including copyright rules, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 436 governs the power of the Tribunal to order winding up of companies under insolvency proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 133 defines the scope of judicial notice, detailing facts courts must accept without proof.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 61 defines the competency of witnesses, outlining who may testify in court and its significance in legal proceedings.

CPC Section 58 defines the procedure for service of summons to defendants in civil suits.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 54 outlines the procedure for filing complaints with Consumer Commissions for grievance redressal.

CrPC Section 68 details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses to appear in court for testimony.

Income Tax Act Section 271AAA penalizes non-filing of TDS statements, ensuring timely compliance by deductors and collectors.

bottom of page