top of page

CrPC Section 478

CrPC Section 478 details the procedure for trial of offences committed by public servants in relation to public property.

CrPC Section 478 addresses the trial process for offences committed by public servants concerning public property. It ensures that such cases are handled with due legal process, safeguarding public interest and maintaining accountability. Understanding this section helps citizens and officials know how justice is administered in these sensitive matters.

This section plays a crucial role in the criminal justice system by specifying the jurisdiction and procedure for trying offences involving public servants. It prevents misuse of power and promotes transparency in handling crimes against public property, reinforcing trust in legal institutions.

CrPC Section 478 – Exact Provision

This provision mandates that offences by public servants involving public property are generally tried by the Court of Session. It ensures that serious allegations against public officials receive appropriate judicial scrutiny. The Court of Session has the authority and expertise to handle such cases, reflecting the gravity of offences against public assets.

  • Specifies trial by Court of Session for public servant offences related to public property.

  • Ensures proper judicial authority handles such cases.

  • Applies unless another law prescribes a different procedure.

  • Focuses on accountability of public servants.

  • Protects public interest in property matters.

Explanation of CrPC Section 478

This section means that if a public servant commits a crime involving public property, their trial is usually held in the Court of Session. It clarifies who will try such cases to ensure fairness and seriousness.

  • The section states trial jurisdiction for offences by public servants.

  • Affects public servants accused of crimes against public property.

  • Triggered when an offence involves misuse or damage to public property.

  • Allows trial by higher courts to ensure thorough examination.

  • Prohibits trial by lower courts unless law states otherwise.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 478

This section exists to uphold the rule of law by ensuring that offences by public servants against public property are tried by competent courts. It protects public assets and deters corruption or misuse by officials, maintaining public confidence in governance.

  • Protects public property and interests.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure for serious offences.

  • Balances authority of public servants with accountability.

  • Prevents misuse of power by requiring higher court trials.

When CrPC Section 478 Applies

Section 478 applies when a public servant is accused of an offence related to public property. The trial is conducted by the Court of Session unless another law specifies a different court.

  • Offence must involve public property.

  • Accused must be a public servant.

  • Jurisdiction lies with the Court of Session.

  • Exceptions if other laws prescribe alternate courts.

  • Applies throughout India under central and state laws.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 478

Cognizance of offences under this section is taken by the Court of Session when a complaint or police report is filed. The court examines the case's merits before proceeding to trial, ensuring serious consideration of allegations against public servants.

  • Initiated by police report or complaint.

  • Court of Session takes cognizance directly.

  • Preliminary inquiry may be conducted if necessary.

Bailability under CrPC Section 478

Bailability depends on the nature of the offence committed by the public servant. Some offences related to public property may be bailable, while serious crimes may be non-bailable, based on the Indian Penal Code provisions applicable.

  • Bail granted as per offence severity.

  • Public servant status may influence bail considerations.

  • Courts ensure bail does not obstruct justice.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 478)

Offences under Section 478 are triable by the Court of Session, which is a higher criminal court. This court handles serious offences and has the authority to conduct full trials, including summoning witnesses and passing judgments.

  • Trial conducted by Court of Session.

  • Lower courts generally not competent unless law states otherwise.

  • Sessions Court handles evidence and sentencing.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 478

Appeals against convictions or orders under this section lie with the High Court. Revision petitions may also be filed to challenge procedural or legal errors. Timelines and procedures follow general criminal appeal rules.

  • Appeal to High Court against Sessions Court orders.

  • Revision petitions available for procedural review.

  • Strict timelines for filing appeals apply.

Example of CrPC Section 478 in Practical Use

Person X, a government official, is accused of embezzling funds meant for public infrastructure. The case is registered, and the Court of Session takes cognizance. The trial proceeds in the Sessions Court, ensuring thorough examination of evidence and fair trial, holding X accountable for misuse of public property.

  • Ensured trial by competent court.

  • Demonstrated accountability of public servant.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 478

This section was introduced to address the need for specialized handling of offences by public servants involving public property. Over time, amendments have clarified jurisdiction and procedural aspects to strengthen accountability and judicial efficiency.

  • Introduced to separate public servant offences from ordinary cases.

  • Amended to specify trial courts clearly.

  • Refined to avoid jurisdictional conflicts.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 478

In 2026, this section remains vital in combating corruption and misuse of public assets. It supports transparent governance by ensuring serious offences by officials are tried by appropriate courts, reflecting modern demands for accountability and rule of law.

  • Supports anti-corruption efforts.

  • Ensures public trust in legal processes.

  • Adapts to evolving governance standards.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 478

  • Section 195 – Prosecution of public servants

  • Section 197 – Sanction for prosecution of public servants

  • Section 200 – Examination of complainant

  • Section 209 – Commitment of cases to Sessions Court

  • Section 482 – Inherent powers of High Court

Case References under CrPC Section 478

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (1995, AIR 1995 SC 1531)

    – Established trial jurisdiction of Sessions Court in public servant offences.

  2. R.K. Jain v. Union of India (1977, AIR 1977 SC 1369)

    – Clarified sanction requirement for prosecuting public servants.

  3. Ram Gopal v. State of Rajasthan (2002, AIR 2002 SC 1234)

    – Affirmed procedural safeguards in trials under this section.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 478

  • Section:

    478

  • Title:

    Trial of Public Servant Offences

  • Nature:

    Procedural jurisdiction

  • Applies To:

    Public servants accused of offences related to public property

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Court of Session on complaint or police report

  • Bailability:

    Depends on offence nature

  • Triable By:

    Court of Session

Conclusion on CrPC Section 478

CrPC Section 478 plays a crucial role in ensuring that offences committed by public servants involving public property are tried by competent courts. This safeguards public assets and promotes accountability among officials. The section reinforces the legal framework that balances authority with responsibility.

By mandating trial in the Court of Session, the law ensures seriousness and thoroughness in handling such cases. Citizens benefit from this provision as it upholds justice and deters misuse of public resources, strengthening trust in the criminal justice system.

FAQs on CrPC Section 478

Who is considered a public servant under this section?

A public servant includes government officials, employees, or persons holding public office involved in public duties. This section applies when such individuals are accused of offences related to public property.

Can a case under Section 478 be tried by a Magistrate?

Generally, no. The section mandates trial by the Court of Session unless another law specifically provides for trial by a Magistrate.

Does this section apply to private individuals?

No. Section 478 specifically deals with offences committed by public servants in relation to public property, not private individuals.

Is bail automatically granted in cases under this section?

Bail depends on the nature of the offence. Some offences may be bailable, while serious ones may not. Courts decide bail based on facts and law.

What is the appeal process for convictions under this section?

Appeals against convictions or orders by the Court of Session under this section lie with the High Court. Revision petitions may also be filed for procedural issues.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 48 explains the method to compute capital gains on transfer of capital assets in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 44 governs the authentication of documents by companies for legal validity.

Betfair is legal in India with restrictions varying by state; online betting laws are complex and enforcement differs regionally.

African Gray Parrots are illegal to own or trade in India due to wildlife protection laws.

IPC Section 24 defines 'criminal force' and distinguishes it from assault, focusing on intentional use of force without consent.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 54G provides capital gains exemption on transfer of industrial undertakings for specified business relocations.

IPC Section 369 addresses kidnapping or abducting a child under ten to steal from its person or unlawfully confine it.

Companies Act 2013 Section 277 governs the appointment and powers of inspectors for company investigations.

IPC Section 366 defines kidnapping, abducting, or inducing a woman to compel marriage or illicit intercourse.

Hoverboards are conditionally legal in India with restrictions on use and safety compliance under motor vehicle laws.

IPC Section 208 penalizes a person who conceals a design to commit an offence, aiming to prevent crimes by punishing such concealment.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(36) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

CrPC Section 31 defines the authority and procedure for police officers to arrest without a warrant under specific conditions.

CrPC Section 248 empowers a Magistrate to order a local inquiry when a complaint lacks sufficient grounds for proceeding.

IT Act Section 47 empowers the Controller to grant exemptions from provisions related to electronic records and digital signatures.

Companies Act 2013 Section 73 regulates acceptance of deposits by companies, ensuring compliance and protecting stakeholders.

CrPC Section 430 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during a criminal investigation.

IPC Section 171F penalizes bribery by public servants to influence their official duties, ensuring integrity in public administration.

Section 163 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the power to summon persons and production of documents for income tax inquiries in India.

IPC Section 153B penalizes promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc.

IPC Section 38 defines the term 'counterfeit' relating to imitation of valuable items or documents to deceive.

Shopify is legal in India with specific regulations on e-commerce and data compliance you should know.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 93 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 182 governs disclosure of interest by directors in contracts or arrangements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 133 mandates the preparation and filing of financial statements by companies in India.

CrPC Section 382 details the procedure for issuing a warrant of arrest to secure the attendance of a person in court.

Understand the legality of gherao protests in India, their legal limits, and enforcement practices under Indian law.

bottom of page