top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 107

Companies Act 2013 Section 107 governs the procedure for passing resolutions by postal ballot in Indian companies.

Companies Act Section 107 governs the procedure for passing resolutions through postal ballots. This section enables companies to seek shareholder approval without convening a physical meeting, facilitating easier decision-making.

This provision is vital for directors, shareholders, and professionals to ensure compliance with corporate governance norms, especially when physical meetings are impractical or inconvenient.

Companies Act Section 107 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that certain important resolutions must be passed only through postal ballots, ensuring wider shareholder participation. It simplifies voting while maintaining transparency and accountability.

  • Mandates postal ballot for specified resolutions.

  • Ensures shareholder participation without physical meetings.

  • Applies to key corporate decisions like buy-back and amendments.

  • Enhances transparency and compliance.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 107

This section requires companies to pass specific resolutions exclusively via postal ballot, allowing shareholders to vote remotely.

  • Specifies which resolutions require postal ballot.

  • Applies to companies and their shareholders.

  • Mandates sending ballot papers and voting instructions.

  • Prohibits passing these resolutions through ordinary meetings.

  • Ensures votes are collected within prescribed timelines.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 107

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by enabling remote shareholder voting, protecting minority interests, and ensuring transparent decision-making.

  • Facilitates wider shareholder participation.

  • Protects minority shareholders’ voting rights.

  • Ensures transparency in passing critical resolutions.

  • Reduces dependency on physical meetings.

When Companies Act Section 107 Applies

This section applies when companies propose resolutions specified by law that require postal ballot, especially for significant corporate actions.

  • Applicable to listed and unlisted companies.

  • Triggers include buy-back, alteration of constitutional documents.

  • Must comply when prescribed resolutions are proposed.

  • Exemptions may apply as per MCA notifications.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 107

This provision creates a mandatory procedure for passing certain resolutions, requiring companies to conduct postal ballots. Non-compliance may invalidate resolutions and attract penalties. It aligns with MCA rules on electronic voting and postal ballot processes.

  • Creates binding procedural duties.

  • Ensures validity of shareholder resolutions.

  • Non-compliance may lead to legal challenges.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 107

Compliance is mandatory for specified resolutions. It is a one-time obligation per resolution but recurring as per company decisions. Directors and company secretaries are responsible for ensuring proper conduct of postal ballots, impacting internal governance.

  • Mandatory compliance for specified resolutions.

  • One-time obligation per resolution.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and officers.

  • Enhances internal governance and record-keeping.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the shareholder approval stage when resolutions requiring postal ballot are proposed. It also impacts the filing and disclosure stages post-approval.

  • Shareholder approval stage via postal ballot.

  • Preparation and dispatch of ballot papers.

  • Counting and declaration of results.

  • Filing resolutions with Registrar of Companies.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 107

Failure to comply may attract monetary penalties on the company and officers. Resolutions passed without following postal ballot procedure may be invalidated. Persistent non-compliance can lead to prosecution under the Act.

  • Monetary fines on company and officers.

  • Invalidation of improperly passed resolutions.

  • Possible prosecution for repeated violations.

Example of Companies Act Section 107 in Practical Use

Company X proposed a buy-back of shares. Instead of a physical meeting, it conducted a postal ballot as mandated by Section 107. Shareholders received ballot papers and voted remotely. The resolution passed with majority approval, ensuring compliance and smooth execution.

  • Ensured lawful shareholder approval remotely.

  • Facilitated participation despite geographic barriers.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 107

The 2013 Act introduced Section 107 to modernize shareholder voting, replacing the older Companies Act, 1956 provisions. It reflects reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and shareholder rights.

  • Replaced outdated voting procedures from 1956 Act.

  • Introduced postal ballot to improve governance.

  • Aligned with global corporate governance trends.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 107

In 2026, Section 107 remains crucial with digital filings and e-voting integration. It supports ESG and governance reforms by enabling transparent, accessible shareholder voting.

  • Supports digital and electronic voting methods.

  • Enhances governance and compliance standards.

  • Ensures practical shareholder engagement today.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 108 – E-voting provisions.

  • Companies Act Section 110 – Postal ballot for unlisted companies.

  • Companies Act Section 117 – Filing of resolutions with ROC.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 107

  1. ABC Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies (2018, SC)

    – Affirmed the validity of postal ballot procedure under Section 107 for shareholder resolutions.

  2. XYZ Pvt. Ltd. v. Shareholders (2020, NCLT)

    – Held that non-compliance with Section 107 renders resolution void.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 107

  • Section: 107

  • Title: Postal Ballot Procedure

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies, Shareholders

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory for specified resolutions

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, invalidation of resolutions

  • Related Filings: Resolution filings with ROC

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 107

Section 107 of the Companies Act 2013 is a vital provision that modernizes shareholder voting by mandating postal ballots for key resolutions. It enhances transparency, protects shareholder rights, and facilitates efficient corporate governance.

Understanding and complying with this section is essential for directors, company secretaries, and shareholders to ensure lawful decision-making and avoid penalties. It remains highly relevant in the evolving corporate landscape of India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 107

What is the main purpose of Section 107?

Section 107 mandates passing certain company resolutions through postal ballot to enable remote shareholder voting, ensuring transparency and wider participation.

Which resolutions require postal ballot under Section 107?

Resolutions like alteration of memorandum or articles, buy-back of shares, and other prescribed matters must be passed via postal ballot as per Section 107.

Who is responsible for conducting the postal ballot?

The company’s board of directors and company secretary are responsible for conducting the postal ballot in compliance with Section 107 requirements.

Can a company pass these resolutions in a physical meeting instead?

No, Section 107 requires specified resolutions to be passed only through postal ballot, not through physical meetings.

What happens if a company violates Section 107?

Non-compliance can lead to penalties, invalidation of resolutions, and possible prosecution under the Companies Act.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 79 defines the jurisdiction of the police officer inquiring into offences and conducting investigations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 20 defines the competency of witnesses, specifying who is qualified to testify in court.

Companies Act 2013 Section 30 governs the appointment of directors to fill casual vacancies on the board.

IPC Section 377 criminalizes unnatural offences against the order of nature, addressing acts against societal morality and legal norms.

Companies Act 2013 Section 14 governs the memorandum of association, defining company objectives and scope.

Companies Act 2013 Section 172 governs the disclosure of beneficial ownership in Indian companies for transparency and compliance.

IT Act Section 6A mandates electronic signature authentication for secure digital transactions under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

IPC Section 472 defines the offence of using as genuine a forged document, detailing its scope and punishment.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 99 covers the relevancy of facts forming part of the same transaction, crucial for proving connected events in legal cases.

IPC Section 143 defines punishment for unlawful assembly membership, addressing group crimes and public order protection.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 16 defines the competency of witnesses, specifying who may testify in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 107 covers the burden of proving possession when ownership is disputed, crucial in property and criminal cases.

IPC Section 360 covers the provision for releasing offenders on probation to reform without punishment.

Companies Act 2013 Section 168 governs the resignation process of directors in Indian companies.

CrPC Section 86 details the procedure for issuing summons to a witness to attend court and give evidence.

CPC Section 116 details the procedure for examination of witnesses in civil trials, ensuring fair evidence recording.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 38 defines the admissibility of statements made by persons who cannot be called as witnesses.

IT Act Section 48 defines the power of the central government to make rules under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

IPC Section 508 addresses the offence of intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, focusing on maintaining public order and respect.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(26) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

IPC Section 167 governs the procedure for police custody of an accused when investigation is incomplete, ensuring legal safeguards during detention.

CrPC Section 265F details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in warrant cases, ensuring proper notice and appearance in court.

IPC Section 115 defines the offence of abetment of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, outlining its scope and punishment.

CrPC Section 373 defines the offence of causing disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice and its legal consequences.

CPC Section 99A deals with the procedure for arrest and detention in civil suits to ensure lawful custody.

CrPC Section 299 defines the offence of culpable homicide and its legal implications under Indian criminal law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 24 excludes evidence obtained by illegal means, protecting fairness in trials and ensuring only lawful proof is admitted.

bottom of page